Search Results

Search found 16565 results on 663 pages for 'private meta'.

Page 350/663 | < Previous Page | 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357  | Next Page >

  • No Change for Index of DropDownList in a Custom Control!!!

    - by mahdiahmadirad
    Hi Dears, I have Created A Custom Control which is a DropDownList with specified Items. I designed AutoPostback and SelectedCategoryId as Properties and SelectedIndexChanged as Event for My Custom Control. Here Is My ASCX file Behind Code: private int _selectedCategoryId; private bool _autoPostback = false; public event EventHandler SelectedIndexChanged; public void BindData() { //Some Code... } protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { BindData(); DropDownList1.AutoPostBack = this._autoPostback; } public int SelectedCategoryId { get { return int.Parse(this.DropDownList1.SelectedItem.Value); } set { this._selectedCategoryId = value; } } public string AutoPostback { get { return this.DropDownList1.AutoPostBack.ToString(); } set { this._autoPostback = Convert.ToBoolean(value); } } protected void DropDownList1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (SelectedIndexChanged != null) SelectedIndexChanged(this, EventArgs.Empty); } I Want Used Update Panel to Update Textbox Fields According to dorp down list selected index. this is my code in ASPX page: <asp:Panel ID="PanelCategory" runat="server"> <p> Select Product Category:&nbsp; <myCtrl:CategoryDDL ID="CategoryDDL1" AutoPostback="true" OnSelectedIndexChanged="CategoryIndexChanged" SelectedCategoryId="0" runat="server" /> </p> <hr /> </asp:Panel> <asp:UpdatePanel ID="UpdatePanelEdit" runat="server"> <ContentTemplate> <%--Some TextBoxes and Other Controls--%> </ContentTemplate> <Triggers> <asp:PostBackTrigger ControlID="CategoryDDL1" /> </Triggers> </asp:UpdatePanel> But Always The Selected Index of CategoryDDL1 is 0(Like default). this means Only Zero Value will pass to the event to update textboxes Data. what is the wrong with my code? why the selected Index not Changing? Help?

    Read the article

  • Creating an instance within the Class itself

    - by didxga
    What's going on when the assignment statement executed at Line 4, does compiler ignore the new operator and keep the foo variable being null or something else happen to handle this awkward moment? public class Foo { // creating an instance before its constructor has been invoked, suppose the "initializing" // gets printed in constructor as a result of the next line, of course it will not print it private Foo foo = new Foo();//Line 4 public Foo() { System.out.println("initializing"); } }

    Read the article

  • how to deal with HTTPS connection in iphone

    - by pnilangekar
    please provide any example or tutorial for the same. I have used SetallowsAnyHTTPSCertificateForHost But it is private API and apple will reject app for it. I have tried to use ASIHTTPRequest but not reaching to final solution. have anyone tried using ASIHTTPRequest with https type url

    Read the article

  • Speeding up Math calculations in Java

    - by Simon
    I have a neural network written in Java which uses a sigmoid transfer function defined as follows: private static double sigmoid(double x) { return 1 / (1 + Math.exp(-x)); } and this is called many times during training and computation using the network. Is there any way of speeding this up? It's not that it's slow, it's just that it is used a lot, so a small optimisation here would be a big overall gain.

    Read the article

  • What are the downside of not having an index.html file to some directories

    - by Pennf0lio
    Hi, I'm curious what are some effects/downside of not putting an index.html file to your directories (e.g images). I know when an index file is not present to a directory, files inside that directory are no longer private and will be visible to the browsers when point (eg yoursite.com/images/). Aside from that what are some big effects to consider? and how to properly secure them. thanks!

    Read the article

  • Securing paths in PHP

    - by tjm
    I'm writing some PHP which takes some paths to different content directories, and uses these to include various parts of pages later. I'm trying to ensure that the paths are as they seem, and none of them break the rules of the application. I have PRIVATEDIR which must lie above DOCUMENT_ROOT (aka) PUBLICDIR. CONTENTDIR which must lie within PRIVATEDIR and not go back below PUBLICDIR and some other *DIR's which must remain within CONTENTDIR. Currently I set up some defaults, and then override the ones the user specifies and then sanity check them with the following. private function __construct($options) { error_reporting(0); if(is_array($options)) { $this->opts = array_merge($this->opts, $options); } if($this->opts['STATUS']==='debug') { error_reporting(E_ALL | E_NOTICE | E_STRICT); } $this->opts['PUBLICDIR'] = realpath($_SERVER['DOCUMENT_ROOT']) .DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR; $this->opts['PRIVATEDIR'] = realpath($this->opts['PUBLICDIR'] .$this->opts['PRIVATEDIR']) .DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR; $this->opts['CONTENTDIR'] = realpath($this->opts['PRIVATEDIR'] .$this->opts['CONTENTDIR']) .DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR; $this->opts['CACHEDIR'] = realpath($this->opts['PRIVATEDIR'] .$this->opts['CACHEDIR']) .DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR; $this->opts['ERRORDIR'] = realpath($this->opts['CONTENTDIR'] .$this->opts['ERRORDIR']) .DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR; $this->opts['TEMPLATEDIR' = realpath($this->opts['CONTENTDIR'] .$this->opts['TEMPLATEDIR']) .DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR; // then here I have to check that PRIVATEDIR is above PUBLICDIR // and that all the rest remain within private dir and don't drop // down into (or below) PUBLICDIR again. And die with an error if // they don't conform. } The thing is this seems like a lot of work to do, especially as it must be run, every time a page is accessed, before I can do anything else, e.g check for a cached version of the page I'm serving. Part of me is thinking, since all of these paths are predefined by the maintainer of the site, they SHOULD be aware of what paths they are allowing access to and ensuring they are secure. But, I think I'm thinking that because currently I am said maintainer, and I KNOW my paths conform to the rules. That said, I do want to secure this thing from any accidental errors by future maintainers (and I bet, now I've said above "I KNOW...", probably from myself somewhere down the line). This just feels like a suboptimal solution. I wonder how fast this would really be and what you would suggest to improve it or as an alternative? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Removing an associated object with a link_to to the update action

    - by Numbers
    class Question < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :category end class Category < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :questions accepts_nested_attributes_for :questions, allow_destroy: true end CategoriesController: private def category_params params.require(:category).permit(:title, questions_attributes: [:id, :category_id, :title, :_destroy]) end In the view I have a category displaying all it's posts (CategoriesController#show). Each post is deletable. How could I construct a link_to helper that deletes a post by updating the category?

    Read the article

  • Inspecting values using the debugger in C#

    - by JC
    How do I inspect the return value of this GetItems() function using the debugger? Do I have to create a local variable for the results to accomplish this? foreach (string item in GetItems()) { // some code } private List<string> GetItems() { // return some list }

    Read the article

  • Sharepoint - how to set permission level to add item but not view?

    - by Stuart
    I want to allow a certain group of users to add items to a list, but not be able to view all items. This is so I can set up a workflow with certain parts of it private. I thought it'd be possible by defining a new permission level in: http://servername/_layouts/addrole.aspx ('Add a permission level' page) However, when you select the "add items" list permission, "view items" is automatically ticked also. Anyone know a solution to this?

    Read the article

  • Access specifier's and classes and objects?

    - by TimothyTech
    Alright, im trying to understand this, so a class is simply creating a template for an object. class Bow { int arrows; }; and an object is simply creating a specific item using the class template. Bow::Bow(arrows) { arrows = 20; } also another question, public specifiers are used to make data members avaible in objects and private specifiers are used to make data memebers only avaialble inside the class?

    Read the article

  • What Design Pattern is this?

    - by 01
    I know that everything we do in programming can be described as design pattern(even abstract method has design pattern called template method) public class Guicer extends AbstractModule { private static Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new Guicer()); public static void setInjector(Injector injector) { Guicer.injector = injector; } public static T getInstance(Class c) { return injector.getInstance(c); } @Override protected void configure() { } } What design patterns are used in this code?

    Read the article

  • Linking a Text Box to a variable?

    - by cam
    I would like to have direct access to the text inside a textbox on another form, so I added a public variable _txt to a form and added an event like so: private void richTextBox1_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { _txt = richTextBox1.Text; } But the form is loaded like this: public FrmTextChild(string text) { InitializeComponent(); _txt = text; richTextBox1.Text = _txt; Text = "Untitled.txt"; } Is there a better way to directly link the two?

    Read the article

  • How do I make defensive copy of an object?

    - by kunjaan
    How do I make defensive copies of a Mutable Object which contains a mutable field in an Immutable Object? class ImmutableObject { private final MutableObject immutable_field; ImmutableObject(MutableObject y) { this.immutable_field = y; } MutableObject return_immutable_field() { return immutable_field; } } class MutableObject { public int mutable_field; } The MutableObject does not have a constructor that lets me set the field. The MutableObject's current state should be captured in the Immutable Object and never changed.

    Read the article

  • Website programming language [closed]

    - by Develman
    Hello everybody, I have worked a lot with PHP in last times, but I am not sure if it is the best choice for website programming. What language do you prefer for website programming? Which type (private, business, etc.) of website do you build with that language?

    Read the article

  • passing Func<TSource, TKey> keySelector error

    - by user338429
    static void Main() { string[] a = { "a", "asd", "bdfsd", "we" }; a = a.OrderBy(fun).ToArray(); } private static int fun(string s) { return s.Length; } its is giving compile time error . I know that we can do this with Lambda expression like this. a.OrderBy(s=>s.Length).ToArray(); but i want to this do by defining different function . What mistake i have done?

    Read the article

  • Why fill() and copy() of Collections in java is implemented this way

    - by Priyank Doshi
    According to javadoc... Collections.fill() is written as below : public static <T> void fill(List<? super T> list, T obj) { int size = list.size(); if (size < FILL_THRESHOLD || list instanceof RandomAccess) { for (int i=0; i<size; i++) list.set(i, obj); } else { ListIterator<? super T> itr = list.listIterator(); for (int i=0; i<size; i++) { itr.next(); itr.set(obj); } } } Its easy to understand why they didn't use listIterator for if (size < FILL_THRESHOLD || list instanceof RandomAccess) condition as of RandomAccess. But whats the use of size < FILL_THRESHOLD in above? I mean is there any significant performance benefit over using iterator for size>=FILL_THRESHOLD and not for size < FILL_THRESHOLD ? I see the same approach for Collections.copy() also : public static <T> void copy(List<? super T> dest, List<? extends T> src) { int srcSize = src.size(); if (srcSize > dest.size()) throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Source does not fit in dest"); if (srcSize < COPY_THRESHOLD || (src instanceof RandomAccess && dest instanceof RandomAccess)) { for (int i=0; i<srcSize; i++) dest.set(i, src.get(i)); } else { ListIterator<? super T> di=dest.listIterator(); ListIterator<? extends T> si=src.listIterator(); for (int i=0; i<srcSize; i++) { di.next(); di.set(si.next()); } } } FYI: private static final int FILL_THRESHOLD = 25; private static final int COPY_THRESHOLD = 10;

    Read the article

  • How can I hide a work item field from some users in TFS 2008?

    - by muerte
    I'm customizing work item templates in TFS 2008 through the PowerTools and I'm wondering is it possible to hide a field (or it's value) for certain users? For example, let's say I open TFS to my clients so they can submit feature requests. I'd like them to see the work item created, to see the history, changes etc. but I'd like to keep some of the field private and for our internal use. Is it possible?

    Read the article

  • C#: check if a string start with any character in a list

    - by JoesyXHN
    Hi, I want to check whether a string starts with any character in a list. My current implementation in C# is as follows: char[] columnChars = new char[] { 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' }; private bool startWithColumn(string toCheck) { for(int i=0; i<columnChars.Length; i++) if (toCheck.StartsWith(columnChars[i]+"")) { return true; } return false; } I would like to know if any solution is better?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357  | Next Page >