Search Results

Search found 6257 results on 251 pages for 'columns'.

Page 29/251 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

  • Selecting rows without a value for Date/Time columns

    - by Ross
    I'm running this query: SELECT TOP 1 [DVD Copy].[Stock No] FROM [DVD Copy] WHERE [DVD Copy].[Catalogue No] =[Forms]![New Rental]![Catalogue No] And [Issue Date] = Null; Which works fine without the null check for Issue Date. I'm trying to select rows without a Date in the Issue Date column. Is Null the wrong kind of value to use for here?

    Read the article

  • Firing Postgres triggers on different table columns

    - by aatifh
    CONTENT_TABLE id | author | timestamp | title | description ----+-----------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------- (0 rows) SEARCH_TABLE id | content_type_id | object_id | tsvector_title | tsvector_description ----+-----------------+-----------+----------------+---------------------- (0 rows) I have to fire a trigger when ever CONTENT_TABLE is UPDATED/INSERTED Something like this: "CREATE TRIGGER tsvectorupdate BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON course_course FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE tsvector_update_trigger(SHOULD_BE_THE_COLUMN_OF_SEARCH_TABLE(tsvector_description), 'pg_catalog.english', description);" Actually, i have to add tsvector for title and description of the CONTENT_TABLE to the table SEARCH_TABLE tsvector_title and tsvector_description. Can i just fire one trigger for it? Any sort of help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • how can i loop through all of the columns of the OracleDataReader

    - by ooo
    I have the following code and i want to loop through all the fields in the result of this query and populate the dictionary called field. Given a datareader is this possible? OracleCommand command = connection.CreateCommand(); string sql = "Select * from MYTABLE where ID = " + id; command.CommandText = sql; Dictionary<string, string> fields = new Dictionary<string, string>(); OracleDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader();

    Read the article

  • Display another field in the referenced table for multiple columns with performance issues in mind

    - by israkir
    I have a table of edge like this: ------------------------------- | id | arg1 | relation | arg2 | ------------------------------- | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | ------------------------------- | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | ------------------------------- where arg1, relation and arg2 reference to the ids of objects in another object table: -------------------- | id | object_name | -------------------- | 1 | book | -------------------- | 2 | pen | -------------------- | 3 | on | -------------------- | 4 | table | -------------------- | 5 | bag | -------------------- | 6 | in | -------------------- What I want to do is that, considering performance issues (a very big table more than 50 million of entries) display the object_name for each edge entry rather than id such as: --------------------------- | arg1 | relation | arg2 | --------------------------- | book | on | table | --------------------------- | pen | in | bag | --------------------------- What is the best select query to do this? Also, I am open to suggestions for optimizing the query - adding more index on the tables etc... EDIT: Based on the comments below: 1) @Craig Ringer: PostgreSQL version: 8.4.13 and only index is id for both tables. 2) @andrefsp: edge is almost x2 times bigger than object.

    Read the article

  • Using Full-Text Search in SQL Server 2005 across multiple tables, columns

    - by crisgomez
    Hi, I have a problem, I created a full text search query which return a record(s), in which the paramater I have supplied match(es) in every fields(full-text indexed) of multiple tables. The problem is , when the user.id is equal to ceritification.AId it returns a records eventhough it was not satisfied with the parameter supplied. For this example I supplied a value "xandrick" which return an Id=184, but the problem is it returns two ids which is 184 and 154.What is the best way to return an ID(s) that satisfied of the supplied given value? User table Id Firstname Lastname Middlename Email AlternativeEmail 154 Gregorio Honasan Pimentel [email protected] [email protected] 156 Qwerty Qazggf fgfgf [email protected]. [email protected] 184 Xandrick Flores NULL [email protected] null Certification table Id AID Certification School 12 184 sdssd AMA 13 43 web-based and framework 2 Asian development foundation college 16 184 hjhjhj STI 17 184 rrrer PUP 18 154 vbvbv AMA SELECT DISTINCT Users.Id FROM Users INNER JOIN Certification on Users.Id=Certification.aid LEFT JOIN FREETEXTTABLE (Users,(Firstname,Middlename,Lastname,Email,AlternativeEmail), 'xandrick' )as ftUsr ON Users.Id=ftUsr.[KEY] LEFT JOIN FREETEXTTABLE (Certification,(Certification,School), 'xandrick' )as ftCert ON Certification.Id=ftCert.[KEY]

    Read the article

  • MSSQL add count column near existing select columns

    - by Luis
    Hi, i have a query that returns something like this. ID | Company| Total_Money | no_items | count_Total_Money_For_Company ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 | A | 1000 | 1 | 2001 2 | A | 1001 | 0 | 2001 3 | B | 1001 | 1 | 5010 4 | B | 1002 | 1 | 5010 5 | B | 1003 | 1 | 5010 6 | B | 1004 | 1 | 5010 7 | B | 1000 | 1 | 5010 How can i add that column with the count for that company?

    Read the article

  • most efficient method of turning multiple 1D arrays into columns of a 2D array

    - by Ty W
    As I was writing a for loop earlier today, I thought that there must be a neater way of doing this... so I figured I'd ask. I looked briefly for a duplicate question but didn't see anything obvious. The Problem: Given N arrays of length M, turn them into a M-row by N-column 2D array Example: $id = [1,5,2,8,6] $name = [a,b,c,d,e] $result = [[1,a], [5,b], [2,c], [8,d], [6,e]] My Solution: Pretty straight forward and probably not optimal, but it does work: <?php // $row is returned from a DB query // $row['<var>'] is a comma separated string of values $categories = array(); $ids = explode(",", $row['ids']); $names = explode(",", $row['names']); $titles = explode(",", $row['titles']); for($i = 0; $i < count($ids); $i++) { $categories[] = array("id" => $ids[$i], "name" => $names[$i], "title" => $titles[$i]); } ?> note: I didn't put the name = value bit in the spec, but it'd be awesome if there was some way to keep that as well.

    Read the article

  • T-SQL: from rows to columns but not an actual pivot

    - by Matte
    Is there a T-SQL (SQL Server 2008R2) query to transform TABLE_1 into the expected resultset? TABLE_1 +----------+-------------------------+---------+------+ | IdDevice | Timestamp | M300 | M400 | +----------+-------------------------+---------+------+ | 3 | 2012-12-05 16:29:51.000 | 2357,69 | 520 | | 6 | 2012-12-05 16:29:51.000 | 1694,81 | 470 | | 1 | 2012-12-05 16:29:51.000 | 2046,33 | 111 | +----------+-------------------------+---------+------+ Expected resultset +-------------------------+---------+--------+---------+--------+---------+--------+ | Timestamp | 3_M300 | 3_M400 | 6_M300 | 6_M400 | 6_M300 | 6_M400 | +-------------------------+---------+--------+---------+--------+---------+--------+ | 2012-12-05 16:29:51.000 | 2357,69 | 520 | 1694,81 | 470 | 2046,33 | 111 | +-------------------------+---------+--------+---------+--------+---------+--------+

    Read the article

  • foreign key constraints on primary key columns - issues ?

    - by zzzeek
    What are the pros/cons from a performance/indexing/data management perspective of creating a one-to-one relationship between tables using the primary key on the child as foreign key, versus a pure surrogate primary key on the child? The first approach seems to reduce redundancy and nicely constrains the one-to-one implicitly, while the second approach seems to be favored by DBAs, even though it creates a second index: create table parent ( id integer primary key, data varchar(50) ) create table child ( id integer primary key references parent(id), data varchar(50) ) pure surrogate key: create table parent ( id integer primary key, data varchar(50) ) create table child ( id integer primary key, parent_id integer unique references parent(id), data varchar(50) ) the platforms of interest here are Postgresql, Microsoft SQL Server.

    Read the article

  • InnoDB Cascade Rule that looks at 2 columns?

    - by Travis
    I have the following mysql InnoDB tables... TABLE foldersA ( ID title ) TABLE foldersB ( ID title ) TABLE records ( ID folderID folderType title ) folderID in table "records" can point to ID in either "foldersA" or "foldersB" depending on the value of folderType. (0 or 1). I am wondering: Is there a way to create a CASCADE rule such that the appropriate rows in table records are automatically deleted when a row in either foldersA or folderB is deleted? Or in this situation, am I forced to have to delete the rows in table "records" programatically? Thanks for you help!

    Read the article

  • SQL Server problems reading columns with a foreign key

    - by illdev
    I have a weird situation, where simple queries seem to never finish for instance SELECT top 100 ArticleID FROM Article WHERE ProductGroupID=379114 returns immediately SELECT top 1000 ArticleID FROM Article WHERE ProductGroupID=379114 never returns SELECT ArticleID FROM Article WHERE ProductGroupID=379114 never returns SELECT top 1000 ArticleID FROM Article returns immediately By 'returning' I mean 'in query analyzer the green check mark appears and it says "Query executed successfully"'. I sometimes get the rows painted to the grid in qa, but still the query goes on waiting for my client to time out - 'sometimes': SELECT ProductGroupID AS Product23_1_, ArticleID AS ArticleID1_, ArticleID AS ArticleID18_0_, Inventory_Name AS Inventory3_18_0_, Inventory_UnitOfMeasure AS Inventory4_18_0_, BusinessKey AS Business5_18_0_, Name AS Name18_0_, ServesPeople AS ServesPe7_18_0_, InStock AS InStock18_0_, Description AS Descript9_18_0_, Description2 AS Descrip10_18_0_, TechnicalData AS Technic11_18_0_, IsDiscontinued AS IsDisco12_18_0_, Release AS Release18_0_, Classifications AS Classif14_18_0_, DistributorName AS Distrib15_18_0_, DistributorProductCode AS Distrib16_18_0_, Options AS Options18_0_, IsPromoted AS IsPromoted18_0_, IsBulkyFreight AS IsBulky19_18_0_, IsBackOrderOnly AS IsBackO20_18_0_, Price AS Price18_0_, Weight AS Weight18_0_, ProductGroupID AS Product23_18_0_, ConversationID AS Convers24_18_0_, DistributorID AS Distrib25_18_0_, type AS Type18_0_ FROM Article AS articles0_ WHERE (IsDiscontinued = '0') AND (ProductGroupID = 379121) shows this behavior. I have no idea what is going on. Probably select is broken ;) I got a foreign key on ProductGroups ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Article] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_ProductGroup_Articles] FOREIGN KEY([ProductGroupID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[ProductGroup] ([ProductGroupID]) GO ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Article] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_ProductGroup_Articles] there are some 6000 rows and IsDiscontinued is a bit, not null, but leaving this condition out does not change the outcome. Anyone can tell me how to handle such a situation? More info, anyone? Additional Info: this does not seem to be restricted to this Foreign Key, but all/some referencing this entity.

    Read the article

  • Subsonic 3 : get only certain columns

    - by CTGA
    Hello, I use : Subsonic 3, SQL Server 2008, Json.Net Here is my problem : I have a house table with id,lot number, address, location, ownerid and an owner table with id,name, description. I'd like to get only the owner name and address of house where location is "San Francisco". How can I do this with Subsonic? My problem is I can only get a typed list or a datareader, I don't understand how to only get an array or a simple list. What is the best solution? Create a custom class ? Create a View ? Anything else ? My aim is to then serialize the data to send it back to my application, but serialization is seriously long because of the numerous relationships (My example here is simplified, there are indeed : house - owner - city - country etc.), whereas I need only 2 fields... Thank you

    Read the article

  • adding Buttons to Columns in Datagride view

    - by kasunmit
    HiHi, I wrote C# application for import unread e-mails from outlook 2007, I could import sender name, sender mail address,subject and body to data grid view as following foreach (Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook._MailItem mailItem in fldEmails.Items) { if (mailItem.UnRead) { UnreadEmails mail = new UnreadEmails(); // mail.AttachmentContent = (mailItem.UnRead == false) ? string.Empty : mailItem.Attachments.Session.OpenSharedItem; foreach (Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Attachment Atmt in mailItem.Attachments) { mail.AttachmentContent = (mailItem.UnRead == false) ? string.Empty : Atmt.DisplayName; } emails.Add(mail); } } UnreadEmails is a separte class. but couldn't find a way to import attachments (word pdf ppt excel) because i need it for my filter pls help me about it but i could import inly name of the attachment but i need to import attachment content (word, pdf , ppt .. atc. ) to this data grid pls tell how i can do it ... with the code

    Read the article

  • Multiplying 2 Columns

    - by itsaboutcode
    Hi, I am very new to asp and having following problem I am getting 2 values from 2 column, from database and when i try to multiply them, its giving following error Error Type: (0x80020009) Exception occurred. This is my code totalPrice = totalPrice + rs("ProductQunaity") * rs("ProductPrice"`)

    Read the article

  • jquery.tablesorter.js > sorting mixed-type columns

    - by JK
    Hi All, I have a table that has a column for Days Remaining. The values in this column are either a number, or 'TBD' (to be determined). The tablesorter plugin doesn't properly handle the sorting of this mixed-type column. How could I get this to work properly? Thanks, ~jk

    Read the article

  • Can't use where clause on correlated columns.

    - by Keyo
    I want to add a where clause to make sure video_count is greater than zero. Only categories which are referenced once or more in video_category.video_id should be returned. Because video_count is not a field in any table I cannot do this. Here is the query. SELECT category . * , ( SELECT COUNT( * ) FROM video_category WHERE video_category.category_id = category.category_id ) AS 'video_count' FROM category WHERE category.status = 1 AND video_count > '0' AND publish_date < NOW() ORDER BY updated DESC; Thanks for the help.

    Read the article

  • List to Columns in LINQ

    - by Sam Saffron
    Given an IEnumerable<T> and row count, I would like to convert it to an IEnumerable<IEnumerable<T>> like so: Input: Row Count: 3 List: [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] Output [ [1,4,7] [2,5] [3,6] ] How can I do this using LINQ?

    Read the article

  • Groovy: Sorting Columns in a view: list

    - by Luixv
    I have a Groovy application. I am rendering the view list using the following statement: render (view: 'list', model:[reportingInstanceList: reportingInstanceList, reportingInstanceTotal: i, params: params]) The list.gsp is as follows: The view is rendered but the default sorting is not working. <g:sortableColumn class="tabtitle" property="id" title="Id" titleKey="reporting.id" /> <g:sortableColumn class="tabtitle" property="company" title="Company" titleKey="reporting.company" /> Unfortunately the default sorting (by id, by company, etc) are not working. Any hint why? Thanks a lot in advance. Luis

    Read the article

  • centering ul so that columns will be centered too

    - by user1815176
    In my page I want it so that when you resize the page past the point of the pictures, that the pictures will go into another row, all the way so each picture has it's own row. And then potentially I won't need any media queries. But unfortunaltely I can't find a way to center. I have tried everything I can think of, aside of making hundreds of media queries with different positioning. I can't make it a block because then it won't go into rows, I have tried margin: 0 auto;. I have tried changing the padding, I have even tried using the html align="center". Nothing is working. Here is the website http://spencedesign.netau.net/singaporehome.html Also I have a minor issue, sorry to croud this with two questions. But when it is in it's mobile state, there is no 10px padding at the bottom, and the singapore title is on the left side rather than floating. Here is my code <html> <head> <title> Singapore - Home </title> <link rel="shortcut icon" href="favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" /> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial scale=1.0"> <style> * { margin: 0; padding: 0; } body { background: url('woodbackground.jpg'); background-size: cover; min-height: 100%; min-width: 100%; position: relative; top: 0; bottom: 0; left: 0; right: 0; } #container { width: 90%; margin: 0 auto; } h1 { font: bold 65px Helvetica, Arial, Sans-serif; text-align: center; color: #eee; position: relative; top: 60px; } h3 { font: 25px Helvetica, Arial, Sans-serif; text-align: center; color: #eee; position: relative; top: 80px; } ul#gallery { list-style: none; display: inline; margin: 0 auto; position: relative; top: 175px; width: 1300px; } ul#gallery li a { float: left; padding: 10px 10px 25px 10px; background-color: #eee; border: 1px solid #fff; -moz-box-shadow: 0px 2px 15px #333; position: relative; margin: 10px; text-decoration: none; } ul#gallery li a:hover { position: relative; top: -15px; } ul#gallery li a img { height: 150px; width: 250px; max-width: 100%; } ul#gallery li a p { margin-top: 25px; text-align: center; color: #000; font: Helvetica, Arial, Sans-serif; text-decoration: none; font-size: 20px; } @media screen and (max-width: 640px)    { ul#gallery {   left: 2.2%;   width: 600px; }   ul#gallery li a:hover {   top: 0px; } } </style> <body> <div id="container"> <h1> Singapore </h1> <h3><i> Singapore is the worlds first machine that works </i>- Lee Kuan Yew </h3> <ul id="gallery"> <li><a href="#"> <img src="gallery.jpg" alt="gallery" /> <p> Gallery </p> </a></li> <li><a href="#"> <img src="facts.jpg" alt="facts" /> <p> Facts </p></a></li> <li><a href="#"> <img src="tour.jpg" alt="tour" /> <p> Tour </p></a></li> <li><a href="#"> <img src="author.jpg" alt="author" /> <p> Author </p> </a></li> </ul> <br/> </div><!-- Container --> </body> <html> Thanks!

    Read the article

  • alias some columns names as one field in oracle's join select query

    - by Marecky
    Hi We are developing something like a social networking website. I've got task to do 'follow me' functionality. In our website objects are users, teams, companies, channels and groups (please don't ask why there are groups and teams - it is complicated for me too, but teams are releated to user's talent) Users, teams, channels, companies and groups have all their own tables. I have a query which gets me all the follower's leaders like this select --fo.leader_id, --fo.leader_type, us.name as user_name, co.name as company_name, ch.title as channel_name, gr.name as group_name, tt.name as team_name from follow_up fo left join users us on (fo.leader_id = us.id and fo.leader_type = 'user') left join companies co on (fo.leader_id = co.user_id and fo.leader_type = 'company') left join channels ch on (fo.leader_id = ch.id and fo.leader_type = 'channel') left join groups gr on (fo.leader_id = gr.id and fo.leader_type = 'group') left join talent_teams tt on (fo.leader_id = tt.id and fo.leader_type = 'team') where follower_id = 83 I need to get all fields like: user_name, company_name, channel_name, group_name, team_name as one field in SELECT's product. I have tried to alias them all the same 'name' but Oracle numbered it. Please help :)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >