Search Results

Search found 45129 results on 1806 pages for 'public key'.

Page 241/1806 | < Previous Page | 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248  | Next Page >

  • Can you explicitly set a structure layout/alignment in C++ as you can in C#?

    - by Gary Willoughby
    In C# you have nice alignment attributes such as this: [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)] public struct Message { [FieldOffset(0)] public int a; [FieldOffset(4)] public short b; [FieldOffset(6)] public int c; [FieldOffset(22)] //Leave some empty space just for the heck of it. public DateTime dt; } Which gives you fine control on how you need your structure to be layed out in memory. Is there such a thing in standard C++?

    Read the article

  • Asp.NET MVC View with different objects

    - by user195910
    If i have a controller action "Create" that returns a view with the following as the Model type: public class PaymentModel { public Model.SummaryInformation SummaryInformation; public Model.CardDetail CardDetail; } If there is a button on this view that POST's to an action "New" and I want that action to recieve a different object e.g. public class PaymentNewModel { public Model.CardDetail CardDetail; } Is this possible? I do not want to use the same Model when the view is rendered to the Model that is POSTed

    Read the article

  • Selecting by ID in Castle ActiveRecord

    - by ripper234
    How can I write a criteria to return all Orders that belong to a specific User? public class User { [PrimaryKey] public virtual int Id { get; set; } } public class Order { [PrimaryKey] public virtual int Id { get; set; } [BelongsTo("UserId")] public virtual User User { get; set; } } return ActiveRecordMediator<Order>.FindAll( // What criteria should I write here ? );

    Read the article

  • C# Keyboard Input (Beginner Help)

    - by ThickBook
    I am trying to ask user "enter any key and when that key is pressed it shows that "You Pressed "Key". Can you help what's wrong in this code? This is what I have written using System; class Program { public static void Main(string[] args) { Console.Write("Enter any Key: "); char name = Console.Read(); Console.WriteLine("You pressed {0}", name); } }

    Read the article

  • Change|Assign parent for the Model instance on Google App Engine Datastore

    - by Vladimir Prudnikov
    Is it possible to change or assign new parent to the Model instance that already in datastore? For example I need something like this task = db.get(db.Key(task_key)) project = db.get(db.Key(project_key)) task.parent = project task.put() but it doesn't works this way because task.parent is built-in method. I was thinking about creating a new Key instance for the task but there is no way to change key as well. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • How solve consumer/producer task using semaphores

    - by user1074896
    I have SimpleProducerConsumer class that illustrate consumer/producer problem (I am not sure that it's correct). public class SimpleProducerConsumer { private Stack<Object> stack = new Stack<Object>(); private static final int STACK_MAX_SIZE = 10; public static void main(String[] args) { SimpleProducerConsumer pc = new SimpleProducerConsumer(); new Thread(pc.new Producer(), "p1").start(); new Thread(pc.new Producer(), "p2").start(); new Thread(pc.new Consumer(), "c1").start(); new Thread(pc.new Consumer(), "c2").start(); new Thread(pc.new Consumer(), "c3").start(); } public synchronized void push(Object d) { while (stack.size() >= STACK_MAX_SIZE) try { wait(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } stack.push(new Object()); System.out.println("push " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " " + stack.size()); notify(); } public synchronized Object pop() { while (stack.size() == 0) try { wait(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } try { Thread.sleep(50); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } stack.pop(); System.out.println("pop " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " " + stack.size()); notify(); return null; } class Consumer implements Runnable { @Override public void run() { while (true) { pop(); } } } class Producer implements Runnable { @Override public void run() { while (true) { push(new Object()); } } } } I found simple realization of semaphore(here:http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/concurrency/guardmeth.html I know that there is concurrency package) How I need to change code to exchange java objects monitors to my custom semaphore. (To illustrate C/P problem using semaphores) Semaphore: class Semaphore { private int counter; public Semaphore() { this(0); } public Semaphore(int i) { if (i < 0) throw new IllegalArgumentException(i + " < 0"); counter = i; } public synchronized void release() { if (counter == 0) { notify(); } counter++; } public synchronized void acquire() throws InterruptedException { while (counter == 0) { wait(); } counter--; } }

    Read the article

  • Dynamic swappable Data Access Layer

    - by Andy
    I'm writing a data driven WPF client. The client will typically pull data from a WCF service, which queries a SQL db, but I'd like the option to pull the data directly from SQL or other arbitrary data sources. I've come up with this design and would like to hear your opinion on whether it is the best design. First, we have some data object we'd like to extract from SQL. // The Data Object with a single property public class Customer { private string m_Name = string.Empty; public string Name { get { return m_Name; } set { m_Name = value;} } } Then I plan on using an interface which all data access layers should implement. Suppose one could also use an abstract class. Thoughts? // The interface with a single method interface ICustomerFacade { List<Customer> GetAll(); } One can create a SQL implementation. // Sql Implementation public class SqlCustomrFacade : ICustomerFacade { public List<Customer> GetAll() { // Query SQL db and return something useful // ... return new List<Customer>(); } } We can also create a WCF implementation. The problem with WCF is is that it doesn't use the same data object. It creates its own local version, so we would have to copy the details over somehow. I suppose one could use reflection to copy the values of similar fields across. Thoughts? // Wcf Implementation public class WcfCustomrFacade : ICustomerFacade { public List<Customer> GetAll() { // Get date from the Wcf Service (not defined here) List<WcfService.Customer> wcfCustomers = wcfService.GetAllCustomers(); // The list we're going to return List<Customer> customers = new List<Customer>(); // This is horrible foreach(WcfService.Customer wcfCustomer in wcfCustomers) { Customer customer = new Customer(); customer.Name = wcfCustomer.Name; customers.Add(customer); } return customers; } } I also plan on using a factory to decide which facade to use. // Factory pattern public class FacadeFactory() { public static ICustomerFacade CreateCustomerFacade() { // Determine the facade to use if (ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["DAL"] == "Sql") return new SqlCustomrFacade(); else return new WcfCustomrFacade(); } } This is how the DAL would typically be used. // Test application public class MyApp { public static void Main() { ICustomerFacade cf = FacadeFactory.CreateCustomerFacade(); cf.GetAll(); } } I appreciate your thoughts and time.

    Read the article

  • Foreign Keys in SQLITE in the Google Gears framework

    - by Maxim Gershkovich
    Hi all, Could someone please tell me why the following foreign key constraint (although executes fine) is not enforced by SQLITE? Could someone pleasse provide an example of how I can go about enforcing the relationship? CREATE TABLE User (UserID TEXT Unique NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, FirstName TEXT NOT NULL, LastName TEXT NOT NULL, Username TEXT NOT NULL, Password TEXT NOT NULL, Email TEXT NOT NULL, SignupDate TEXT NOT NULL) CREATE TABLE Category (CategoryID TEXT Unique NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, UserID TEXT, FOREIGN KEY(UserID) REFERENCES User(UserID))

    Read the article

  • Adding keys to superglobals in php

    - by gautam kumar
    Is there any way by which I can add keys to superglobals in php without defining the corresponding values to those key? For example: $_SESSION['key']='set';//key` automatically gets defined. But I want to do something like this add_key($_SESSION,'key')//key is added to $_SESSION array. Is it possible?

    Read the article

  • How to sort & Group in Android?

    - by crickpatel0024
    I have ArrayList and I want to sort and group all data by header in Android. How it is possible in Android? please help me.below me from owner And set header Me And Joe Manager From owner And set Header in listview. How to do that in Android? My code in below:: public class Request extends Activity { private String assosiatetoken; private ArrayList<All_Request_data_dto> list = new ArrayList<All_Request_data_dto>(); ListView lv; Button back; private Spinner spndata; String[] reqspinner = { "Request Date", "Last Update", "Type", "Owner", "State" }; ArrayAdapter<String> adapter; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.request); assosiatetoken = MyApplication.getToken(); new doinbackground(this).execute(); back = (Button) findViewById(R.id.button1); spndata = (Spinner) findViewById(R.id.list_all_quize_req); adapter = new ArrayAdapter<String>(this, android.R.layout.simple_spinner_item, reqspinner); spndata.setAdapter(adapter); lv = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.listrequestdata); lv.setOnItemClickListener(new OnItemClickListener() { public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> a, View v, int position, long id) { Intent edit = new Intent(Request.this, Request_webview.class); // edit.putExtra("Cat_url", url_link); startActivity(edit); } }); spndata.setOnItemSelectedListener(new OnItemSelectedListener() { public void onItemSelected(AdapterView<?> arg0, View arg1, int position, long arg3) { switch (position) { case 0: list = DBAdpter.requestUserData(assosiatetoken); Collections.sort(list, byDate1); // Collections.reverse(list); for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) { if (list.get(i).submitDate != null) { lv.setAdapter(new MyListAdapter( getApplicationContext(), list)); } } break; case 1: list = DBAdpter.requestUserData(assosiatetoken); Collections.sort(list, byDate); for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) { if (list.get(i).lastModifiedDate != null) { lv.setAdapter(new MyListAdapter( getApplicationContext(), list)); } } break; case 2: list = DBAdpter.requestUserData(assosiatetoken); Collections.sort(list, byDate3); // Collections.reverse(list); for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) { if (list.get(i).state != null) { lv.setAdapter(new MyListAdapter( getApplicationContext(), list)); } } break; case 3: list = DBAdpter.requestUserData(assosiatetoken); for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) { lv.setAdapter(new MyListAdapter( getApplicationContext(), list)); } break; default: break; } } public void onNothingSelected(AdapterView<?> arg0) { } }); back.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { finish(); } }); } static final Comparator<All_Request_data_dto> byDate = new Comparator<All_Request_data_dto>() { SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss a"); public int compare(All_Request_data_dto ord1, All_Request_data_dto ord2) { java.util.Date d1 = null; java.util.Date d2 = null; try { d1 = sdf.parse(ord1.lastModifiedDate); d2 = sdf.parse(ord2.lastModifiedDate); } catch (java.text.ParseException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } return (d1.getTime() > d2.getTime() ? -1 : 1); // descending // return (d1.getTime() > d2.getTime() ? 1 : -1); //ascending } }; static final Comparator<All_Request_data_dto> byDate1 = new Comparator<All_Request_data_dto>() { SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss a"); public int compare(All_Request_data_dto ord1, All_Request_data_dto ord2) { java.util.Date d1 = null; java.util.Date d2 = null; try { d1 = sdf.parse(ord1.submitDate); d2 = sdf.parse(ord2.submitDate); } catch (java.text.ParseException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e.printStackTrace(); } return (d1.getTime() > d2.getTime() ? -1 : 1); // descending // return (d1.getTime() > d2.getTime() ? 1 : -1); //ascending } }; static final Comparator<All_Request_data_dto> byDate3 = new Comparator<All_Request_data_dto>() { public int compare(All_Request_data_dto ord1, All_Request_data_dto ord2) { String d1 = null; String d2 = null; d1 = ord1.state; d2 = ord2.state; return d1.compareToIgnoreCase(d2); } }; class doinbackground extends AsyncTask<Void, Void, Void> { ProgressDialog pd; private Context ctx; public doinbackground(Context c) { ctx = c; } @Override protected void onPreExecute() { super.onPreExecute(); pd = new ProgressDialog(ctx); pd.setMessage("Loading..."); pd.show(); } @Override protected Void doInBackground(Void... Params) { return null; } @Override protected void onPostExecute(Void result) { super.onPostExecute(result); pd.cancel(); } } public class MyListAdapter extends BaseAdapter { private ArrayList<All_Request_data_dto> list; public MyListAdapter(Context mContext, ArrayList<All_Request_data_dto> list) { this.list = list; } public int getCount() { return list.size(); } public All_Request_data_dto getItem(int position) { return list.get(position); } public long getItemId(int position) { return position; } public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { // if (convertView == null) { LayoutInflater inflator = (LayoutInflater) getSystemService(LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE); convertView = inflator.inflate(R.layout.custom_request_data, null); TextView req_id = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.req_txt); TextView date = (TextView) convertView.findViewById(R.id.date_txt); TextView owner = (TextView) convertView .findViewById(R.id.owner_txt); TextView state = (TextView) convertView .findViewById(R.id.state_txt); req_id.setText(list.get(position).requestId + " - " + list.get(position).title); date.setText(list.get(position).lastModifiedDate + " - " + list.get(position).submitDate); owner.setText(list.get(position).owner); state.setText(list.get(position).state); // } return convertView; } } }

    Read the article

  • Basic question about encryption - what exactly are keys?

    - by Tomas
    Hi, I was browsing and found good articles about encryption. However, none of them described why the key lenght is important and what exactly the key is used for. My guess is that could work this way: 0101001101010101010 Key: 01010010101010010101 //the longer the key, the longer unique sequence XOR or smth: //result Is this at least a bit how it works or I am missing something? Thanks

    Read the article

  • MySql Alter Syntax error with mulitple FK

    - by acidzombie24
    If i do the first one i have no problem. When i do addition i get a syntax error. What is wrong with the syntax? The error says syntax error near [entire 2nd line] alter table `ban_Status` add FOREIGN KEY (`banned_user`) REFERENCES `user_data`(`id`) alter table `ban_Status` add FOREIGN KEY (`banned_user`) REFERENCES `user_data`(`id`), FOREIGN KEY (`banning_user`) REFERENCES `user_data`(`id`), FOREIGN KEY (`unban_user`) REFERENCES `user_data`(`id`)

    Read the article

  • How can I link two Java serialised objects back together?

    - by Kidburla
    Sometimes (quite a lot, actually) we get a situation in Java where two objects are pointing to the same thing. Now if we serialise these separately it is quite appropriate that the serialised forms have separate copies of the object as it should be possible to open one without the other. However if we now deserialise them both, we find that they are still separated. Is there any way to link them back together? Example follows. public class Example { private static class ContainerClass implements java.io.Serializable { private ReferencedClass obj; public ReferencedClass get() { return obj; } public void set(ReferencedClass obj) { this.obj = obj; } } private static class ReferencedClass implements java.io.Serializable { private int i = 0; public int get() { return i; } public void set(int i) { this.i = i; } } public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { //Initialise the classes ContainerClass test1 = new ContainerClass(); ContainerClass test2 = new ContainerClass(); ReferencedClass ref = new ReferencedClass(); //Make both container class point to the same reference test1.set(ref); test2.set(ref); //This does what we expect: setting the integer in one (way of accessing the) referenced class sets it in the other one test1.get().set(1234); System.out.println(Integer.toString(test2.get().get())); //Now serialise the container classes java.io.ObjectOutputStream os = new java.io.ObjectOutputStream(new java.io.FileOutputStream("C:\\Users\\Public\\test1.ser")); os.writeObject(test1); os.close(); os = new java.io.ObjectOutputStream(new java.io.FileOutputStream("C:\\Users\\Public\\test2.ser")); os.writeObject(test2); os.close(); //And deserialise them java.io.ObjectInputStream is = new java.io.ObjectInputStream(new java.io.FileInputStream("C:\\Users\\Public\\test1.ser")); ContainerClass test3 = (ContainerClass)is.readObject(); is.close(); is = new java.io.ObjectInputStream(new java.io.FileInputStream("C:\\Users\\Public\\test2.ser")); ContainerClass test4 = (ContainerClass)is.readObject(); is.close(); //We expect the same thing as before, and would expect a result of 4321, but this doesn't happen as the referenced objects are now separate instances test3.get().set(4321); System.out.println(Integer.toString(test4.get().get())); } }

    Read the article

  • Does UNIQ constraint mean also an index on that field(s)?

    - by Gremo
    As title, should i defined a separate index on email column (for searching purposes) or the index is "automatically" added along with UNIQ_EMAIL_USER constraint? CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `customer` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `user_id` int(11) NOT NULL, `first` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `last` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `slug` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `email` varchar(255) NOT NULL, `created_at` datetime NOT NULL, `updated_at` datetime NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), UNIQUE KEY `UNIQ_SLUG` (`slug`), UNIQUE KEY `UNIQ_EMAIL_USER` (`email`,`user_id`), KEY `IDX_USER` (`user_id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB;

    Read the article

  • How can I map a String to a function in Java?

    - by Bears will eat you
    Currently, I have a bunch of Java classes that implement a Processor interface, meaning they all have a processRequest(String key) method. The idea is that each class has a few (say, <10) member Strings, and each of those maps to a method in that class via the processRequest method, like so: class FooProcessor implements Processor { String key1 = "abc"; String key2 = "def"; String key3 = "ghi"; // and so on... String processRequest(String key) { String toReturn = null; if (key1.equals(key)) toReturn = method1(); else if (key2.equals(key)) toReturn = method2(); else if (key3.equals(key)) toReturn = method3(); // and so on... return toReturn; } String method1() { // do stuff } String method2() { // do other stuff } String method3() { // do other other stuff } // and so on... } You get the idea. This was working fine for me, but now I need a runtime-accessible mapping from key to function; not every function actually returns a String (some return void) and I need to dynamically access the return type (using reflection) of each function in each class that there's a key for. I already have a manager that knows about all the keys, but not the mapping from key to function. My first instinct was to replace this mapping using if-else statements with a Map<String, Function>, like I could do in Javascript. But, Java doesn't support first-class functions so I'm out of luck there. I could probably dig up a third-party library that lets me work with first-class functions, but I haven't seen any yet, and I doubt that I need an entire new library. I also thought of putting these String keys into an array and using reflection to invoke the methods by name, but I see two downsides to this method: My keys would have to be named the same as the method - or be named in a particular, consistent way so that it's easy to map them to the method name. This seems WAY slower than the if-else statements I have right now. Efficiency is something of a concern because these methods will tend to get called pretty frequently, and I want to minimize unnecessary overhead. TL; DR: I'm looking for a clean, minimal-overhead way to map a String to some sort of a Function object that I can invoke and call (something like) getReturnType() on. I don't especially mind using a 3rd-party library if it really fits my needs. I also don't mind using reflection, though I would strongly prefer to avoid using reflection every single time I do a method lookup - maybe using some caching strategy that combines the Map with reflection. Thoughts on a good way to get what I want? Cheers!

    Read the article

  • Replace a method call

    - by deV
    Hi, I want to achieve below task: 1. I need to search Html.Resource("key") in my application and replace it with GetResource("key",object) 2. The GetResource method has two parameters: the first parameter should be the same as the original method,"key" in this case, and I need to pass in the second parameter which is variable. 3. I need to replace only when the Html.Resource("key") occurs inside certain tags like td and div else I need not replace it. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Why doesn't HashTable.Contains() just simply return false if it is passed a null?

    - by Nate Pinchot
    I understand why passing a null to HashTable.Contains() doesn't work, but I don't understand what the point of it throwing an ArgumentNullException is - instead of just simply returning false? What is the benefit of throwing the exception (other than to make me do null checks before calling .Contains())? Caused By [System.ArgumentNullException] Key cannot be null. Parameter name: key at System.Collections.Hashtable.ContainsKey(Object key) at System.Collections.Hashtable.Contains(Object key)

    Read the article

  • Resharper intellisense confusion

    - by Mystere Man
    Today I had something weird happen in my copy of Resharper 5. I have a class that looks like this: public class Foo { public string Username { get; private set; } public Foo (string userName) { Username = userName; } public void Bar() { DoWork(Username); } public DoWork(string userName) { } } When I start to type DoWork(us I get the following from intellisense: Notice that it's pulling up the constructor argument, and it ends with a colon: userName: What's going on here?

    Read the article

  • How do I mock/fake/replace/stub a base class at unit-test time in C#?

    - by MatthewMartin
    UPDATE: I've changed the wording of the question. Previously it was a yes/no question about if a base class could be changed at runtime. I may be working on mission impossible here, but I seem to be getting close. I want to extend a ASP.NET control, and I want my code to be unit testable. Also, I'd like to be able to fake behaviors of a real Label (namely things like ID generation, etc), which a real Label can't do in an nUnit host. Here a working example that makes assertions on something that depends on a real base class and something that doesn't-- in a more realistic unit test, the test would depend on both --i.e. an ID existing and some custom behavior. Anyhow the code says it better than I can: public class LabelWrapper : Label //Runtime //public class LabelWrapper : FakeLabel //Unit Test time { private readonly LabelLogic logic= new LabelLogic(); public override string Text { get { return logic.ProcessGetText(base.Text); } set { base.Text=logic.ProcessSetText(value); } } } //Ugh, now I have to test FakeLabelWrapper public class FakeLabelWrapper : FakeLabel //Unit Test time { private readonly LabelLogic logic= new LabelLogic(); public override string Text { get { return logic.ProcessGetText(base.Text); } set { base.Text=logic.ProcessSetText(value); } } } [TestFixture] public class UnitTest { [Test] public void Test() { //Wish this was LabelWrapper label = new LabelWrapper(new FakeBase()) LabelWrapper label = new LabelWrapper(); //FakeLabelWrapper label = new FakeLabelWrapper(); label.Text = "ToUpper"; Assert.AreEqual("TOUPPER",label.Text); StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter(); HtmlTextWriter writer = new HtmlTextWriter(stringWriter); label.RenderControl(writer); Assert.AreEqual(1,label.ID); Assert.AreEqual("<span>TOUPPER</span>", stringWriter.ToString()); } } public class FakeLabel { virtual public string Text { get; set; } public void RenderControl(TextWriter writer) { writer.Write("<span>" + Text + "</span>"); } } //System Under Test internal class LabelLogic { internal string ProcessGetText(string value) { return value.ToUpper(); } internal string ProcessSetText(string value) { return value.ToUpper(); } }

    Read the article

  • Java: "implements Runnable" vs. "extends Thread"

    - by goosefraba19
    From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads. public class ThreadA implements Runnable { public void run() { //Code } } //with a "new Thread(threadA).start()" call public class ThreadB extends Thread { public ThreadB() { super("ThreadB"); } public void run() { //Code } } //with a "threadB.start()" call Is there any significant difference in these two blocks of code?

    Read the article

  • git clone with ssh issue

    - by george
    Hi, I have generated a public key, private key pair. I've set the public key to the site. How to use the console in windows to clone a git repository? What do I do with the private key? I keep getting: the remote end hung up unexp. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Why is Dictionary.First() so slow?

    - by Rotsor
    Not a real question because I already found out the answer, but still interesting thing. I always thought that hash table is the fastest associative container if you hash properly. However, the following code is terribly slow. It executes only about 1 million iterations and takes more than 2 minutes of time on a Core 2 CPU. The code does the following: it maintains the collection todo of items it needs to process. At each iteration it takes an item from this collection (doesn't matter which item), deletes it, processes it if it wasn't processed (possibly adding more items to process), and repeats this until there are no items to process. The culprit seems to be the Dictionary.Keys.First() operation. The question is why is it slow? Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); HashSet<int> processed = new HashSet<int>(); Dictionary<int, int> todo = new Dictionary<int, int>(); todo.Add(1, 1); int iterations = 0; int limit = 500000; while (todo.Count > 0) { iterations++; var key = todo.Keys.First(); var value = todo[key]; todo.Remove(key); if (!processed.Contains(key)) { processed.Add(key); // process item here if (key < limit) { todo[key + 13] = value + 1; todo[key + 7] = value + 1; } // doesn't matter much how } } Console.WriteLine("Iterations: {0}; Time: {1}.", iterations, watch.Elapsed); This results in: Iterations: 923007; Time: 00:02:09.8414388. Simply changing Dictionary to SortedDictionary yields: Iterations: 499976; Time: 00:00:00.4451514. 300 times faster while having only 2 times less iterations. The same happens in java. Used HashMap instead of Dictionary and keySet().iterator().next() instead of Keys.First().

    Read the article

  • Java: "implements Runnable" vs. "extends Thread"

    - by user65374
    From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads. public class ThreadA implements Runnable { public void run() { //Code } } //with a "new Thread(threadA).start()" call public class ThreadB extends Thread { public ThreadB() { super("ThreadB"); } public void run() { //Code } } //with a "threadB.start()" call Is there any significant difference in these two blocks of code?

    Read the article

  • Ques: Which method will be called and y?

    - by Gaurav
    Ques: Which method will be called and y? public class Test { public void method(Object o){ System.out.println("object"); } public void method(String s) { System.out.println("String"); } public void method() { System.out.println("blank"); } /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Test test=new Test(); test.method(null); } }

    Read the article

  • C# - Inserting and Removing from Cache

    - by Nir
    1 - If I insert to Cache by assigning the value: Cache["key"] = value; what's the expiration time? 2 - Removing the same value from Cache: I want to check if the value is in Cache by if(Cache["key"]!=null), is it better to remove it from Cache by Cache.Remove("key") or Cache["key"]=null ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248  | Next Page >