Search Results

Search found 25546 results on 1022 pages for 'management studio express'.

Page 280/1022 | < Previous Page | 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287  | Next Page >

  • Découvrez les éditions de Visual Studio 2012 et leurs nouvelles fonctionnalités de design et de gestion du cycle de vie des applications

    Découvrez les éditions de Visual Studio 2012 ainsi que les fonctionnalités adaptées à vos besoins de la solution de gestion des projets logiciels Mise à jour du 24/09/2012 Visual Studio 2012 est disponible depuis le 12 septembre 2012. La solution propose une nouvelle génération d'outils de développement, de collaboration et de gestion du cycle de vie pour la conception des applications non seulement modernes et attrayantes, mais aussi accessibles n'importe où, n'importe quand, répondant aux attentes des clients. [IMG]http://rdonfack.developpez.com/images/vs20...

    Read the article

  • Micro Focus intègre Visual COBOL à Visual Studio 2012 et lance la version 11 de Borland DevPartner, son débogueur optimisé pour l'EDI

    Micro Focus intègre Visual COBOL à Visual Studio 2012 Et lance la version 11 de Borland DevPartner optimisée pour l'EDI L'éditeur Micro Focus vient d'annoncer l'intégration de sa solution Visual Cobol au prochain EDI de Microsoft. Une nouveauté qui permet de réutiliser ou de réaffecter les applications COBOL dans d'autres langages et dans d'autres environnements de développement tels que C#, Visual Basic ou ASP.NET. Nouveauté intéressante, cette version permet le déploiement dans le Cloud et des capacités de travail collaboratif renforcées. « Visual Studio 2012 améliore le processus de développement en permettant aux équipes de travai...

    Read the article

  • Windows Azure SDK 1.6 disponible : simplification du déploiement avec Visual Studio et introduction de nouvelles bibliothèques .NET

    Windows Azure SDK 1.6 disponible : simplification du déploiement avec Visual Studio et introduction de nouvelles bibliothèques .NET Microsoft vient de publier une nouvelle version du kit de développement pour Windows Azure. Le SDK 1.6 pour Windows Azure intègre de nouveaux outils de la plateforme d'hébergement Cloud de Microsoft pour Visual Studio 2010, de nouvelles bibliothèques .NET pour Windows Azure ainsi que des améliorations de performance et corrections de bugs. L'outil réduit les contraintes liées au déploiement des applications sur Windows Azure, dont la configuration peut se faire désormais en seulement quelques clics, sans quitter l'environnement de développemen...

    Read the article

  • Micro Focus intègre Visual COBOL à Visual Studio 2012 et lance la version 11 de Borland DevPartner, son débogueur optimisée pour l'EDI

    Micro Focus intègre Visual COBOL à Visual Studio 2012 Et lance la version 11 de Borland DevPartner optimisée pour l'EDI L'éditeur Micro Focus vient d'annoncer l'intégration de sa solution Visual Cobol au prochain EDI de Microsoft. Une nouveauté qui permet de réutiliser ou de réaffecter les applications COBOL dans d'autres langages et dans d'autres environnements de développement tels que C#, Visual Basic ou ASP.NET. Nouveauté intéressant, cette version permet le déploiement dans le Cloud et des capacités de travail collaboratif renforcées. « Visual Studio 2012 améliore le processus de développement en permettant aux équipes de travail...

    Read the article

  • ARM sort un IDE gratuit pour le développement natif sous Android : d'édition communautaire d'ARM Development Studio 5

    ARM sort un IDE gratuit pour le développement natif sous Android L'édition communautaire d'ARM Development Studio 5 ARM ltd, développeur de l'architecture éponyme, vient d'annoncer la disponibilité de Development Studio 5 (DS-5) en édition communautaire (CE). Cette édition permettra de développer sans frais de licence, des applications Android natives en C/C++ allant jusqu'à quatre fois plus vite que le code Java. Ce toolkit est fondé sur Eclipse. Il vient compléter les SDK et NDK (Native Develope...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft met à jour Windows App Studio, la plateforme de développement Web en ligne compte désormais 1,1 million d'utilisateurs

    Microsoft met à jour Windows App Studio La plateforme de développement Web en ligne compte désormais 1,1 million d'utilisateursWindows App Studio, la plateforme de développement en ligne de Microsoft évolue encore pour répondre aux besoins de ses utilisateurs.Microsoft vient d'annoncer le déploiement d'une nouvelle mise à jour qui ajoute des nouvelles fonctionnalités pour faciliter le déploiement d'applications Windows et Windows Phone sur le store.Désormais, après la création de votre application,...

    Read the article

  • Managing access to multiple linux system

    - by Swartz
    A searched for answers but have found nothing on here... Long story short: a non-profit organization is in dire need of modernizing its infrastructure. First thing is to find an alternatives to managing user accounts on a number of Linux hosts. We have 12 servers (both physical and virtual) and about 50 workstations. We have 500 potential users for these systems. The individual who built and maintained the systems over the years has retired. He wrote his own scripts to manage it all. It still works. No complaints there. However, a lot of the stuff is very manual and error-prone. Code is messy and after updates often needs to be tweaked. Worst part is there is little to no docs written. There are just a few ReadMe's and random notes which may or may not be relevant anymore. So maintenance has become a difficult task. Currently accounts are managed via /etc/passwd on each system. Updates are distributed via cron scripts to correct systems as accounts are added on the "main" server. Some users have to have access to all systems (like a sysadmin account), others need access to shared servers, while others may need access to workstations or only a subset of those. Is there a tool that can help us manage accounts that meets the following requirements? Preferably open source (i.e. free as budget is VERY limited) mainstream (i.e. maintained) preferably has LDAP integration or could be made to interface with LDAP or AD service for user authentication (will be needed in the near future to integrate accounts with other offices) user management (adding, expiring, removing, lockout, etc) allows to manage what systems (or group of systems) each user has access to - not all users are allowed on all systems support for user accounts that could have different homedirs and mounts available depending on what system they are logged into. For example sysadmin logged into "main" server has main://home/sysadmin/ as homedir and has all shared mounts sysadmin logged into staff workstations would have nas://user/s/sysadmin as homedir(different from above) and potentially limited set of mounts, a logged in client would have his/her homedir at different location and no shared mounts. If there is an easy management interface that would be awesome. And if this tool is cross-platform (Linux / MacOS / *nix), that will be a miracle! I have searched the web and so have found nothing suitable. We are open to any suggestions. Thank you. EDIT: This question has been incorrectly marked as a duplicate. The linked to answer only talks about having same homedirs on all systems, whereas we need to have different homedirs based on what system user is currently logged into(MULTIPLE homedirs). Also access needs to be granted only to some machinees not the whole lot. Mods, please understand the full extent of the problem instead of merely marking it as duplicate for points...

    Read the article

  • Why isn’t my autoreleased object getting released?

    - by zoul
    Hello. I am debugging a weird memory management error and I can’t figure it out. I noticed that some of my objects are staying in memory longer than expected. I checked all my memory management and finally got to the very improbable conclusion that some of my autorelease operations don’t result in a release. Under what circumstances is that possible? I created a small testing Canary class that logs a message in dealloc and have the following testing code in place: NSLog(@"On the main thread: %i.", [NSThread isMainThread]); [[[Canary alloc] init] autorelease]; According to the code we’re really on the main thread, but the dealloc in Canary does not get called until much later. The delay is not deterministic and can easily take seconds or more. How is that possible? The application runs on a Mac, the garbage collection is turned off (Objective-C Garbage Collection is set to Unsupported on the target.) I am mostly used to iOS, is memory management on OS X different in some important way?

    Read the article

  • Users in database server or database tables

    - by Batcat
    Hi all, I came across an interesting issue about client server application design. We have this browser based management application where it has many users using the system. So obvisously within that application we have an user management module within it. I have always thought having an user table in the database to keep all the login details was good enough. However, a senior developer said user management should be done in the database server layer if not then is poorly designed. What he meant was, if a user wants to use the application then a user should be created in the user table AND in the database server as a user account as well. So if I have 50 users using my applications, then I should have 50 database server user logins. I personally think having just one user account in the database server for this database was enough. Just grant this user with the allowed privileges to operate all the necessary operation need by the application. The users that are interacting with the application should have their user accounts created and managed within the database table as they are more related to the application layer. I don't see and agree there is need to create a database server user account for every user created for the application in the user table. A single database server user should be enough to handle all the query sent by the application. Really hope to hear some suggestions / opinions and whether I'm missing something? performance or security issues? Thank you very much.

    Read the article

  • Tips on managing dependencies for a release?

    - by Andrew Murray
    Our system comprises many .NET websites, class libraries, and a MSSQL database. We use SVN for source control and TeamCity to automatically build to a Test server. Our team is normally working on 4 or 5 projects at a time. We try to lump many changes into a largish rollout every 2-4 weeks. My problem is with keeping track of all the dependencies for a rollout. Example: Website A cannot go live until we've rolled out Branch X of Class library B, built in turn against the Trunk of Class library C, which needs Config Updates Y and Z and Database Update D, which needs Migration Script E... It gets even more complex - like making sure each developer's project is actually compatible with the others and are building against the same versions. Yes, this is a management issue as much as a technical issue. Currently our non-optimal solution is: a whiteboard listing features that haven't gone live yet relying on our memory and intuition when planning the rollout, until we're pretty sure we've thought of everything... a dry-run on our Staging environment. It's a good indication but we're often not sure if Staging is 100% in sync with Live - part of the problem I'm hoping to solve. some amount of winging it on rollout day. So far so good, minus a few close calls. But as our system grows, I'd like a more scientific release management system allowing for more flexibility, like being able to roll out a single change or bugfix on it's own, safe in the knowledge that it won't break anything else. I'm guessing the best solution involves some sort of version numbering system, and perhaps using a project management tool. We're a start-up, so we're not too hot on religiously sticking to rigid processes, but we're happy to start, providing it doesn't add more overhead than it's worth. I'd love to hear advice from other teams who have solved this problem.

    Read the article

  • Is Social Media The Vital Skill You Aren’t Tracking?

    - by HCM-Oracle
    By Mark Bennett - Originally featured in Talent Management Excellence The ever-increasing presence of the workforce on social media presents opportunities as well as risks for organizations. While on the one hand, we read about social media embarrassments happening to organizations, on the other we see that social media activities by workers and candidates can enhance a company’s brand and provide insight into what individuals are, or can become, influencers in the social media sphere. HR can play a key role in helping organizations make the most value out of the activities and presence of workers and candidates, while at the same time also helping to manage the risks that come with the permanence and viral nature of social media. What is Missing from Understanding Our Workforce? “If only HP knew what HP knows, we would be three-times more productive.”  Lew Platt, Former Chairman, President, CEO, Hewlett-Packard  What Lew Platt recognized was that organizations only have a partial understanding of what their workforce is capable of. This lack of understanding impacts the company in several negative ways: 1. A particular skill that the company needs to access in one part of the organization might exist somewhere else, but there is no record that the skill exists, so the need is unfulfilled. 2. As market conditions change rapidly, the company needs to know strategic options, but some options are missed entirely because the company doesn’t know that sufficient capability already exists to enable those options. 3. Employees may miss out on opportunities to demonstrate how their hidden skills could create new value to the company. Why don’t companies have that more complete picture of their workforce capabilities – that is, not know what they know? One very good explanation is that companies put most of their efforts into rating their workforce according to the jobs and roles they are filling today. This is the essence of two important talent management processes: recruiting and performance appraisals.  In recruiting, a set of requirements is put together for a job, either explicitly or indirectly through a job description. During the recruiting process, much of the attention is paid towards whether the candidate has the qualifications, the skills, the experience and the cultural fit to be successful in the role. This makes a lot of sense.  In the performance appraisal process, an employee is measured on how well they performed the functions of their role and in an effort to help the employee do even better next time, they are also measured on proficiency in the competencies that are deemed to be key in doing that job. Again, the logic is impeccable.  But in both these cases, two adages come to mind: 1. What gets measured is what gets managed. 2. You only see what you are looking for. In other words, the fact that the current roles the workforce are performing are the basis for measuring which capabilities the workforce has, makes them the only capabilities to be measured. What was initially meant to be a positive, i.e. identify what is needed to perform well and measure it, in order that it can be managed, comes with the unintended negative consequence of overshadowing the other capabilities the workforce has. This also comes with an employee engagement price, for the measurements and management of workforce capabilities is to typically focus on where the workforce comes up short. Again, it makes sense to do this, since improving a capability that appears to result in improved performance benefits, both the individual through improved performance ratings and the company through improved productivity. But this is based on the assumption that the capabilities identified and their required proficiencies are the only attributes of the individual that matter. Anything else the individual brings that results in high performance, while resulting in a desired performance outcome, often goes unrecognized or underappreciated at best. As social media begins to occupy a more important part in current and future roles in organizations, businesses must incorporate social media savvy and innovation into job descriptions and expectations. These new measures could provide insight into how well someone can use social media tools to influence communities and decision makers; keep abreast of trends in fast-moving industries; present a positive brand image for the organization around thought leadership, customer focus, social responsibility; and coordinate and collaborate with partners. These measures should demonstrate the “social capital” the individual has invested in and developed over time. Without this dimension, “short cut” methods may generate a narrow set of positive metrics that do not have real, long-lasting benefits to the organization. How Workforce Reputation Management Helps HR Harness Social Media With hundreds of petabytes of social media data flowing across Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter, businesses are tapping technology solutions to effectively leverage social for HR. Workforce reputation management technology helps organizations discover, mobilize and retain talent by providing insight into the social reputation and influence of the workforce while also helping organizations monitor employee social media policy compliance and mitigate social media risk.  There are three major ways that workforce reputation management technology can play a strategic role to support HR: 1. Improve Awareness and Decisions on Talent Many organizations measure the skills and competencies that they know they need today, but are unaware of what other skills and competencies their workforce has that could be essential tomorrow. How about whether your workforce has the reputation and influence to make their skills and competencies more effective? Many organizations don’t have insight into the social media “reach” their workforce has, which is becoming more critical to business performance. These features help organizations, managers, and employees improve many talent processes and decision making, including the following: Hiring and Assignments. People and teams with higher reputations are considered more valuable and effective workers. Someone with high reputation who refers a candidate also can have high credibility as a source for hires.   Training and Development. Reputation trend analysis can impact program decisions regarding training offerings by showing how reputation and influence across the workforce changes in concert with training. Worker reputation impacts development plans and goal choices by helping the individual see which development efforts result in improved reputation and influence.   Finding Hidden Talent. Managers can discover hidden talent and skills amongst employees based on a combination of social profile information and social media reputation. Employees can improve their personal brand and accelerate their career development.  2. Talent Search and Discovery The right technology helps organizations find information on people that might otherwise be hidden. By leveraging access to candidate and worker social profiles as well as their social relationships, workforce reputation management provides companies with a more complete picture of what their knowledge, skills, and attributes are and what they can in turn access. This more complete information helps to find the right talent both outside the organization as well as the right, perhaps previously hidden talent, within the organization to fill roles and staff projects, particularly those roles and projects that are required in reaction to fast-changing opportunities and circumstances. 3. Reputation Brings Credibility Workforce reputation management technology provides a clearer picture of how candidates and workers are viewed by their peers and communities across a wide range of social reputation and influence metrics. This information is less subject to individual bias and can impact critical decision-making. Knowing the individual’s reputation and influence enables the organization to predict how well their capabilities and behaviors will have a positive effect on desired business outcomes. Many roles that have the highest impact on overall business performance are dependent on the individual’s influence and reputation. In addition, reputation and influence measures offer a very tangible source of feedback for workers, providing them with insight that helps them develop themselves and their careers and see the effectiveness of those efforts by tracking changes over time in their reputation and influence. The following are some examples of the different reputation and influence measures of the workforce that Workforce Reputation Management could gather and analyze: Generosity – How often the user reposts other’s posts. Influence – How often the user’s material is reposted by others.  Engagement – The ratio of recent posts with references (e.g. links to other posts) to the total number of posts.  Activity – How frequently the user posts. (e.g. number per day)  Impact – The size of the users’ social networks, which indicates their ability to reach unique followers, friends, or users.   Clout – The number of references and citations of the user’s material in others’ posts.  The Vital Ingredient of Workforce Reputation Management: Employee Participation “Nothing about me, without me.” Valerie Billingham, “Through the Patient’s Eyes”, Salzburg Seminar Session 356, 1998 Since data resides primarily in social media, a question arises: what manner is used to collect that data? While much of social media activity is publicly accessible (as many who wished otherwise have learned to their chagrin), the social norms of social media have developed to put some restrictions on what is acceptable behavior and by whom. Disregarding these norms risks a repercussion firestorm. One of the more recognized norms is that while individuals can follow and engage with other individual’s public social activity (e.g. Twitter updates) fairly freely, the more an organization does this unprompted and without getting permission from the individual beforehand, the more likely the organization risks a totally opposite outcome from the one desired. Instead, the organization must look for permission from the individual, which can be met with resistance. That resistance comes from not knowing how the information will be used, how it will be shared with others, and not receiving enough benefit in return for granting permission. As the quote above about patient concerns and rights succinctly states, no one likes not feeling in control of the information about themselves, or the uncertainty about where it will be used. This is well understood in consumer social media (i.e. permission-based marketing) and is applicable to workforce reputation management. However, asking permission leaves open the very real possibility that no one, or so few, will grant permission, resulting in a small set of data with little usefulness for the company. Connecting Individual Motivation to Organization Needs So what is it that makes an individual decide to grant an organization access to the data it wants? It is when the individual’s own motivations are in alignment with the organization’s objectives. In the case of workforce reputation management, when the individual is motivated by a desire for increased visibility and career growth opportunities to advertise their skills and level of influence and reputation, they are aligned with the organizations’ objectives; to fill resource needs or strategically build better awareness of what skills are present in the workforce, as well as levels of influence and reputation. Individuals can see the benefit of granting access permission to the company through multiple means. One is through simple social awareness; they begin to discover that peers who are getting more career opportunities are those who are signed up for workforce reputation management. Another is where companies take the message directly to the individual; we think you would benefit from signing up with our workforce reputation management solution. Another, more strategic approach is to make reputation management part of a larger Career Development effort by the company; providing a wide set of tools to help the workforce find ways to plan and take action to achieve their career aspirations in the organization. An effective mechanism, that facilitates connecting the visibility and career growth motivations of the workforce with the larger context of the organization’s business objectives, is to use game mechanics to help individuals transform their career goals into concrete, actionable steps, such as signing up for reputation management. This works in favor of companies looking to use workforce reputation because the workforce is more apt to see how it fits into achieving their overall career goals, as well as seeing how other participation brings additional benefits.  Once an individual has signed up with reputation management, not only have they made themselves more visible within the organization and increased their career growth opportunities, they have also enabled a tool that they can use to better understand how their actions and behaviors impact their influence and reputation. Since they will be able to see their reputation and influence measurements change over time, they will gain better insight into how reputation and influence impacts their effectiveness in a role, as well as how their behaviors and skill levels in turn affect their influence and reputation. This insight can trigger much more directed, and effective, efforts by the individual to improve their ability to perform at a higher level and become more productive. The increased sense of autonomy the individual experiences, in linking the insight they gain to the actions and behavior changes they make, greatly enhances their engagement with their role as well as their career prospects within the company. Workforce reputation management takes the wide range of disparate data about the workforce being produced across various social media platforms and transforms it into accessible, relevant, and actionable information that helps the organization achieve its desired business objectives. Social media holds untapped insights about your talent, brand and business, and workforce reputation management can help unlock them. Imagine - if you could find the hidden secrets of your businesses, how much more productive and efficient would your organization be? Mark Bennett is a Director of Product Strategy at Oracle. Mark focuses on setting the strategic vision and direction for tools that help organizations understand, shape, and leverage the capabilities of their workforce to achieve business objectives, as well as help individuals work effectively to achieve their goals and navigate their own growth. His combination of a deep technical background in software design and development, coupled with a broad knowledge of business challenges and thinking in today’s globalized, rapidly changing, technology accelerated economy, has enabled him to identify and incorporate key innovations that are central to Oracle Fusion’s unique value proposition. Mark has over the course of his career been in charge of the design, development, and strategy of Talent Management products and the design and development of cutting edge software that is better equipped to handle the increasingly complex demands of users while also remaining easy to use. Follow him @mpbennett

    Read the article

  • Best laptop for .NET and Java programmer [closed]

    - by achinth
    I am planning to buy a new laptop and would like to know if I should go for an i3, i5 or an i7 based laptop? I do most of my development in Visual Studio 2010 and also use Eclipse and Weblogic 10. Also planning to use WPF/Silverlight in the future. Will going for a i7 really benefit me or an i3 or an i5 will suffice for my needs?

    Read the article

  • Understanding Linker Map File (MS Visual Studio 2005)

    - by jeshop
    All - I'm trying to understand the first section of the Map file produced by the MS Visual Studio 2005 linker. I know it has something to do with memory sections, but can someone help me decipher it? Timestamp is 4b4f8d2b (Thu Jan 14 14:31:23 2010) Preferred load address is 00400000 Start Length Name Class 0001:00000000 0028b752H .text CODE 0002:00000000 000001b4H .idata$5 DATA 0002:000001b4 00000004H .CRT$XCA DATA 0002:000001b8 00000004H .CRT$XCAA DATA 0002:000001bc 00000004H .CRT$XCC DATA 0002:000001c0 00000004H .CRT$XCZ DATA 0002:000001c4 00000004H .CRT$XIA DATA 0002:000001c8 00000004H .CRT$XIAA DATA 0002:000001cc 00000004H .CRT$XIC DATA 0002:000001d0 00000004H .CRT$XIZ DATA 0002:000001d8 00025288H .rdata DATA 0002:00025460 00000004H .rdata$sxdata DATA 0002:00025464 00000004H .rtc$IAA DATA 0002:00025468 00000004H .rtc$IZZ DATA 0002:0002546c 00000004H .rtc$TAA DATA 0002:00025470 00000004H .rtc$TZZ DATA 0002:00025478 0000007cH .xdata$x DATA 0002:000254f4 00000028H .idata$2 DATA 0002:0002551c 00000014H .idata$3 DATA 0002:00025530 000001b4H .idata$4 DATA 0002:000256e4 00000542H .idata$6 DATA 0002:00025c26 00000000H .edata DATA 0003:00000000 000f070cH .data DATA 0003:000f0720 001f1280H .bss DATA

    Read the article

  • Font Setting in VS2010 - missing FixedSys

    - by Nano HE
    After installing VS2010 yesterday - (both VS2005 and VS2010 installed), I can't find the "FixedSys" style font from the Fonts and Colors - Font (pull down list). I can still use the font in VS2005. [update] I just searched "C:\WINDOWS\Fonts", there is no Fixedsys style in the folder. Any suggestions on how to make FixedSys available as a choice in Visual Studio 2010?

    Read the article

  • How to change VS2010 Add Reference box filter ?

    - by rook
    I'm getting used to the new IDE (it's vc# express), but the first contact is somewhat confusing. When I open the Add Reference dialog and switch to the .NET tab, a label above the assembly list states: "Filtered to:.NET Framework 4". And it's true - I can reference .NET 4.0 assemblies only plus things like XNA 3.1. However I can't see older assemblies i.e. Managed DirectX libs, which are obviously installed on my computer as there was no trouble with adding a ref to them in vc#08. What is this? How to change the filter? The label is read-only. These sound like dull guy's questions, but I'm out of lack of finding an answer and there is no intuitive solution. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Pros and Cons of ASNA Visual RPG (AVR)

    - by mga911
    Have you had any experience with ASNA Visual RPG for Visual Studio 2005/2008? I'm looking for some feedback on this product. I'm especially curious as to how it compares to other methods of accessing files and programs on the IBM’s System i (formerly known as iSeries, AS/400) server. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Migrating ASP.NET (MVC 2) on .NET 3.5 over to .NET 4

    - by Charlino
    I've currently got a ASP.NET MVC 2 application on .NET 3.5 and I want to migrate it over to the new .NET 4.0 with Visual Studio 2010. Reason being that it's always good to stay on top of these things - plus I really like the new automatic encoding with <%: %> and clean web.config :-) So, does anyone have any experience they could share? Looking for gotchas and the likes. I guess this could also apply to any ASP.NET Forms projects aswell. TIA, Charles

    Read the article

  • Build failing - VS2010 solution on TFS2008

    - by Nick
    I have migrated a VS2008 ASP.NET MVC solution to VS2010/MVC2/.NET 4.0 The solution builds locally and all unit tests pass. Our TFS server is still TFS2008 and I am having problems getting the CI build to pass. The projects all build successfully, the unit tests all run and pass but the Running Tests item fails. I followed this blog post on how to get the build working and I'm almost there. Combing the log file for failures I have found the following: Test Run Completed. Passed 1101 ------------ Total 1101 Results file: C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\TestResults\apptemetrybuild_ATT15DEV01 2010-04-27 09_09_59_Any CPU_Release.trx Test Settings: Default Test Settings Waiting to publish... Publishing results of test run apptemetrybuild@ATT15DEV01 2010-04-27 09:09:59_Any CPU_Release to http://att15tfs01:8080/... .....Publish completed successfully. Command: D:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\MSTest.exe /nologo /searchpathroot:"C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\Binaries\Release" /resultsfileroot:"C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\TestResults" /testcontainer:"C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\Binaries\Release\\Attenda.Stargate.Security.Tests.dll" /publish:"http://att15tfs01:8080/" /publishbuild:"vstfs:///Build/Build/149" /teamproject:"Client Portal 3" /platform:"Any CPU" /flavor:"Release" The "TestToolsTask" task is using "MSTest.exe" from "D:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\MSTest.exe". Loading C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\Binaries\Release\\Attenda.Stargate.Security.Tests.dll... C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\Binaries\Release\\Attenda.Stargate.Security.Tests.dll Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\Binaries\Release\Attenda.Stargate.Security.Tests.dll' or one of its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded. MSBUILD : warning MSB6006: "MSTest.exe" exited with code 1. [C:\Documents and Settings\apptemetrybuild\Local Settings\Temp\Client Portal 3\CI\BuildType\TFSBuild.proj] The previous error was converted to a warning because the task was called with ContinueOnError=true. Build continuing because "ContinueOnError" on the task "TestToolsTask" is set to "true". Done executing task "TestToolsTask" -- FAILED. It looks like it's trying to use the 2008 MSTest tool even though I have specified ToolsVersion="4.0" in the tfsbuild.proj and changed the MSBuildPath in the TfsBuildService.exe.config on the build server. Can anyone point me in the right direction to get this to build successfully? Many thanks, Nick

    Read the article

  • how to exclude a Web Reference from Code Coverage in VS 2008 Team System

    - by Sarah Vessels
    When I run my MSTest tests in Visual Studio 2008 Team System and get code coverage results, I always see a particular web service included. I don't care how well this web service is tested, I'm intentionally only using a small part of it. How can I exclude the Web Reference from showing up in my Code Coverage results? I see that someone asked this very question over on Microsoft Connect and it's marked as postponed, but I was hoping someone knew of a workaround.

    Read the article

  • Problems upgrading VB.Net 2008 project into VS2010

    - by Brett Rigby
    Hi there, I have been upgrading several different VS2008 projects into VS2010 and have found a problem with VB.Net projects when they are converted. Once converted, the .vbproj files have changed from this in VS2008: <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Debug|AnyCPU' "> <DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols> <DebugType>full</DebugType> <DefineDebug>true</DefineDebug> <DefineTrace>true</DefineTrace> <OutputPath>bin\Debug\</OutputPath> <DocumentationFile>CustomerManager.xml</DocumentationFile> <WarningsAsErrors>41999,42016,42017,42018,42019,42020,42021,42022,42032,42036</WarningsAsErrors> </PropertyGroup> To this in VS2010: <PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Debug|AnyCPU' "> <DebugSymbols>true</DebugSymbols> <DebugType>full</DebugType> <DefineDebug>true</DefineDebug> <DefineTrace>true</DefineTrace> <OutputPath>bin\Debug\</OutputPath> <DocumentationFile>CustomerManager.xml</DocumentationFile> <NoWarn>42353,42354,42355</NoWarn> <WarningsAsErrors>41999,42016,42017,42018,42019,42020,42021,42022,42032,42036</WarningsAsErrors> </PropertyGroup> The main difference, is that in the VS2010 version, the 42353,42354,42355 value has been added; Inside the IDE, this manifests itself as the following setting in the Project Properties | Compile section as: "Function returning intrinsic value type without return value" = None This isn't a problem when building code inside Visual Studio 2010, but when trying to build the code through our continuous integration scripts, it fails with the following errors: [msbuild] vbc : Command line error BC2026: warning number '42353' for the option 'nowarn' is either not configurable or not valid [msbuild] vbc : Command line error BC2026: warning number '42354' for the option 'nowarn' is either not configurable or not valid [msbuild] vbc : Command line error BC2026: warning number '42355' for the option 'nowarn' is either not configurable or not valid I couldn't find anything on Google for these messages, which is strange, as I am trying to find out why this is happening. Any suggestions as to why Visual Studio 2010's conversion wizard is doing this?

    Read the article

  • Webservice works with SoapSonar but not with Visual Studio Winform

    - by Rebol Tutorial
    I have generated a wsdl file with Visual Studio which is here; http://reboltutorial.com/webservices/discordian.wsdl Implementation is a cgi instead of a .net framework program but that should not matter as it is the purposes of webservices. I tested it successfully with SoapSonar: But under Visual Studio it fails with this code: private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { RebolTutorial.ServiceSoapClient Discordian = new RebolTutorial.ServiceSoapClient("ServiceSoap"); int year = int.Parse(this.year.Text); int month = int.Parse(this.month.Text); int day = int.Parse(this.day.Text); response.Text = Discordian.Discordian(year,month,day); } Any reason you can see ? Thanks. Request below: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:tns="http://reboltutorial.com/"> <soap:Body> <tns:Discordian> <tns:year>2010</tns:year> <tns:month>5</tns:month> <tns:day>1</tns:day> </tns:Discordian> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope> as well as WSDL if needed: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <wsdl:definitions xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:tm="http://microsoft.com/wsdl/mime/textMatching/" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/" xmlns:tns="http://reboltutorial.com/" xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/" xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/" targetNamespace="http://reboltutorial.com/" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"> <wsdl:types> <s:schema elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://reboltutorial.com/"> <s:element name="Discordian"> <s:complexType> <s:sequence> <s:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="year" type="s:int" /> <s:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="month" type="s:int" /> <s:element minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" name="day" type="s:int" /> </s:sequence> </s:complexType> </s:element> <s:element name="DiscordianResponse"> <s:complexType> <s:sequence> <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" name="DiscordianResult" type="s:string" /> </s:sequence> </s:complexType> </s:element> </s:schema> </wsdl:types> <wsdl:message name="DiscordianSoapIn"> <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="tns:Discordian" /> </wsdl:message> <wsdl:message name="DiscordianSoapOut"> <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="tns:DiscordianResponse" /> </wsdl:message> <wsdl:portType name="ServiceSoap"> <wsdl:operation name="Discordian"> <wsdl:input message="tns:DiscordianSoapIn" /> <wsdl:output message="tns:DiscordianSoapOut" /> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:portType> <wsdl:binding name="ServiceSoap" type="tns:ServiceSoap"> <soap:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" /> <wsdl:operation name="Discordian"> <soap:operation soapAction="http://reboltutorial.com/Discordian" style="document" /> <wsdl:input> <soap:body use="literal" /> </wsdl:input> <wsdl:output> <soap:body use="literal" /> </wsdl:output> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:binding> <wsdl:binding name="ServiceSoap12" type="tns:ServiceSoap"> <soap12:binding transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" /> <wsdl:operation name="Discordian"> <soap12:operation soapAction="http://reboltutorial.com/Discordian" style="document" /> <wsdl:input> <soap12:body use="literal" /> </wsdl:input> <wsdl:output> <soap12:body use="literal" /> </wsdl:output> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:binding> <wsdl:service name="Service"> <wsdl:port name="ServiceSoap" binding="tns:ServiceSoap"> <soap:address location="http://reboltutorial.com/cgi-bin/discordian.cgi" /> </wsdl:port> <wsdl:port name="ServiceSoap12" binding="tns:ServiceSoap12"> <soap12:address location="http://reboltutorial.com/cgi-bin/discordian.cgi" /> </wsdl:port> </wsdl:service> </wsdl:definitions>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287  | Next Page >