When should I stub out a type by manually creating a "stub" version, rather than using a mocking fra

Posted by Ben Aston on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Ben Aston
Published on 2010-03-16T10:12:55Z Indexed on 2010/03/16 10:16 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 467

Filed under:

testing

|

mocking

|

stubs

Are there any circumstances where it is favourable to manually create a stub type, as opposed to using a mocking framework (such as Rhino Mocks) at the point of test.

We take both these approaches in our projects. My gut feel when I look at the long list of stub versions of objects is that it will add maintenance overhead, and moves the implementation of the stub away from the point of test.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about testing

Automated unit testing, integration testing or acceptance testing

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
TDD and unit testing seems to be the big rave at the moment. But it is really that useful compared to other forms of automated testing? Intuitively I would guess that automated integration testing is way more useful than unit testing. In my experience the most bugs seems to be in the interaction… >>> More
Modifying a HTML page to fix several "bugs" add a function to next/previous on a option dropdown

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
SOF, I've got a few problems plaguing me at the moment and am wondering if anyone could assist me with them. I'm trying to get Next Class | Previous Class to act as buttons so that when Next Class is clicked it will go to the next item in the dropdown list and for previous it would go to back one… >>> More
Automation testing tool for Regression testing of desktop application

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi I am working on a desktop application which uses Infragistic grids. We need to automate the regression tests for same. QTP alone does not support this, we need to buy new plug in for same which my company is not very much interested in. Do we have any open source tool for automating regression… >>> More
Oracle Functional Testing Suite Advanced Pack for Oracle EBS Now Available

as seen on Oracle Blogs - Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
There’s new news about automated testing of E-Business Suite using the Oracle Application Testing Suite, a.k.a, “OATS”. E-Business Suite Development is pleased to announce the availability of the new Oracle Functional Testing Suite Advanced Pack for Oracle E-Business Suite. The new pack, available… >>> More
Do You Know How OUM defines the four, basic types of business system testing performed on a project? Why not test your knowledge?

as seen on Oracle Blogs - Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
Testing is perhaps the most important process in the Oracle® Unified Method (OUM). That makes it all the more important for practitioners to have a common understanding of the various types of functional testing referenced in the method, and to use the proper terminology when communicating with each… >>> More

Related posts about mocking

Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start let’s first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name… >>> More
Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start lets first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name { get;… >>> More
Auto Mocking using JustMock

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Auto mocking containers are designed to reduce the friction of keeping unit test beds in sync with the code being tested as systems are updated and evolve over time. This is one sentence how you define auto mocking. Of course this is a more or less formal. In a more informal way auto mocking containers… >>> More
not using partial mocking? do they also mean in web-app?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Im learning Mockito and in chapter 16 they say you should not use partial mocking in new system. I disagree, for example in one of my actions i use partial mocking for static framework methods, sql calls, etc. I extracted the stuff into methods and then mock it in tests. Most of those methods are… >>> More
Talks Submitted for Ann Arbor Day of .NET 2010

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Just submitted my session abstracts for Ann Arbor's Day of .NET 2010. Getting up to speed with .NET 3.5 -- Just in time for 4.0! Yes, C# 4.0 is just around the corner. But if you haven't had the chance to use C# 3.5 extensively, this session will start from the ground up with the new… >>> More