Search Results

Search found 14956 results on 599 pages for 'mysql dba'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 337/599 | < Previous Page | 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344  | Next Page >

  • Update/Increment a single column on multiple rows at once

    - by Jordan Feldstein
    I'm trying to add rows to a column, keeping the order of the newest column set to one, and all other rows counting up from there. In this case, I add a new row with order=0, then use this query to update all the rows by one. "UPDATE favorits SET order = order+1" However, what happens is that all the rows are updated to the same value. I get a stack of favorites, all with order 6 for example, when it should be one with 1, the next with 2 and so on. How do I update these rows in a way that orders them the way they should be? Thanks, ~Jordan

    Read the article

  • optimizing an sql query using inner join and order by

    - by Sergio B
    I'm trying to optimize the following query without success. Any idea where it could be indexed to prevent the temporary table and the filesort? EXPLAIN SELECT SQL_NO_CACHE `groups`.* FROM `groups` INNER JOIN `memberships` ON `groups`.id = `memberships`.group_id WHERE ((`memberships`.user_id = 1) AND (`memberships`.`status_code` = 1 AND `memberships`.`manager` = 0)) ORDER BY groups.created_at DESC LIMIT 5;` +----+-------------+-------------+--------+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------------+--------+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | memberships | ref | grp_usr,grp,usr,grp_mngr | usr | 5 | const | 5 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort | | 1 | SIMPLE | groups | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY | 4 | sportspool_development.memberships.group_id | 1 | | +----+-------------+-------------+--------+--------------------------+---------+---------+---------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) +--------+------------+-----------------------------------+--------------+-----------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+ | Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | +--------+------------+-----------------------------------+--------------+-----------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+ | groups | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | id | A | 6 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | groups | 1 | index_groups_on_name | 1 | name | A | 6 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | groups | 1 | index_groups_on_privacy_setting | 1 | privacy_setting | A | 6 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | groups | 1 | index_groups_on_created_at | 1 | created_at | A | 6 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | groups | 1 | index_groups_on_id_and_created_at | 1 | id | A | 6 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | groups | 1 | index_groups_on_id_and_created_at | 2 | created_at | A | 6 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | +--------+------------+-----------------------------------+--------------+-----------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+ +-------------+------------+----------------------------------------------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+ | Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | +-------------+------------+----------------------------------------------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+ | memberships | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | | memberships | 0 | grp_usr | 1 | group_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 0 | grp_usr | 2 | user_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | grp | 1 | group_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | usr | 1 | user_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | grp_mngr | 1 | group_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | grp_mngr | 2 | manager | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | complex_index | 1 | group_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | complex_index | 2 | user_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | complex_index | 3 | status_code | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | complex_index | 4 | manager | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | index_memberships_on_user_id_and_status_code_and_manager | 1 | user_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | index_memberships_on_user_id_and_status_code_and_manager | 2 | status_code | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | | memberships | 1 | index_memberships_on_user_id_and_status_code_and_manager | 3 | manager | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | +-------------+------------+----------------------------------------------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+

    Read the article

  • database splitting; multiple tables

    - by Ben
    I am coding a classifieds ad web app. What is the optimal way to structure the database for this? Because of the high repeatability, would it be faster (in terms of searching/indexing) to have a separate table in the database for each city? Or would it be okay to just have one table for every city (it would have a lot of rows..). The classifieds table has id, user_id, city_name, category,[description and detail fields].

    Read the article

  • Relational database question with php.

    - by Oliver Bayes-Shelton
    Hi, Not really a coding question more a little help with my idea of a Relational database. If I have 3 tables in a SQL database. In my php script I basically query the companies which are in industry "a" and then insert a row into a separate table with their details such as companyId , companyName etc is that a type of Relational database ? I have explained it in a simple way so we don't get confused what I am trying to say.

    Read the article

  • Table design issues - should I create separate fields or store as a blob

    - by Ali
    Hi guys I'm working on my web based ordering system and we would like to maintain a kind of task history for each of our orders. A hsitory in the sense that we would like to maintain a log of who did what on an order like lets say an order has been entered - we would like to know if the order was acknowledged for an example. Or lets say somebody followed up on the order - etc. Consider that there are numerous situations like this for each order would it be wise to create a schema on the lines of: Orders ID - title - description - date - is_ack - is_follow - ack_by ..... That accounts to a lot of fields - on teh other hand I could have one LongText field called 'history' and fill it with a serialised object holding all the information. However in the latter case I can't run a query to lets say retrieve all orders that have not been acknowledged and stuff like that. With time requirements woudl change and I would be required to modify it to allow for more detailed tracking and that is why I need to set up a way which would be feasible to scale upon yet I don't want to be restricted on the SQL side too much.

    Read the article

  • optimize query: get al votes from user's item

    - by Toni Michel Caubet
    hi there! i did it my way because i'm very bad getting results from two tables... Basically, first i get all the id items that correspond to the user, and then i calculate the ratings of each item. But, there is two different types of object item, so i do this 2 times: show you: function votos_usuario($id){ $previa = "SELECT id FROM preguntas WHERE id_usuario = '$id'"; $r_previo = mysql_query($previa); $ids_p = '0, '; while($items_previos = mysql_fetch_array($r_previo)){ $ids_p .= $items_previos['id'].", "; //echo "ids pregunta usuario: ".$items_previos['id']."<br>"; } $ids = substr($ids_p,0,-2); //echo $ids; $consulta = "SELECT valor FROM votos_pregunta WHERE id_pregunta IN ( $ids )"; //echo $consulta; $resultado = mysql_query($consulta); $votos_preguntas = 0; while($voto = mysql_fetch_array($resultado)){ $votos_preguntas = $votos_preguntas + $voto['valor']; } $previa_r = "SELECT id FROM recetas WHERE id_usuario = '$id'"; $r_previo_r = mysql_query($previa_r); $ids_r = '0, '; while($items_previos_r = mysql_fetch_array($r_previo_r)){ $ids_r .= $items_previos_r['id'].", "; //echo "ids pregunta usuario: ".$items_previos['id']."<br>"; } $ids = substr($ids_r,0,-2); $consulta_b = "SELECT valor FROM votos_receta WHERE id_receta IN ( $ids )"; //echo $consulta; $resultado_b = mysql_query($consulta_b); $votos_recetas = 0; while($voto_r = mysql_fetch_array($resultado_b)){ $votos_recetas = $votos_recetas + $voto_r['valor']; } $total = $votos_preguntas + $votos_recetas; return $total; } As you can si this is two much.. O(n^2) Feel like thinking? thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to mark posts as edited?

    - by user156814
    I would like to have questions marked as "Edited", but I dont know what the best way to do this would be. Users post a question, people answer/comment on the question, and if necessary the user edits/updates the question (just like SO). I would like to note that the user edited the question, but I'm not sure of the best way to do this. I was going to add a last_edited column in the table (because thats all thats really important to me), but I'm not sure if I should just split the edit times (and whatever else) into another table and record everytime the question gets edited.

    Read the article

  • Query results taking too long on 200K database, speed up tips?

    - by colorfulgrayscale
    I have a sql statement where I'm joining about 4 tables, each with 200K rows. The query runs, but keeps freezing. When I do a join on 3 tables instead, it returns the rows (takes about 10secs). Any suggestion why? suggestions to speed up? Thanks! Code SELECT * FROM equipment, tiremap, workreference, tirework WHERE equipment.tiremap = tiremap.`TireID` AND tiremap.`WorkMap` = workreference.`aMap` AND workreference.`bMap` = tirework.workmap LIMIT 5 p.s and if it helps any, I'm using sql alchemy to generate this code, the sqlalchemy code for this is query = session.query(equipment, tiremap, workreference, tirework) query = query.filter(equipment.c.tiremap == tiremap.c.TireID) query = query.filter(tiremap.c.WorkMap==workreference.c.aMap) query = query.filter(workreference.c.bMap == tirework.c.workmap) query = query.limit(5) query.all()

    Read the article

  • Best practice for storing global data in PHP?

    - by user281434
    Hi I'm running a web application that allows a user to log in. The user can add/remove content to his/her 'library' which is displayed on a page called "library.php". Instead of querying the database for the contents of the users library everytime they load "library.php", I want to store it globally for PHP when the user logs in, so that the query is only run once. Is there a best practice for doing this? fx. storing their library in an array in a session? Thanks for your time

    Read the article

  • Retrieve object from jquery in php script

    - by majc
    I'm trying to rebuild an object encoded with Json but i'm not getting any value. JQuery: $.post("views/insert_tasks.php",{ clickedRows : clickrows , <?php echo "tasks:'" . json_encode($tasks) . "'"; ?> }, function(data) { }); this is the PHPcode to retrieve the object: $tasks = json_decode(stripslashes($_POST['tasks']), true); $tasks is empty after execute the code above. This is what I'm getting with the $_POST['tasks']: [{"task_id":"1","description":"<p>Fazer heroi</p>","createdat":"Saturday 22nd of May 2010 11:37:37 PM","createdby":"Miguel Cardoso","max_requests":"2","max_duration":"5","job_id":"Concept Artist"},{"task_id":"2","description":"<p>teste2</p>","createdat":"Sunday 23rd of May 2010 11:23:55 AM","createdby":"Miguel Cardoso","max_requests":"2","max_duration":"5","job_id":"3D Modeller"},{"task_id":"3","description":"<p>teste3</p>","createdat":"Sunday 23rd of May 2010 11:45:39 AM","createdby":"Miguel Cardoso","max_requests":"1","max_duration":"10","job_id":"Writer"}] What I'm doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Database Schema for survey polling application with a default choice.

    - by user156814
    I have a survey application, where users can create surveys and give choices for every survey. Other users can choose their answers for the aurvey and then polls are taken to get the results of the survey. I already have the database schema for this Questions id, user_id, category_id, question_text, date_started Answers id, user_id, question_id, choice_id, explanation, date_added Choices id, question_id, choice_text As for now, users can choose their own choice answers to their surveys... but I want to be able to add a default "I dont care" or "I dont know" choice to every survey for people who simply dont care about the topic to take sides or who cant choose. So lets say theres a survey that asks who was a better president, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagon, or Richard Nixon... I want to be able to add a default "I dont care" option. I was thinking to just add that extra choice EVERY TIME a user creates a survey, but then I wouldn't have much control over the text for that choice after that survey has been created, and I want to know if theres a better way to do this, like create another table or something Thanks

    Read the article

  • PHP mysqli Insert not working, but not giving any errors.

    - by asdasdas
    As the title says Im trying to do a simple insert, but nothing actually is inserted into the table. I try to print out errors, but nothing is reported. My users table has many more fields than these 4, but they should all default. $query = 'INSERT INTO users (username, password, level, name) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)'; if($stmt = $db -> prepare($query)) { $stmt -> bind_param('ssis', $username, $password, $newlevel, $realname); $stmt -> execute(); $stmt -> close(); echo 'Any Errors: '.$db->error.PHP_EOL; } There are no errors given, but when I go to look at the table in phpmyadmin there is not a new row added. I know for sure that the types are correct (strings and integers). Is there something really wrong here or does it have something to do with the fact that I'm ignoring other columns. I have about 8 columns in the user table.

    Read the article

  • Single value data to multiple values of data in database relation

    - by Sofiane Merah
    I have such a hard time picturing this. I just don't have the brain to do it. I have a table called reports. --------------------------------------------- | report_id | set_of_bads | field1 | field2 | --------------------------------------------- | 123 | set1 | qwe | qwe | --------------------------------------------- | 321 | 123112 | ewq | ewq | --------------------------------------------- I have another table called bads. This table contains a list of bad data. ------------------------------------- | bad_id | set_it_belongs_to | field2 | field3 | ------------------------------------- | 1 | set1 | qwe | qwe | ------------------------------------- | 2 | set1 | qee | tte | ------------------------------------- | 3 | set1 | q44w | 3qwe | ------------------------------------- | 4 | 234 | qoow | 3qwe | ------------------------------------- Now I have set the first field of every table as the primary key. My question is, how do I connect the field set_of_bads to set_it_belongs_to in the bads table. This way if I want to get the entire set of data that is set1 by calling on the reports table I can do it. Example: hey reports table.. bring up the row that has the report_id 123. Okay thank you.. Now get all the rows from bads that has the set_of_bads value from the row with the report_id 123. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • OT: US Banks: Bank Routing Number and BIC/SWIFT

    - by Konerak
    I know it is a bit offtopic, but I've been having a hard time finding more information to this question, and since this site is visited by a lot of people from the United States, you guys might know/find the answer more easily. Banks in europe each have a SWIFT Number, while US Banks use Routing Numbers. This leads to following questions: Does each bank in the US also carry a BIC number? (SWIFT) Is there a 1-1 relationship between BIC and SWIFT? Is there a list of these numbers somewhere? (background information: we're adding international payments to our bookkeeping application. Users can add international suppliers, but my boss prefered not to change the current supplier table but to have the ROUTING NUMBER in another table, with as PK the BIC. I'm wondering if BIC is a valid choice, or if it should just be BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER.)

    Read the article

  • How to echo if field is not found?

    - by Fahad
    Hi I'm trying to figure out how to echo back if the value entered does not match when a database lookup is done. I'm using ajax to run the request and php to do the lookup ajax.js: function showResult(str) { if (str=="") { document.getElementById("description").innerHTML=""; return; } if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById("description").innerHTML=xmlhttp.responseText; } } xmlhttp.open("GET","getuser.php?voucher="+str,true); xmlhttp.send(null); } and getuser.php: <?php $q=$_GET["voucher"]; $con = mysql_connect('localhost', 'root', ''); if (!$con) { die('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); } mysql_select_db("test", $con); $sql="SELECT * FROM redemption WHERE voucher = '".$q."'"; $result = mysql_query($sql); echo "<table> <tr> <th>Name</th> <th>Product</th> <th>Address</th> <th>Status</th> </tr>"; while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { echo "<tr>"; echo "<td>" . $row['name'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['product'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['address'] ." ".$row['city'] ." ".$row['province'] ." ".$row['postal'] . "</td>"; echo "<td>" . $row['status'] . "</td>"; echo "</tr>"; } echo "</table>"; mysql_close($con); ?> What I would like to do is that once the person enters an invalid or a voucher number that is not found I would like to return an error that "Voucher number is not found". There is also a column in the db that stores the status such as "redeemed" or "not redeemed". How could I check for both whether the voucher number exists and if it has already been redeemed? I assume it'd have to be a syntax such as $sql="SELECT * FROM redemption WHERE voucher = '".$q."'" AND status = 'not redeemed' and then use an else or case statement perhaps? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Suggest me solution to track the change in test DB and replicate in Another DB

    - by Parth
    Suggest me solution to track the change in test DB and replicate in Another DB... My Client need a script or any solution, if he has two Database, One Test DB in which he tests his data on test portal and if he find it appropriate he can use those changes to be done in main DB to display on Live site.. Fior this he needs the solution to record or track all updation/deletion/insertion, so that he can do the same in main DB if found appropriate, ** NOTE: ** we hav only on server, no separate server, hence binary log replication doesnt seems to be working for my case...

    Read the article

  • what is called KEY

    - by Bharanikumar
    CREATE TABLE `ost_staff` ( `staff_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment, `group_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `dept_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `username` varchar(32) collate latin1_german2_ci NOT NULL default '', `firstname` varchar(32) collate latin1_german2_ci default NULL, `lastname` varchar(32) collate latin1_german2_ci default NULL, `passwd` varchar(128) collate latin1_german2_ci default NULL, `email` varchar(128) collate latin1_german2_ci default NULL, `phone` varchar(24) collate latin1_german2_ci NOT NULL default '', `phone_ext` varchar(6) collate latin1_german2_ci default NULL, `mobile` varchar(24) collate latin1_german2_ci NOT NULL default '', `signature` varchar(255) collate latin1_german2_ci NOT NULL default '', `isactive` tinyint(1) NOT NULL default '1', `isadmin` tinyint(1) NOT NULL default '0', `isvisible` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL default '1', `onvacation` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `daylight_saving` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `append_signature` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `change_passwd` tinyint(1) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', `timezone_offset` float(3,1) NOT NULL default '0.0', `max_page_size` int(11) NOT NULL default '0', `created` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', `lastlogin` datetime default NULL, `updated` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00', PRIMARY KEY (`staff_id`), UNIQUE KEY `username` (`username`), KEY `dept_id` (`dept_id`), **KEY `issuperuser` (`isadmin`),** **KEY `group_id` (`group_id`,`staff_id`)** ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=35 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 COLLATE=latin1_german2_ci; Hi the above query is the osticket open source one, i know primary key , foreign key , unique but AM NOT SURE WHAT IS THIS KEY group_id (group_id,staff_id) Please tell me, this constraints name....

    Read the article

  • Column locking in innodb?

    - by ming yeow
    I know this sounds weird, but apparently one of my columns is locked. select * from table where type_id = 1 and updated_at < '2010-03-14' limit 1; select * from table where type_id = 3 and updated_at < '2010-03-14' limit 10; the first one would not finish running even in a few hours, while the second one completes smoothly. the only difference is the type_id between the 2 queries. a bit of background, the first statement screwed up before which i had to kill manually. Thanks in advance for your help - i have an urgent data job to finish, and this problem is driving me crazy

    Read the article

  • SQL Join to only the maximum row puzzle

    - by Billy ONeal
    Given the following example data: Users +--------------------------------------------------+ | ID | First Name | Last Name | Network Identifier | +--------------------------------------------------+ | 1 | Billy | O'Neal | bro4 | +----+------------+-----------+--------------------+ | 2 | John | Skeet | jsk1 | +----+------------+-----------+--------------------+ Hardware +----+-------------------+---------------+ | ID | Hardware Name | Serial Number | +----+-------------------+---------------+ | 1 | Latitude E6500 | 5555555 | +----+-------------------+---------------+ | 2 | Latitude E6200 | 2222222 | +----+-------------------+---------------+ HardwareAssignments +---------+-------------+-------------+ | User ID | Hardware ID | Assigned On | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 1 | 1 | April 1 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 1 | 2 | April 10 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 2 | 2 | April 1 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 2 | 1 | April 11 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ I'd like to write a SQL query which would give the following result: +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ | Network Identifier | First Name | Last Name | Hardware Name | Serial Number | Assigned On | +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ | bro4 | Billy | O'Neal | Latitude E6200 | 2222222 | April 10 | +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ | jsk1 | John | Skeet | Latitude E6500 | 5555555 | April 11 | +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ My trouble is that the maximum "Assigned On" date for each user needs to be selected for each individual user and used for the actual join ... Is there a clever way accomplish this in SQL?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344  | Next Page >