Search Results

Search found 7418 results on 297 pages for 'argument passing'.

Page 129/297 | < Previous Page | 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136  | Next Page >

  • C++: get const or non-const reference type from trait

    - by maciekp
    I am writing a functor F which takes function of type void (*func)(T) and func's argument arg. Then functor F calls func with arg. I would like F not to copy arg, just to pass it as reference. But then I cannot simply write "void F(void (*func)(T), T&)" because T could be a reference. So I am trying to write a trait, which allows to get proper reference type of T: T -> T& T& -> T& const T -> const T& const T& -> const T& I come up with something like this: template<typename T> struct type_op { typedef T& valid_ref_type; }; template<typename T> struct type_op<T&> { typedef typename type_op<T>::valid_ref_type valid_ref_type; }; template<typename T> struct type_op<const T> { typedef const T& valid_ref_type; }; template<typename T> struct type_op<const T&> { typedef const T& valid_ref_type; }; Which doesn't work for example for void a(int x) { std::cout << x << std::endl; } F(&a, 7); Giving error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘int&’ from a temporary of type ‘int’ in passing argument 2 of ‘void f(void (*)(T), typename type_op::valid_ref_type) [with T = int]’ How to get this trait to work?

    Read the article

  • Variable type for Application on Time Events [on hold]

    - by user2931226
    Been Trying to figure out how to go about setting a Variable for some Application On Time events, But still not confident to do it. These events (Macro's) get called by another Macro then they wait for 10 - 20 minutes, then they don't Run. So have read that (EarliestTime argument) should be assigned to a variable to store it other wise it looses it when other things are running Help appreciated Thanks Sub settimers() Application.OnTime TimeValue(Range("$X$9").Text), "StartBlink" Application.OnTime TimeValue(Range("$W$11").Text), "StopBlink" End Sub

    Read the article

  • How to const declare the this pointer sent as parameter

    - by Tomas
    Hi, I want to const declare the this pointer received as an argument. static void Class::func(const OtherClass *otherClass) { // use otherClass pointer to read, but not write to it. } It is being called like this: void OtherClass::func() { Class::func(this); } This does not compile nad if i dont const declare the OtherClass pointer, I can change it. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to effectively measure difference in a run-time.

    - by Knowing me knowing you
    Guys, in one of the excersises in TC++PL B.S. asks to: "Write a function that either returns a value or that throws that value based on an argument. Measure the difference in run-time between the two ways." Great pity he never explaines how to measure such things. I'm not sure if I'm suppose to write simple "time start, time end" counter or maybe there are more effective and practical ways to do it? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Ninject: Syntax for dependency arguments?

    - by Rosarch
    I have a class with a public constructor: public MasterEngine(IInputReader inputReader) { this.inputReader = inputReader; graphicsDeviceManager = new GraphicsDeviceManager(this); Components.Add(new GamerServicesComponent(this)); } How can I inject dependencies like graphicsDeviceManager and new GamerServicesComponent while still supplying the argument this?

    Read the article

  • how to find if groovy args contains a particular string

    - by groovynoob
    println args println args.size() println args.each{arg-> println arg} println args.class if (args.contains("Hello")) println "Found Hello" when ran give following error: [hello, somethingelse] 2 hello somethingelse [hello, somethingelse] class [Ljava.lang.String; Caught: groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: [Ljava.lang. String;.contains() is applicable for argument types: (java.lang.String) values: [Hello] why can I not do contains?

    Read the article

  • How to call a generic method through reflection

    - by milan
    Hi, is it possible to call with reflection a method with "explict type argument" <S> definition e.g. oObject.Cast<S>() ? where is: IList <P> oObject = new List <P>(); I tried with oObject.getType().InvokeMember( "Cast", BindingFlags.InvokeMethod, null, oObject, null) but it does not work, does anyone know why?

    Read the article

  • Why GUID is returned as empty?

    - by jess
    Hi, After loading an entity from the database using LINQ-to_SQL,I pass the entity.ID to a method having argument of type GUID.When I access this parameter in the method,I get an empty value,and not the GUID.Why is it so?

    Read the article

  • Grails UnitTest

    - by Tomáš
    Hi (it is propably stupid question) how can acquire Domain class from database in test? class PollServiceTests extends GrailsUnitTestCase { Integer id = 1 void testSomething() { Teacher teacher1 = Teacher.get(id) assert teacher1 != null } } I always get null or No signature of method: cz.jak.Teacher.get() is applicable for argument types: (java.lang.Integer) values: [1] thanks a lot Tom

    Read the article

  • How can I define a method with multiple optional arguments in Obj-C

    - by The Dark Bug Returns
    I want to be able to update two sets of identical buttons with one function. Also I don't want to update all the buttons, only some of them. Can I have a function like this?: -(void) updateFields{ updateButton1 : (Bool) x updateButton2 : (Bool) y updateButton3 : (Bool) z } The implementation will look like this: [button1_1 setEnabled:x]; [button1_2 setEnabled:x]; //called only if updateButton1 is given an argument [button2_1 setEnabled:y]; etc...

    Read the article

  • gzip several files and pipe them into one input

    - by Daniel
    I have this program that takes one argument for the source file and then it parse it. I have several files gzipped that I would like to parse, but since it only takes one input, I'm wondering if there is a way to create one huge file using gzip and then pipe it into the only one input.

    Read the article

  • Zend Framework, what $this->_forward is doing

    - by RageZ
    Hello everyone, I would like someone to explain me what _forward is exactly doing, I cannot see if _forward is also rendering the attached view to the action or just executing the action. Also is it possible to pass argument to $this-action in a view script ? More generally my problem is how to code a confirmation page, let's say the user input some stuff and you want to show him confirmation, is forward is mean for that case ? Thanks

    Read the article

  • One class per file rule in .NET?

    - by Joan Venge
    I follow this rule but some of my colleagues disagree with it and argue that if a class is smaller it can be left in the same file with other class(es). Another argument I hear all the time is "Even Microsoft don't do this, so why should we?" What's the general consensus on this? Are there cases where this should be avoided?

    Read the article

  • how to identify process in kernel read func without using current->pid

    - by yoavstr
    my lecture wants us to build module where we need to identify each read process and where the same read process called twice on the same writer massage we should insert him to an queue who's we wake up when all readers have read I achieved this goal by by using list of pid's and boolean read/not_read inside each node but he decided to be nasty and require us to it with some argument from FILE struct can you please help me ?....

    Read the article

  • More trivia than really important: Why no new() constraint on Activator.CreateInstance<T>() ?

    - by flq
    I think there are people who may be able to answer this, this is a question out of curiosity: The generic CreateInstance method from System.Activator, introduced in .NET v2 has no type constraints on the generic argument but does require a default constructor on the activated type, otherwise a MissingMethodException is thrown. To me it seems obvious that this method should have a type constraint like Activator.CreateInstance<T>() where T : new() { ... } Just an omission or some anecdote lurking here?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136  | Next Page >