Mocking using 'traditional' Record/Replay vs Moq model
        Posted  
        
            by fung
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by fung
        
        
        
        Published on 2009-03-16T13:50:06Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/05/07
            23:38 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 398
        
I'm new to mocks and am deciding on a mock framework. The Moq home quotes
Currently, it's the only mocking library that goes against the generalized and somewhat unintuitive (especially for novices) Record/Reply approach from all other frameworks.
Can anyone explain simply what the Record/Replay approach is and how Moq differs? What are the pros and cons of each especially from the point of deciding a framework?
Thanks.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner