validation control unable to find its control to validate
- by nat
i have a repeater that is bound to a number of custom dataitems/types
on the itemdatabound event for the repeater the code calls a renderedit function that depending on the custom datatype will render a custom control. it will also (if validation flag is set) render a validation control for the appropriate rendered edit control
the edit control overrides the CreateChildControls() method for the custom control adding a number of literalControls thus
protected override void CreateChildControls()
{
//other bits removed - but it is this 'hidden' control i am trying to validate
this.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl(string.Format(
"<input type=\"text\" name=\"{0}\" id=\"{0}\" value=\"{1}\" style=\"display:none;\" \">"
, this.UniqueID
, this.MediaId.ToString())
));
//some other bits removed
}
the validation control is rendered like this: where the passed in editcontrol is the control instance of which the above createchildcontrols is a method of..
public override Control RenderValidationControl(Control editControl)
{
Control ctrl = new PlaceHolder();
RequiredFieldValidator req = new RequiredFieldValidator();
req.ID = editControl.ClientID + "_validator";
req.ControlToValidate = editControl.UniqueID;
req.Display = ValidatorDisplay.Dynamic;
req.InitialValue = "0";
req.ErrorMessage = this.Caption + " cannot be blank";
ctrl.Controls.Add(req);
return ctrl;
}
the problem is, altho the validation controls .ControlToValidate property is set to the uniqueid of the editcontrol.
when i hit the page i get the following error:
Unable to find control id 'FieldRepeater$ctl01$ctl00' referenced by the 'ControlToValidate' property of 'FieldRepeater_ctl01_ctl00_validator'.
i have tried changing the literal in the createchildcontrols to a new TextBox(), and then set the id etc then, but i get a similar problem.
can anyone enlighten me?
is this because of the order the controls are rendered in? ie the validation control is written before the editcontrol?
or...
anyhow any help much appreciated
thanks
nat
