Search Results

Search found 74171 results on 2967 pages for 'data control'.

Page 355/2967 | < Previous Page | 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362  | Next Page >

  • Tab Control Troubles

    - by VBeginner
    Best to explain with an example. TabControl has Tab1 and Tab2. I'm trying to make it so when Tab1 is selected, Button1 is visible and stays visible. When Tab2 is selected, Button1 is invisible and stays invisible. I need it to work when the Tab is clicked, not when the content area of the Tab is clicked. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • [PHP Array] - Sorting data and print out in alphabetic order

    - by kwokwai
    Hi all, I got an array which contains some data like this: $arrs = Array("ABC_efg", "@@zzAG", "@$abc", "ABC_abc") I was trying to print the data out in this way (Printing in alphabetic order): [String begins with character A] ABC_abc ABC_efg [String begins with character other than A to Z] @$abc @@zzAG I don't know how to do it.

    Read the article

  • Where to find free-to-use, complex test databases?

    - by Jay
    I need a database for testing a data masking solution. Any database would do (Oracle/MSSQL flavor). I just need the schema / db definition. I have tools to generate data records. The magnitude of database I am looking should have 30 odd tables with 30 odd columns in each table - a HUGE database. Do freely available complex database /schema definitions exist on the internet? If yes, where do I find them?

    Read the article

  • IE6 HTML control wrapping

    - by astonius
    Is there any way to prevent wrapping across controls in IE6? For example, I have a label and a single select box. The select box width is dynamic (depending on the content). I want the label to always be to the left of the select box. Right now the problem I am having is the select box drops below the label. I have tried using the <nobr> tag as well as CSS word-wrap rules, but because this isn't text the wrapping rules do not apply. The only way I have found for sure to make it work is to place them in a two-column table, but I do not like this solution. Is there any other way?

    Read the article

  • Disable control in .aspx from Masterpage conditionally

    - by miccet
    Ok, this might be a bit weird, so I'll start with explaining what I'm trying to do. I have several masterpages for my site, and in they inherit each other. In the second of them (4 in total) I have a background image. Here comes the trick, I'd like to override this image from the final aspx page. I can't change the position of this image, it has to be in masterpage 2, since some pages uses that very page as masterpage. One idea I had was to create a ContentPlaceHolder next to the image and if there are any images in that (check in Page_Load) then the main image would be hidden. I did this with a recursive function, that finds the image by looping through the ContentPlaceHolder's controls. When I set the visibility property to false though, nothing happens. Any other ideas to how this could be done, or why the above doesn't work? Edit: It's not about changing items in the master pages, rather the other way around, that from the Masterpages codebehind dig down into the page that is displayed currently and see if it has controls in a specific ContentPlaceHolder.

    Read the article

  • give control in datalist color

    - by KareemSaad
    I had datalist as menu that display categories and subs and I want to give red color or css for the selected item(category or sub) I tried but I had a problem This is my code private Label Lb; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { } protected void dlCategory_ItemDataBound(object sender, DataListItemEventArgs e) { if (e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.Item || e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.AlternatingItem) { Lb = (Label)e.Item.FindControl("LblCat"); } } protected void dlCategory_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { Lb.ForeColor = System.Drawing.Color.Red; } }

    Read the article

  • Storring data in web.config(custom section/appSettings element) vs storing it in a class

    - by rubysons
    Hi. Why is it better to store data inside an appSettings element (or inside a custom section) of a web.config file than to store it in a class? One argument would be that by using custom sections we don’t have to recompile code when we change data, but that’s a weak argument, especially if we’re using Web Sites, which get recompiled automatically whenever code changes! Thank you

    Read the article

  • Objective-c design advice for use of different data sources, swapping between test and live

    - by user200341
    I'm in the process of designing an application that is part of a larger piece of work, depending on other people to build an API that the app can make use of to retrieve data. While I was thinking about how to setup this project and design the architecture around it, something occurred to me, and I'm sure many people have been in similar situations. Since my work is depending on other people to complete their tasks, and a test server, this slows work down at my end. So the question is: What's the best practice for creating test repositories and classes, implementing them, and not having to depend on altering several places in the code to swap between the test classes and the actual repositories / proper api calls. Contemplate the following scenario: GetDataFromApiCommand *getDataCommand = [[GetDataFromApiCommand alloc]init]; getDataCommand.delegate = self; [getDataCommand getData]; Once the data is available via the API, "GetDataFromApiCommand" could use the actual API, but until then a set of mock data could be returned upon the call of [getDataCommand getData] There might be multiple instances of this, in various places in the code, so replacing all of them wherever they are, is a slow and painful process which inevitably leads to one or two being overlooked. In strongly typed languages we could use dependency injection and just alter one place. In objective-c a factory pattern could be implemented, but is that the best route to go for this? GetDataFromApiCommand *getDataCommand = [GetDataFromApiCommandFactory buildGetDataFromApiCommand]; getDataCommand.delegate = self; [getDataCommand getData]; What is the best practices to achieve this result? Since this would be most useful, even if you have the actual API available, to run tests, or work off-line, the ApiCommands would not necessarily have to be replaced permanently, but the option to select "Do I want to use TestApiCommand or ApiCommand". It is more interesting to have the option to switch between: All commands are test and All command use the live API, rather than selecting them one by one, however that would also be useful to do for testing one or two actual API commands, mixing them with test data. EDIT The way I have chosen to go with this is to use the factory pattern. I set up the factory as follows: @implementation ApiCommandFactory + (ApiCommand *)newApiCommand { // return [[ApiCommand alloc]init]; return [[ApiCommandMock alloc]init]; } @end And anywhere I want to use the ApiCommand class: GetDataFromApiCommand *getDataCommand = [ApiCommandFactory newApiCommand]; When the actual API call is required, the comments can be removed and the mock can be commented out. Using new in the message name implies that who ever uses the factory to get an object, is responsible for releasing it (since we want to avoid autorelease on the iPhone). If additional parameters are required, the factory needs to take these into consideration i.e: [ApiCommandFactory newSecondApiCommand:@"param1"]; This will work quite well with repositories as well.

    Read the article

  • Loading data in constructors and not in constructors [JAVA]

    - by Richeve S. Bebedor
    i just want to know the difference between loading the data inside the constructor and loading the data outside the constructor but not inside any methods example: Loading inside constructor public class Model{ Object testobject; public Model(){ testobject=new Object(); } } VS example: Loading outside constructor public class Model{ Object testobject=new Object(); public Model(){ } }

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Chart control - how to make it Smaller or add a scrollbar

    - by nCdy
    How to make the table column width inside the chart smaller so I can see more values and how to add some scrollbar to see the values that I can't see on right sight . There is no changes in ASP (just added this element) here is a method how I drawing this line : if (dt != null) // dt - my DataTable { string seriesName = "Graph"; Chart1.Series.Add(seriesName); Chart1.Series[seriesName].ChartType = SeriesChartType.Line; Chart1.Series[seriesName].BorderWidth = 3; foreach (DataRow row in dt.Rows) { string columnName = row[0].ToString(); try { double YVal = Convert.ToDouble(row[1]); Chart1.Series[seriesName].Points.AddXY(columnName, YVal); } catch (Exception) { Chart1.Series[seriesName].Points.AddXY(columnName, 0); } } }

    Read the article

  • NSMutableArray of NSString in CoreData(iPhone

    - by azia
    I have a class, which describe an object for parsing XML. This class contains NSStrings and NSMutableArrays of NSStrings.I want to store parsed data using CoreData. How should I write CoreData model to store such objects if there is no such data type like NSMutableArray? Is there any way?

    Read the article

  • Refresh a control on the master page after postback

    - by Andreas
    Hi all! What i am trying to do here is to show a couple of validation messages in form of a bulletlist, so i have a Div on my master page containing a asp:bulletlist. Like this: <div> <asp:BulletedList ID="blstValidationErrorMessage" runat="server" BulletStyle="Disc"> </asp:BulletedList> </div> When i then click the Save button from any of my pages (inside the main contentPlaceHolder) i create a list of messages and give this list as datasouce like this: blstValidationErrorMessage.DataSource = validationMessageCollection; blstValidationErrorMessage.DataBind(); The save button is located inside an updatepanel: asp:UpdatePanel runat="server" ID="UpdatePanel" ChildrenAsTriggers="true" UpdateMode="Conditional" Nothing happens, i can see that the datasource of the bulletlist contains X items, the problems must arise because the Save button is inside an update panel and the elements outside this updatepanel (master page controls for example) is not refreshed. So my question is, how do i make the bulletlist refresh after the postback? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Control an embedded flash movie's playback in HTML/php

    - by lostInTransit
    Hi I am using an embedded flash movie in my web page. I would like to show some alerts on the page when the movie has played for x seconds, pause the movie while the user views and dismisses the alert and start playing the movie again after that (or the user can press the play button, not important) The important parts being - the app being able to find out if x secs worth of movie has played, pausing the movie then and showing an alert. Is this possible using a php/javascript code within the web page? Or will I have to do this within the flash movie itself? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Silverlight + ItemsControl + Get Control Property Value

    - by Villager
    Hello, I have an ItemsControl with a DataTemplate that has been defined. My ItemsControl definition looks like the following: <ItemsControl x:Name="myItemsControl" ItemsSource="{Binding}"> <ItemsControl.ItemTemplate> <DataTemplate> <Grid> <CheckBox x:Name="myCheckBox" Content="{Binding Name}" /> </Grid> </DataTemplate> </ItemsControl.ItemTemplate> </ItemsControl> This is a simplified version of my DataTemplate. Regardless, when a user clicks a button on the page, I want to loop through the items in myItemsControl and determine if the CheckBox element associated with the item is checked. How do I determine if a CheckBox is checked for a specific item within an ItemsControl? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • How to make a control invisible?

    - by Nakilon
    I've made several TextCtrls and Button, but currently users of my application don't want to see them. So I have to hide them temporary (for current build). Here they are: class MainFrame < Wx::Frame def initialize (parent = nil) super nil,:title=>"sometitle",:size=>[600,600] set_sizer Wx::BoxSizer.new Wx::VERTICAL @tag1 = Wx::TextCtrl.new self sizer.add_item @tag1,:flag=>Wx::RIGHT|Wx::EXPAND @tag1.set_value 'property' @tag1title = Wx::TextCtrl.new self sizer.add_item @tag1title,:flag=>Wx::RIGHT|Wx::EXPAND @tag1title.set_value 'title' @tag2 = Wx::TextCtrl.new self sizer.add_item @tag2,:flag=>Wx::RIGHT|Wx::EXPAND @tag2.set_value 'description' @tag2title = Wx::TextCtrl.new self sizer.add_item @tag2title,:flag=>Wx::RIGHT|Wx::EXPAND @tag2title.set_value '' @button_parse = Wx::Button.new self sizer.add_item @button_parse @button_parse.label = "Parse XML" evt_button @button_parse, :click_parse # ...... end # ...... end I see nothing about it in docs and Google is also not a friend for me today.

    Read the article

  • Set item.selected in ASP.NET Menu Control

    - by BillB
    ASP.NET newbie here. When on a page I'd like to set the corresponding menu item to selected. My approach is this: On Home.aspx.cs: Menu menu = (Menu)Master.FindControl("Menu1"); if (menu.Items.Count > 0) { menu.FindItem("Home").Selected = true; } Trouble is, menu.item.count == 0. My menu is bound to a sitemap, if that matters. Thanks, Bill

    Read the article

  • Ajaxcontrol toolkit ConfirmButtonExtender with radiobuttonlist control

    - by chugh97
    I have a Yes/No Radiobutton List, When the asp.net page is loaded, if there are items in the gridview this radio is defaulted to Yes. Now if the user clicks no, I have to delete all the items for the gridview and persist them in db. But I want to show a confimation whether the user wants to go ahead doing this operation. If user clciks Yes then go ahead and delete the rows in gridview if no then keep the original radio setting to Yes. I have been struggling to get this to work as the ConfirmButtonExtender which opens up a modalpopup extender even before I know what has been clicked on the radio. If the radio is preselected with Yes, then if I clcik no, the Modal extender is shown and in the Page PreRender event handler the value of the radio is still Yes and not No as extender is run on click using ajax and it doesnt know the correct value of the radio.Even if I use onClick client side javascript to find out which option has been chosen the difficulty is then executing the server side delete command to the db. Has anyone enconuntered this problem before? Any solutions would be appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362  | Next Page >