Search Results

Search found 1208 results on 49 pages for 'tsql'.

Page 25/49 | < Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >

  • MSSQL choosing row (from group) with max value

    - by sriehl
    I have a large database and am putting together a report of the data. I have aggregated and summed the data from many tables to get two tables that look like the following. id | code | value id | code | value 13 | AA | 0.5 13 | AC | 2.0 13 | AB | 1.0 14 | AB | 1.5 14 | AA | 2.0 13 | AA | 0.5 15 | AB | 0.5 15 | AB | 3.0 15 | AD | 1.5 15 | AA | 1.0 I need to get a list of id's, with the code (sumed from both tables) with the largest value. 13 | AC 14 | AA 15 | AB There are 4-6 thousand records and it is not possible to change the original tables. I'm not too worried about performance as I only need to run it a few times a year.

    Read the article

  • Stored procedure woes ... inserting binary ...

    - by Wardy
    Ok so I have this storedproc in my SQL 2008 database (works in 2005 too / used to) ... CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[SetBinaryContent] @Ref nvarchar(50), @Content varbinary(MAX), @ObjectID uniqueidentifier AS BEGIN DELETE ObjectContent WHERE ObjectId = @ObjectID AND Ref = @Ref IF DATALENGTH(@Content) > 5 BEGIN INSERT INTO ObjectContent (Ref,BinaryContent,ObjectId) VALUES (@Ref,@Content,@ObjectId) END UPDATE Objects SET [Status] = 1 WHERE ID = @ObjectID END Relatively simple, I take a byte array in C# and chuck it in @Content i then give it a guid and string for the other params and off we go. ... Great, it used to work ... but it don't anymore ... so erm ... What's wrong with this stored proc? I've stepped through my C# code thinking I screwed up somehow in that but it definately adds the params and gives them the correct values so what would cause the server to just stop executing this storedproc correctly? When called this proc executes but nothing changes in the db ... no new records are added to the ObjectContent table. Weird huh ...

    Read the article

  • Please help me to write the sql

    - by Lu Lu
    Hello everyone, I am a new with T-SQL. So, please help me to write the sql. I have table Price (Code column is primary column): Code Value A1 234 A2 525 A3 566 I will input a string and the sql need to return a table. Ex1: input 'A2' - return: Code Value A2 525 Ex2: input 'A1 A3' - return: Code Value A1 234 A3 566 Ex3: input 'A1 A3 A1' - return: Code Value A1 234 A3 566 Ex4: input 'A1 A4' - return: Code Value A1 234 Please help me. I am using SQL Server 2005. Tks.

    Read the article

  • Get Unique Results in a query.

    - by Bathan
    Hi guys! Im sure this will be pretty simple for a t-sql guru. I have the following result from a table idMain IdSecondary TextValue 1,1,text1 1,2,text2 2,5,text3 2,6,text5 And I want to obtain the first occurence of the idMain only. THe result should be like this. idMain,idSecondary,TextValue 1,1,text1 2,5,text3 How can I achieve this?

    Read the article

  • What is your most irritating quirk of t-sql

    - by Jude Wood
    I realise this is a bit flippant but it may highlight some 'interesting' features of t-sql. Or just provide some light distraction on a Friday morning... I'm currently torn between t-sql allows three part naming when dropping tables but not when dropping procudures and When using Coalesce to produce a delimited string the presence of a leading delimiter is dependant on whether the delimited string was initialised prior to calling Coalesce I'd be interested to hear yours......

    Read the article

  • SQL dynamic date but fixed time query

    - by Marko Lombardi
    I am trying to write a sql query like the example below, however, I need it to always choose the DateEntered field between the current day's date at 8:00am and the current day's date at 4:00pm. Not sure how to go about this. Can someone please help? SELECT OrderNumber , OrderRelease , HeatNumber , HeatSuffix , Operation , COUNT(Operation) AS [Pieces Out of Tolerance] FROM Alerts WHERE (Mill = 3) AND (DateEntered BETWEEN GetDate '08:00' AND GetDate '16:00') GROUP BY OrderNumber, OrderRelease, HeatNumber, HeatSuffix, Operation

    Read the article

  • Specifying schema for temporary tables

    - by Tom Hunter
    I'm used to seeing temporary tables created with just the hash/number symbol, like this: CREATE TABLE #Test ( [Id] INT ) However, I've recently come across stored procedure code that specifies the schema name when creating temporary tables, for example: CREATE TABLE [dbo].[#Test] ( [Id] INT ) Is there any reason why you would want to do this? If you're only specifying the user's default schema, does it make any difference? Does this refer to the [dbo] schema in the local database or the tempdb database?

    Read the article

  • Small methods - Small sprocs

    - by Berlioz
    Uncle Bob recommends having small methods. Do stored procedures have an ideal size? Or can they run on for 100's and 100's of lines long? Also does anyone have anything to say about where to place business logic. If located in stored procedures, the database is being used as data processing tier. If you read Adam Machanic, his bias is toward the database, does that imply long stored procedures that only the author of the sproc understands, leaving maintainers to deal with the mess? I guess there is two inter-related questions, somehow. Thanks in advance for responding to a fuzzy question(s).

    Read the article

  • SQL: Order randomly when inserting objects to a table

    - by Ekaterina
    I have an UDF that selects top 6 objects from a table (with a union - code below) and inserts it into another table. (btw SQL 2005) So I paste the UDF below and what the code does is: selects objects for a specific city and add a level to those (from table Europe) union that selection with a selection from the same table for objects that are from the same country and add a level to those From the union, selection is made to get top 6 objects, order by level, so the objects from the same city will be first, and if there aren't any available, then objects from the same country will be returned from the selection. And my problem is, that I want to make a random selection to get random objects from table Europe, but because I insert the result of my selection into a table, I can't use order by newid() or rand() function because they are time-dependent, so I get the following errors: Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'newid' within a function. Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'rand' within a function. UDF: ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[Objects] (@id uniqueidentifier) RETURNS @objects TABLE ( ObjectId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL, InternalId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL ) AS BEGIN declare @city varchar(50) declare @country int select @city = city, @country = country from Europe where internalId = @id insert @objects select @id, internalId from ( select distinct top 6 [level], internalId from ( select top 6 1 as [level], internalId from Europe N4 where N4.city = @city and N4.internalId != @id union select top 6 2 as [level], internalId from Europe N5 where N5.countryId = @country and N5.internalId != @id ) as selection_1 order by [level] ) as selection_2 return END If you have fresh ideas, please share them with me. (Just please, don't suggest to order by newid() or to add a column rand() with seed DateTime (by ms or sthg), because that won't work.)

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008: Getting duration between user sessions

    - by Nai
    I have this table UserID SessionID SessionStart SessionEnd ----------------------------------------------- 1 abc1 2010-1-1 2010-1-2 5 def3 2010-1-5 2010-1-9 1 llk0 2010-1-10 2010-1-11 5 spo8 2010-1-13 2010-1-15 1 pie7 2010-1-16 2010-1-29 I would like to be able to find the days between the end of one session to the start of the next session for each particular user. So I am looking to get something like UserID DaysBetweenSessions ----------------------------- 1 8 1 5 5 4 Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Design SQL Query for following case

    - by rs
    Consider tables Table1 id, name 1 xyz 2 abc 3 pqr Table2 id title 1 Mg1 2 Mg2 3 SG1 Table3 Tb1_id tb2_id count 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 4 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 I want to do query to give result like id title 1 MG1 2 MG2 3 Two or More Title MG1 has higher preference if MG1 and count = 1 then it is given as MG1 title , for others corresponding title is used and for count 1 as two or more

    Read the article

  • generating sequence number

    - by stackoverflowuser
    Hi Based on following TableA Data -------- Dummy1 Dummy2 Dummy3 . . DummyN is there a way to generate sequence number while selecting rows from the table. something like select sequence() as ID,* from Data that will give ID Data --------- 1 Dummy1 2 Dummy2 3 Dummy3 .... N DummyN Thanks.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2000: Why is this query w/ variables so slow vs w/o variables?

    - by William DiStefano
    I can't figure out why this query would be so slow with variables versus without them. I read some where that I need to enable "Dynamic Parameters" but I cannot find where to do this. DECLARE @BeginDate AS DATETIME ,@EndDate AS DATETIME SELECT @BeginDate = '2010-05-20' ,@EndDate = '2010-05-25' -- Fix date range to include time values SET @BeginDate = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), ISNULL(@BeginDate, '01/01/1990'), 101) + ' 00:00' SET @EndDate = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), ISNULL(@EndDate, '12/31/2099'), 101) + ' 23:59' SELECT * FROM claim c WHERE (c.Received_Date BETWEEN @BeginDate AND @EndDate) --this is much slower --(c.Received_Date BETWEEN '2010-05-20' AND '2010-05-25') --this is much faster

    Read the article

  • collation in stored procedure

    - by Sharique
    I have a table which contains data in different languages. All fields are nvarchar(max). I created a stored procedure which trim values of all the fields Create Proc [dbo].[TrimValues] as update testdata set city = dbo.trim(city), state = dbo.trim(state), country = dbo.trim(country), schoolname = dbo.trim(schoolname) after trim all non-english text become ?????

    Read the article

  • Sql Calculation And Sort By Date

    - by mahesh
    I have Confusion against utilize If,Else Statement against calculation of stock By date. And sort the same by date. There is real challenge to calculate running total between equal date: If date is equal If date is greater than If date is less than My Table Schema Is: TransID int, Auto Increment Date datetime, Inwards decimal(12,2) Outward decimal(12,2) Suppose If I have Records as Below: TransID Date(DD/MM/YYYY) Inward Outward 1 03/02/2011 100 2 12/04/2010 200 3 03/02/2011 400 Than Result Should be: TransID Date(DD/MM/YYYY) Inward Outward Balance 1 03/02/2011 100 -100 2 12/04/2010 200 -300 3 03/02/2011 400 100 I wants to calculate Inward - outwards = Balance and Balance count as running total as above. but the condition that it should be as per date order How to sort and calculate it by date and transID? What is transact SQL IN SQL_SERVER-2000**?.

    Read the article

  • "Order By" in LINQ-to-SQL Causes performance issues

    - by panamack
    I've set out to write a method in my C# application which can return an ordered subset of names from a table containing about 2000 names starting at the 100th name and returning the next 20 names. I'm doing this so I can populate a WPF DataGrid in my UI and do some custom paging. I've been using LINQ to SQL but hit a snag with this long executing query so I'm examining the SQL the LINQ query is using (Query B below). Query A runs well: SELECT TOP (20) [t0].[subject_id] AS [Subject_id], [t0].[session_id] AS [Session_id], [t0].[name] AS [Name] FROM [Subjects] AS [t0] WHERE (NOT (EXISTS( SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY] FROM ( SELECT TOP (100) [t1].[subject_id] FROM [Subjects] AS [t1] WHERE [t1].[session_id] = 1 ORDER BY [t1].[name] ) AS [t2] WHERE [t0].[subject_id] = [t2].[subject_id] ))) AND ([t0].[session_id] = 1) Query B takes 40 seconds: SELECT TOP (20) [t0].[subject_id] AS [Subject_id], [t0].[session_id] AS [Session_id], [t0].[name] AS [Name] FROM [Subjects] AS [t0] WHERE (NOT (EXISTS( SELECT NULL AS [EMPTY] FROM ( SELECT TOP (100) [t1].[subject_id] FROM [Subjects] AS [t1] WHERE [t1].[session_id] = 1 ORDER BY [t1].[name] ) AS [t2] WHERE [t0].[subject_id] = [t2].[subject_id] ))) AND ([t0].[session_id] = 1) ORDER BY [t0].[name] When I add the ORDER BY [t0].[name] to the outer query it slows down the query. How can I improve the second query? This was my LINQ stuff Nick int sessionId = 1; int start = 100; int count = 20; // Query subjects with the shoot's session id var subjects = cldb.Subjects.Where<Subject>(s => s.Session_id == sessionId); // Filter as per params var orderedSubjects = subjects .OrderBy<Subject, string>( s => s.Col_zero ); var filteredSubjects = orderedSubjects .Skip<Subject>(start) .Take<Subject>(count);

    Read the article

  • Same query has nested loops when used with INSERT, but Hash Match without.

    - by AaronLS
    I have two tables, one has about 1500 records and the other has about 300000 child records. About a 1:200 ratio. I stage the parent table to a staging table, SomeParentTable_Staging, and then I stage all of it's child records, but I only want the ones that are related to the records I staged in the parent table. So I use the below query to perform this staging by joining with the parent tables staged data. --Stage child records INSERT INTO [dbo].[SomeChildTable_Staging] ([SomeChildTableId] ,[SomeParentTableId] ,SomeData1 ,SomeData2 ,SomeData3 ,SomeData4 ) SELECT [SomeChildTableId] ,D.[SomeParentTableId] ,SomeData1 ,SomeData2 ,SomeData3 ,SomeData4 FROM [dbo].[SomeChildTable] D INNER JOIN dbo.SomeParentTable_Staging I ON D.SomeParentTableID = I.SomeParentTableID; The execution plan indicates that the tables are being joined with a Nested Loop. When I run just the select portion of the query without the insert, the join is performed with Hash Match. So the select statement is the same, but in the context of an insert it uses the slower nested loop. I have added non-clustered index on the D.SomeParentTableID so that there is an index on both sides of the join. I.SomeParentTableID is a primary key with clustered index. Why does it use a nested loop for inserts that use a join? Is there a way to improve the performance of the join for the insert?

    Read the article

  • Remove and Replace multiple chars ( spaces, hyphen, brackets, period) from string in sql

    - by Muhammad Kashif Nadeem
    +39 235 6595750 19874624611 +44 (0)181 446 5697 +431 6078115-2730 +1 617 358 5128 +48.40.23755432 +44 1691 872 410 07825 893217 0138 988 1649 (415) 706 2001 00 44 (0) 20 7660 4650 (765) 959-1504 07731 508 486 please reply by email dont have one +447769146971 Please see the above given phone numbers. I need to replace all spaces, hyphen, period, brackets and leading 0 etc from these numbers. I need this format +447469186974 If number has leading plus sign then don't replace it otherwise I have to concatenate + sign with it. E.G +39 235 6595750 in this number I just need to remove spaces. +44 (0)181 446 5697 in this i need to removes spaces and brackets and 0 in between brackets i.e (0) 07825 893217 in this I need to replace leading 0 with + sign and remove spaces (415) 706 2001 in this replace '(' with + sign and remove ')' and spaces. 'please reply by email' This is the entry in phone number field and I just need to ignore this. +48.40.23755432 Remove period in phone number (765) 959-1504 Remove brackets and spaces and hyphen and add + sign in front of number. 7798724250 just need to add + sign in front of number 00 44 (0) 20 7660-4650 Need to remove leading 0 I.E '00' remove spaces and brackets and 0 in between brackets and hyphen and add + sign in front of number Only leading '0' will be replaced not anyother occourence of '0' The desired result is +447769146971 Should I use nested REPLACE, CHARINDES, PATINDES for each char I want to replace? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Export products and variants from MSSQL

    - by mickyjtwin
    I have a SQL DB that has a table of products, and another table which contains a list of the sku variants of each product if it has one. I want to export all the products and their SKU's into excel. At the moment, I have a helper SQL function which performs the subquery against a product_id and concatenates all the SKU's into a comma-delimited string, e.g: Product Code, Name, SKUs 111 P1 77, 22, 11 Is there an easier way to do this, so that each SKU is a row which the associated product code as well, i.e: Product Code, Name, SKUs 111 P1 77 111 P1 22 111 P1 11

    Read the article

  • SQL syntax problem (multiple selects)

    - by user279521
    I am having problems retrieving accurate data values with my stored proc query below: CREATE PROCEDURE usp_InvoiceErrorLog @RecID int AS DECLARE @ErrorString as varchar(1000), @ErrorCode as int; Select @ErrorCode = ErrorCode from tbl_AcctRecv_WebRpt Where RecID = @RecID; IF NOT(@ErrorCode = NULL) Begin Select @ErrorString = ErrorDesc from tbl_ErrDesc Where ErrorCode = @ErrorCode End Select RecID, VendorNum, VendorName, InvNum, InvTotal, (SELECT CONVERT(VARCHAR(11), InvDate, 106) AS [DD MON YYYY]) As InvDate, TicketRequestor, ErrorCode, @ErrorString as ErrorDesc from tbl_AcctRecv_WebRpt Where RecID = @RecID The ErrorDesc column (in the final select statement at the bottom) returns a NULL value, when it should return a valid string data. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • FORMSOF Thesaurus in SQL Server

    - by Coolcoder
    Has anyone done any performance measures with this in terms of speed where there is a high number of substitutes for any given word. For instance, I want to use this to store common misspellings; expecting to have 4-10 variations of a word. <expansion> <sub>administration</sub> <sub>administraton</sub> <sub>aministraton</sub> </expansion> When you run a fulltext search, how does performance degrade with that number of variations? for instance, I assume it has to do a separate fulltext search performing an OR? Also, having say 20/30K entries in the Thesaurus xml file - does this impact performance?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >