Is there any Security software recommendation for Windows Server 2003 as a Web Application/Website server?
Or any particular settings I should adjust before making a website to be Live.
Hi, I live in Israel and I bought Windows 7 Professional in Hebrew. I'd like to switch the language to English.
In Control Panel - Region and Language I don't have any options to switch the display language to English because only Hebrew is installed. In Windows Update, there are no language updates. I have waited three days, and still no language update.
Any Ideas?
Thank you.
I've got a Flip Mino HD and am looking for a free utility that will convert the default mp4 video format into something that is Windows Movie Maker (Live or Standard) friendly.
What do you guys recommend?
I'm trying to do Remote Administration of IIS in C#.NET using System.Web.Administration tools. Everything works fine on a test server (windows 2008), however when I try using our live server (windows 2003) it fails giving the message:
System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException : Not enough storage is available to process this command. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070008)
The server itself has plenty of memory free, so I believe this is some kind of memory limit with the RPC itself.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890425
Is there any way around this?
I was using Firefox 3.5 when this happened.
I tried the obvious workarounds: Upgrade to 3.6. Downgrade to 3.0. None worked.
I'm using Windows Vista 64-bit.
The only extensions installed are Lori, Roboform, Google Toolbar, Live HTTP Headers, Skype, and Yahoo Toolbar -- all of which I have used for a very long time with no problems.
I have Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) on a G4 Powerbook and a camcorder with a firewire device. It doesn't have iMovie, which is now part of the separate iLife Suite and requires an Intel Mac.
Anyway, Image Capture does not recognize the firewire video feed as an image capture device. What software would give me the simplest "capture this frame from live firewire video feed to image" functionality.
As the title reads, I'm about to download and install URL Rewrite Go Live extension on my Windows Server 2008 R2 dedicated server, and I need to find out which version of URL Rewrite I should be downloading, x64 or x86.
The information that came with the server when I started to rent it said it was 64-bit but when I look at my C: directory I have two Program Files directories, one titled "Program Files" and the other "Program Files (86)" - so this has confused me somewhat.
Can anybody suggest how to find this out?
I created a gmail account ages ago whilst living in the UK where google has trademark problem with gmail (similar to budweiser v budvar dispute)
Now I no longer live in the uk, how can I change the address from being
[email protected]
to simply
[email protected]
I've changed the 'reply address' to be gmail, and it works fine, but it's still annoying.
I installed latest Ubuntu on a flash drive. Was ready to install clonezilla with apt-get install clonezilla but that's not the way to do it?
I prefer a physical install to a live one because I then have a chance to load specialized ntfs drivers for instance, should there be a need.
How can I do this? Thank you!
I'm facing error on Windows XP Start, KEYBOARD not work and can't choose Start windows normally.
After wait 30 seconds, windows not start. I'm test with Windows Live CD and keyboard work well. How can i fix?
I'm facing error on Windows XP Start, KEYBOARD not work and can't choose Start windows normally.
After wait 30 seconds, windows not start. I'm test with Windows Live CD and keyboard work well. How can i fix?
I have an icon on my desktop for a website called QUAKE LIVE and I use Google Chrome as my default browser. The website isn't compatible with Google Chrome, but it with Mozilla Firefox. Is there any way to edit the properties of the icon to open with Firefox instead of Chrome?
We live in a place where we have a slow internet connection and get charged per MB. We have unlimited access to email though. Is there an easy way for somebody to send us the contents of a web page (news article) they are on other than copying and pasting the text.
Thanks,
Paul
I am trying to boot BAMT a Debian flavor via USB on a brand new Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 motherboard. I tried various flash drive and various OS. I never had this problem with ASUS and MSI. The problem is from Gigabyte hardware.
I found that my BIOS is very strict about MBR compatibility. Now I can boot in DOS mode. The flash drive need to be formated as a Win98 Startup disk using HP USB disk storage format tool. Unetbootin menu is booting from USB but won't install BAMT.
If I use Windows or Linux diskimager the working MBR is deleted. I tried converting BAMT .img to .iso and it is not booting with Unetbootin.
Is it possible to boot BAMT(Debian Linux) from a Win98 DOS command prompt? Maybe there is a way to burn the image and keep the working MBR?
If the working MBR is deleted, the flash drive is not recognized at all by the BIOS.
This is the info I found that got me booting for the first time in DOS:
GB's BIOS will only boot USBs formatted to FAT-32, conforming to normal MBR
bootloader. I've seen this before, and surmised that the 'stick-maker' was
formatting in ReiserFile, or one of the EXT 'flavors', but no one ever followed
up to confirm or deny... Also, if it's putting the bootloader into its own
partition - won't work!
In the BIOS, on the "Integrated Peripherals" page, the "USB Storage Function"
item must be enabled (which should be the default) to allow USB booting...
I've put a little work into a 'GB USB booting tutorial', and frankly, I'd just
go ahead and finish it up for you, but I really don't want to reboot the several
times it will take me to 'firm up' procedural details, and take the BIOS/boot
pictures for the post - just noticed VAIL finally went 'public beta', so will be
downloading for likely twenty-six hours or so There's likely enough there to
test a 'raw DOS boot', just to see if your hardware (especially the USB stick
itself) will do it...
Some post later:
Fixed. Here is a brief summary. Since my ubuntu live usb sticks (2gb kingston
and 8gb sandisk sd/usb reader - fat32, created in ubuntu 10.04) would not boot
this board even though they would boot my ga-ep45-ud3p, I decided to try
bilbat's suggestion with the HP usb boot program. I created the win98 boot disk
on the kingston 2gb stick without reformatting. It booted right up. Next, I used
windows version of unetbootin to write the ubuntu live cd to the kingston disk.
This fired right up and completed the install. Everything seems to be in good
order now.
Unfortunately I can boot in DOS mode but can't boot BAMT.
I am settings up a lab and wanted to be sure the following makes sense\is possible:
One server running vsphere with two fiber HBAs
2 Windows 2012 Hyper-V VMs each bound to an HBA
I'm using vsphere because it supports nested visualization, but I'm really setting up this lab to test out hyper-v and live migrations.
Will I easily be able to bind each VM to a physical HBA on the host or are there any caveats I should know about?
Hey, I have a bluetooth "headset" (it's more like a speaker with a microphone on it, but it registers as a headset) and I want to play music through it. I also want to play the same music through the "normal" speakers on the laptop. Is this possible?
If so, is it possible to play two different streams on each speaker? Say if I wanted to DJ a party or something, I'd want to hear the upcoming song and mix it before sending it live.
I'm trying to learn about permissions on linux webserver with apache.
Some clues to the system:
The server I have to play around with is Fedora based. Apache runs as apache:apache. To allow for e.g. php to write to a file the file needs to be chmod 777. 755 is not sufficiant.
What I'm wondering is basically how set up permissions like they should be on e.g. a "shared web host".
My main problem is that if I set a permission so that one user cannot access anothers home folder, then apache can't read from the public_html folder either.
To keep the users out I need to set chmod 700. But to let apache to read I need to have at least execute on world, so a 701 basically works, but won't let some users in.
So I'm really stuck on what to do. Have been concidering adding the apache user to the frous grours below to avoid having to add the world execute flag, but is that a bad thing? Should it be the other way around, the users in the groups below should also be in the apache group?
I was aiming at having 4 groups:
1. webapp
same as dev_int, but is the only one that can go inside the webapp/live folder to e.g. do an update from the repo.
2. dev_int
can read,write and execute everything in the "web root", including the two below, but nothing outside of the web root
3. dev_ext
can read write and execute in all client folders, but cannot access anything outside of the webapp root
4. clientsBasic ftp accounts. Has a home folder with a public_html, but cannot access any other home folders
An example of folder structure:
webroot no users in the aforementioned groups can go outside of here
some_project :dev_int only
webapp
live :webapp only
staging :dev_int and :dev_ext
clients :dev_int and :dev_ext
client_1 :dev_int, :dev_ext and client1:clients
public_html
dev
developer_1 developer_1:dev_int OR :dev_ext
public_html
How do you replace the Passenger Application failed to load error messages. They are lovely, but I'd rather not display them when we move our application to production. It'd be better to just show them on the dev box and maintenance page on the live site.
For clarification, this is the call stack page passenger displays when your rails app fails to load.
I'd rather not modify the passenger template files directly.
Passenger doesn't seem to be respecting:
ErrorDocument 500 /500.html
Does anyone know if a VMware Fusion virtual machine of Windows 7 would run better on a class 6 SDHC card than it does sharing the disk with Mac OS? Or if a single SSD drive would do better? I like to live in the Mac world for day-to-day things, but I also have a complete development environment set up in Windows 7.
Where can I get MICROSOFT WINDOWS PEER - TO - PEER NETWORKING speed characteristics?
I need to know if and what speed advantages you get with it over net.tcp and other ws-* bindings and if it is faster than flash 10.1 p2p and classic bittorrent p2p?
Is it good for live video broadcasting?
Has any one seen any reserches on this field?
More than anything, I'm just curious to know if this is even possible, since Plan 9 isn't in the list of GuestOSes on the VirtualBox website.
However, if someone out there has got it working, my specific question: Whenever I try to boot Plan9, either as a live cd or to install inside of VirtualBox, once the GUI loads all I get is a screen of garbage. I think I've tried just about every graphics driver combination at startup - specifically, even 640x480x8 in VESA mode didn't work.
Any suggestions as to how I can load it?
Hi, we have an internal test-server that uses real, live mail addresses to send out status mails sometimes. We don't want these mails to end up with our users but for different reasons we can't use a catch_all solution and we only have the one available mail server. What we need is a way to forward incoming mail from any domain not specified in relay_domains to a specified mailbox.
I'm going to be live blogging from a event and expect huge spike in traffic.
im currently using apache with modphp and it died last year under traffic
Don't want it to happen again.
I'm thinking of setting up a separate VPS for this blog running on worpdress
what should i install ? apache . lighttpd or nginx ?
which will perform the best under heavy load ?
content will be very dynamic - AJAX updates
I live in a country that enjoys manipulating DNS entries for fun and profit. For various reasons, I cannot surf with a VPN running 100% of the time. Because some sites are only blocked via DNS spoofing, it would be very handy if I could run a local DNS server that I could update on command during active VPN sessions.
Is this granularity possible on Win7? Most of the DNS server related posts on SU are regarding the more config-friendly Linux platforms...
Hi all!
I have the following HTML/PHP page:
<?php
if(empty($_SERVER['CONTENT_TYPE'])) {
$type = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
$_SERVER['CONTENT_TYPE'] = $type;
}
echo "<pre>";
var_dump($_POST);
var_dump(file_get_contents("php://input"));
echo "</pre>";
?>
<form method="post" action="test.php">
<input type="text" name="test[1]" />
<input type="text" name="test[2]" />
<input type="text" name="test[3]" />
<input type="submit" name="action" value="Go" />
</form>
As you can see, the form will submit and the expected output is a POST array with one array in it containing the filled in values and one entry "action" with the value "Go" (the button). However, no matter what values I enter in the fields; the result is always:
array(2) {
["test"]=>
string(0) ""
["action"]=>
string(2) "Go"
}
string(16) "test=&action=Go&"
Somehow, the array named test is emptied, the "action" variable does make it through.
I've used the Live HTTP Headers extension for Firefox to check whether the POST fields get submitted, and they do. The relevant information from Live HTTP Headers (with a, b and c filled in as values in the textboxes):
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 51
test%5B1%5D=a&test%5B2%5D=b&test%5B3%5D=c&action=Go
Does anybody have any idea as to why this is happening? I'm freaking out on this one, it has cost me so much time already...
EDIT: We've tried this on different servers, on Windows boxes it does work, on the Ubuntu server with PHP version 5.2.4 (with Suhosin), it doesn't. It even works on a different server, also with Ubuntu and the same PHP version, also with Suhosin installed.