Hi Folks,
Learning C++, so be gentle :)...
I have been designing my application primarily using heap variables (coming from C), so I've designed structures like this:
QList<Criteria*> _Criteria;
// ...
Criteria *c = new Criteria(....);
_Criteria.append(c);
All through my program, I'm passing pointers to specific Criteria, or often the list. So, I have a function declared like this:
QList<Criteria*> Decision::addCriteria(int row,QString cname,QString ctype);
Criteria * Decision::getCriteria(int row,int col)
which inserts a Criteria into a list, and returns the list so my GUI can display it.
I'm wondering if I should have used references, somehow. Since I'm always wanting that exact Criteria back, should I have done:
QList<Criteria> _Criteria;
// ....
Criteria c(....);
_Criteria.append(c);
...
QList<Criteria>& Decision::addCriteria(int row,QString cname,QString ctype);
Criteria& Decision::getCriteria(int row,int col)
(not sure if the latter line is syntactically correct yet, but you get the drift).
All these items are specific, quasi-global items that are the core of my program.
So, the question is this: I can certainly allocate/free all my memory w/o an issue in the method I'm using now, but is there are more C++ way? Would references have been a better choice (it's not too late to change on my side).
TIA
Mike
