Search Results

Search found 90467 results on 3619 pages for 'new rows'.

Page 115/3619 | < Previous Page | 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122  | Next Page >

  • SQL: GROUP BY after JOIN without overriding rows?

    - by krismeld
    I have a table of basketball leagues, a table af teams and a table of players like this: LEAGUES ID | NAME | ------------------ 1 | NBA | 2 | ABA | TEAMS: ID | NAME | LEAGUE_ID ------------------------------ 20 | BULLS | 1 21 | KNICKS | 2 PLAYERS: ID | TEAM_ID | FIRST_NAME | LAST_NAME | --------------------------------------------- 1 | 21 | John | Starks | 2 | 21 | Patrick | Ewing | Given a League ID, I would like to retrieve all the players' names and their team ID from all the teams in that league, so I do this: SELECT t.id AS team_id, p.id AS player_id, p.first_name, p.last_name FROM teams AS t JOIN players AS p ON p.team_id = t.id WHERE t.league_id = 1 which returns: [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 1 [first_name] => John [last_name] => Starks ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 2 [first_name] => Patrick [last_name] => Ewing ) + around 500 more objects... Since I will use this result to populate a dropdown menu for each team containing each team's list of players, I would like to group my result by team ID, so the loop to create these dropdowns will only have to cycle through each team ID instead of all 500+ players each time. But when I use the GROUP BY like this: SELECT t.id AS team_id, p.id AS player_id, p.first_name, p.last_name FROM teams AS t JOIN players AS p ON p.team_id = t.id WHERE t.league_id = 1 GROUP BY t.id it only returns one player from each team like this, overriding all the other players on the same team because of the use of the same column names. [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 21 [player_id] => 2 [first_name] => Patrick [last_name] => Ewing ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 22 [player_id] => 31 [first_name] => Shawn [last_name] => Kemp ) etc... I would like to return something like this: [0] => stdClass Object ( [team_id] => 2 [player_id1] => 1 [first_name1] => John [last_name1] => Starks [player_id2] => 2 [first_name2] => Patrick [last_name2] => Ewing +10 more players from this team... ) +25 more teams... Is it possible somehow?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 FTS CONTAINSTABLE Not Returning More Than Five Rows

    - by Elijah Glover
    I have a single table called "Indexes", it contains one nvarchar and three ntext columns (all Full Text Indexes). Index is up to date. CONTAINSTABLE(Indexes, *), 'test', 5) //5 results No matter what I change the above keyword too, it only returns the first 3-5 results. It should roughly return 90-120 results, for the above query. SELECT count(*) FROM Indexes WHERE [Description] like '%test%' //122 results How would I start to troubleshoot this problem?

    Read the article

  • Div tags, how to create rows with them

    - by Daniel
    How to you define a row in div tags High level example in pseudo code: [DIV TAGS LEFT] [DIV TAGS CENTER] [DIV TAGS RIGHT] [WHAT GOES HERE?????] [DIV TAGS LEFT] [DIV TAGS CENTER] [DIV TAGS RIGHT] [WHAT GOES HERE?????] [DIV TAGS LEFT] [DIV TAGS CENTER] [DIV TAGS RIGHT]

    Read the article

  • How to mutate rows of data frame - replacing one value with another

    - by rhh
    I'm having trouble with what I think is a basic R task. Here's my sample dataframe named 'b' Winner Color Size Tom Yellow Med Jerry Yellow Lar Jane Blue Med where items in the Winner column are factors. I'm trying to change "Tom" in the dataframe to "Tom LLC" and I can't get it done. Here's what I tried: Simple way: b$winner[b$winner=='Tom'] = as.factor('Tom LLC') but that failed with "invalid factor level, NAs generated" Next I tried a more advanced route: name_reset = function (x, y, z) { if (x$winner == y) {x$winner = z} } b = adply(b,1,name_reset,'Tom','Tom LLC') but that failed with "Error in list_to_dataframe(res, attr(.data, "split_labels")) : Results are not equal lengths" I feel I'm missing something basic. Can someone redirect me or offer suggestions on the code I wrote above? Thank you very much

    Read the article

  • Are there solutions for streamlining the update of legacy code in multiple places?

    - by ccomet
    I'm working in some old code which was originally designed for handling two different kinds of files. I was recently tasked with adding a new kind of file to this code. Most of my problems were solved by filling out an extensive XML file with a new entry that handled everything from what lists were named to how the file is written in plural lower case. But this ended up being insufficient, as there were maybe 50 different places in 24 different code files where I had to update hardcoded switch-statements that only branched for the original two file types. Unfortunately there is no consistency in this; there are methods which operate half from the XML file, and half off of hardcode. Some of the files which look like they would operate off of the XML file don't, and some that I would expect that I'd need to update the hardcode don't need it. So the only way to find the majority of these is to run through testing the whole system when only part of it is operational, finding that one step to fix (when I'm lucky that error logging actually tells me what is going on), and then running the whole thing again. This wastes time testing the parts of the code which are already confirmed to work, time better spent testing the new parts I have to add on top of it all. It's a hassle and a half, and to my luck I can expect that I will have to add yet another new kind of file in the near future. Are there any solutions out there which can aid in this kind of endeavour? Something which I can input some parameters of current features, document what points in a whole code project actually need to be updated, and run something nice the next time I need to add a new feature to the code. It needn't even be fully automated, something that'll help me navigate straight to the specific points in everything and maybe even record what kind of parameters need to be loaded. Doubt it matters specifically, but the code is comprised of ASP.NET pages, some ASP.NET controls, hundreds of C# code files, and a handful of additional XML files. It's all currently in a couple big Visual Studio 2008 projects.

    Read the article

  • Get list of duplicate rows in MySql

    - by user347033
    Hi, i have a table like this ID nachname vorname 1 john doe 2 john doe 3 jim doe 4 Michael Knight I need a query that will return all the fields (select *) from the records that have the same nachname and vorname (in this case, records 1 and 2). Can anyone help me with this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Reorganizing MySQL table to multiple rows by timestamp.

    - by Ben Burleson
    OK MySQL Wizards: I have a table of position data from multiple probes defined as follows: +----------+----------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------+----------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | time | datetime | NO | | NULL | | | probe_id | char(3) | NO | | NULL | | | position | float | NO | | NULL | | +----------+----------+------+-----+---------+-------+ A simple select outputs something like this: +---------------------+----------+----------+ | time | probe_id | position | +---------------------+----------+----------+ | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00A | 0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00B | 0.0005 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00C | 0.002 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 01A | 0 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 01B | 0.001 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 01C | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 00A | 0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 00B | 0.0005 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 00C | 0.002 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 01A | 0 | | . | . | . | | . | . | . | | . | . | . | +---------------------+----------+----------+ However, I'd like to output something like this: +---------------------+--------+--------+-------+-----+-------+--------+ | time | 00A | 00B | 00C | 01A | 01B | 01C | +---------------------+--------+--------+-------+-----+-------+--------+ | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:44 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:45 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:46 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:47 | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.0025 | | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | +---------------------+--------+--------+-------+-----+-------+--------+ Ideally, the different probe position columns are dynamically generated based on data in the table. Is this possible, or am I pulling my hair out for nothing? I've tried GROUP BY time with GROUP_CONCAT that roughly gets the data out, but I can't separate that output into probe_id columns. mysql SELECT time, GROUP_CONCAT(probe_id), GROUP_CONCAT(position) FROM MG41 GROUP BY time LIMIT 10; +---------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------+ | time | GROUP_CONCAT(probe_id) | GROUP_CONCAT(position) | +---------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------+ | 2010-05-05 14:16:42 | 00A,00B,00C,01A,01B,01C | 0.0045,0.0005,0.002,0,0.001,0.0025 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:43 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:44 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:45 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:46 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:47 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:48 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:49 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:50 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | | 2010-05-05 14:16:51 | 01C,01B,01A,00C,00B,00A | 0.0025,0.001,0,0.002,0.0005,0.0045 | +---------------------+-------------------------+------------------------------------+

    Read the article

  • Windows is very slow with my new SSD

    - by Maksym H.
    I have a laptop HP probook 4520s with Core i5 M480 @ 2.67Ghz, 4Gb RAM, 640 GB HDD Radeon HD 6370m 1GB video card. It would seem like a good stack for work, right? But My HDD has crashed after everyday walking with laptop about 1 year. After buying my new SSD (Patriot memory - Torqx II 128 Gb SATA II) and installing new Windows 8 from scratch - it was amazing fast. But I had only install windows updates, and I feel that the speed become the same as my old HDD, after install other software for my work, it becomes so slow, so when I use my PC with old lower configuration and it really works better than my awesome laptop... I checked that TRIM and AHCI mode are turned on. So why's that? I asked for help in Patriot Memory support, they suggested to send them ATTO test results, done, sent. Here is the response: "Thank you very much for the attached results. Looking at the results, I can see that your SSD speed is a lot lower than it should be. Can you tell me your system specs?" Until they checked my email, I re-installed Windows 8 to Windows 7 and it was again perfect, but the story repeats it becomes slower and slower after every installing new software. Check out some screenshots.. (sorry for the screenshot with russian TaskManager, I hope you will recognize those parameters accordingly with your english or other lang TaskManager) So the main issue that something everytime loads the disc on 100% and the response time is jumping around 1000-3000 ms. Why am I asking about Windows? Because I tried to install Linux Mint (x86) and It just flies. So great performance independent on how many programs I have installed. Only Windows (any 7 or 8) has this problem. So guys, I appreciate any ideas about how to fix that and may be answers of main question - "why is it so.?" Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to select DISTINCT rows without having the ORDER BY field selected

    - by JannieT
    So I have two tables students (PK sID) and mentors (PK pID). This query SELECT s.pID FROM students s JOIN mentors m ON s.pID = m.pID WHERE m.tags LIKE '%a%' ORDER BY s.sID DESC; delivers this result pID ------------- 9 9 3 9 3 9 9 9 10 9 3 10 etc... I am trying to get a list of distinct mentor ID's with this ordering so I am looking for the SQL to produce pID ------------- 9 3 10 If I simply insert a DISTINCT in the SELECT clause I get an unexpected result of 10, 9, 3 (wrong order). Any help much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • AVG time spent on multiple rows SQL-server?

    - by seo20
    I have a table tblSequence with 3 cols in MS SQL: ID, IP, [Timestamp] Content could look like this: ID IP [Timestamp] -------------------------------------------------- 4347 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:50.470 4346 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:45.547 4345 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:36.940 4344 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:29.347 4343 62.107.95.103 2010-05-24 09:27:12.080 ID is unique, there can be n number of IP's. Would like to calculate the average time spent per IP. in a single row Know you can do something like this: SELECT CAST(AVG(CAST(MyTable.MyDateTimeFinish - MyTable.MyDateTimeStart AS float)) AS datetime) But how on earth do I find the first and last entry of my unique IP row so I can have a start and finish time? I'M stuck. Would like to calculate the average time spent per IP. in a single row

    Read the article

  • acts_as_solr returns all rows in the database when using the model as search query

    - by chris Chan
    In our application we're using acts_as_solr for search. Everything seems to be running smoothly except for the fact that using the model name as the search query returns every single row in the table. For example, let's say we have a users table. We specify acts_as_solr in our model to search the fields first name, last name and handle acts_as_solr :fields = [:handle, :lname, :fname]. When you use "user" as the search term it returns every single user in the system, or every row in the database as a result. Has anyone else run into this?

    Read the article

  • how to open a function in new window ?or new tab?

    - by udaya
    Hi I am calling a function in my controller from a button click .... I want the function to be opened in a new window how can we get that ex: now my url is "http://localhost/codeigniter_cup_myth/index.php/adminController/adminDegree" with a button click i am calling a function degreechk in my adminController I want the url "http://localhost/codeigniter_cup_myth/index.php/adminController/degreechk " to be opened in a new window How can i get the new url in a new window

    Read the article

  • wordpress num rows, how?

    - by krike
    I'm creating a plugin for wordpress and I need to check if a post with a specific title exist or not. This to prevent duplicates, how can I query this and see if it returned true or false?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server combining 2 rows into 1 from the same table

    - by Maton
    Hi, I have a table with an JobID (PK), EmployeeID (FK), StartDate, EndDate containing data such as: 1, 10, '01-Jan-2010 08:00:00', '01-Jan-2010 08:30:00' 2, 10, '01-Jan-2010 08:50:00', '01-Jan-2010 09:05:00' 3, 10, '02-Feb-2010 10:00:00', '02-Feb-2010 10:30:00' I want to return a record for each EndDate for a Job and then the same employees StartDate for his next immediate job (by date time). So from the data above the result would be Result 1: 10, 01-Jan-2010 08:30:00, 01-Jan-2010 08:50:00 Result 2: 10, 01-Jan-2010 09:05:00, 02-Feb-2010 10:00:00 Greatly appreciate any help!

    Read the article

  • optional search parameters in sql query and rows with null values

    - by glenn.danthi
    Ok here is my problem : Before i start the description, let me to tell you that I have googled up a lot and I am posting this question for a good optimal solution :) i am building a rest service on WCF to get userProfiles... the user can filter userProfiles by giving something like userProfiles?location=London now i have the following method GetUserProfiles(string firstname, string lastname, string age, string location) the sql query string i built is: select firstname, lastname, .... from profiles where (firstName like '%{firstname}%') AND (lastName like '%{lastName}%') ....and so on with all variables being replaced by string formatter. Problem with this is that it filters any row having firstname, lastname, age or location having a null value.... doing something like (firstName like '%{firstName}%' OR firstName IS NULL) would be tedious and the statement would become unmaintanable! (in this example there are only 4 arguments, but in my actual method there are 10) What would be the best solution for this?....How is this situation usually handled? Database used : MySql

    Read the article

  • MySql - only update some rows if the table exists - do not want an error thrown

    - by Pete Oakey
    I want to run an update query. The query will be run against multiple databases - not every database will have the table. I don't want the update to be attempted if the table does not exist. I don't want any error to be thrown - I just want the update to be ignored. Any ideas? EDIT: just to be clear - the query is executed in an automated deployment - no human interaction possible. EDIT2: the logic to say whether the update should run or not will need to be in the MySql query itself. This is not being run through a command prompt or batch or managed code.

    Read the article

  • MySQL Query order by numer of rows?

    - by Clemens
    hi, i have a mysql table for votes. there's am id, a project_id and a vote field (which is 1 if a specific project is voted). now i want to generate a ranking from those entries. is there a way to get the number of votes for each project_id and automatically sort the entries by the number of TRUE votes of a project with a single mysql query? Or do you know a php way? e.g. ID - Project ID - Vote 1 - 2 - 1 2 - 2 - 1 3 - 1 - 1 == Project Nr. 2 has 2 Votes Project Nr. 1 has 1 Vote Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • How to achieve table like rows within container using CSS

    - by Barry
    I'm helping an artist maintain her website and have inherited some pretty outdated code. Have moved lots of redundant common code to include files and am now working on moving from inline styles to more CSS-driven styles. For the gallery pages, e.g. http://artistsatlaketahoe.com/abstract.html, a lot of inline styling is used to force the current layout. My preference would be to replace this entirely with CSS that presents the following table-like layout within the "content" div: [image] [image descriptives and purchase button] [image] [image descriptives and purchase button] [image] [image descriptives and purchase button] I'd like to middle-align the image descriptives & purchase button relative to the image if possible. And then apply some padding above and below each row to stop using tags for vertical spacing. Any ideas how to create a div that I can use to get this kind of layout? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to return number of rows in the template

    - by xRobot
    In my view I return all posts of one blog: posts = Post.objects.filter(blog=blog) and pass it to context. But.. How can I get the number of posts in the template ? This is my template: <h1>Number of posts: {{ ??? }} </h1> {% for post in posts %} {{ post.title }} {{ post.body }} {% endfor %}

    Read the article

  • count and fetch rows in php

    - by Mac Taylor
    hey guys i have a table in my mysql database named (names) now everyone can save their real names now i want to query this table and find out how many times these names used forexample the output should be : Jakob (20) Jenny (17) now this is my own code : list($usernames) =mysql_fetch_row(mysql_query('SELECT name FROM table_user GROUP BY name ORDER BY COUNT(name) DESC LIMIT 50 ')); list($c) =mysql_num_rows(mysql_query('SELECT COUNT(name) FROM table_user GROUP BY name ')); print $usernames.'('.$c.')' is this a correct approach ?!

    Read the article

  • Updating/Inserting multiple rows using jQuery and OData (WCF Data Services)

    - by Pieter
    I have three tables, Template, Fields and TemplateFields. TemplateFields holds the selected fields for each template. I need to update TemplateFields when the user is finished selecting the fields. The only way I can see to do this is by deleting all the TemplateFields for that Template and then add them one by one in separate requests. This is really bad because there is not transaction to fall back onto and there will also be MANY requests. Is there a way of adding multiple 'objects' at once using WCF Data Services? I can then use an Interceptor to update the database.

    Read the article

  • SQL: select rows with the same order as IN clause

    - by Andrea3000
    I know that this question has been asked several times and I've read all the answer but none of them seem to completely solve my problem. I'm switching from a mySQL database to a MS Access database with MS SQL. In both of the case I use a php script to connect to the database and perform SQL queries. I need to find a suitable replacement for a query I used to perform on mySQL. I want to: perform a first query and order records alphabetically based on one of the columns construct a list of IDs which reflects the previous alphabetical order perform a second query with the IN clause applied with the IDs' list and ordered by this list. In mySQL I used to perform the last query this way: SELECT name FROM users WHERE id IN ($name_ids) ORDER BY FIND_IN_SET(id,'$name_ids') Since FIND_IN_SET is available only in mySQL and CHARINDEX and PATINDEX are not available from my php script, how can I achieve this? I know that I could write something like: SELECT name FROM users WHERE id IN ($name_ids) ORDER BY CASE id WHEN ... THEN 1 WHEN ... THEN 2 WHEN ... THEN 3 WHEN ... THEN 4 END but you have to consider that: IDs' list has variable length and elements because it depends on the first query that list can easily contains thousands of elements Have you got any hint on this? Is there a way to programmatically construct the ORDER BY CASE ... WHEN ... statement? Is there a better approach since my list of IDs can be big?

    Read the article

  • selecting among duplicated rows in VBA _updated

    - by Elaine Kuo
    I wanna select one row of each duplicated SIDs in a field below. (an attribute table of a shape file) The priority is R S = I 0 Therefore, among SID 87, FID1 will be selected. (SID 88, STATUS will be S+I) (SID 89, FID 6 will be chosen) (SID 90, deleting FID 9 or 10) Please kindly advise VBA cord to run the selection and thanks. FID SID STATUS 1 87 R 2 87 O 3 88 I 4 88 S 5 89 I 6 89 R 7 89 I 8 89 S 9 90 S 10 90 S

    Read the article

  • Recursive query question - break rows into columns?

    - by Stew
    I have a table "Families", like so FamilyID PersonID Relationship ----------------------------------------------- F001 P001 Son F001 P002 Daughter F001 P003 Father F001 P004 Mother F002 P005 Daughter F002 P006 Mother F003 P007 Son F003 P008 Mother and I need output like FamilyID PersonID Father Mother ------------------------------------------------- F001 P001 P003 P004 F001 P002 P003 P004 F001 P003 F001 P004 F002 P005 P006 F002 P006 F003 P007 P008 F003 P008 In which the PersonID of the Father and Mother for a given PersonID are listed (if applicable) in separate columns. I know this must be a relatively trivial query to write (and therefore to find instructions for), but I can't seem to come up with the right search terms. Searching "SQL recursive queries" has gotten me closest, but I can't quite translate those methods to what I'm trying to do here. I'm trying to learn, so multiple methods are welcome, as is vocabulary I should read up on. Thanks!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122  | Next Page >