Search Results

Search found 33258 results on 1331 pages for 'search form'.

Page 159/1331 | < Previous Page | 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166  | Next Page >

  • How to make checkboxes have the same submit behavior as other inputs?

    - by Tim Santeford
    I have a search form where several checkboxes are checked by default. When the form submits, as a GET, the url will only contain the list of checkboxes that were left checked. http://www.example.com/page/?checkbox1=yes&checkbox2=yes It is difficult with this scenario to determine the difference between when a user first arrives at this search page and when they submit the form with all checkboxes unchecked because the querystrings look the same. To combat this problem I have started injecting a hidden field before the checkbox with the same name and a 'no' value. When the checkbox is unchecked the browser will send the hidden field's no value and when the checkbox is set then the browser is overriding the hidden field with the checkbox's 'yes' value. <input type="hidden" name="checkbox1" value="no" /> <input type="checkbox" name="checkbox1" value="yes" /> when the user submits the form with all checkboxes unchecked I get this querystring: http://www.example.com/page/?checkbox1=no&checkbox2=no This seems to work on ff, chrome, ie5.5+ so I'am I safe in using this method or is there a better way to make checkboxes submit like inputs and selects?

    Read the article

  • Cakephp: Extend search capability to hasMany Relationship

    - by Chris
    I have two models: Car hasMany Passengers Passenger belongsTo Car I want to implement a search using Cake Search. The user should input a number and the searchengine should return all cars that have less than this number passengers. In my search form: echo $form->input('passengers', array('label' => 'Passengers', 'div' => false)); In my Car model: public $filterArgs = array( array('name' => 'passengers', 'type' => 'int'), ); In the controller: public $presetVars = array( array('field' => 'passengers', 'type' => 'int') } I thought of adding a function to the model that returns the number of passengers: function countPassengers(){ return(count($this->Car->Passenger)); //Not sure if this works } And how to I implement this search criteria?: return all Cars where countPassengers()<passenger

    Read the article

  • T-SQL stored procedure to return google style "suggested" search results

    - by stephen776
    Ok, using SQL Server 2008. On my web page I have a textbox with jQuery-UI AutoComplete hooked up. Now I need a stored procedure to search across all columns of a single table(or multiple joined tables I suppose) for a search string coming from the textbox/autocomplete AJAX call, and return "suggested" search strings. I am using the AdventureWorks db for testing(Products table) So for example, the product table has columns for product name and product number(among others) and I want to return suggested search strings based on user input where they may enter a product name and/or a product number. I have it working across a single column which was simple. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Validation on user registration form ?

    - by Nitz
    Hey Guys, i have made module in which i am trying to add validation like if the user had entered the characters in "Phone No" text filed and same on "Mobile No". This will run when user had open the user registration form. I have made this.... <?php function form_intro_form_alter(&$form,&$form_state,$form_id){ if($form_id == 'user_register' || $form_id == 'user_edit'){ $form['Personal Information']['profile_pno']['#validate'] = array('form_intro_pno_validate' => array()); //profile_pno is for Phone No. $form['Personal Information']['profile_mno']['#validate'] = array('form_intro_mno_validate' => array()); //profile_mno is for Mobile No. } } function form_intro_pno_validate($element){ if(!is_numeric($element['#value'])){ form_set_error('profile_state' , t('Please Enter Only Number in Phone no')); } } function form_intro_mno_validate($element){ if(!is_numeric($element['#value'])){ form_set_error('profile_state' , t('Please Enter Only Number in Mobile no')); } } ?> the module name is form_intro..... plz check it and send me replay... this isn't working...it not giving any error when user had entered the characters.

    Read the article

  • Showing a hidden form

    - by Arcadian
    Newb question: how do i show a from that have been hidden using this.Hide(); I have tried MainMenuForm.Show(); and this just says i need an object ref have tried: MainMenuForm frmMainMenu = new MainMenuForm(); frmMainMenu.Show(); which seems to show the appropriate form. but when you exit the app, it is still held in memory because it hasn't shown the form that was hidden, instead it has shown a new version of the form. in effect having 2 instances of the form (one hidden, one visible). whats the correct procedure here Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Grep without storing search to the "/ register in Vim

    - by Phro
    In my .vimrc I have a mapping that makes a line of text 'title capitalized': noremap <Leader>at :s/\v<(.)(\w{2,})/\u\1\L\2/g<CR> However, whenever I run this function, it highlights every word that is at least three characters long in my entire document. Of course I could get this behaviour to stop simply by appending :nohlsearch<CR> to the end of the mapping, but this is more of an awkward hack that still avoids a bigger problem: The last search has been replaced by \v<(.)(\w{2,}). Is there any way to use the search commands in Vim without storing the last search in the "/ register; a 'silent' search of sorts? That way, after running this title-making command, I can still use my previous search to navigate the document using n, N, etc. Edit Using @brettanomyces' answer, I found that simply setting the mapping: noremap <Leader>at :call setline(line('.'),substitute(getline('.'), '\v<(.)(\w{2,})', '\u\1\L\2', 'g'))<CR> will successfully perform the substitution without storing the searched text into the / register.

    Read the article

  • Jquery Form Validation Plugin Not Working

    - by nayanjyoti hazarika
    I try to validate a simple Form but the Jquery Validation Plugin not working when I use only Button not The Submit Button. I can not use the Submit button there Because If I use submit Button After Submitting the form It take the Action and goes to Default page while my current form is comes from Ajax. I am very new to Jquery. Please Help its Urgent... I am giving the files here. index.html <html> <head> <script src="jquery.js"> <script="jquery-validate-min.js"> <script="validation.js> </head> <body> <form id="contact_form"> <table> <tr><th>Name</th><td><input name="name" /></td></tr> <tr><th>E Mail</th><td><input name="email" /></td></tr> <tr><th><input type="button" name ="submit" id="form_sub" onclick="save"></th><td><input name="email" /></td></tr> </table> </form> </body> </html> Now the validation.js file function save(){ $("#form_sub").click(function(){ $("#contact_form").validate({ 'rules':{ 'name':{ 'required':true, 'minlength':5 }, 'email':{ 'required':true, 'email':true } } }) } Everything works fine when we use input type="submit"... But it not working when we use input type="button" Any Idea how can Fix this? I am new to Jquery ... Please Help

    Read the article

  • htaccess; /search/?q=test to /test

    - by Matthew Haworth
    I have a similar situation to the one described in the title. All that I need to do is map all requests in the form /search/?q=test to /test. This is because we are changing the way our search works to make it user friendly, but still want to allow for backward compatability (i.e. anyone that may have these links bookmarked etc). However, thus far I have this: RedirectMatch 301 /search/?q=(.*) /$1 And that doesn't work, but: RedirectMatch 301 /search/(.*) /$1 does... Any idea why? Cheers.

    Read the article

  • How to set a predefined value in a form in Rails

    - by marco
    So I just got started in Rails, and I'm trying to create an Object (a book_loan in my case) with a Form. The thing is that I get to this form by clicking on a book, so I pass the book_id as a parameter, like localhost:3000/loans/new?id=1. Now I don't want the user to be able to set the book id field in the form, since I already know the id. So my question is how to set the value in the form. I have been trying things like: <% form_for(@loan) do |f| %> <%= f.error_messages %> ... <%= @loan.book_id = params[:id] %> <%= f.submit 'Create' %> <% end %> without any success. Does anybody have a hint for me?

    Read the article

  • Jquery - Dynamically build form action on submit?

    - by Probocop
    Hi, I'm trying to have the action of a HTML form built when the user clicks the submit button. So the user fills in a form, clicks submit, then the action gets built then it actually gets submitted. The reason being is because the form has a load of options on it which will be passed to a script. How would I go about doing this with Jquery?

    Read the article

  • ferret,multiple model search -undefined method `aaf_index' for #<Class:>

    - by jissy
    ferret,multiple model search - I have 2 models A and B.I want to perform a text search by using 3 fields; title, description(part of A) and comment(part of B). Where I want to include the comment field to perform the ferret search.Then,what other changes needed. class A < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :b acts_as_ferret :fields => [:title, :description], :additional_fields => [:comment_text] def comment_text return b.comment end In a_controller, i wrote: @search = A.find_with_ferret( params[:st][:text_search], :limit => :all, :multi => [B] ).paginate :per_page =>10, :page=>params[:page] The second mosel is given below: class B < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :a while using :multi[B] option with the find_with_ferret,the following error is getting: undefined method `aaf_index' for #ClassName

    Read the article

  • can't save form content to database, help plsss!!

    - by dana
    i'm trying to save 100 caracters form user in a 'microblog' minimal application. my code seems to not have any mystakes, but doesn't work. the mistake is in views.py, i can't save the foreign key to user table models.py looks like this: class NewManager(models.Manager): def create_post(self, post, username): new = self.model(post=post, created_by=username) new.save() return new class New(models.Model): post = models.CharField(max_length=120) date = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) created_by = models.ForeignKey(User, blank=True) objects = NewManager() class NewForm(ModelForm): class Meta: model = New fields = ['post'] # widgets = {'post': Textarea(attrs={'cols': 80, 'rows': 20}) def save_new(request): if request.method == 'POST': created_by = User.objects.get(created_by = user) date = request.POST.get('date', '') post = request.POST.get('post', '') new_obj = New(post=post, date=date, created_by=created_by) new_obj.save() return HttpResponseRedirect('/') else: form = NewForm() return render_to_response('news/new_form.html', {'form': form},context_instance=RequestContext(request)) i didn't mention imports here - they're done right, anyway. my mistake is in views.py, when i try to save it says: local variable 'created_by' referenced before assignment it i put created_py as a parameter, the save needs more parameters... it is really weird help please!!

    Read the article

  • How to map a search object to a class with more fields with JPA annotations

    - by Moli
    Hi all, I'm a newbie with JPA. I need to map a search object to a table. The search object has only and id, name. The big object has more fileds id, name, adress and more. I use this as big object view plaincopy to clipboardprint? I use this as big object @Entity @Table(name="users") public class User { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO) private long id; private String name; private String adress; private String keywords; } //this is my search object @XXX public class UserSearch { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO) private long id; private String name; } What annotations I need to use to map the search object to the table users? I'm using spring+struts2+hibernate+JPA. Help is appreciated! Thanks!

    Read the article

  • MS Access raise form events programmatically

    - by Eric G
    Is it possible to raise built-in MS Access form events programmatically? I have a feeling it isn't but thought I would check. (I am using Access 2003). For instance, I want to do something like this within a private sub on the form: RaiseEvent Delete(Cancel) and have it trigger the Access.Form delete event -- i.e. without actually deleting a bound record. Note my delete event is not handled by the form itself but by an external class, so I can't simply call Form_Delete(Cancel).

    Read the article

  • How to Disable Alt + F4 closing form?

    - by Aros
    What is the best way to disable Alt + F4 in a c# win form to prevent the user from closing the form? I am using a form as a popup dialog to display a progress bar and I do not want the user to be able to close it. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • PHP-How to Pass Multiple Value In Form Field

    - by Tall boY
    hi i have a php based sorting method with drop down menu to sort no of rows, it is working fine. i have another sorting links to sort id & title, it is also working fine. but together they are not working fine. what happens is that when i sort(say by title) using links, result gets sorted by title, then if i sort rows using drop down menu rows get sorted but result gets back to default of id sort. sorting codes for id & tite is if ($orderby == 'title' && $sortby == 'asc') {echo " <li id='scurrent'><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=title&sort=asc'>title-asc:</a></li> ";} else {echo " <li><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=title&sort=asc'>title-asc:</a></li> ";} if ($orderby == 'title' && $sortby == 'desc') {echo " <li id='scurrent'><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=title&sort=desc'>title-desc:</a></li> ";} else {echo " <li><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=title&sort=desc'>title-desc:</a></li> ";} if ($orderby == 'id' && $sortby == 'asc') {echo " <li id='scurrent'><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=id&sort=asc'>id-asc:</a></li> ";} else {echo " <li><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=id&sort=asc'>id-asc:</a></li> ";} if ($orderby == 'id' && $sortby == 'desc') {echo " <li id='scurrent'><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=id&sort=desc'>id-desc:</a></li> ";} else {echo " <li><a href='?rpp=$rowsperpage&order=id&sort=desc'>id-desc:</a></li> ";} ?> sorting codes for rows is <form action="is-test.php" method="get"> <select name="rpp" onchange="this.form.submit()"> <option value="10" <?php if ($rowsperpage == 10) echo 'selected="selected"' ?>>10</option> <option value="20" <?php if ($rowsperpage == 20) echo 'selected="selected"' ?>>20</option> <option value="30" <?php if ($rowsperpage == 30) echo 'selected="selected"' ?>>30</option> </select> </form> this method passes only rows per page(rpp) into url. i want it to pass order, sort& rpp. is there a way around to pass multiple values in form fields like this. <form action="is-test.php" method="get"> <select name="rpp, order, sort" onchange="this.form.submit()"> <option value="10, $orderby, $sortby" <?php if ($rowsperpage == 10) echo 'selected="selected"' ?>>10</option> <option value="20, $orderby, $sortby" <?php if ($rowsperpage == 20) echo 'selected="selected"' ?>>20</option> <option value="30, $orderby, $sortby" <?php if ($rowsperpage == 30) echo 'selected="selected"' ?>>30</option> </select> </form> this may seem silly but it just to give you an idea of what i am trying to implement,(i am very new to php) please suggest any way to make this work. thanks

    Read the article

  • Best practices for "search data class" in ASP.NET MVC

    - by Tim Ridgely
    Hi everybody, I'm hoping this isn't too subjective, but I'm new to ASP.NET MVC and I'm trying to figure out how others may have solved similar problems. Basically, I have two entities, Customers and Orders. A customer has many orders; an order belongs to exactly one customer. I'm making an Order Search feature that should allow a user to search for orders based on order or customer information. Pretty straightforward, I think. I've read in other posts that the search controller should use GET, but I think it makes more sense to use POST because of the large number of search params. I'm using Entity Framework to create my models, and that's in a separate class library project and namespace. This article talks about using binding instead of Request.Form to get at the POST data. Would it make decent sense to make a class to hold all the search data that could be materialized by the magic model binding? Otherwise I'd just be poking through the FormCollection to pull out particular values, which might be fine. Where would you recommend making such a class?

    Read the article

  • How can I debug a form?

    - by alesch
    I'd like to see what a website is sending when I submit a form. Using Firebug I can see that it is regular POST form. I'm interested in the coding of the form fields. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Form Search Onkeyup event

    - by Aryan
    I Have a Form In which the form should automatically search when i complete entering the 10th character in the text field but the below code is searching for each n every character i enter in the text field . . . I just want the result after completing the 10th character not for each n every character . . i have used onkeyup event and i set that value to 10 but still it is searching for each n every character... please do help me <body OnKeyPress="return disableKeyPress(event)"> <section id="content" class="container_12 clearfix" data-sort=true> <center><table class='dynamic styled with-prev-next' data-table-tools='{'display':true}' align=center> <script> function disableEnterKey(e) { var key; if(window.event) key = window.event.keyCode; //IE else key = e.which; //firefox return (key != 13); } function showUser(str) { if (str=="") { document.getElementById("txtHint").innerHTML=""; return; } if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById("txtHint").innerHTML=xmlhttp.responseText; } } xmlhttp.open("GET","resdb.php?id="+str,true); xmlhttp.send(); } </script> <script type='text/javascript'> //<![CDATA[ $(window).load(function(){ $('#id').keyup(function(){ if(this.value.length ==10) }); });//]]> </script> <form id="form" method="post" name="form" > <tr><td><p align="center"><font size="3"><b>JNTUH - B.Tech IV Year II Semester (R07) Advance Supplementary Results - July 2012</b></font></p></td></tr> <td><p align="center"><b>Last Date for RC/RV : 8th August 2012</b></p></td> <tr><td><p align="center"></b> <input type="text" onkeyup="showUser(this.value)" onKeyPress="return disableEnterKey(event)" data-type="autocomplete" data-source="extras/autocomplete1.php" name="id" id="id" maxlength="10" placeholder=" Hall-Ticket Number">&emsp;</p></td></tr> </table> </center> </form> <center> <div id="txtHint"><b>Results will be displayed here</b></div> </center> </body>

    Read the article

  • submitting a form inside a modalbox with jquery

    - by birdy
    submitting form with jQuery works $('#testform').submit(); doesn't work $('#testform').submit(function () { alert('test1'); return true; }); This is just an exmaple but at times i'd like to do stuff before submission of the form. Like for example submit the form using $.POST Update: If I keep both then the $.POST has no value because the form still gets submitted the traditional way, without ajax... $("#testform").submit(function() { $.post('/myajaxcontroller', function(data) { $('#result').html(data); }); }); $("#testform").submit();

    Read the article

  • Instantiate a form, then find it later, without showing it initially

    - by awilson53
    I am having a problem that is strange to me but hopefully is not so strange to someone else. : ) Some background: I am working on a simple IM client that allows the user to broadcast messages to multiple recipients. The goal is to create a chat form for each of the recipients containing the text of the broadcast message, then show that form only if the recipient responds to the broadcast-er. However, when the application receives a response then attempts to locate the form for that particular chat session (using Application.OpenForms) it cannot find it UNLESS I .Show at the time it is created. I would like to avoid having to show this form when it is created because this means that the user will see a flash on the screen. The form doesn't seem to really be created until I show it, but it would seem there has to be a way to do this without showing first. Can anyone assist? I can provide code snippets if needed, I didn't in this post because this feels more like a conceptual misunderstanding on my part than a bug in the code. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • How to nest a form in an ASP.NET page (which has a form wrapped around it)

    - by Josh
    I am writing HTML to an ASP.NET page (from a web service response), and the HTML has tags. Unfortunately, because the ASP.NET page already has a wrapped around it, a lot of the buttons on the page break. Does anyone know how I can nest the form inside the ASP.NET page without breaking the top-level form? Note: the HTML I am bringing in is a form with a bunch of hidden fields inside of it, and it has to be placed within the ASP.NET page, and thus nested in the top-level form. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to write submit form in another manner?

    - by user281180
    I have the follwing: <% using (Ajax.BeginForm("ChangePassword", new AjaxOptions { OnComplete = "ChangePasswordComplete" })) {% <%Html.RenderPartial("ChangePassword"); % <input type="submit" value="test" /> <%} % I want to write it in the following manner: <form> <%Html.RenderPartial("ChangePassword"); %> <input type="submit" value="test" /> </form> How can I do that? What to write in the form tag

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166  | Next Page >