Search Results

Search found 38584 results on 1544 pages for 'object required'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 119/1544 | < Previous Page | 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126  | Next Page >

  • !gcroot output leads nowhere

    - by Jeff Costa
    I am troubleshooting memory fragmentation in an app pool, as evidenced by a small number of Free objects consuming the most space on the heap: 0x000007ff00256728 6,543 3,890,208 System.Collections.Hashtable+bucket[] 0x000007ff002649a8 7,297 22,979,560 System.Byte[] 0x000007ff001e0d90 251,347 30,374,304 System.String 0x0000000001d0c830 373 48,036,816 Free Running the !dumpgen 3 command reveals the fragmentation; There is a repeating pattern of Free and System.Object objects of the same size: 000000017feb7350 24 **** FREE **** 000000017feb7368 8192 System.Object[] 000000017feb9368 24 **** FREE **** 000000017feb9380 8192 System.Object[] 000000017febb380 24 **** FREE **** 000000017febb398 8192 System.Object[] 000000017febd398 24 **** FREE **** 000000017febd3b0 8192 System.Object[] 000000017febf3b0 24 **** FREE **** 000000017febf3c8 8192 System.Object[] 000000017fec13c8 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fec13e0 8192 System.Object[] 000000017fec33e0 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fec33f8 8192 System.Object[] 000000017fec53f8 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fec5410 14024 System.Object[] 000000017fec8ad8 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fec8af0 8192 System.Object[] 000000017fecaaf0 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fecab08 8192 System.Object[] 000000017feccb08 24 **** FREE **** 000000017feccb20 8192 System.Object[] 000000017feceb20 24 **** FREE **** 000000017feceb38 8192 System.Object[] 000000017fed0b38 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fed0b50 8192 System.Object[] 000000017fed2b50 24 **** FREE **** 000000017fed2b68 8192 System.Object[] When I try to obtain the root of one of the System.Objects with !gcroot, I get a pinned handle, but no additional stack data: Scan Thread 41 OSThread 1044 DOMAIN(0000000001D51330):HANDLE(Pinned):15217e8:Root: 000000017fe60fe8(System.Object[]) As you can see, there is no additional data to go on. Running a !handle command also yields nothing: 0:041> !handle 000000017fe7a068 ff Handle 000000017fe7a068 Type <Error retrieving type> unable to query object information unable to query object information No object specific information available How can I trace out this memory leak when I cannot find what is rooting System.Object?

    Read the article

  • What's the best way to store custom objects in relational database?

    - by user342610
    I have my objects with their properties. Objects could change their structure: properties may be added/removed/changed. Objects could be absolutely dropped. So object's metadata (description, classes, call them like you want :) )could be changed. The database should store objects schemas and instances of these objects. What's the best way to organise a relational database structure to store data mentioned above? Currently I see only two ways: 1) Store objects schemas in a few tables: schema general data,schema properties, possible properties types. Store instances in their tables: instance general data, a few tables - per each type from possible properties types table to store instance properties data. And so on. 2) store objects schemas like in p1 but store instances like XML files in one table: one table for general instance info and one table with instance XML. please, don't ask why/for what I need this. Just need to store custom objects and DB should work fast :)

    Read the article

  • simulate what native object is not exist

    - by Naitro
    Here is the situation: I have checking on existing class like: ('Promise' in window) // true/false` And I wanna force return false or true on it, can I do it? Yes, I can check it by some other way, like ` window.Promise = undefined; window.Promise === undefined; Or something like this, but can I somehow delete this object or simulate something for 'in' operator? I check specification and v8 code, there is 'in' operator just call 'HasProperty' operator, which realization on c++.. I know 'hack' with faking toString/valueOf methods: obj = { toString: function(){ return 'myName'; } }, obj2 = {}; obj2[obj] = 1; // Object {myName: 1} May be I can use it in some way? But, as I send string 'Promise' I can't just fake it like this way.. may be exist some way to fake 'HasProperty'?

    Read the article

  • Unit Testing Example, on a class with required fields?

    - by Mastro
    I'm new to developing Unit test and I can't find an example of how to test an existing class I have. The class has a save method which does an insert or update in the database when the user clicks Save in the UI. But the save method has required fields that need to be populated. And has other fields that do not. So how can I run this test properly? Was trying to write it out.. Give a user When user saves object Then Field1 is required then Field2 is required Then Field3 is required WhenUserSavesObject() object = new object object.field1 IsNot Nothing something like that right? And what about the other fields that are optional? How would I test the save method to make sure it takes all those values properly? Was trying to use BDD but not sure if I should try it or not. Can't find any example of classes with many properties that are needed when calling a test method.

    Read the article

  • Saving a modified object from ASP.NET MVC View Using Entity-Franework 4

    - by Dani
    I retrieve an object graph from DB using EF4. The context is closed as soon as the data retrieve and the data passes to the controller, and then to the view. in the view the data is modified, and then the controller gets it back. From the controller I run Repository.Update(MyEmp); and in my repository the code goes: using (var context = new mydb()) { if (myEmp.ID != 0) // Checking if it's modified or new { context.Emp.Attach(MyEmp); int result = context.SaveChanges(); return myEmp.ID; } } The problem - once attached, the object entityState goes to unchanged, and not modified, and of course - nothing is saved to the database. What am I doing wrong ?

    Read the article

  • Force result for empty() test on an object

    - by hsz
    Hello ! Simple class for example: class Foo { protected $_bar; public function setBar( $value ) { $this->_bar = $value; } } And here is the question: $obj = new Foo(); var_dump( empty( $obj ) ); // true $obj->setBar( 'foobar' ); var_dump( empty( $obj ) ); // false Is it possible to change class's behaviour with testing it with empty() function so it will returns true when object is not filled with data ? I know about magic function __isset( $name ) but it is called only when we test specific field like: empty( $obj->someField ); but not when test whole object.

    Read the article

  • Singelton restricted to instance of dll

    - by codeySmurf
    If I create a singleton class in the context of a dll, the singleton class is instantiated once and used by all instances of the dll. I am using a dll as a plug-in for an application. Now the following thing came to my mind: If I use a singleton Class, it will be shared across multiple instances of the plug-in. However, this makes it difficult to manage the lifetime of the singleton class efficiently. The only way I could think of would be to use a reference count and to make the singleton delete its self when the reference count is 0. Does anyone have any better ideas on that? Is there any good way to restrict the singleton object to one instance of the dll? Language is c++

    Read the article

  • Pass C++ object to Lua function

    - by peterdemin
    Hello there. I have a C++ project, where 1 method of a 1 class changes very often. So I want to take that code from C++ to Lua. Note, I'm novice to Lua. The whole task: Bind some class methods to Lua state machine; Pass reference to class object to a function, written in Lua; Operate with passed C++ object in Lua function. I've found how to make first step with Lunar, and can't cope with second and third. I can't use SWIG and boost.

    Read the article

  • Call function from object instantiated in one class in another

    - by Dk43
    I have two classes, both of which need to be able to call the same instance of entitymanager class Engine { EntityManager::Entitymanager EManager; } And I need to add an object to a vector contained by this particular instance of Engine. What I want to do is be able to add a bullet spawned by the player to the vector that contains all my entities. class Player : Entity { void SpawnBullet() {Engine::EManager.Add(BULLET);} } The above returns this error: error: object missing in reference to ‘Engine::EManager’ How do I resolve this? Any help or pointers in the right direction would be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Obj-C: Creating an object with a String name

    - by FnGreg7
    Hey all. I know this sounds simple, but I can't find a way to do it. I have a method in Obj-C that takes in a NSString and then should create a new class with the String as its title. -(DataModel *)createDataModel:(NSString *)dataModel_name { DataModel *[initWithString:dataModel_name] = [[DataModel alloc] init]; } I know I have some problems in this. For starters, I don't know how to define a return on an object whose name could change. Second, I know this doesn't compile considering the initWithString method is wrong. I just don't know what to do or what method to use so that I can create this DataModel object with the specified name...

    Read the article

  • Return an opaque object to the caller without violating type-safety

    - by JS Bangs
    I have a method which should return a snapshot of the current state, and another method which restores that state. public class MachineModel { public Snapshot CurrentSnapshot { get; } public void RestoreSnapshot (Snapshot saved) { /* etc */ }; } The state Snapshot class should be completely opaque to the caller--no visible methods or properties--but its properties have to be visible within the MachineModel class. I could obviously do this by downcasting, i.e. have CurrentSnapshot return an object, and have RestoreSnapshot accept an object argument which it casts back to a Snapshot. But forced casting like that makes me feel dirty. What's the best alternate design that allows me to be both type-safe and opaque?

    Read the article

  • ActionScript - Automatic containment and repositioning of object bounds

    - by TheDarkIn1978
    when adding objects arbitrarily to the stage with mouse clicks, is there a more simple way to making sure the object's bounds do not exceed those of the stage? currently i'm calling something like this before adding the object to the display list: var newSwatchRect:Rectangle = newSwatch.getBounds(this); if (newSwatchRect.x < stage.x) {newSwatchRect.x = stage.x;} if (newSwatchRect.y < stage.y) {newSwatchRect.y = stage.y;} if (newSwatchRect.x + newSwatchRect.width > stage.stageWidth) {newSwatchRect.x = stage.stageWidth - newSwatchRect.width;} if (newSwatchRect.y + newSwatchRect.height > stage.stageHeight) {newSwatchRect.y = stage.stageHeight - newSwatchRect.height;}

    Read the article

  • Getting error "Activex Component cannot create Object" while using .NET dll in VB 6 Code

    - by ssman321
    HI, I am deploying a VB6 application on client machine. The Application need to access code from a C#.NET dll. I created a COM object of the .NET dll and used it VB 6 using the side by side versioning (Registration free COM). It is running fine on the development machine but on the client machine it is throwing an error "ActiveX Component cannot create Object" I created two manifest files one for the VB application and the other one for the C# application. I embedded the C# manifest file in the C#.NET dll through visual studio 2008. Am I missing some step. Please help me out. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • finding last loop through a jQuery object

    - by DA
    Sample jquery. Assume $cog is a cached selector of multiple items. $cog.fadeOut('slow',function(){ alert('hey'); }) In that example, of $cog is a jQuery object of 4 DOM elements, the above will fade each element out one by one, and trigger an alert each time on the callback (4 alerts). I'd like to only call the alert when all 4 elements are done with their fadeOut function. This: $cog.fadeOut('slow',function(){ }) alert('hey'); when run, will show an alert, then the $cog elements disappear (I'm guessing due to timing issues with the fadeOut animation) Is there a way when calling a function against multiple DOM objects in a jQuery object to know when it's done with the last item?

    Read the article

  • About memory and delete object in c++

    - by barssala
    I will give some examples and explain. First, I declare some object like CString* param = new CString[100] And when I declare this one, my memory would increase a little bit because it's some implemented string. Then I store this object in some list of CString just like List<CString> myList = new List<CString>; // new list of CString myList.add(param); This is my question: I wanna know, when I delete myList, my param isn't deleted, right? And memory in param still exists. Do I misunderstand?

    Read the article

  • Easy way to cast an object array into another type in C#

    - by Na7coldwater
    I want to be able to be able to quickly cast an array of objects to a different type, such as String, but the following code doesn't work: String[] a = new String[2]; a[0] = "Hello"; a[1] = "World"; ArrayList b = new ArrayList(a); String[] c = (String[]) b.ToArray(); And I don't want to have to do this: String[] a = new String[2]; a[0] = "Hello"; a[1] = "World"; ArrayList b = new ArrayList(a); Object[] temp = b.ToArray(); Object[] temp = b.ToArray(); String[] c = new String[temp.Length]; for(int i=0;i<temp.Length;i++) { c[i] = (String) temp[i]; } Is there an easy way to do this without using a temporary variable?

    Read the article

  • How to cast/convert form Object in an byte[] array

    - by maddash
    I've got a maybe simple problem, but at the moment I am not able to solve it. I have an Object and I need to convert it into a byte[]. public byte[] GetMapiPropertyBytes(string propIdentifier) { return (byte[])this.GetMapiProperty(propIdentifier); //InvalidCastException } Exception: Unable to cast COM object of type 'System.__ComObject' to class type 'System.Byte[]'. Instances of types that represent COM components cannot be cast to types that do not represent COM components; however they can be cast to interfaces as long as the underlying COM component supports QueryInterface calls for the IID of the interface. So far so good - I've tried to serialize it, but I got another exception - NOT serializable Could someone help me? I need a method to convert it...

    Read the article

  • Why people define class, trait, object inside another object in Scala?

    - by Zwcat
    Ok, I'll explain why I ask this question. I begin to read Lift 2.2 source code these days. In Lift, I found that, define inner class and inner trait are very heavily used. object Menu has 2 inner traits and 4 inner classes. object Loc has 18 inner classes, 5 inner traits, 7 inner objects. There're tons of codes write like this. I wanna to know why the author write it like this. Is it because it's the author's personal taste or a powerful use of language feature?

    Read the article

  • Calling a method on an object a bunch of times versus constructing an object a bunch of times

    - by Ami
    I have a List called myData and I want to apply a particular method (someFunction) to every element in the List. Is calling a method through an object's constructor slower than calling the same method many times for one particular object instantiation? In other words, is this: for(int i = 0; i < myData.Count; i++) myClass someObject = new myClass(myData[i]); slower than this: myClass someObject = new myClass(); for(int i = 0; i < myData.Count; i++) someObject.someFunction(myData[i]); ? If so, how much slower?

    Read the article

  • How to assign one object to another in Linq c# without making new

    - by LLL
    I m facing issue in assiging one object to another in linq sql. In this example Func<result, result> make = q => new result { Id = q.Id, lName = q.lName, GroupId = q.GroupId, Age = (from tags in q.age where tags.Del == null && tags.lId == q.Id select age).ToEntitySet(), }; p = (from q in dc.results where q.Id == Id.Value select make(q)).First(); i am making new and assigning the object, but i dont want to do this, it will cause propblem in insertion. so i want to assign without making new, how is it possible?

    Read the article

  • How does one find a '.' in a string object in Object-C

    - by NaZer
    I am working on getting a simple calculator working as part of my adventure to learning Object-C and iOS development. In Object-C using NSString, how does one look for a period in a string? Based on the comments this is what I got so far. NSString * tmp = [display text]; NSLog(@"%@", tmp); // Shows the number on the display correctly int x = [tmp rangeOfString:@"."].location; NSLog(@"%i", x); // Shows some random signed number if (x < 0) { [display setText:[[display text] stringByAppendingFormat:@"."]]; } It is still not working :(

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126  | Next Page >