Search Results

Search found 15055 results on 603 pages for 'volume shadow copy'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 249/603 | < Previous Page | 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256  | Next Page >

  • Disabling RAID feature on HP Smart Array P400

    - by Arie K
    I'm planning to use ZFS on my system (HP ML370 G5, Smart Array P400, 8 SAS disk). I want ZFS to manage all disks individually, so it can utilize better scheduling (i.e. I want to use software RAID feature in ZFS). The problem is, I can't find a way to disable RAID feature on the RAID controller. Right now, the controller aggregates all of the disks into one big RAID-5 volume. So ZFS can't see individual disk. Is there any way to acomplish this setup?

    Read the article

  • Best way to backup and restore millions of files

    - by bongo
    Hi, I'm facing a rebuilding of the volume on which I host the mail storage (kerio mailserver, which uses maildirs). I need to backup and restore as quick as possible the 3.5+ millions (for about 600GB) small files of the store directory. It takes more than 12 hours via rsync to a NFS share, but I also have a 1TB firewire 800 raid1 disk that I can use (from some preliminary tests it's faster). I'm working off a XServe intel. What is the fastest way to do it? Rsync? Finder copy? tar?

    Read the article

  • Apple: Time capsule, 2 questions

    - by Patrick
    1) Can I use time capsule as server ? Can I run operating systems on it ? 2) I'm using time machine with my mac with time capsule. Let's say my mac crashes, and I cannot use it anymore. Can i restore my mac disk on another laptop from time capsule ? In other words, can I have a perfect copy of my mac hard disk on another mac ? thanks

    Read the article

  • My EliteBook is not auto picking 1080p for external monitor, poor display on forcing

    - by Griever
    I'm connecting my Samsung LED S22A300B to my HP EliteBook 6930p through VGA out. Laptop has Intel 4500MHD video card. I have latest drivers installed for both card and monitor. Only 800x600 and 1024x768 are shown. A lot of other people get this problem when they use it with docking station as discussed here. But I am not using any docking station. The monitor works great with my desktop though. As advised on the aforementioned page, one of the things I tried was to force the resolution using Intel's "custom resolution" feature. I installed PowerStrip on my desktop and copied advanced timing values(front/back porch,sync width, etc.) from there and then used the same values while defining a custom resolution in my laptop's Intel graphics utility. As a result, I got the 1080p resolution but the display is poor. Text has some weird colored shadow and sometimes on images too. What should I do?

    Read the article

  • Tool to automatically combine many large pivot table in many large Excel sheet ?

    - by Sim
    Hi all, We have several Excel files that contains large pivot data table with the same structure For example File A Pivot table (Field A, B, C) File B Pivot table (Field A, B, C) We want to combine them into 1 pivot table (A, B, C). Just want to know which ways we can do it ? Manual way : open a new empty sheet, copy and paste the pivot there and create the pivot again Automatic way : is there some tool that did this ? Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to create .iso from Snow Leopard retail DVD

    - by user10580
    I have a legal copy of Snow Leopard on DVD (retail) which I am attempting to use to create a bootable flash drive. The software I have been directed to use requests a .iso file (as I am familiar with from other os installs), but when inserting the DVD into either Windows 7 or Ubuntu 9.10 the disk is recognized only as a "Windows Support" DVD, with materials to "support Apple hardware with Windows." This is eventually intended for a hackintosh attempt on an ASUS EEEPC 1000HE netbook. This is an install disk. Thanks

    Read the article

  • ZFS: Redistribute zvol over all disks in the zpool?

    - by growse
    Is there a way in which ZFS can be prompted to redistribute a given filesystem over the all of the disks in its zpool? I'm thinking of a scenario where I have a fixed size ZFS volume that's exported as a LUN over FC. The current zpool is small, just two 1TB mirrored disks, and the zvol is 750GB in total. If I were to suddenly expand the size of the zpool to, say, 12 1TB disks, I believe the zvol would still effectively be 'housed' on the first two spindles only. Given that more spindles = more IOPS, what method could I use to 'redistribute' the zvol over all 12 spindles to take advantage of them?

    Read the article

  • Function keys on Dell laptop work double as OEM keys

    - by Factor Mystic
    I'm working with a new Dell Studio 1555, and the F1-F12 keys at the top of the keyboard are dual function with OEM keys such as volume and screen brightness. The problem is, is that the OEM keys are the default, and you have to press the Fn key to get the F- key to work. For example, this means you have to hit Alt+Fn+F4 to close a window, instead of the regular Alt+F4. This is really annoying. Is there a way to reverse the default functions of the F- keys in Windows? Ideally this is possible without some kind of third party hotkey manager.

    Read the article

  • Installing Windows 7 games on Windows 8

    - by soandos
    I wish to play all of the games that I have on Windows 7 by default (chess, freecell, minesweeper, etc) on my Windows 8 machine. I tried to just copy over the relevant .exe files, but when I run them (even in Windows 7 compatibility mode) nothing happens (no errors, no running process, nothing). How can I get my games working? Note: I tried the Into Windows Guide: How To Play Windows 7 Games In Windows 8 and after I downloaded the patch, it still did not work.

    Read the article

  • hyper-v multiple virtual machines with >2TB volumes from one raid

    - by wurlog
    I have a server with two Raids. Raid 0: 2x 1TB Raid 6: 8x 2TB The first raid I used for the hyper-v installation itself. The virtual machines should use the Raid 6, but how can I config it? I need at least one file server with the most of the disc space (maybe a second). But every vhd has a maximum of 2 TB and I can't use the volume directly because other virtual machines have to have access the Raid6. What do I do?

    Read the article

  • File Sharing: User-created folders are read-only to others on Mac 10.6 Server

    - by Anriëtte Combrink
    Hi there We recently got a new Mac Mini Server with 10.6 Server on it. It has two 500GB volumes, one of which [Macintosh HD2 the extra one other than the boot disk] we are using to share our work files. I have added a user account for each user in the Users pane on Server Preferences, and all our staff (users added to the system) are added to a new group, called toolboxstaff. Now, when a user creates a new folder on this volume, folders are created with read-only access for everyone else besides the owner. How do I set it that when a user creates a folder, it creates it with RW access for the toolboxstaff group? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How to disable the second partition without unmount it in Mac?

    - by bagusflyer
    I've installed OSX Yosemite in another partition in my Mac. But there is a problem. For example, I installed iBooks in both partition. When I right click one of my epub or pdf file, both iBooks are shown in my context menu. This is not what I want. What I want is to only allow the apps in Yosemite shown. Of course I can disable apps in my old Maverick partition by unmount the volume. But again this is not what I want because it will hide the partition when I boot my machine so that I can't boot up into my Maverick partition. Can anybody advise if there are any better ideas? Thanks

    Read the article

  • VMWare tools not installing with an error

    - by JDS
    VMWare tools not installing on Ubuntu 12.04. I'm using Chef to manage the installation, but the Apt commands fail if run manually. I'm using the VMWare tool Debian repo. Example: $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/vmware-tools-source.list deb http://packages.vmware.com/tools/esx/5.0u2/ubuntu precise main When trying to install, most packages seem to go ok, but one, "vmware-tools-foundation", does not. Example: $ apt-get -q -y install vmware-tools-esx-nox=8.6.10-1.precise Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: vmware-tools-esx-kmods-3.2.0-23-generic : Depends: vmware-tools-foundation (>= 8.6.10) but it is not going to be installed vmware-tools-esx-nox : Depends: ...snip list of deps... E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). $ apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: vmware-tools-foundation The following NEW packages will be installed: vmware-tools-foundation 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 118 not upgraded. 7 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/5,886 B of archives. After this operation, 86.0 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 103499 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking vmware-tools-foundation (from .../vmware-tools-foundation_8.6.10-1.precise_all.deb) ... VMware Tools cannot install because it appears that another installation of VMware Tools is already present. Please remove the previous installation and then attempt to install this copy of VMware Tools again. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vmware-tools-foundation_8.6.10-1.precise_all.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/vmware-tools-foundation_8.6.10-1.precise_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The key seems to be this error: "VMware Tools cannot install because it appears that another installation of VMware Tools is already present. Please remove the previous installation and then attempt to install this copy of VMware Tools again." However, I've tryed removing and purging and can't seem to "trick" VMWare tools into thinking the packages are gone. Apt thinks they are gone. Is there some service/file/cache/lock left that VMWare tools sees that makes it think that VMWare tools are still installed? I've googled and googled but there is no answer to this question with my particular circumstances on the interwebs. VMWare's documentation of this error is minimal.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu and Windows 8 shared partition gets corrupted

    - by Bruno-P
    I have a dual boot (Ubuntu 12.04 and Windows 8) system. Both systems have access to an NTFS "DATA" partition which contains all my images, documents, music and some application data like Chrome and Thunderbird Profiles which used by both OS. Everything was working fine in my Dual boot Ubuntu/Windows 7, but after updating to Windows 8 I am having a lot of troubles. First, sometimes, I add some files from Ubuntu into my DATA partition but they don't show up in Windows. Sometimes, I can't even use the DATA partition from Windows. When I try to save a file it gives an error "The directory or file is corrupted or unreadable". I need to run checkdisk to fix it but after some time, same error appears. Before upgrading to Windows 8 I also installed a new hard drive and copied the old data using clonezilla (full disk clone). Here is the log of my last chkdisk: Chkdsk was executed in read/write mode. Checking file system on D: Volume dismounted. All opened handles to this volume are now invalid. Volume label is DATA. CHKDSK is verifying files (stage 1 of 3)... Deleted corrupt attribute list entry with type code 128 in file 67963. Unable to find child frs 0x12a3f with sequence number 0x15. The attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x1097b has allocated length of 0x560000 instead of 0x427000. Deleted corrupt attribute list entry with type code 128 in file 67963. Unable to locate attribute with instance tag 0x2 and segment reference 0x1e00000001097b. The expected attribute type is 0x80. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 67963. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x3 is cross linked starting at 0x2431b2 for possibly 0x20 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x3 in file 0x1791e is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 96542. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 is cross linked starting at 0x6bc7 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 in file 0x17e83 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 97923. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 is cross linked starting at 0x1f7cec for possibly 0x5 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x4 in file 0x17eaf is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 97967. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x441bd7f for possibly 0x9 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x32085 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 204933. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4457850 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x320be is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 204990. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4859249 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3726b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225899. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x485d309 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3726c is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225900. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48a47de for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37286 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225926. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48ac80b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37287 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225927. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48ae7ef for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37288 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225928. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48af7f8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3728a is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225930. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x48c39b6 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37292 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 225938. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x495d37a for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x372d7 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226007. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d0bd38 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x372dc is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226012. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4c2d9bc for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x372ed is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226029. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4a4c1c3 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37354 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226132. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4a8e639 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37376 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226166. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4a8f6eb for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37379 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226169. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ae1aa8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37391 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226193. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4b00d45 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x37396 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226198. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4b02d50 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3739c is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226204. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4b3407a for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373a8 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226216. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4bd8a1b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373db is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226267. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4bd9a28 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373dd is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226269. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4c2fb24 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x373f3 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226291. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cb67e9 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37424 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226340. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cba829 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37425 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226341. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cbe868 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37427 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226343. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cbf878 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37428 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226344. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cc58d8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742a is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226346. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ccc943 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226347. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd199b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742d is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226349. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd29a8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3742f is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226351. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd39b8 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37430 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226352. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd49c8 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37432 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226354. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cd9a16 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37435 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226357. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cdca46 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37436 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226358. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ce0a78 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37437 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226359. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ce6ad9 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743a is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226362. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cebb28 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226363. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4ceeb67 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743d is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226365. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cf4bc6 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x3743e is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226366. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cfbc3a for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37440 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226368. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4cfcc48 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37442 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226370. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d02ca9 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37443 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226371. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d06ce8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37444 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226372. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d9a608 for possibly 0x2 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x37449 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226377. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d844ab for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x3744b is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226379. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d6c32b for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x3744c is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226380. Attribute record of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 is cross linked starting at 0x4d2af25 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0xa0 and instance tag 0x5 in file 0x3744e is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (160, $I30) from file record segment 226382. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d0fd78 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 in file 0x37451 is already in use. Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "") from file record segment 226385. Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x2 is cross linked starting at 0x4d16ef8 for possibly 0x1 clusters. Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x8 Can anyone help? Thank you

    Read the article

  • How to make a 100% UNIQUE dvd? [closed]

    - by sajawikio
    Is it possible to make a DVD which would be next to impossible to replicate exactly even with special equipment? To be clear, not in the sense of making the data itself resistant to piracy - nothing like that. More like as an analogy to antiques - a reproduction of a furniture would be able to be spotted to a trained eye, that it is not the original. Is it possible to do this for a dvd? Like, say a dvd is copied, even by someone who is trying to use even special equipment and is hypothetically dying to copy the dvd exactly for whatever reason - even such copied dvd would be detectable that it is not exactly the original dvd somehow (as if it were a reproduction of an original antique, but not the original), and would be almost or even preferably impossible to actually copy 100% exact the dvd ever again. Just some ideas below on the sort of thing i might go about doing to do this, but really am not sure how or what programs, media, hardware, etc. would do the trick Not sure what would do the trick -- but for instance do there exist any blank dvd's that already come pre-recorded with some sort of serial number or bar code, or other metadata, or an encrypted hash, or something like that? Maybe any blank dvd will do but i should get a special software to extract hardcoded metadata? If so which software? Or special hardware even maybe? Such dvd which the "secret" can be: Well, to know what the "secret" is and if it is present on the disk, it probably should be readable by some software or maybe a particular hardware (i guess preferably only if some sort of key is known and input into the software, even better, only then such secret data on disk can be read, otherwise nothing shows up and it looks like just a regular disk with no secret on it), and Would be impossible to actually replicate, especially not with regular burning hardware and preferably not at all. Other idea: Is there any special software that can direct the write head of laser to physically "mar" the dvd in such a way that, when played in dvd player, makes a particular visual pattern or something like that, also say the mar itself shows up as faint scratch on disk, but would be impossible for someone to do themselves exactly? EDIT: Also to clarify suppose the dvd contains video and music that should be playable on dvd players, maybe a menu too (i.e not a dvd containing software), and also to clarify the question is about how to make dvd 100% unique, not how to make the actual content of dvd protected from "piracy".

    Read the article

  • Controller Error: Do I need to worry?

    - by Kryten
    Hi, I have a HP Pavillion dv5224ea Laptop with Windows 7 on it. Recently I discovered a Error in Event Viewer: The driver detected a controller error on \Device\Ide\IdePort1. (more details): - System - Provider [ Name] atapi - EventID 11 [ Qualifiers] 49156 Level 2 Task 0 Keywords 0x80000000000000 - TimeCreated [ SystemTime] 2010-03-07T12:43:07.090197600Z EventRecordID 30198 Channel System Computer Alistair-Win7 Security - EventData \Device\Ide\IdePort1 0000100001000000000000000B0004C002000000850100C00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004100000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Binary data: In Words 0000: 00100000 00000001 00000000 C004000B 0008: 00000002 C0000185 00000000 00000000 0010: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0018: 00000000 00001004 In Bytes 0000: 00 00 10 00 01 00 00 00 ........ 0008: 00 00 00 00 0B 00 04 C0 .......À 0010: 02 00 00 00 85 01 00 C0 ......À 0018: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ 0020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ 0028: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ 0030: 00 00 00 00 04 10 00 00 ........ Event Viewer is recording A LOT of these errors (sometimes 13, one after the other!). Do I need to worry? What does this error mean? What device could "\Device\Ide\IdePort1" be? What is a ATAPI Error? Do I need to re-install Windows? I generally find the occurs when I try to backup my machine (using Windows Backup) or when using a program that uses Volume Shadow Copy. I have run "sfc", no problems. There are no Device Errors in Device Manager. I have also run "vssadmin list writers", no problems. Whats going on??? Would it be a good idea to re-install Windows 7?

    Read the article

  • Importing Outlook emails into Gmail - Getting Unknown Sender

    - by James Newton-King
    I want to backup my Outlook email into Gmail. I have setup my Gmail account in Outlook using IMAP like is suggested here - http://www.keenerliving.com/importing-outlook-into-gmail - and I can successfully upload Outlook emails into Gmail, but Exchange mail doesn't copy across the sender and receivers. All Exchange emails in Gmail are listed as sent by (unknown sender). How do you upload Exchange emails into Gmail from Outlook while maintaining the correct From and To email addresses?

    Read the article

  • What is the easiest/simplest way to change the HD on a Linux server?

    - by ArmlessJohn
    Hello. I have a machine running Ubuntu Server that has been presenting some HD-related problems. Instead of reinstalling and reconfiguring everything (and to save time) we'd like to copy everything from the current hard drive to a new one and start using it. We only have a single hard drive with a main partition and a swap partition. What tools or methods would you recommend for replacing a hard drive with minimum difficulty and chance of problems? Thank you.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256  | Next Page >