Search Results

Search found 14016 results on 561 pages for 'mysql like'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 179/561 | < Previous Page | 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186  | Next Page >

  • how to avoid deadlock in mysql

    - by noam
    I have the following query (all tables are innoDB) INSERT INTO busy_machines(machine) SELECT machine FROM all_machines WHERE machine NOT IN (SELECT machine FROM busy_machines) and machine_name!='Main' LIMIT 1 Which causes a deadlock when I run it in threads, obviously because of the inner select, right? The error I get is: (1213, 'Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction') How can I avoid the deadlock? Is there a way to change to query to make it work, or do I need to do something else?

    Read the article

  • MySQL Join Comma Separated Field

    - by neeraj
    I have two tables. First Table is a batch table that contain comma separated student id in field "batch" batch -------------- id batch -------------- 1 1,2 2 3,4 Second Table is marks marks ---------------------- id studentid subject marks 1 1 English 50 2 2 English 40 3 3 English 70 4 1 Math 65 5 4 English 66 6 5 English 75 7 2 Math 55 How we can find those students of first batch id =1 who have scored more than 45 marks in English without using sub query. Problem i found to get this done using a single query is that we can not use IN as an association operator in JOIN statement What changes are required in below query to make it work? SELECT * FROM batch INNER JOIN marks ON marks.studentid IN(batch.batch) where batch.id = 1

    Read the article

  • MySQL Multiple Subquery on same table

    - by user1444980
    I have a table of the following structure ID | Amount | Bank (1 or 2) ---+--------+------ 1 | 100000 | 1 2 | 256415 | 2 3 | 142535 | 1 1 | 214561 | 2 2 | 123456 | 1 1 | 987654 | 2 I want a result like this (from the same table): ID | sum(Bank 1) | sum(Bank 2) ---+-------------+------------ 1 | 100000 | 1202215 2 | 123456 | 256415 3 | 142535 | 0 What will be the easiest query to achieve this?

    Read the article

  • MySQL Casting in C#

    - by user798080
    Okay, so I'm attempting to print out the contents of a table in a comma-separated file. using (OdbcCommand com = new OdbcCommand("SELECT * FROM pie_data WHERE Pie_ID = ?", con)) { com.Parameters.AddWithValue("", Request.Form["pie_id"]); com.ExecuteNonQuery(); using (OdbcDataReader reader = com.ExecuteReader()) { string finalstring = ""; while (reader.Read()) { finalstring = reader.GetString(9) + ","; for (int i = 0; i <= 8; i = i + 1) { finalstring = finalstring + reader.GetString(i) + ","; } } } Response.Write(finalstring); noredirect = 1; } My table layout is: CREATE TABLE `rent_data` ( `Pies` INT(10) UNSIGNED NOT NULL, `Name` VARCHAR(85) NOT NULL, `Email` VARCHAR(85) NOT NULL, `Pie_Rent` DATE NOT NULL, `Rent_To` DATE NOT NULL, `Returned_Date` DATE NULL DEFAULT NULL, `Place` VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL, `Purpose` MEDIUMTEXT NOT NULL, `Comments` MEDIUMTEXT NULL, `Pie_ID` SMALLINT(5) UNSIGNED ZEROFILL NOT NULL, INDEX `Pie_ID` (`Equipment_ID`) ) The error I'm getting is this: Exception Details: System.InvalidCastException: Unable to cast object of type 'System.Int64' to type 'System.String'. On the line: finalstring = finalstring + reader.GetString(i) + ",";

    Read the article

  • mysql data being inserted twice via php

    - by Jascha
    I can't for the life of me figure out why this function is causing multiple entries into my database table... When I run the function I end up with two records stacked on top of each one second apart here is the function: function generate_signup_token(){ $connection = new DB_Connect(); // <--- my database connection class $ip = mysql_real_escape_string($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']); $sign_up_token = uniqid(mt_rand(), true); $_SESSION['signup_token'] = $sign_up_token; $sign_up_token = mysql_real_escape_string($sign_up_token); $query = "INSERT INTO `token_manager` (`ip_address`, `signup_token`) VALUES ('$ip', '$sign_up_token')"; mysql_query($query); } generate_signup_token();

    Read the article

  • MySQL join headaches, please help!

    - by Andrew Heath
    Ok, I've hit the wall here and need some help. Sample tables are as follows: SCENARIO_NATIONS [scenID] [side] [nation] scen001 1 Germany scen001 2 Britain scen001 2 Canada SCENARIO_NEEDUNITS [scenID] [unitID] scen001 0001 scen001 0003 scen001 0107 scen001 0258 scen001 0759 UNIT_BASIC_DATA [unitID] [nation] [name] 0001 Germany Mortars 0003 Germany Infantry 0107 Britain Lt 0258 Britain Infantry 0759 Canada Kilted Yaksmen Goal: given a scenID, pull a list of units from the database sorted by side, nation, name. I can do everything except for the side inclusion with: SELECT scenario_needunits.scenID, unit_basic_data.nation, unit_basic_data.name FROM scenario_needunits LEFT OUTER JOIN unit_basic_data ON scenario_needunits.unitID=unit_basic_data.unitID WHERE scenario_needunits.scenID='scen001' ORDER BY unit_basic_data.nation ASC, unit_basic_data.name ASC I've tried just dropping the SCENARIO_NATIONS table in as a LEFT OUTER JOIN on scenID but what ends up happening is that ALL units come back with a side of 1 because that's always the first side listed for the scenID in the SCENARIO_NATIONS table. Conceptually, what I think needs to happen is SCENARIO_NATIONS must be joined to both the scenID (to restrict it to just that scenario) and to each unit's nation but I don't have any idea how to do that and my Google-fu is inadequate. :-/

    Read the article

  • Help with MySQL database structure - user notification system

    - by Simon
    Hi, I'd like to send global notifications to my users (1000+ users) and allow them to close the notification box once they have read the message. Basically I may send one notification per week globally ie/ each user get the same message and they are not personal in nature. What is the best way to achieve this? Create 2 tables: **tb_messages** message_id massage_title message_content **tb_read_messages** user_id message_id is-read That way i can just show each user the current notifications that are not read? select * from tb_read_messages WHERE user_id = $user_id AND is-read = no OR is there a more efficient way? Thanks!!!

    Read the article

  • Failed to execute stored procedure from the JDBC code using mysql connection

    - by Purushotham
    Hi, I have one database. I executed a stored procedure on it. I wrote some JDBC code to connect to this database. When I am calling this stored procedure from my JDBC code it is throwing SQLException. One interesting thing I found is that I have one user other than root user. This user has all the privileges to this database where the stored procedure is present. When I use the root user I am able to call the stored procedure successfully. But with the other user I am getting SQLexception. I am not able to find why it happens like this. For sure I want this user(other than root) has to call this stored procedure successfully. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • MySQL count problem

    - by Skuja
    I have 3 tables users(id,name),groups(id,name) and users_groups(user_id,group_id). users and groups have many to many relationship, so the third one is for storing users and groups relations. I would like to select all the data from groups with user count in each group. So far I came up with this: SELECT groups.*, COUNT(users_groups.user_id) AS user_count FROM groups LEFT JOIN users_groups ON users_groups.group_id = groups.id The problem is that query result is not returning any of groups which has no users (users_groups doesnt have any records with group_id of those groups). How should I create my query to select all the groups and they user count, or user count as 0 if there are no users for that group?

    Read the article

  • Partitioning a table in mysql after creation

    - by erik
    I have a table with a bunch of data already in it. I know how to create a partitioned table or alter an already existing partitioned table, but can I add partitions to a table after it has been created, has data in it, without losing the data? The other option is to dump all the data, recreate the table with the partitions and then insert it all back it. Is that the only way? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How do I write this GROUP BY in mysql UNION query

    - by user1652368
    Trying to group the results of two queries together. When I run this query: SELECT pr_id, pr_sbtcode, pr_sdesc, od_quantity, od_amount FROM ( SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`, SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `bgOrderMain` JOIN `bgOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `bgOrderMain`.`or_id` = `bgOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` UNION SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`,SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `npOrderMain` JOIN `npOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `npOrderMain`.`or_id` = `npOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` ) TEMPTABLE3; it produces this result +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | pr_id | pr_sbtcode | pr_sdesc | od_quantity | od_amount +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 5 | 125 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 4 | 100 | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 5 | 125 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 2 | 50 +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+</pre> What I want to get a result that combines those into 2 lines: +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | pr_id | pr_sbtcode | pr_sdesc | od_quantity | od_amount +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 10 | 250 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 6 | 150 +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+</pre> So I added GROUP BY pr_id to the end of the query: SELECT pr_id, pr_sbtcode, pr_sdesc, od_quantity, od_amount FROM ( SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`, SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `bgOrderMain` JOIN `bgOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `bgOrderMain`.`or_id` = `bgOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` UNION SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`,SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `npOrderMain` JOIN `npOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `npOrderMain`.`or_id` = `npOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` ) TEMPTABLE3 GROUP BY pr_id; But that just gives me this: +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | pr_id | pr_sbtcode | pr_sdesc | od_quantity | od_amount +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 5 | 125 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 4 | 100 +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ What am I missing here??

    Read the article

  • select mysql data using MAX

    - by JPro
    I have a testdata like this: DROP TABLE SELECT_PASS; CREATE TABLE SELECT_PASS(ID INT(20),TESTCASE VARCHAR(20),RESULT VARCHAR(20)); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(1,"TC1","PASS"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(2,"TC2","PASS"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(3,"TC3","INCONC"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(4,"TC1","FAIL"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(5,"TC21","FAIL"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(6,"TC4","PASS"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(7,"TC3","PASS"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(8,"TC2","PASS"); INSERT INTO SELECT_PASS VALUES(9,"TC1","TIMEOUT"); SELECT TESTCASE, MAX(RESULT) FROM SELECT_PASS GROUP BY TESTCASE; The resultset I get is : TC1 TIMEOUT TC2 PASS TC21 FAIL TC3 PASS TC4 PASS Basically I want to see those testcases which never passed. Any way to do it? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Can't connect to MySQL database hosted in CloudBees

    - by user3692698
    I have a free CloudBees account and created a free ClearDB database using their wizards. My trouble is when I use their connection information (whether I try to connect from my Java app, or an outside tool - SQLyog to be exact) I take the error: Access denied for user 'b51dbc5757d79f'@'%' to database 'mywiki. The username provided by CloudBees does not contain those extra characters that the error message is displaying which seems like it would be a problem, but I'm not sure there is anything I can do about that since everything is configured for me. The username I am given is: b51dbc5757d79f - which I can delete and rebuild after sharing here :)

    Read the article

  • MySQL - Selecting the top occurring entries

    - by RC
    Hi, Should be a simple one. Database is mydb. One of the columns is mydata. What SELECT query do I need in order to select the top 3 occurring results from mydata, but sorted alphabetically? For example, if my data is this: mydata ====== kilo (x 1 occurrence) lima (x 9 occurrences) golf (x 5 occurrences) echo (x 9 occurrences) zulu (x 8 occurrences) How do I get it to return "echo, lima, zulu", which are the top three frequently occurring entries sorted alphabetically? Thanks! EDIT: Just to add, they need to be distinct entries. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • MySQL Update query with left join and group by

    - by Rob
    I am trying to create an update query and making little progress in getting the right syntax. The following query is working: SELECT t.Index1, t.Index2, COUNT( m.EventType ) FROM Table t LEFT JOIN MEvents m ON (m.Index1 = t.Index1 AND m.Index2 = t.Index2 AND (m.EventType = 'A' OR m.EventType = 'B') ) WHERE (t.SpecialEventCount IS NULL) GROUP BY t.Index1, t.Index2 It creates a list of triplets Index1,Index2,EventCounts. It only does this for case where t.SpecialEventCount is NULL. The update query I am trying to write should set this SpecialEventCount to that count, i.e. COUNT(m.EventType) in the query above. This number could be 0 or any positive number (hence the left join). Index1 and Index2 together are unique in Table t and they are used to identify events in MEvent. How do I have to modify the select query to become an update query? I.e. something like UPDATE Table SET SpecialEventCount=COUNT(m.EventType)..... but I am confused what to put where and have failed with numerous different guesses.

    Read the article

  • MySQL - mysqldump --routines to only export 1 stored procedure (by name) and not every routine

    - by Joe Stein
    So we have a lot of routines that come out from exporting. We often need to get these out in CLI, make changes and bring them back in. Yes some of these are managed by different folks and a better change control is required but for now this is the situation. If I do mysqldump --routines --no-create-info --no-data --no-create-db then great I have 200 functions I need to go through a file to find just the one or set I want. Is there anyway to mysqldump routines that I want like there is for tables???

    Read the article

  • MySQL left outer join is slow

    - by Ryan Doherty
    Hi, hoping to get some help with this query, I've worked at it for a while now and can't get it any faster: SELECT date, count(id) as 'visits' FROM dates LEFT OUTER JOIN visits ON (dates.date = DATE(visits.start) and account_id = 40 ) WHERE date >= '2010-12-13' AND date <= '2011-1-13' GROUP BY date ORDER BY date ASC That query takes about 8 seconds to run. I've added indexes on dates.date, visits.start, visits.account_id and visits.start+visits.account_id and can't get it to run any faster. Table structure (only showing relevant columns in visit table): create table visits ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `account_id` int(11) NOT NULL, `start` DATETIME NOT NULL, `end` DATETIME NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; CREATE TABLE `dates` ( `date` date NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`date`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1; dates table contains all days from 2010-1-1 to 2020-1-1 (~3k rows). visits table contains about 400k rows dating from 2010-6-1 to yesterday. I'm using the date table so the join will return 0 visits for days there were no visits. Results I want for reference: +------------+--------+ | date | visits | +------------+--------+ | 2010-12-13 | 301 | | 2010-12-14 | 356 | | 2010-12-15 | 423 | | 2010-12-16 | 332 | | 2010-12-17 | 346 | | 2010-12-18 | 226 | | 2010-12-19 | 213 | | 2010-12-20 | 311 | | 2010-12-21 | 273 | | 2010-12-22 | 286 | | 2010-12-23 | 241 | | 2010-12-24 | 149 | | 2010-12-25 | 102 | | 2010-12-26 | 174 | | 2010-12-27 | 258 | | 2010-12-28 | 348 | | 2010-12-29 | 392 | | 2010-12-30 | 395 | | 2010-12-31 | 278 | | 2011-01-01 | 241 | | 2011-01-02 | 295 | | 2011-01-03 | 369 | | 2011-01-04 | 438 | | 2011-01-05 | 393 | | 2011-01-06 | 368 | | 2011-01-07 | 435 | | 2011-01-08 | 313 | | 2011-01-09 | 250 | | 2011-01-10 | 345 | | 2011-01-11 | 387 | | 2011-01-12 | 0 | | 2011-01-13 | 0 | +------------+--------+ Thanks in advance for any help!

    Read the article

  • Filtering out unique rows in MySQL

    - by jpatokal
    So I've got a large amount of SQL data that looks basically like this: user | src | dst 1 | 1 | 1 1 | 1 | 1 1 | 1 | 2 1 | 1 | 2 2 | 1 | 1 2 | 1 | 3 I want to filter out pairs of (src,dst) that are unique to one user (even if that user has duplicates), leaving behind only those pairs belonging to more than one user: user | src | dst 1 | 1 | 1 1 | 1 | 1 2 | 1 | 1 In other words, pair (1,2) is unique to user 1 and pair (1,3) to user 2, so they're dropped, leaving behind only all instances of pair (1,1). Any ideas? The answers to the question below can find the non-unique pairs, but my SQL-fu doesn't suffice to handle the complication of requiring that they belong to multiple users as well. [SQL question] How to select non "unique" rows

    Read the article

  • Adding with PHP to a MySQL database

    - by shinjuo
    I am pretty new to PHP and I am trying to make an inventory database. I have been trying to make it so that a user can enter a card ID and then amount the want to add to the inventory and have it update the inventory. For example someone could type in test and 2342 and it would update test. Here is what I have been trying with no success: add.html <body> <form action="add.php" method="post"> Card ID: <input type="text" name="CardID" /> Amount to Add: <input type="text" name="Add" /> <input type="submit" /> </form> </body> </html> add.php <?php $link = mysql_connect('tulsadir.ipowermysql.com', 'cbouwkamp', '!starman1'); if (!$link){ die('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); } mysql_select_db("tdm_inventory", $link); $add = $_POST[Add] mysql_query("UPDATE cardLists SET AmountLeft = '$add' WHERE cardID = 'Test'"); echo "test successful"; mysql_close($link); ?>

    Read the article

  • block write access to table from an application in mysql

    - by hoberion
    Hello, We have a CMS plugin that writes statistics to 1 table, this creates performance issues on the entire platform. We decided to use another statistics plugin which can connect to a different database server (the first plugin couldn't!) however we need parts of the first plugin. I want to lock the statistics table to prevent misusage (not allowed to drop it by the developer) So I was wondering if a lock table could do this or if I can implement some sort of read only table

    Read the article

  • MYSQL - SImple database design

    - by sequelDesigner
    Hello guys, I would like to develop a system, where user will get the data dynamically(what I mean dynamic is, without reloading pages, using AJAX.. but well, it does not matter much). My situation is like this. I have this table, I called it "player", in this player table, I will store the player information like, player name, level, experience etc. Each player can have different clothes, start from tops(shirts), bottoms, shoes, and hairstyle, and each player can have more than 1 tops, bottoms, shoes etc. What I am hesitated or not very sure about is, how do you normally store the data? My current design is like this: Player Table =========================================================================================== id | name | (others player's info) | wearing | tops | bottoms =========================================================================================== 1 | player1 | | top=1;bottom=2;shoes=5;hair=8 | 1,2,3| 7,2,3 Tops Table ===================== id | name | etc... ===================== 1 | t-shirt | ... I am not sure if this design is good. If you are the database designer, how would you design the database? Or how you will store them? Please advise. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Strange use of the index in Mysql

    - by user309067
    explain SELECT feed_objects.* FROM feed_objects WHERE (feed_objects.feed_id IN (165,160,159,158,157,153,152,151,150,149,148,147,129,128,127,126,125,124,122,121,120,119,118,117,116,115,114,113,111,110)) ; +----+-------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | feed_objects | ALL | by_feed_id | NULL | NULL | NULL | 188 | Using where | +----+-------------+--------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ Not used index 'by_feed_id' But when I point less than the values in the "WHERE" - everything is working right explain SELECT feed_objects.* FROM feed_objects WHERE (feed_objects.feed_id IN (165,160,159,158,157,153,152,151,150,149,148,147,129,128,127,125,124)) ; +----+-------------+--------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+--------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | feed_objects | range | by_feed_id | by_feed_id | 9 | NULL | 18 | Using where | +----+-------------+--------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+------+-------------+ Used index 'by_feed_id' What is the problem?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186  | Next Page >