Search Results

Search found 5069 results on 203 pages for 'hidden premise'.

Page 132/203 | < Previous Page | 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139  | Next Page >

  • ASP.net hiding panel using javascript

    - by Zaps
    Hi, I have a radioButtonList with 2 items in it. A radiobutton with a "Yes" value and a radionButton with a "No" value. Below that I have a panel which I want made visible when "Yes" radioButton is selected and hidden when "No" is selected. I had originally implemented this using the AutoPostBack attribute but I want to do it in Javascript so that it doesn't cause a postback. Here's the code. Any help would be greatly appreciated. <asp:RadioButtonList ID="rbl1" runat="server" onClick="changed(this);" > <asp:ListItem Value="Yes">Yes</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="No">No</asp:ListItem> <asp:Panel ID="panel1" runat="server"> <--other controls here --> </asp:Panel> function changed(rbl) { //not sure what to put in here } Thanks in advance, Zaps

    Read the article

  • is it some bug in firefox or jquery or i doing something wrong?

    - by llamerr
    I want to change hidden input value on div click, so i do following: $('#gallery').click(function(){ if ($('input[name=isgallery]').attr('value') == '0') { $('input[name=isgallery]').attr('value', '1') } else { $('input[name=isgallery]').attr('value', '0') } $('#filterform').attr('action',$('#filterform').attr('act')); alert('ok'); $('#filterform').submit(); } ); when it equals 0 i change it to 1 and otherwise but it did not work and following code works: $('#gallery').click(function(){ if ($('input[name=isgallery]').attr('value') == '0') { $('input[name=isgallery]').attr('value', '0') } else { $('input[name=isgallery]').attr('value', '1') } $('#filterform').attr('action',$('#filterform').attr('act')); alert('ok'); $('#filterform').submit(); } ); and also, when i delete the function at all it still works and form submits maybe i have one more handler for this div, but i can't find one you can check it on http://www.4block.org/en/museum/posters and click "gallery view" on top-right

    Read the article

  • Writing an optimised and efficient search engine with mySQL and ColdFusion

    - by Mel
    I have a search page with the following scenarios listed below. I was told there was a better way to do it, but not how, and that I am using too many if statements, and that it's prone to causing an error through url manipulation: Search.cfm will processes a search made from a search bar present on all pages, with one search input (titleName). If search.cfm is accessed manually (through URL not through using the simple search bar on all pages) it displays an advanced search form with three inputs (titleName, genreID, platformID) or it evaluates searchResponse variable and decides what to do. If simple search query is blank, has no results, or less than 3 characters it displays an error If advanced search query is blank, has no results, or less than 3 characters it displays an error If any successful search returns results, they come back normally. The top-of-page logic is as follows: <!---SET DEFAULT VARIABLE---> <cfparam name="variables.searchResponse" default=""> <!---CHECK TO SEE IF SIMPLE SEARCH A FORM WAS SUBMITTED AND EXECUTE SEARCH IF IT WAS---> <cfif IsDefined("Form.simpleSearch") AND Len(Trim(Form.titleName)) LTE 2> <cfset variables.searchResponse = "invalidString"> <cfelseif IsDefined("Form.simpleSearch") AND Len(Trim(Form.titleName)) GTE 3> <!---EXECUTE METHOD AND GET DATA---> <cfinvoke component="myComponent" method="simpleSearch" searchString="#Form.titleName#" returnvariable="simpleSearchResult"> <cfset variables.searchResponse = "simpleSearchResult"> </cfif> <!---CHECK IF ANY RECORDS WERE FOUND---> <cfif IsDefined("variables.simpleSearchResult") AND simpleSearchResult.RecordCount IS 0> <cfset variables.searchResponse = "noResult"> </cfif> <!---CHECK IF ADVANCED SEARCH FORM WAS SUBMITTED---> <cfif IsDefined("Form.AdvancedSearch") AND Len(Trim(Form.titleName)) LTE 2> <cfset variables.searchResponse = "invalidString"> <cfelseif IsDefined("Form.advancedSearch") AND Len(Trim(Form.titleName)) GTE 2> <!---EXECUTE METHOD AND GET DATA---> <cfinvoke component="myComponent" method="advancedSearch" returnvariable="advancedSearchResult" titleName="#Form.titleName#" genreID="#Form.genreID#" platformID="#Form.platformID#"> <cfset variables.searchResponse = "advancedSearchResult"> </cfif> <!---CHECK IF ANY RECORDS WERE FOUND---> <cfif IsDefined("variables.advancedSearchResult") AND advancedSearchResult.RecordCount IS 0> <cfset variables.searchResponse = "noResult"> </cfif> I'm using the searchResponse variable to decide what the the page displays, based on the following scenarios: <!---ALWAYS DISPLAY SIMPLE SEARCH BAR AS IT'S PART OF THE HEADER---> <form name="simpleSearch" action="search.cfm" method="post"> <input type="hidden" name="simpleSearch" /> <input type="text" name="titleName" /> <input type="button" value="Search" onclick="form.submit()" /> </form> <!---IF NO SEARCH WAS SUBMITTED DISPLAY DEFAULT FORM---> <cfif searchResponse IS ""> <h1>Advanced Search</h1> <!---DISPLAY FORM---> <form name="advancedSearch" action="search.cfm" method="post"> <input type="hidden" name="advancedSearch" /> <input type="text" name="titleName" /> <input type="text" name="genreID" /> <input type="text" name="platformID" /> <input type="button" value="Search" onclick="form.submit()" /> </form> </cfif> <!---IF SEARCH IS BLANK OR LESS THAN 3 CHARACTERS DISPLAY ERROR MESSAGE---> <cfif searchResponse IS "invalidString"> <cfoutput> <h1>INVALID SEARCH</h1> </cfoutput> </cfif> <!---IF SEARCH WAS MADE BUT NO RESULTS WERE FOUND---> <cfif searchResponse IS "noResult"> <cfoutput> <h1>NO RESULT FOUND</h1> </cfoutput> </cfif> <!---IF SIMPLE SEARCH WAS MADE A RESULT WAS FOUND---> <cfif searchResponse IS "simpleSearchResult"> <cfoutput> <h1>Search Results</h1> </cfoutput> <cfoutput query="simpleSearchResult"> <!---DISPLAY QUERY DATA---> </cfoutput> </cfif> <!---IF ADVANCED SEARCH WAS MADE A RESULT WAS FOUND---> <cfif searchResponse IS "advancedSearchResult"> <cfoutput> <h1>Search Results</h1> <p>Your search for "#Form.titleName#" returned #advancedSearchResult.RecordCount# result(s).</p> </cfoutput> <cfoutput query="advancedSearchResult"> <!---DISPLAY QUERY DATA---> </cfoutput> </cfif> Is my logic a) not efficient because my if statements/is there a better way to do this? And b) Can you see any scenarios where my code can break? I've tested it but I have not been able to find any issues with it. And I have no way of measuring performance. Any thoughts and ideas would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

    Read the article

  • user access management in j2ee web application

    - by kawtousse
    Hi everyone, I am working with jsp/servlet project and i have to complete the module of access management to my jsps since I have more than one user with different profile. I defined a table in my database wich resume the profil and the url permitted like that: id_profil :1 url : http://localhost/...xyz.jsp id page 1 Now I am trying to let the menu modified appropriately to the id_profil of the logged user. So there are pages allowed in one profile but must be hidden to others. I have no idea since now how to realize this and it is so important for me. thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • calling command line from .NET application

    - by Roman Dorevich
    I want to call from a c# application a command line starting from it an application and retrieve the stat from it. I did this but something is missing: ProcessStartInfo psf = new ProcessStartInfo("cmd.exe", "/C time"); psf.WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden; psf.RedirectStandardOutput = true; psf.UseShellExecute = false; psf.CreateNoWindow = true; Process p = Process.Start(psf); StreamReader sr = p.StandardOutput; p.WaitForExit(); What is wrong ?

    Read the article

  • Can I send a POST form in an encoding other than of its body?

    - by Daziplqa
    Hi gang, I've Html page that looks like: <HTML> <meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html; charset=gb2312'> <BODY onload='document.forms[0].submit();'> <form name="form" method="post" action="/path/to/some/servlet"> <input type="hidden" name="username" value="??"> <!-- UTF-8 characters --> </form> </BODY> </HTML> As you can see, the content of this page is UTF-8, but I need to send it with GB2312 character encoding, as the servlet that I am sending this page to expects from me GB2312. Is this a valid scenario? Because in the servlet, I couldn't retive these chines characters back using a filter that sets the character encoding to GB2312!! Please help

    Read the article

  • Is there a unified way to know if a node is visible or not?

    - by zneak
    Hello guys, I'd like to be able to know if a node is visible and rendered on screen. As far as I know, there are at least 3 standard and easy ways of making HTML nodes not visible: Setting opacity: 0; Setting display: none; Setting visibility: hidden. I could check for just these three, but I'm afraid people can get creative when it comes to ways of hiding contents: Sending the element offscreen using negative margins; Using a width or height of 0 and hiding overflow; many more I trust people to have developed. So I was wondering if there is a standard way of determining if a node is rendered to the screen. I'm pretty sure all major browsers determine it for themselves to accelerate drawing, so maybe it's somehow exposed.

    Read the article

  • How do I make a multiple file upload?

    - by Bluemagica
    I am trying to make a multiple image uploader. The file upload fields are being added in the form dynamically using jquery. I tried making an array of the fields since I don't want to have a hidden field. so my generated upload fields look like <input type="file" id="img0" name="img[]"/> <input type="file" id="img1" name="img[]"/> <input type="file" id="img2" name="img[]"/> ..... .. And on the php side I did something like if(isset($_FILES['img'])) { foreach($_FILES['img'] as $k=>$v) { if($v!="") { uploadImage($k,0,0,0,"content/gallery/"); } } } Now I know I am way too wrong, since in that code I am looping through the 'img' file's properties instead of all images....but I have no idea how to fix this. PS: uploadImage is a function I wrote which expects the file input field's name as the first parameter.

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Prototype and Encapsulation

    - by Adam Davies
    Sorry I'm probably being a realy noob here...but: I have the following javascript object: jeeni.TextField = (function(){ var tagId; privateMethod = function(){ console.log("IN: privateMethod"); } publicMethod = function(){ console.log("IN: publicMethod: " + this.tagId); } jeeni.TextField = function(id){ console.log("Constructor"); this.tagId = id; } jeeni.TextField.prototype = { constructor: jeeni.TextField, foo: publicMethod }; return jeeni.TextField; }()); Now when I run the following code I get the corresponding result: var textField1 = new jeeni.TextField(21); // Outputs: Constructor textField1.foo(); // Outputs: IN: publicMethod: 21 console.log(textField1.tagId); // Outputs: 21 console.log(textField1.privateMethod); // Outputs: undefined So my question is why is privateMethod hidden and tagId is not. I want them both to be private scope. Please help a noob. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework 4 Hiding Underlying Resolver Tables when model is generated from database

    - by grrrrrrrrrrrrr
    When creating an entity framework model from scratch it is possible to specify a Many to Many relationship in the model. e.g Entity1 * ----- * Entity2 When a database is then generated from this, a resolver table is then created automatically between the two entities, this is hidden in the code model, allowing direct access to each of the entities via properties. e.g. Entity1 ----* ResolverEntity *----- Entity2 My question is, when a model is generated from an existing database, which contains resolver tables, is it possible to create the same effect so the resolver tables do not appear in the generated object model? When I have attempted this, the entity framework appears to create entities in the model for the resolver tables with no obvious way of hiding them in the object model. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Unicode string handling using Windows API

    - by DeadMG
    I always assumed that Unicode string handling was some dark art. However, I've seen that the Windows API has functions for comparing Unicode strings, for example. Does that mean that it's actually feasible to write a Unicode string class that can perform simple actions like sorting, equality comparison, and extraction from a file? Or are there hidden gotchas in the use of these functions that makes it actually a really bad idea? I'm just looking at libraries like ICU and they seem incredibly over-complicated compared to what a Unicode string class backed by the Windows API could actually look like, which would resemble the Standard string classes quite closely.

    Read the article

  • jquery asp.net button visibility

    - by Pratik
    There is some code like this : if ( bValid ) { $( this ).dialog( "close" ); $("#btnExcel_Click").show(); } and .aspx look like : <form id="form1" runat="server"> <input id="inpHide" type="hidden" runat="server" /> <asp:Button ID="btnExcel" runat="server" Text="Excel" AccessKey="E" BorderWidth="0px" OnClick="btnExcel_Click" ToolTip="Excel" Visible="false" /> </form> `bValid` is some part of code Why this doesnt work ? What can be done to work it out. To make button visisble ?

    Read the article

  • problem with live function

    - by Dirty Bird Design
    I had this working to spec, until the specs changed. This function is now brought in via ajax .load. Easy enough to bring it in and I have all my other functions on the page that is brought in working in the parent page except this one: $("#CME").hide(); $(function() { $("#CME1, #CMEQL, #CBT1, #CBTQL, #NYM1, #CMX1").live("change", function(){ var checkBoxes = $("#CME1, #CMEQL, #CBT1, #CBTQL, #NYM1, #CMX1").filter(":not(:checked)"); if(checkBoxes.length == 0){ $("#CME").slideDown("fast"); } else { $("#CME").slideUp("fast"); } }); the div "#CME" is not hidden and the .live('change', function () { isn't working. I have other similar .live functions that are working and structured the same. How do I bind the initial $(function() with .live and why isn't the .hide() working? });//CME

    Read the article

  • z index background issue in IE

    - by Michael
    I have a jQuery tools scroller set up with controls managing two separate divs of info - one images, the other related text that needs to sit over the top of the images with a transparent bg image. I am using z-indexing to achieve this and am aware of IE's issues with this but am unable to sort it (tested in IE6-8). Image of the issue below: http://test.shakingpaper.com.au/not_working.png It seems that the overlayed div is taking on the containers white. Try as I might, I can't resolve this. HTML/CSS code below: <div id="content"> <div id="nav"></div> <div class="s4 slideshow"> <div> <img src="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_directory'); ?>/images/hero_1_white.jpg" width="770" height="367" /> </div> <div> <img src="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_directory'); ?>/images/hero_1_white.jpg" width="770" height="367" /> </div> <div> <img src="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_directory'); ?>/images/hero_1_white.jpg" width="770" height="367" /> </div> </div> <div id="overlay_bg"></div> <div class="s4 information"> <div> <h1>Support</h1> <p>Quisque lacus quam, egestas ac tincidunt a, lacinia vel velit. Aenean facilisis nulla vitae.</p> <p><a href="#">Support Us</a></p> </div> <div> <h1>Events</h1> <p>Quisque lacegestas ac tincidunt a, lacinia vel velit. Aenean facilisis nulla vitae.</p> <p><a href="#">Read More</a></p> </div> <div> <h1>Regional</h1> <p>Quisque lacus quam, egestas ac tincidunt a, lacinia vel velit. Aenean facilisis nulla vitae.</p> <p><a href="#">Support Us</a></p> </div> </div> </div> <!-- end of content --> #content { height: auto; min-height: 300px !important; overflow: hidden; position:relative; margin-left: 27px; width: 770px; padding-bottom: 43px; } #nav { width: 60px; z-index: 10000; position: absolute; top:340px; left: 28px; } .s4 { width: 770px; height: 370px; overflow: hidden; } #nav a { background-color: transparent; background-image: url(images/transition.png); background-position: 0 0; text-indent: -1000em; width: 10px; height: 10px; display: block; float: left; margin-right: 5px; } #nav a.activeSlide { background-position: 0 -10px; } #overlay_bg { background: url(images/soild_block.png) no-repeat; width: 318px; height: 339px; z-index: 5000; position: absolute; top: 28px; } .information { position: absolute; top: 60px; left: 28px; z-index: 16000; width: 290px; height: 260px; color: #FFF; } .information h1 { font-size: 50px; font-style: italic; text-transform: uppercase; } .information p { font-size: 17px; line-height: 27px; margin-top: 37px; } .information a { font-size: 13px; padding-bottom: 2px; border-bottom: 1px solid; color: #FFF; text-transform: uppercase; font-style: italic; } .information a:hover { color: #000; } Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • R scatterplot overplotting color

    - by rgeekay
    So far I have this: qplot(df[[1]], as.numeric(rownames(df)), group=df[[2]], color=df[[2]], ylab="") I want to use different colors for the points in the 2 groups - perhaps a lighter shade for the what's in black now and a darker - say, red for what's in blue. Also, I want to use hexbin kind of thing for group=0 but not for group=1. I'm not able to get the syntax to get this working. In the current plot 0 is in black and 1 is in blue. Added: I worked on it some more, and by using factor and scale_colour_manual, I got the grey color for 0 and red for 1: > palette1 [1] "grey" "red" "blue" "violet" "black" fy=factor(y, labels=c('grey', 'red')) qplot(x, seq(1:length(x)),col=fy, ylab="") + geom_point() + scale_colour_manual(values=palette1) Pending questions are: How to first plot all the grey and then red on top (some of the red is now hidden because the grey is plotted over). How to apply the hexbin logic for group0 i.e. the grey points only and not for the red.

    Read the article

  • $.post is not working

    - by BEBO
    i am trying to post data to Mysql using jquery $.post and php page. my code is not running and nothing is added to the mysql table. I am not sure if the path i am creating is wrong but any help would be appreciated. Jquery location: f_js/tasks/TaskTest.js <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#AddTask").click(function(){ var acct = $('#acct').val(); var quicktask = $('#quicktask').val(); var user = $('#user').val(); $.post('addTask.php',{acct:acct,quicktask:quicktask,user:user}, function(data){ $('#result').fadeIn('slow').html(data); }); }); }); </script> addTask.php (runs the jqeury code) <?php include 'dbconnect.php'; include 'sessions.php'; $acct = $_POST['acct']; $task = $_POST['quicktask']; $taskstatus = 'Active'; //get task Creator $user = $_POST['user']; //query task creator from users table $allusers = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '$user'"); while ($rows = mysql_fetch_array($allusers)) { //get first and last name for task creator $taskOwner = $rows['user_firstname']; $taskOwnerLast = $rows['user_lastname']; $taskOwnerFull = $taskOwner." ".$taskOwnerLast; mysql_query("INSERT INTO tasks (taskresource, tasktitle, taskdetail, taskstatus, taskowner, taskOwnerFullName) VALUES ('$acct', '$task', '$task', '$taskstatus', '$user', '$taskOwnerFull' )"); echo "inserted"; } ?> Accountview.php finally the front page <html> <div class="input-cont "> <input type="text" class="form-control col-lg-12" placeholder="Add a quick Task..." name ="quicktask" id="quicktask"> </div> <div class="form-group"> <div class="pull-right chat-features"> <a href="javascript:;"> <i class="icon-camera"></i> </a> <a href="javascript:;"> <i class="icon-link"></i> </a> <input type="button" class="btn btn-danger" name="AddTask" id="AddTask" value="Add" /> <input type="hidden" name="acct" id="acct" value="<?php echo $_REQUEST['acctname']?>"/> <input type="hidden" name="user" id="user" value="<?php $username = $_SESSION['username']; echo $username?>"/> <div id="result">result</div> </div> </div> <!-- js placed at the end of the document so the pages load faster --> <script src="js/jquery.js"></script> <script src="f_js/tasks/TaskTest.js"></script> <!--common script for all pages--> <script src="js/common-scripts.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="assets/gritter/js/jquery.gritter.js"></script> <script src="js/gritter.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script> </html> Firebug reponse: Response Headers Connection Keep-Alive Content-Length 0 Content-Type text/html Date Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:48:50 GMT Keep-Alive timeout=5, max=100 Server Apache/2.4.4 (Win32) OpenSSL/0.9.8y PHP/5.4.16 X-Powered-By PHP/5.4.16 refresh 5; URL=index.php Request Headers Accept */* Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate Accept-Language en-US,en;q=0.5 Content-Length 13 Content-Type application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8 Cookie PHPSESSID=6gufl3guiiddreg8cdlc0htnc6 Host localhost Referer http://localhost/betahtml/AccountView.php?acctname=client%201 User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 X-Requested-With XMLHttpRequest

    Read the article

  • What action is my Symfony/Doctrine generated form actually going to?

    - by Arms
    In my Symfony 1.4 project I am using the doctrine:generate-admin task to create the modules that compose my backend system. One such module is "journeys". When I view the source of the "journeys/new" page (which displays the form to create a new journey entity) the action of the form is simply "journeys" (I expected it to be "journeys/create"). The "journeys" route on its own would call the executeIndex method - however I put a log call in there and upon form submission, the log is not made. So this leads me to believe that executeIndex is NOT being called, and another piece of code is being fired upon form submission that then (depending on a hidden input in the form) calls either executeCreate() or executeUpdate(). Problem is, I don't know where that would be happening. Any insight would be much appreciated. I don't if this is relevant, but here is the routing definition for the journeys module journey: class: sfDoctrineRouteCollection options: model: journey module: journeys prefix_path: /journeys column: id with_wildcard_routes: true Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to go 'back' 2 levels?

    - by Joe McGuckin
    From the list view of my app, I can view a list of records or drill down and edit/update a record. After updating, I want to go directly back to the list view, bypassing a couple of intermediate pages - but I don't simply want to link_to(:action => list) - there's pagination involved. I want to go back to the exact 'list' page I came from. What's the best way? Pass a hidden arg somewhere with the page number? Is there an elegant way to accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • setTimeout is acting weird

    - by mnish
    I am trying to make a simple setTimeout, to make a div tag invisible after 2 seconds. The setTimeout function makes the div invisible but irregularly, sometimes immediately and sometimes after 1 sec, and so on. Here is my code: function beginTimeOut(){ t = setTimeout(function(){hideSubMenu()},2000); } function hideSubMenu(){ var elem; elem = document.getElementById("ul_navlist1"); elem.style.visibility="hidden"; clearTimeout(t); } By the way, t is a global variable. I have tried this too: t = setTimeout("hideSubMenu()",2000); but with the same irregular results.

    Read the article

  • textFieldShouldBeginEditing + UIKeyboardWillShowNotification + OS 3.2

    - by user193545
    I have multiple textfields on a UIView. I resign for a previous textField in textFieldShouldBeginEditing method, where following sequence of events are performed UIKeyboardWillHideNotification is received corresponding to that field where the keyboard for the previous field is hidden. the method textFieldShouldBeginEditing returns a YES and then UIKeyboardWillShowNotification is received where the keyboard for the current field is displayed. However, in OS 3.2 even though textFieldShouldBeginEditing returns a YES, UIKeyboardWillShowNotification for the current field is not received. The logic works for OS < 3.2 Any ideas where I might be doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Creating a Drop-Down Menu with Javascript

    - by iceteea
    Question about logics here: What's the most elegant way to make the menu appear/disappear onmouseover/onmouseout? See the following JsBin: http://jsbin.com/owayeb/edit#source The Menu is hidden by default. If the user moves his cursor above the Link the showme() function gets called. When the user moves his cursor away the hideme() functions gets called. How would I get the Menu to persist while the user moves his mouse away from the Link to above the Menu? Or is this all the wrong school of thought?

    Read the article

  • slideIn and slideOut reduces width of component

    - by shub
    Can someone help me to solve the problem of reducing the width of the component during SlideIn or SlideOut? I am using the Ext JS version 4.1 RC1. Ext.onReady(function () { Ext.create('Ext.container.Viewport', { layout: 'border', items: [{ region: 'north', autoHeight: true, border: false, margins: '0 0 5 0', items: [{ xtype: 'container', id: 'con_notification-box', cls: 'notification-box', hidden: true, border: true, width: 500, height: 0, style: { position: 'fixed', minHeight: '75px !important', left: '50%', marginLeft: '-250px', zIndex: '999999', backgroundColor: 'white' }, items:[{ xtype: 'container', html: '<p>Insert your information text here.</p>' },{ xtype: 'container', id: 'con_application-close', cls: 'notification-close', html: '<br />Close' }] },{ xtype: 'container', html: '<h1 class="x-panel-header">Your title</h1>' }] }] }); var con_notification_box = Ext.getCmp('con_notification-box').getEl(); con_notification_box.slideIn('t', { easing: 'easeOut', duration: 500 }); Ext.getCmp('con_application-close').getEl().on('click',function(){ con_notification_box.slideOut('t', { duration: 2000 }); }); }); I'd be very grateful if you could help me. Kind regards, shub

    Read the article

  • How to read a complex view model on POST?

    - by Interfector
    Hello, I have an user view model that has the following properties: public User user; public List<Language> Languages; I send the above model to the view and use html helpers to build the form, so I end up with something like: <form action="/Users/Edit/5" method="post"><input id="user_UserId" name="user.UserId" type="hidden" value="5" /> First Name Last Name Email Language - en en Now, I try to read the POST in something that initially was something like : [AcceptVerbs( HttpVerbs.Post )] public ActionResult Edit( int UserId, FormCollection form ) { and cannot get the user.UserId variable, user.FirstName variable etc. Any idea what needs to be done to be able to read this kind of POST request. I'm kind of reluctant to modifying my ViewModel as it is very simple and easy to maintain as it is. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Javascript error in Setting focus to a textbox inside a lightbox(Overlay) window.

    - by Rishabh Ohri
    Hi All, I have a textbox, a button and a "AdvancedSearch" link on my aspx page. On page load, the focus is set to the textbox. On click of the "AdvancedSearch" link, a lightbox(overlay) window will be opened. I want to set focus to a textbox present within this lightbox window. I am using javascript to achieve this. The code looks somewhat like this: if( element.type != "hidden" && element.style.display != "none" && !element.disabled ) { element.focus(); return; } when the lightbox window loads, i get a javascript error - "Can't move focus to the control because it is invisible, not enabled, or of a type that does not accept the focus" Any idea why this error is thrown and why it is not able to set focus to the textbox in the lightbox window? Thanks, Rishab.

    Read the article

  • Class architecture, no friends allowed

    - by Captain Comic
    The question of why there are no friends in C# has been extensively discussed. I have the following design problems. I have a class that has only one public function AddOrder(Order ord). Clients are allowed to call only this function. All other logic must be hidden. Order class is listening to market events and must call other other function of TradingSystem ExecuteOrder, so I have to make it public as well. Doing that I will allow clients of Trading system to call this function and I don't want that. class TradingSystem { // Trading system stores list of orders List<Order> _orders; // this function is made public so that Order can call ir public ExecuteOrder(Order ord) { } // this function is made public for external clients public AddOrder(OrderRequest ordreq) { // create order and pass it this order.OnOrderAdded(this); } } class Order { TradingSystem _ts; public void OnOrderAdded(TradingSystem ts) { _ts = ts; } void OnMarketEvent() { _ts.ExecuteOrder() } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139  | Next Page >