Why is setuid ignored on directories?
        Posted  
        
            by 
                Blacklight Shining
            
        on Super User
        
        See other posts from Super User
        
            or by Blacklight Shining
        
        
        
        Published on 2012-09-09T00:14:40Z
        Indexed on 
            2012/09/09
            3:40 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 555
        
linux
|file-permissions
On Linux systems, you can successfully chmod u+s $some_directory, but instead of forcing the ownership of new subdirectories and files to be the owner of the containing directory (and setting subdirectories u+s as well) as you might expect, the system just ignores the setuid bit. Subdirectories and files continue to inherit the UIDs of their creating processes, and subdirectories are not setuid by default.
Why is setuid ignored on directories, and how can I get the system to recognize it?
© Super User or respective owner