Search Results

Search found 45193 results on 1808 pages for 'select call'.

Page 282/1808 | < Previous Page | 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289  | Next Page >

  • Execute query stored in variable in a very specific way

    - by niao
    Greetings, I have a problem as follows: I have an SQL variable declared: DECLARE @myVariable nvarchar(max) a third party library set a value for this variable. To simplify, lets say that the value is as follows: SET @myVariable = 'Select ROWGUID from MySampleTable' Now, I want to execute the following query: SELECT ROWGUID FROM myTable WHERE ROWGUID in (exec sp_executesql @myVariable ) However, the above statement does not work because it returns an error telling me that I can't execute stored procedure in that way. I made a workaround and this is what I wrote: create table #temptable (ID uniqueidentifier null) if(@myVariable is not null AND @myVariable !='') insert into #temptable exec sp_executesql @myVariable SELECT ROWGUID FROM myTable WHERE ROWGUID in (select * from #temptable) DROP TABLE #temptable This works fine.However I don't think it is a good idea to use temporary table. How can I achieve the same result without necessity of creating temporary tables? I am using SQL SERVER 2005

    Read the article

  • Selecting a sequence of elements from the IList

    - by KhanS
    I have a IList. where the object PersonDetails consists of the persons name, address and phone number. The list consists of more than 1000 person details. I would like to display 50 PersonDetails per page. Is there a way to select only 50 elements from the list, and return them. For example. myList.select(1,50) myList.select(51, 100) I am able to select only first 50 by using. myList.Take(50); The entire list is at the wcf service, and i would like to get only fifty elements at a time.

    Read the article

  • need help understanding a function.

    - by Adam McC
    i had previously asked for help writing/improving a function that i need to calculate a premium based on differing values for each month. the premium is split in to 12 months and earned on a percentage for each month. so if the policy start in march and we are in jan we will have earned 10 months worth. so i need to add up the monthly earning to give us the total earned. wach company wil have differeing earnings values for each month. my original code is Here. its ghastly and slow hence the request for help. and i was presented with the following code. the code works but returns stupendously large figures. begin set @begin=datepart(month,@outdate) set @end=datepart(month,@experiencedate) ;with a as ( select *, case calmonth when 'january' then 1 when 'february' then 2 when 'march' then 3 when 'april' then 4 when 'may' then 5 when 'june' then 6 when 'july' then 7 when 'august' then 8 when 'september' then 9 when 'october' then 10 when 'november' then 11 when 'december' then 12 end as Mnth from tblearningpatterns where clientname=@client and earningpattern=@pattern ) , b as ( select earningvalue, Mnth, earningvalue as Ttl from a where Mnth=@begin union all select a.earningvalue, a.Mnth, cast(b.Ttl*a.earningvalue as decimal(15,3)) as Ttl from a inner join b on a.Mnth=b.Mnth+1 where a.Mnth<=@end ) select @earningvalue= Ttl from b inner join ( select max(Mnth) as Mnth from b ) c on b.Mnth=c.Mnth option(maxrecursion 12) SET @earnedpremium = @earningvalue*@premium end can someone please help me out?

    Read the article

  • How to set the option value through model

    - by user281180
    I need to have the value for the option in the following: I have created my select as follows: <select id="fromSelectBox" multiple="multiple" > <% foreach (var item in Model.Projects) { %> <option><%=Html.Encode(item.Text)%></option> <%} %> </select> How do I set the value of the option using the value in the model which s item.ID?

    Read the article

  • get index name within specific table name

    - by AmRoSH
    I need to check if this index not exist in specific table name not in all tables because this select statement select all indexes under this condition. IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT name from sysindexes WHERE name = 'IDX_InsuranceID') CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IDX_InsuranceID] ON [dbo].[QuoteInsurances] ( [InsuranceID] ASC )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY] GO Thanks,

    Read the article

  • How to group by having the same id?

    - by simpatico
    Hello, I want the customerid who bought product X and Y and Z, from the following schema: Sales(customerid, productName, rid); I could do the intersection: select customerid from sales where productName='X' INTERSECT select customerid from sales where productName='X' INTERSTECT select customerid from sales where productName='Z' Is this the best I could do?

    Read the article

  • How to use strtok in C properly so there is no memory leak?

    - by user246392
    I am somewhat confused by what happens when you call strtok on a char pointer in C. I know that it modifies the contents of the string, so if I call strtok on a variable named 'line', its content will change. Assume I follow the bellow approach: void function myFunc(char* line) { // get a pointer to the original memory block char* garbageLine = line; // Do some work // Call strtok on 'line' multiple times until it returns NULL // Do more work free(garbageLine); } Further assume that 'line' is malloced before it is passed to myFunc. Am I supposed to free the original string after using strtok or does it do the job for us? Also, what happens if 'line' is not malloced and I attempt to use the function above? Is it safer to do the following instead? (Assume the programmer won't call free if he knows the line is not malloced) Invocation char* garbageLine = line; myFunc(line); free(garbageLine); Function definition void function myFunc(char* line) { // Do some work // Call strtok on 'line' multiple times until it returns NULL // Do more work }

    Read the article

  • is there an equivalent to a "Focus Listener" in Objective-C or iPhone SDK? (Coming from Java)

    - by MarcZero
    Hello. I am a student programmer who has taken up Objective-C on my free time as my college doesn't teach it. We have only used Java and basic C so far. I am in the middle of making a program for the iPod and was wondering if there was any type of way to call a method in a class similar to the way a Focus Listener does in Java? I have a view that I would like to call a refresh method (to update the newly inputted titles of buttons from another view) when the view is put at the top and visible again. Is this too easy or is there a more methodical way of doing that? I have tried to just call the method from the other view class but it does not seem to work (says the other class is either undefined or may not accept the method call and crashes on execution). Any insight would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.

    Read the article

  • Mysql dynamic query

    - by pradeep
    I have two table in mysql one tbl_a which has one int column id, second tbl_b which has one column song_ids in which data stored seapated by comma like 1,2,3,4 i want to select all id like this select * from tbl_a where id in (select song_id from tbl_b) but its giving me no record as its varchar HOW to do it in mysql

    Read the article

  • what is the output of this code?

    - by user329820
    Hi,I have wriiten a part of code for you and I want to know the output ,I need your help because there is not any body for helping me also I think that the out put is A ,is this correct? thanks. declare @v1 varchar(20),@v2 varchar(20) select @v1 = 'NULL' if @v1 is null and @v2 is null select 'A' else select 'B'

    Read the article

  • How to validate the radio button and checkbox?

    - by xasjaiod123
    For radio button: $(document).ready(function() { $('#select-number').click(function() { if ($('input:radio', this).is(':checked')) { return true; } else { alert('Please select something!'); return false; } }); }); It is working fine when no radio button is selected. But When I select the radio button and submit the form Then also it is giving me the alert message 'Please select something!' Is there any good tutorials available for validation using Jquery for newbie.

    Read the article

  • Update XML as Upper Case in SQL Server

    - by monO
    I store an XML string in a column in my SQL Server database. I'm trying to run an UPDATE statement that will make a certain field into Upper Case. I can do that easily during a SELECT but can't get it to work with an update. This SELECT statement works select Upper(XmlTest.value('(/CodeFiveReport/Owner/@UnitNumber)[1]', 'varchar(10)')) as UnitNumber from uploadreport But I want to update it the XML as that permanently Update table Set XmlString.Modify('replace value of (/Root/Node/@Field)[1] with ?

    Read the article

  • Cant use with clauses in find_by_sql

    - by PaulMurrayCbr
    Activerecord seems to be peeking at my sql and getting it wrong. I am finding that this: sql = " select etn.* from edittree_name etn where id = #{id}" Name.find_by_sql(sql) works, but this: sql = " with pp as ( select * from dual) select etn.* from edittree_name etn where id = #{id}" Name.find_by_sql(sql) Gives me a "undefined method `each' for 1:Fixnum". Any clues? Is there a "find_by_raw_sql (and don't try to understand it yourself)" method?

    Read the article

  • difference between where and nested queries

    - by Chris H
    I'm not able to figure out the difference between these queries. I'm pretty sure that the first one is an equi-join. I'm not sure how the second one ISN'T the same as the first. The sub query in #2 selects all Ids from S, and then it returns all R's that also have those ID's, no? SELECT R.cname FROM R, S, WHERE R.Id = S.Id SELECT R.cname FROM R WHERE R.Id IN (SELECT S.Id FROM S)

    Read the article

  • SQL Server dilemma, performance

    - by Woland
    Hello I am creating app where user can save options witch one is better? to save into user table varchar feeld smthing like ('1,23,4354,34,3') query for this is select * from data where CHARINDEX ( 'L', Providers , 0 ) 0 create other table where user options are and just add rows select * from data where Providers in (select Providers from userdata where userid=100) thanks for help

    Read the article

  • SQL to LINQ translating probem

    - by ognjenb
    I have problem with convertion this SQL statement to LINQ : SELECT a.Id, a.Name, a.ArtiklNumber, a.Notes, a.Weight, l.StartDate AS LastStartDate, l.LocationNameId, loc.Name AS CarrentLocation, a.Reserved FROM Accessories a LEFT OUTER JOIN Location l LEFT JOIN LocationName loc ON l.LocationNameId = loc.Id ON a.Id = (SELECT AccessoriesId FROM Location WHERE AccessoriesId = a.Id HAVING MAX(StartDate) = StartDate ) This is part of my translated code: testEntities6 accessoriesEntities = new testEntities6(); var max_StartDate = (from msd in accessoriesEntities.location from d in accessoriesEntities.device where msd.DeviceId == d.Id select msd.StartDate).Min(); var accessories_query = from accs in accessoriesEntities.accessories join l in accessoriesEntities.location on accs.Id equals l.AccessoriesId join loc in accessoriesEntities.locationname on l.LocationNameId equals loc.Id select new AccessoriesModel { //Accessories Id = accs.Id, Name = accs.Name, ArtiklNumber = accs.ArtiklNumber, Notes = accs.Notes, Weight = accs.Weight, Reserved = accs.Reserved, //Location LocationNameId = l.LocationNameId, StartDate = max_StartDate,//l.StartDate, //Locationname Loc_name = loc.Name };

    Read the article

  • How can I decrease time opening myisam table in an "union all" of the same table??

    - by parm.95
    I have a myisam table with 2.5M rows, I use an union all to get my results as following: (SELECT t.id FROM t WHERE type=1 LIMIT 10) UNION ALL (SELECT t.id FROM t WHERE type=2 LIMIT 10) ... UNION ALL (SELECT t.id FROM t WHERE type=25 LIMIT 10) the time to opening the table t is about 6ms. With a single request: SELECT t.id FROM t WHERE type=1 LIMIT 10 the time is about 1ms. What I don't understand is why mysql spend more time to the same table in union all. It should recognize that is the same table and so just opening at the first union. Does anybody can help me to decrease the time for opening table in a "union all"? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Setting MySQL column names

    - by Richard Mar.
    Say I have these tables: people(id, name), cars(person_id, car) and this query: SELECT c.car FROM people as p, cars as c WHERE c.person_id = p.id AND p.id = 3 I want the c.car column to take its name from the name field in the people table, like this (invalid SQL, just to illustrate): SELECT c.car AS(SELECT name FROM people WHERE id = 3) How do I do that?

    Read the article

  • Only get the value if a condition is true

    - by Autolycus
    I am checking to see if element1, element 2 or element 3 exists and then add them to finalData if they exist. However if one of those dont exist or are not true then I just want to add the elements whose bool value is true! Below is my code bool hasElement1 = ( from Playlist in loaded.Descendants("Node") select Playlist.Descendants("Element1").Any() ).Single(); bool hasElement2 = ( from Playlist in loaded.Descendants("Node") select Playlist.Descendants("Element2").Any() ).Single(); bool hasElement3 = ( from Playlist in loaded.Descendants("Node") select Playlist.Descendants("Element2").Any() ).Single(); var finalData = from x in loaded.Descendants("Node") select new { Element1 = x.Descendants("Element1").First().Value, Element2 = x.Descendants("Element2").First().Value, Element3 = x.Descendants("Element3").First().Value, };

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289  | Next Page >