Search Results

Search found 20659 results on 827 pages for 'var'.

Page 349/827 | < Previous Page | 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356  | Next Page >

  • Difference between Class Abstraction and Object Interfaces in PHP?

    - by Mark Tomlin
    What is the difference between a Class Abstraction and an Object Interfaces in PHP? I ask because, I don't really see the point to both of them, they both do the same thing! So, what are the advantages of disadvantages using both against one or the other? Class Abstraction: abstract class aClass { // Force extending class to define these methods abstract public function setVariable($name, $var); abstract public function getHtml($template); } Object Interface: interface iClass { // Force impementing class to define these methods public function setVariable($name, $var); public function getHtml($template); }

    Read the article

  • Why does GetExportedValues<T>() no longer work after using the .net 4 final version of MEF?

    - by BigJason
    I have been developing a managed extensibility framework application for the last several months using the community preview. I have been using the GetExportedValues() method and the PartCreationPolicy(CreationPolicy.NonShared) to fake a class factory (since only the silverlight version supports a factory). This was working great until I upgraded the project to use .net 4.0. There is no error, it just doesn't work. So why did this code stop working? The code follows: The factory method: public static IEnumerable<DataActionBase> GetActionsFromDirectory(string PluginsFolder) { IEnumerable<DataActionBase> result = null; var catalog = new DirectoryCatalog(PluginsFolder); var container = new CompositionContainer(catalog: catalog); result = container.GetExportedValues<DataActionBase>(); return result; } Example Export Class: [Export(typeof(DataActionBase))] [PartCreationPolicy(CreationPolicy.NonShared)] public class AnAction : DataActionBase { .... }

    Read the article

  • Highlight current page in jquery

    - by 3gwebtrain
    Hi, I have the 12 html pages. and all this pages are loads when the left navigation bar link clicked. in this, i need to add a class to the current link, which is clicked and loaded the page. i tried with this: $(function(){ $('#container li a').click(function(){ $('#container li a').removeClass('current'); var pathname = (window.location.pathname.match(/[^\/]+$/)[0]); var currentPage = $(this).attr('href'); if(currentPage==pathname){ $(this).addClass('current'); } else{ alert('wrong'); } // alert(pathname+' currentPage: '+currentPage); }) }) it works, but on page load, the class is removed, i don't know why it's happening.. any help?

    Read the article

  • Why does coffeescript generate classes like this?

    - by ryeguy
    Given the following coffeescript code: class Animal constructor: (@name) -> speak: (things) -> "My name is #{@name} and I like #{things}" This is generated: var Animal = (function() { function Animal(name) { this.name = name; } Animal.prototype.speak = function(things) { return "My name is " + this.name + " and I like " + things; }; return Animal; })(); But why isn't this more idiomatic code generated? var Animal = function Animal(name) { this.name = name; }; Animal.prototype.speak = function(things) { return "My name is " + this.name + " and I like " + things; }; I know that coffeescript wraps a lot of stuff in anonymous functions to control scope leak, but what could leak here?

    Read the article

  • jQuery - deferred versus promise

    - by fletchsod
    What is the difference between Deferred and Promise other than the jQuery versions? What should I use for my need? I only want to call the fooExecute(). I only need the fooStart() and fooEnd() to toggle the html div status for example. //I'm using jQuery v2.0.0 function fooStart() { /* Start Notification */ } function fooEnd() { /* End Notification */ } function fooExecute() { /* Execute the scripts */ } $('#button1').on('click', function() { var deferred1 = $.Deferred(); var promise1 = $.Promise(); deferred1.??? promise1.??? });

    Read the article

  • jQuery: position() on created element

    - by Parched Squid
    The following code creates a div at the bottom of the page: var popup = $('<div id="popup" />') .appendTo('body'); The following code causes it to position correctly once there. $('#popup') .position({ my: 'left top', at: 'left bottom', of: $('#someDiv') }); But this code causes it to appear in the DOM but not be positioned anywhere (it is not visible, but it is in the DOM). var popup = $('<div id="popup" />') .appendTo('body') .position({ my: 'left top', at: 'left bottom', of: $('#someDiv') }); Is there a trick to being able to use jQuery position() on an item you are creating? Cheers, Craig

    Read the article

  • Cast object as OleVariant in Delphi

    - by Alan Clark
    Is there a way to pass a wrap and unwrap a TObject descendent in an OleVariant? I am trying to pass a TObject across automation objects. I know it's not a good idea but I don't have a good alternative. Something like this: function GetMyObjAsVariant; var MyObj: TMyObj; begin MyObj := TMyObj.Create; result := OleVariant(MyObj); end; Which would be used by a client as var MyObj: TMyObj; begin MyObj := GetMyObjAsVariant as TMyObj; end; This fails to compile, returning E2015 Operator not applicable to this operand type.

    Read the article

  • How to get two different array checkbox value in Jquery?.

    - by boss
    Hi.. For example i have 5 checkbox, 3 checkbox with name=a[] and 2 checkbox with name=b[], if i checked array a[] 3checkbox iam getting the same value for b[] checkbox even b[] checkbox not checked. please suggest... For ur reference: var selectedAItems = new Array(); $("input[@name='a[]']:checked").each(function() { selectedAItems.push($(this).val()); }); var selectedBItems = new Array(); $("input[@name='b[]']:checked").each(function() { selectedBItems.push($(this).val()); }); alert(selectedAItems); alert(selectedBItems );

    Read the article

  • Unity JS - simple if statements not behaving as expected?

    - by IHazABone
    I have a simple script (please no remarks on the fact that I'm not using a switch statement or better code, this is the earliest version and written this way by a peer, I am improving it) that takes an object and moves it back and forth. For some reason, the variable time gets stuck at 249. It is probably an obvious bug with this inefficient logic, but I cannot seem to find it. var speed = 1; private var time = 0; function Start() { } function Update() { if(condition == true)moveStuff(); } function moveStuff() { var timeSwitch = false; if(time == 0)timeSwitch = false; if(time == timeSet)timeSwitch = true; if(direction == 1) { if(timeSwitch == false) { transform.Translate(Vector3.up * (Time.deltaTime * speed)); time += 1; Debug.Log(time); }else if(timeSwitch == true) { transform.Translate(Vector3.up * ((Time.deltaTime * speed) * -1)); time -= 1; Debug.Log(time); } } else if(direction == 2) { if(timeSwitch == false) { transform.Translate(Vector3.down * (Time.deltaTime * speed)); time += 1; Debug.Log("Moved down. "); }else if(timeSwitch == true){ transform.Translate(Vector3.down * ((Time.deltaTime * speed) * -1)); time -= 1; } } else if(direction == 3) { if(timeSwitch == false) { transform.Translate(Vector3.forward * (Time.deltaTime * speed)); time += 1; Debug.Log("Moved forward. "); }else if(timeSwitch == true){ transform.Translate(Vector3.forward * ((Time.deltaTime * speed) * -1)); time -= 1; } } else if(direction == 4) { if(timeSwitch == false) { transform.Translate(Vector3.back * (Time.deltaTime * speed)); time += 1; Debug.Log("Moved back. "); }else if(timeSwitch == true){ transform.Translate(Vector3.back * ((Time.deltaTime * speed) * -1)); time -= 1; } } else if(direction == 5) { if(timeSwitch == false) { transform.Translate(Vector3.right * (Time.deltaTime * speed)); time += 1; Debug.Log("Moved right. "); }else if(timeSwitch == true){ transform.Translate(Vector3.right * ((Time.deltaTime * speed) * -1)); time -= 1; } } else if(direction == 6) { if(timeSwitch == false) { transform.Translate(Vector3.left * (Time.deltaTime * speed)); time += 1; Debug.Log("Moved left. "); }else if(timeSwitch == true){ transform.Translate(Vector3.left * ((Time.deltaTime * speed) * -1)); time -= 1; } } }

    Read the article

  • Data Annotations validation Built into model

    - by Josh
    I want to build an object model that automatically wires in validation when I attempt to save an object. I am using DataAnnotations for my validation, and it all works well, but I think my inheritance is whacked. I am looking here for some guidance on a better way to wire in my validation. So, to build in validation I have this interface public interface IValidatable { bool IsValid { get; } ValidationResponse ValidationResults { get; } void Validate(); } Then, I have a base class that all my objects inherit from. I did a class because I wanted to wire in the validation calls automatically. The issue is that the validation has to know the type of the class is it validating. So I use Generics like so. public class CoreObjectBase<T> : IValidatable where T : CoreObjectBase<T> { #region IValidatable Members public virtual bool IsValid { get { // First, check rules that always apply to this type var result = new Validator<T>().Validate((T)this); // return false if any violations occurred return !result.HasViolations; } } public virtual ValidationResponse ValidationResults { get { var result = new Validator<T>().Validate((T)this); return result; } } public virtual void Validate() { // First, check rules that always apply to this type var result = new Validator<T>().Validate((T)this); // throw error if any violations were detected if (result.HasViolations) throw new RulesException(result.Errors); } #endregion } So, I have this circular inheritance statement. My classes look like this then: public class MyClass : CoreObjectBase<MyClass> { } But the problem occurs when I have a more complicated model. Because I can only inherit from one class, when I have a situation where inheritance makes sense I believe the child classes won't have validation on their properties. public class Parent : CoreObjectBase<Parent> { //properties validated } public class Child : Parent { //properties not validated? } I haven't really tested the validation in these cases yet, but I am pretty sure that anything in child with a data annotation on it will not be automatically validated when I call Child.Validate(); due to the way the inheritance is configured. Is there a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Create JavaScript array of function pointer, without calling it

    - by sibidiba
    I have the code below. I would like to have an array (buttons) with a single element pointing to the a function (closeFlag). <script type="text/javascript"> var closeFlag = new function() { alert('Clicked'); } var buttons = { 'OK': closeFlag } </script> However, when loading the page the alert immediately pops up. When the array is constructed, instead of using it as a pointer, JavaScript calls my function. Why? What mistake, misconception do I have?

    Read the article

  • javascript function object's inheritFrom method

    - by gawpertron
    I've come across this.inheritFrom that enables you to inherit from a super class. var superClass = function() { this.foo = 'foo'; this.bar = 'bar'; } var subClass = function() { this.inheritFrom = superClass; this.inheritFrom(); this.myFunction = function() { return this.foo; }; } I've looked in Mozilla and MSDN, but I can't seem to find it documented any where. As far as I can see it works in IE6 and Firefox 3. Any reason why it wouldn't be documented?

    Read the article

  • Javascript + IFrame + Chrome + Https = strange issue

    - by GuiDoody
    Using a modal plugin for jquery, I'm opening an iframe in a modal with a click event and setting the source attribute to a relative url (should be within https). The page containing the click is an authenticated ssl page. In IE and Safari, this works as expected. In Chrome and Firefox, the source url is opened in http not https. If I set the source to an absolute url using https, same result. Example: // This doesn't work - resolves to http $('.lnkViewDetails').click(function(e){ var src = "/ThePage"; $.modal('<iframe src="' + src + '" height="500" width="425" style="border:0" frameborder="no">'); }); // This doesn't work - also resolves to http $('.lnkViewDetails').click(function(e){ var src = "https://MySite.com/ThePage"; $.modal('<iframe src="' + src + '" height="500" width="425" style="border:0" frameborder="no">'); }); Anyone know a way to get around this?

    Read the article

  • Sending JSON content type in from JavaScript objects ( jQuery ajax )

    - by smartnut007
    I am having trouble sending JavaScript objects as a http request that only accepts json content-type. i.e "application/json" or "text/json" But, I am not sure why data2 ( stringified json ) works fine But, data1 ( json object ) does throws 400 ( Bad Request ). i.e I am not sure jQuery does not serialize the json object to a valid json string for the server to process. var data1 = ({ rating : 3 }); //does not work var data2 = '{ "rating" : 3}'; //works fine $.ajax({ url : "/rate", data : data1, type : "POST", contentType: "application/json", success: function(json){ console.log("Ajax Return :"+json); } });

    Read the article

  • JavaScript inner function scope chain?

    - by Ding
    In this example var a = 1; ( function(x) { function inner() { alert(a); alert(x); alert(y); } var y = 3; inner(); })(2); When does function inner get created? during execution time or parsing time of outer anonymous function? What is in the scope chain of function inner? What is in the execution context of function inner? I know it is not a simple question, thanks for enlighting me in advance!

    Read the article

  • Permalink Ajax Issue Wordpress

    - by Soumya
    function AjaxRequest(section,divName) { var pageurl = fullPath+"/ajaxrequest.php?section="+section+"&divName="+divName; //alert(pageurl); var xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById(divName).innerHTML=''; document.getElementById(divName).innerHTML=xmlhttp.responseText; } } xmlhttp.open("GET",pageurl,true); xmlhttp.send(); } I have a Code like that in wordpress which is calling a page using ajax. It is working fine when the page are coming in ID like ?page_id=37 but stop working when I am activating Permalink like /overview/ajaxpage. I am getting 404 pafe error on xmlhttp.readyState. Can any one help me to solve it. I know its a permalink Problem probably this code of ajax is not sufficient for transmuting Permalink.

    Read the article

  • Does async and await incease performance of an ASP.Net application

    - by Kerezo
    I recently read a article about c#-5 and new $ nice asynchronous programming. I see it works greate in windows application. The question came to me before is if this feature can increase ASP.Net performance? consider this code: public T GetData() { var d = GetSomeData(); return d; } and public async T GetData2() { var d = await GetSomeData(); return d; } Has in an ASP.Net appication that two codes difference? thanks

    Read the article

  • Best way to get a date in .NET?

    - by frenchie
    I'm getting a string back from my page and I want to make sure it's a date. This is what I have so far (it works) and I just want to know if this is the "best" way to do it. I'm using .NET 4. int TheMonth =0; int TheDay = 0; int TheYear = 0; DateTime NewDate; var TheIncomingParam = Request.Params.Get("__EVENTARGUMENT").ToString(); char[] TheBreak = { '/' }; string[] TheOutput = TheIncomingParam.Split(TheBreak); try { TheMonth = Convert.ToInt32(TheOutput[0]); } catch { } try { TheDay = Convert.ToInt32(TheOutput[1]); } catch { } try { TheYear = Convert.ToInt32(TheOutput[2]); } catch { } if (TheMonth!=0 && TheDay!=0 && TheYear!=0) { try { NewDate = new DateTime(TheYear, TheMonth, TheDay); } catch { var NoDate = true; } }

    Read the article

  • Can you use POST to run a query in Solr (/select)

    - by RyanFetz
    I have queries that I am running against out solr index that sometimes have very long query parameters, I get errors when i run these queries, which i assume are do to the limit of a GET query parameters. Here is the method I use to query (JSON), this is to show I am using the Http Extensions (the client i use is a thin wrapper for HttpClient) not an end to end solution. 90% of the queries run fine, it is just when the params are large i get the 500 error from solr. I have read somewhere you can use POSt's when doing the select command but have not found examples of how to do it. Any help would be fantastic! public string GetJson(HttpQueryString qs) { using (var client = new DAC.US.Web.XmlHttpServiceClient(this.Uri)) { client.Client.DefaultHeaders.Authorization = new Microsoft.Http.Headers.Credential("Basic", DAC.US.Encryption.Hash.WebServiceCredintials); qs.Add("wt", "json"); if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(this.Version)) qs.Add("version", this.Version); using (var response = client.Get(new Uri(@"select/", UriKind.Relative), qs)) { return response.Content.ReadAsString(); } } }

    Read the article

  • as3 dynamic button name capturing problem

    - by user16458
    i am using this code below to dynamically capture the name of the button pressed and then playing the related balloon movie clip animation. stage.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, player); function player(evt:MouseEvent){ var nameofballoon = evt.target.name; nameofballoon =nameofballoon.substring(nameofballoon.length-1,nameofballoon.length); var movie = "balloon"+nameofballoon; trace(movie); movie.gotoAndPlay("burst"); } i'm getting this error even though the name of the clip capture by the event is correct TypeError: Error #1006: value is not a function. at Balloons2_fla::MainTimeline/player() any thoughts ? what wrong with this code?

    Read the article

  • Why is this code generating extra commas?

    - by user816829
    Iam using javascript function chkout_pp(i) { var myarray = new Array(); var li = 1; myarray[0] = "" for(j = 1; j < 13; j++) { if ($('#chkpp'+j).is(':checked') == true) { myarray[li] = $('#chkpp'+j).val()+"<br>"; li++; } } $("#ownerarray").val(myarray); $("#edmt_pp").html(myarray+""); } this is javascript in this it is generating comma i want to remove comma from that,is their anyone can as\nswer my question

    Read the article

  • What would be jQuery equivalent of this sf hover suckerfish code?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    What would be jQuery equivalent of this sf hover suckerfish code? <script> sfHover = function() { var sfEls = document.getElementById("navbar").getElementsByTagName("li"); for (var i=0; i<sfEls.length; i++) { sfEls[i].onmouseover=function() { this.className+=" hover"; } sfEls[i].onmouseout=function() { this.className=this.className.replace(new RegExp(" hover\\b"), ""); } } } if (window.attachEvent) window.attachEvent("onload", sfHover); </script>

    Read the article

  • How to add an object into an object

    - by FlyingCat
    I am trying to add an object into another object. My previous post helped me on the array issue but I also need to add object into an object too. I have something like var temp = {}; for(var i=0; i<test.length; i++){ console.log(test[i]) console.log(product[i]) temp.test[i] =product[i]; } Both of console.log show values. However, I am getting "Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property '0' of undefined" for the temp.test[i] =product[i] Can someone help me out on this? Thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • How to hide an element after $compile?

    - by Miron
    How to hide directive generated html after inserting it to body? Directive has "replace" set to trueThere is a directive: .directive('location', function () { return { restrict : 'A', scope : {}, replace : true, templateUrl: 'common/components/location/location.html', link : function (scope, element, attr) {……} } }); So it is used in another directive: var scope = $rootScope.$new(true); var directive = $compile('<div location></div>')(scope); $document.find('body').append(directive); directive.hide(); - not working How to hide directive generated html after inserting it to body? Directive has "replace" set to true

    Read the article

  • Javascript: best solution to wait for all ajax callbacks to be executed

    - by glaz666
    Hi! Imagine we have to sources to be requested by ajax. I want to perform some actions when all callbacks are triggered. How this can be done besides this approach: (function($){ var sources = ['http://source1.com', 'http://source2.com'], guard = 0, someHandler = function() { if (guard != sources.length) { return; } //do some actions }; for (var idx in sources) { $.getJSON(sources[idx], function(){ guard++; someHandler(); }) } })(jQuery) What I don't like here is that in this case I can't handle response failing (eg. I can't set timeout for response to come) and overall approach (I suppose there should be a way to use more power of functional programming here) Any ideas? Regards!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356  | Next Page >