Initializing an object to all zeroes
        Posted  
        
            by dash-tom-bang
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by dash-tom-bang
        
        
        
        Published on 2010-05-14T21:51:00Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/05/14
            21:54 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 193
        
Oftentimes data structures' valid initialization is to set all members to zero. Even when programming in C++, one may need to interface with an external API for which this is the case.
Is there any practical difference between:
some_struct s;
memset(s, 0, sizeof(s));
and simply
some_struct s = { 0 };
Do folks find themselves using both, with a method for choosing which is more appropriate for a given application?
For myself, as mostly a C++ programmer who doesn't use memset much, I'm never certain of the function signature so I find the second example is just easier to use in addition to being less typing, more compact, and maybe even more obvious since it says "this object is initialized to zero" right in the declaration rather than waiting for the next line of code and seeing, "oh, this object is zero initialized."
When creating classes and structs in C++ I tend to use initialization lists; I'm curious about folks thoughts on the two "C style" initializations above rather than a comparison against what is available in C++ since I suspect many of us interface with C libraries even if we code mostly in C++ ourselves.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner