Search Results

Search found 24958 results on 999 pages for 'select region'.

Page 177/999 | < Previous Page | 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184  | Next Page >

  • jQuery, selecting form elements by name, getting: Error: uncaught exception: Syntax error, unrecogni

    - by Mark Steudel
    I'm trying to select an select element by name I found this thread showing how to do it, and I followed it but I'm getting Syntax error. I'm using jquery 1.4.1, here's my code. <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/> <title>TODO supply a title</title> <script type="text/javascript" src="/js/jquery-1.4.1.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ alert( $('select[@name="country[0]"]').val() ); }) </script> </head> <body> <form> <select name="country[0]"> <option value="23">test</option> </select> </form> </body> </html> Thanks in advance for any insight. MS

    Read the article

  • How to get only the date from the sql server

    - by Pradeep
    this is what i want. but i have put only a specified date. SELECT BookName, Author, BookPrice FROM Book WHERE Book.Book_ID = ( SELECT Book_ID FROM Temp_Order WHERE Temp_Order.User_ID = 25 AND Temp_Order.OrderDate='3/24/2010' ) this is the date function i used. but it takes the time also. how to stop it. please help me SELECT Book_ID, BookName,Author,BookPrice FROM Book INNER JOIN FavCategory ON Book.Category_ID = FavCategory.Category_ID WHERE FavCategory.User_ID = " + useridlabel.Text + " AND OrderDate = **GETDATE()**

    Read the article

  • Selecting row in SSMS causes Entity Framework 4 to Fail

    - by Eric J.
    I have a simple Entity Framework 4 unit test that creates a new record, saves it, attempts to find it, then deletes it. All works great, unless... ... I open up SQL Server Management Studio while stopped at a breakpoint in the unit test and execute a SELECT statement that returns the row I just created (not SELECT FOR UPDATE, not WITH (updlock), no transaction, just a plain SELECT). If I do that before attempting to find the row I just created, I don't find the row. If I instead do that after finding the row but before deleting the row, I do find the row but get an OptimisticConcurrencyException. This is consistently repeatable. Unit Test: [TestMethod()] public void CreateFindDeleteActiveParticipantsTest() { // Setup this test Participant utPart = CreateUTParticipant(); ctx.Participants.AddObject(utPart); ctx.SaveChanges(); // External SELECT Point #1: // part is null // Find participant Participant part = ParticipantRepository.Find(UT_SURVEY_ID, UT_TOKEN); Assert.IsNotNull(part, "Expected to find a participant"); // External SELECT Point #2: // SaveChanges throws OptimisticConcurrencyException // Cleanup this test ctx.Participants.DeleteObject(utPart); ctx.SaveChanges(); }

    Read the article

  • What is the best way of inserting a datetime value using dynamic sql

    - by jaffa
    What is the best way of inserting a datetime value using a dynamic sql string, whilst at the same time being able to handle the possibility of the value being null? The current statement inserts into a table from a select statement built using a string. The datetime value is stored in a parameter and the parameter is used in the select. Like so: set @execsql = 'Insert into ( start_date ) SELECT ( ''' + CAST(start_date as VARCHAR) + ''' + ')'

    Read the article

  • How does Zend_Db_Table_Select work?

    - by jwhat
    I'm trying to figure out how to use Zend_Db_Table_Abstract correctly. I want to return just the name column from my query. Can you please explain what's wrong with the following code? class Model_DbTable_Foo extends Zend_Db_Table_Abstract { protected $_name = 'foo'; public function getFooById($id) { $select = $this->select(true)->columns('name')->where('id=' . $id); $row = $this->fetchRow($select); print_r($row->toArray()); } }

    Read the article

  • error in fill datagrid whit query

    - by Amir Tavakoli
    i have a data-gride-view and i add my query to this when write my query i catch this error: The schema returned by the new query differs from the base query and this my query: SELECT B.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsDep' AS TableName, B.SettingValue, B.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsDep AS B ON A.SettingKey = B.SettingKey UNION SELECT C.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsMachine' AS TableName, C.SettingValue, C.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsMachine AS C ON A.SettingKey = C.SettingKey UNION SELECT D.SettingKey, 'SysSettings' AS TableName, D.SettingValue, D.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettings AS D ON A.SettingKey = D.SettingKey help me to solve this, tnx

    Read the article

  • Reading Excel file with C# - Choose sheet

    - by Dänu
    Hey Guys I'm reading an excel file with C# and OleDB (12.0). There I have to specify the select statement with the name of the sheet I wish to read ([Sheet1$]). this.dataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM [Sheet1$]", connectionString); Is it possible to select the first sheet, no matter what name? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • With SQL can you use a sub-query in a WHERE LIKE clause?

    - by Jason
    I'm not even sure how to even phrase this as it sounds weird conceptually, but I'll give it a try. Basically I'm looking for a way to create a query that is essentially a WHERE IN LIKE SELECT statement. As an example, if I wanted to find all user records with a hotmail.com email address, I could do something like: SELECT UserEmail FROM Users WHERE (UserEmail LIKE '%hotmail.com') But what if I wanted to use a subquery as the matching criteria? Something like this: SELECT UserEmail FROM Users WHERE (UserEmail LIKE (SELECT '%'+ Domain FROM Domains)) Is that even possible? If so, what's the right syntax?

    Read the article

  • While Loop in TSQL with Sum totals

    - by RPS
    I have the following TSQL Statement, I am trying to figure out how I can keep getting the results (100 rows at a time), store them in a variable (as I will have to add the totals after each select) and continue to select in a while loop until no more records are found and then return the variable totals to the calling function. SELECT [OrderUser].OrderUserId, ISNULL(SUM(total.FileSize), 0), ISNULL(SUM(total.CompressedFileSize), 0) FROM ( SELECT DISTINCT TOP(100) ProductSize.OrderUserId, ProductSize.FileInfoId, CAST(ProductSize.FileSize AS BIGINT) AS FileSize, CAST(ProductSize.CompressedFileSize AS BIGINT) AS CompressedFileSize FROM ProductSize WITH (NOLOCK) INNER JOIN [Version] ON ProductSize.VersionId = [Version].VersionId ) AS total RIGHT OUTER JOIN [OrderUser] WITH (NOLOCK) ON total.OrderUserId = [OrderUser].OrderUserId WHERE NOT ([OrderUser].isCustomer = 1 AND [OrderUser].isEndOrderUser = 0 OR [OrderUser].isLocation = 1) AND [OrderUser].OrderUserId = 1 GROUP BY [OrderUser].OrderUserId

    Read the article

  • Is is faster to filter and get data or filter then get data ?

    - by remi bourgarel
    Hi I have this kind of request : SELECT myTable.ID, myTable.Adress, -- 20 more columns of all kind of type FROM myTable WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM myLink WHERE myLink.FID = myTable.ID and myLink.FID2 = 666) myLink has a lot of rows. Do you think it's faster to do like this : SELECT myLink.FID INTO @result FROM myLink WHERE myLink.FID2 = 666 UPDATE @result SET Adress = myTable.Adress, -- 20 more columns of all kind of type FROM myTable WHERE myTable.ID = @result.ID

    Read the article

  • Problem in using xpath with xslt having distint values

    - by AB
    I have XML like, <items> <item> <products> <product>laptop</product> <product>charger</product> <product>Cam</product> </products> </item> <item> <products> <product>laptop</product> <product>headphones</product> <product>Photoframe</product> </products> </item> <item> <products> <product>laptop</product> <product>charger</product> <product>Battery</product> </products> </item> </items> and I am using xslt on it //can't change xpath as getting it from somewhere else <xsl:param name="xparameter" select="items/item[products/product='laptop' and products/product='charger']"></xsl:param> <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:for-each select="$xparameter"> <xsl:for-each select="products/product[not(.=preceding::product)]"> <xsl:sort select="."></xsl:sort> <xsl:value-of select="." ></xsl:value-of>, </xsl:for-each> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> I want the output to be laptop charger cam Battery But I m not getting the result as I m expecting...distinct values is working fine ..something is getting wrong when I am adding that and claus

    Read the article

  • Why did the following linq to sql query generate a subquery?

    - by Xaisoft
    I did the following query: var list = from book in books where book.price > 50 select book; list = list.Take(50); I would expect the above to generate something like: SELECT top 50 id, title, price, author FROM Books WHERE price > 50 but it generates: SELECT [Limit1].[C1] as [C1] [Limit1].[id] as [Id], [Limit1].[title] as [title], [Limit1].[price] as [price], [Limit1].[author] FROM (SELECT TOP (50) [Extent1].[id] as as [Id], [Extent1].[title] as [title], [Extent1].[price] as [price], [Extent1].[author] as [author] FROM Books as [Extent1] WHERE [Extent1].[price] > 50 ) AS [Limit1] Why does the above linq query generate a subquery and where does the C1 come from?

    Read the article

  • PreparedStatement.setString() method without quotes

    - by Slavko
    I'm trying to use a PreparedStatement with code similar to this: SELECT * FROM ? WHERE name = ? Obviously, what happens when I use setString() to set the table and name field is this: SELECT * FROM 'my_table' WHERE name = 'whatever' and the query doesn't work. Is there a way to set the String without quotes so the line looks like this: SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE name = 'whatever' or should I just give it up and use the regular Statement instead (the arguments come from another part of the system, neither of those is entered by a user)?

    Read the article

  • Which MySql line is faster:

    - by Camran
    I have a classified_id variable which matches one document in a MySql table. I am currently fetching the information about that one record like this: SELECT * FROM table WHERE table.classified_id = $classified_id I wonder if there is a faster approach, for example like this: SELECT 1 FROM table WHERE table.classified_id = $classified_id Wont the last one only select 1 record, which is exactly what I need, so that it doesn't have to scan the entire table but instead stops searching for records after 1 is found? Or am I dreaming this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • What value should .net SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() return if no rows are affected?

    - by peacedog
    I have the following code: int result = -1; StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); SqlCommand cmd = MyConnection. sb.AppendLine("delete from Table1 where ID in"); sb.AppendLine("(select id from Table1 t1 where not exists(select * from Table2 t2 where t2.Table1ID = t1.ID))"); cmd.CommandText = sb.ToString(); result = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); _log.Info("StoredXMLDocument Records Deleted: " + result.ToString()); That SQL, in a more readable format, is: delete from Table1 where ID in (select id from Table1 t1 where not exists(select * from Table2 t2 where t2.Table1ID = t1.ID)) I know that the SQL, when executed directly in the database, deletes no rows. When this code runs, however, result gets a value of 1. I was expecting it to be 0. Am I missing something? Why is it 1?

    Read the article

  • Oracle - pl sql selecting from SYS_REFCURSOR

    - by Einstein
    I have a function that returns a SYS_REFCURSOR that has a single row but multiple columns. What I'm looking to do is to be able to have a SQL query that has nested sub-queries using the column values returned in the SYS_REFCURSOR. Alternative ideas such as types, etc would be appreciated. Code below is me writing on-the-fly and hasn't been validated for syntax. --Oracle function CREATE DummyFunction(dummyValue AS NUMBER) RETURN SYS_REFCURSOR IS RETURN_DATA SYS_REFCURSOR; BEGIN OPEN RETURN_DATA SELECT TO_CHAR(dummyValue) || 'A' AS ColumnA ,TO_CHAR(dummyValue) || 'B' AS ColumnB FROM DUAL; RETURN RETURN_DATA; END; --sample query with sub-queries; does not work SELECT SELECT ColumnA FROM DummyFunction(1) FROM DUAL AS ColumnA ,SELECT ColumnB FROM DummyFunction(1) FROM DUAL AS ColumnB FROM DUAL;

    Read the article

  • How to output items in Order in MySQL?

    - by RailsRor
    I have a column called "menu_order" which has no default value. When I select the contents of this column using the following select statement: SELECT * FROM categories ORDER BY menu_order ASC It lists the category items that have nothing as their menu order first and then the one's that have 1's and 2's and 3's. Is there any way to prevent SQL from take nothing to come before numbers when I am trying to list things in order? So for example, if I have: cat_name | menu_order ---------------------- Lunch | 1 Dinner | And I perform my query, the output should be: Lunch Dinner Not: Dinner Lunch

    Read the article

  • jquery load function problem

    - by andrew
    Hi, i have a select box like that <select name="sehirler_post" id="sehirler_post"> i am getting values via jquery. i know two different ways to get values. first one is : var sehirler_post = jQuery('select#sehirler_post').attr('value'); second one is: jQuery('#sehirler_post ').val() and finally here is my problem, i have something like this: jQuery("#okay").load("ajax_post_category.php?okay="+id+""); i would like to use selectbox value instead of id (okay="+id+"). so, i must change +id+ part with select box value. however i can not do it.. i tried to do like that: jQuery("#okay").load("ajax_post_category.php?okay="+jQuery('#sehirler_post').val()+""); it did not work. there must be a way, so i can use selectbox value instead of id in my load function. if anyone helps me, ill be so glad. regards

    Read the article

  • join codition in sqlserver

    - by Pallavi
    after applying join condition on two tables i want records which is maximum among records of left table my query SELECT a1.*, t.*, ( a1.trnratefrom - t.trnratefrom )AS minrate, ( a1.trnrateto - t.trnrateto ) AS maxrate FROM (SELECT a.srno, trndate, b.trnsrno, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnstate))) AS trnstate, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnarea))) AS trnarea, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnquality))) AS trnquality, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnlength))) AS trnlength, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(b.trnunit))) AS trnunit, b.trnratefrom, b.trnrateto, a.remark, entdate FROM mstprodrates a INNER JOIN trnprodrates b ON a.srno = b.srno)a1 INNER JOIN (SELECT c.srno, trndate, d.trnsrno, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnstate))) AS trnstate, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnarea))) AS trnarea, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnquality))) AS trnquality, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnlength))) AS trnlength, Upper(Rtrim(Ltrim(d.trnunit))) AS trnunit, d.trnratefrom, d.trnrateto, c.remark, entdate FROM mstprodrates c INNER JOIN trnprodrates d ON c.srno = d.srno) AS t ON a1.trnstate = t.trnstate AND a1.trnquality = t.trnquality AND a1.trnunit = t.trnunit AND a1.trnlength = t.trnlength AND a1.trnarea = t.trnarea AND a1.remark = t.remark WHERE t.srno = (SELECT MAX(srno) FROM a1 WHERE srno < a1.srno)

    Read the article

  • Passing arguments and conditions to model in codeigniter

    - by stormdrain
    I'm adding some models to a project, and was wondering if there is a "best practice" kind of approach to creating models: Does it make sense to create a function for each specific query? I was starting to do this, then had the idea of creating a generic function that I could pass parameters to. e.g: Instead of function getClients(){ return $this->db->query('SELECT client_id,last FROM Names ORDER BY id DESC'); } function getClientNames($clid){ return $this->db->query('SELECT * FROM Names WHERE client_id = '.$clid); } function getClientName($nameID){ return $this->db->query('SELECT * FROM Names WHERE id ='.$nameID); } } Something like function getNameData($args,$cond){ if($cond==''){ $q=$this->db->query('SELECT '.$args.' FROM Names'); return $q; }else{ $q=$this->db->query('SELECT '.$args.' FROM Names WHERE '.$cond); return $q; } } where I can pass the fields and conditions (if applicable) to the model. Is there a reason the latter example would be a bad idea? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • sql statement to access sql

    - by Mitch Albert
    SELECT eventID, eventRedacteur, eventEvenement, eventGenreId, eventDatum, eventLocatieId, eventLocatieNaam, eventPlaatsId, eventBijzonderheden, eventBezoekers, lokId, lokNaam, lokUrl, pltsId, (SELECT pltsNaam FROM tblAgendaPlaatsen WHERE pltsId=tblAgendaPunten.eventPlaatsId) AS eventPlaatsNaam, (SELECT genreNaam FROM tblAgendaGenre WHERE genreId=tblAgendaPunten.eventGenreId) AS eventGenre, lokadres, lokhuisnr FROM tblAgendaPunten LEFT JOIN tblAgendaLocaties ON eventLocatieId=tblAgendaLocaties.lokId i get a join not supported error. I also tryed to remake the sql in access, but no luck. Anyone can help?

    Read the article

  • Selecting previous and next row using sp

    - by davor
    I want to select previous and next row from table based on current id. I send current id to stored procedure and use this query: -- previous select top 1 id from table where id < @currentId order by id desc -- next select top 1 id from table where id < @currentId order by id asc The problem is when I send currentId which is the last id in the table and want to select next row. Then is nothing selected. Same problem for previous row, when I send currentId which is first id in table Is it possible to solve this in sql without additional queries?

    Read the article

  • Subquery vs Traditional join with WHERE clause?

    - by BradC
    When joining to a subset of a table, any reason to prefer one of these formats over the other? Subquery version: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN (SELECT * FROM Classification WHERE CustomerType = 'Standard') AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID vs the WHERE clause at the end: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN Classification AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps AS s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID WHERE cf.CustomerType = 'Standard' The WHERE clause at the end feels more "traditional", but the first is arguably more clear, especially as the joins get increasingly complex. Only other reason I can think of to prefer the second is that the "SELECT *" on the first might be returning columns that aren't used later (In this case, I'd probably only need to return cf.Code and Cf.SalesRepID)

    Read the article

  • SQL Math in Excel VBA

    - by Scott
    Excel seems to have a problem with doing math in SQL queries. SELECT ( SELECT sum(column) FROM table1 ) + ( SELECT sum(column) FROM table2 ) AS total This technique works completely fine in ASP and ASP.NET. Has anyone had success doing this in Excel VBA? (My database engine is SQL Server 2000.)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184  | Next Page >