Whats the problem with int *p=23;

Posted by piemesons on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by piemesons
Published on 2010-03-29T13:22:41Z Indexed on 2010/03/29 13:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 306

Filed under:

pointers

Yesterday in my interview I was asked this question. (At that time I was highly pressurized by so many abrupt questions).

int *p;
*p=23;
printf('%d',*p);

Is there any problem with this code?

I explained him that you are trying to assign value to a pointer to whom memory is not allocated.

But the way he reacted, it was like I am wrong. Although I got the job but after that he said Mohit think about this question again. I don't know what he was trying to say. Please let me know is there any problem in my answer?

Related posts about pointers

C++ smart pointers: sharing pointers vs. sharing data

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
In this insightful article, one of the Qt programmers tries to explain the different kinds of smart pointers Qt implements. In the beginning, he makes a distinction between sharing data and sharing the pointers themselves: First, let’s get one thing straight: there’s a difference between sharing … >>> More
handling refrence to pointers/double pointers using SWIG [C++ to Java]

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
My code has an interface like class IExample { ~IExample(); //pure virtual methods ...}; a class inheriting the interface like class CExample : public IExample { protected: CExample(); //implementation of pure virtual methods ... }; and a global function to create object of this class - createExample(… >>> More
char pointers & integer pointers (++)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
i have two pointers, char *str1; int *str2; if i look at the size of both the pointers lets assume str1=4 bytes str2=4 bytes str1++ will increment by 1 byte but if str2++ will increment 4 byte could anybody tell e the concept behind this? >>> More
Smart pointers - cases where they cannot replace raw pointers

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
HI, I have this query about smart pointers. I heard from one of my friends that smart pointers can almost always replace raw pointers. but when i asked him what are the other cases where smart pointers cannot replace the raw pointers,i did not get the answer from him. could anybody please tell… >>> More
C++ Pointers: Number of levels of Indirection

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
In a C++ program that doesn't contain legacy C code, is there a guideline regarding the maximum number of levels of indirection that should be used in the source code? I know that in C (as opposed to C++), some programmers have used pointers to pointers for a multiple dimension array, but for the… >>> More

Developer IT

Whats the problem with int *p=23; - Developer IT

Whats the problem with int *p=23;

c

pointers

Related posts about c

Related posts about pointers

C++ smart pointers: sharing pointers vs. sharing data

handling refrence to pointers/double pointers using SWIG [C++ to Java]

char pointers & integer pointers (++)

Smart pointers - cases where they cannot replace raw pointers

C++ Pointers: Number of levels of Indirection

Categories cloud