Search Results

Search found 20687 results on 828 pages for 'outlook form'.

Page 366/828 | < Previous Page | 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373  | Next Page >

  • Long URLs (Bitly and TinyURL)

    - by Sixfoot Studio
    I'm sitting with a problem where I need to pass more than 2000 characters from my Flash application to an HTML page which reads the information and displays the correct options made in the Flash app the person came from. All's good but on the final stage, when the user needs to post their choices to a form, the character cannot be sent because the string is too long. Is there a way to use a service such as Bitly or TinyURL to send these long string and for them to be "deconstruction" on the other end when the form is sent? Otherwise, is there another solution to this problem? Many thanks!

    Read the article

  • How would I go about writing a conditional statement to check if visitor is coming from a particular

    - by Matthew
    Hello guys, What I have in mind is this... We are going to have people come from a particular site during a acquisition campaign and was wondering how I could conditionalize a certain section of my site to display a thank you message instead of the sign up form as they would have had the opportunity to fill this out before coming to my landing page. I have seen solutions like: $referal = mysql_real_escape_string($_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER']); I would like to know if this is the best way to get this to work??? - okay this is what i think might work. The third party website that is referring people to our landing page once the form on that site has been filled out can push into the record a hidden input value of "www.sample.com" or whatever... then I can have something check the for that particular value and fire off the conidtional. Does that even sound right?

    Read the article

  • Messaging in local network with .NET

    - by Richard
    Hi All, I need to implement some form of communication mechanism in my application, to send notifications/messages from one application instance to all the others. This is a normal scenario where someone adds and item or deletes and item and you want to notify other users that this has happened. The application runs on the client and connects to a database on the local network. So its not like all clients access a server instance of the application. So from what I know I could use MessageQueues or some form of Database polling where I have a table that stores all the messages (not ideal). Issue is I need to implement this very quickly, so sadly can't go very complex but need the quickest easiest solution. thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • update_attributes with validations

    - by Timothy
    I have the following contrived example in Rails. I want to make sure the Garage model has at least one car with this. class Garage has_many :cars validate :at_least_one_car def at_least_one_car if cars.count == 0 errors.add_to_base("needs at least one car") end end end class Car belongs_to :garage end In my form I have a remove button that will set the hidden field _delete to true for an existing car. Let's say there is only one car object and I "delete" it in my form, if I do garage_object.update_attributes(params[:garage]), it will delete the car model and make the garage object invalid. Is there to a way to make it not update the attributes if it will make the model invalid?

    Read the article

  • attaching multiple files to a domain class

    - by Emyr
    I've seen various Grails plugins which allow easier handling of file uploads, however these tend only to support a single file per form-submit. I'd like a multi-attach form where as soon as you pick one file, an extra field and button is added using JS (various sites do it like this). Do you know of any good plugins which provide elegant uploading of multiple files without excessive coding? A progress bar either per-file of for the whole process would also be very nice. I don't know to what extent I can allow GORM to handle a java.io.File field (or in this case a Collection<File>).

    Read the article

  • how do you group select_tag and text_field_tag?

    - by Eytan
    I'm trying to build a form where a user can select an existing category, or define their own. My form looks something like this... <%= f.select :category, category_options, prompt: "Select"> <%= f.text_field :category %> However, this UI is confusing. The user can select something in the select box, and type in a custom category. In this case, the final result is not obvious. Do you guys have any recommendations on how to handle this situation?

    Read the article

  • <o:massAttribute> affects another components in same <h:panelGrid>

    - by Ignacio Ayuste
    I'm using the new version of OmniFaces 1.8.1, and particullary I start to use the new tag: <o:massAttribute>. Basically, I have the following form with conditionally rendered and disabled fields: <h:form id="formABMProducto"> <h:panelGrid id="datosProducto" columns="4"> <o:massAttribute name="rendered" value="#{cc.attrs.page != 'baja'}"> <h:outputLabel for="codigo" ... /> <h:inputText id="codigo" ... /> <rich:message for="codigo" /> <h:panelGroup /> </o:massAttribute> <o:massAttribute name="rendered" value="#{cc.attrs.page eq 'baja'}"> <h:outputLabel for="codigo" .../> <rich:autocomplete id="codigoProducto" ... /> <rich:message for="codigo" /> <h:panelGroup /> </o:massAttribute> <o:massAttribute name="disabled" value="#{cc.attrs.disableComponents}"> <h:outputLabel for="nombre" ... /> <h:inputTextarea id="nombre" ... /> <rich:message for="nombre" /> <span /> <h:outputLabel for="descripcion" ... /> <h:inputTextarea id="descripcion" ... /> <rich:message for="descripcion" /> <span /> </o:massAttribute> <h:outputLabel value="#{msgs['producto.abm.panel.proveedor.tipo']}" for="CmbTipoProveedor"/> <rich:select id="CmbTipoProveedor" ... /> <rich:message for="CmbTipoProveedor" /> <a4j:commandButton ... /> </h:panelGrid> </h:form> However, when I open the page, the third <o:massAttribute> is also disabling another input fields codigo and codigoProducto. I think this isn't the expected behaviour.

    Read the article

  • Javascript click function for multiple Classes

    - by Jason Bassett
    So basically I have this little social networking site which allow comments. I've built a comment section that will slide down once a user clicks "Comment" and it slides down under the users status. My problem is that right now, the JavaScript only works on ONE post ID, and not the rest obviously seeing you can only use an ID once. But of course if I use classes instead, All the comment sections slide down because now they're all the same class. See below for my HTML and JavaScript. So if someone has a better method out there, please help :) $(function () { $(".comment-box").slideUp(); //when "comment" is clicked, slide down the comment box. if ($(".comment-box-btn").click(function () { $(".comment-box").slideDown(); })); //when "cancel" is clicked, slide up the comment box. if ($(".close-comment-box").click(function () { $(".comment-box").slideUp() })); }); And here's the HTML used //anchor for "Comment" <a class="comment-box-btn" href="#"><i class="icon-comment"></i> Comment</a> //comment box <div class="row comment-box" style="display:none;"> <div class="col-md-12"> <form accept-charset="UTF-8" action="" method="post"> <textarea class="form-control animated" cols="180" id="new-comment" name="comment" placeholder="Comment.." rows="1"></textarea> <div class="text-right" style="margin-top:20px;"> <a class="btn btn-default close-comment-box" href="#"> <span class="glyphicon glyphicon-remove"></span> Cancel</a> <button class="btn btn-info" type="submit">Comment</button> </div> </form> </div> </div>

    Read the article

  • Firefox running infinitely even after condition met in jquery function

    - by Kyle
    The following function is called with setTimeout(function () { get_progress(fileID,fileName)},8000); upon a form submit. The purpose of the function is to get read_file.php to read a txt file that stores the file upload status from a form (in percentage). Upon reaching 80%, my Firefox seems to run infinitely even when HEAD returns an error. Am I have too many recursions or have I used a wrong condition that's causing get_progress to run repeatedly even when filename does not exist in the folder ? function get_progress( fileID, filename) { $.ajax({ url: filename, type: 'HEAD', success: function() { $.ajax({ type: 'POST', url: 'read_file.php', data: 'filename=' +filename, success: function(html) { document.getElementById(fileID).innerHTML = html + ' <img src="images/loading.gif" />' setInterval(function() {get_progress(fileID,filename)},4000); } }); } });}

    Read the article

  • CSS. Placing footer at bottom of the webpage (not in the bottom of screen) in ASP Pages

    - by strakastroukas
    I have read a lot of approaches regarding placement of the footer in a webpage with CSS. Between others i found solutions, within SO too. The problem is (i think) that most of them, do not apply in asp pages. So the question is how can i place the footer with pure CSS in Asp pages? Before you post your answer, you have to take in mind the following. I use a master page (If this one has anything to do) The webpage contains the form element, which i believe destroys the placing of the footer in the bottom of the webpage. <form name="aspnetForm" method="post" action="Default.aspx" id="aspnetForm"> So, you may start down-voting, but i think a different approach exists regarding footer placement with CSS in Asp.Net pages

    Read the article

  • need small javascript for greasemonkey

    - by muqtar
    HI, i need a greasemonkey code for a web page. The page has hidden input type and value. I need a gm script which can alert the value of the hidden input object as soon as the page loads. The input tag is present in a form with: form id="bloog" method="post" action= "/newpage.php" name="bloog" The hidden content is present as: <input type="hidden" value="abcd" name="ans"> now as soon as the page loads the value abcd must come in the alertbox.. some body please help me i've been trying for these...

    Read the article

  • Change find() type of contained model or array transformation

    - by Ramon Marco Navarro
    I have the following model associations: Response->Survey Response->Question Response->Choice Survey->Question Question->Choice I want to create a form where I could answer all the questions for one survey. So I used the following to return the needed data: $questions = $this->Response->Question->find('all', array( 'conditions' => array('survey_id' => $id), 'contain' => array('Choice') ) ); Sample output for debug($questions). Questions Is there a contain() option so that an associated model returns in the find('list') format so that I could use: foreach($question as $questions) { $this-Form-select('field_name', $question['Choice']); } If no option is available, how could I do this using PHP's builting array methods? PS: The foreach block won't turn into a code block. If someone could edit and fix it, please do so and delete this line. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Trigger Backgroundworker Completed event.

    - by fireBand
    Hello, I am trying to display the progress bar(marque) in a separate form (progressForm) while i do some calculation in background. I know the typical way of doing it is to include the calculation in background worker and show progressForm in main thread. This approach how ever will lead to lot of synch issues in my application hence I am showing the progressForm using progressForm.ShowDialog() inside the background worker process. But I need to trigger the Completed event with in the application to close the form. Is this possible? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • asp.net could a half submitted web page be processed?

    - by c00ke
    Having a weird bug in production and just wondering if it's possible for a half submitted web page to processed by the server? The page has no view state just using plain old html controls and accessing data displayed in repeater on the back end via Request.Form[name] etc. Is it possible for a request to be truncated perhaps due to lost internet connection and the page still processed by the server. Therefore if field not part of the request Request.Form[name] could result in null? I know can use fiddler to modify request but unfortunately we are not allowed to change group policy and change the proxy! Many Thanks

    Read the article

  • MVC3 application I want javascript methods to fire on passed in route values

    - by DavieDave
    I have an MVC3 application in Visual Studio 2010. I have a view with several dropdowns that do javascript calls to populate dropdowns based on the selected value, some of which are disabled initially. That all works great with the initial state of nothing. If I however pass routevalues to the dropdowns from a redirect to this action, I do get the value set correctly but it's not enabled like it should be on the dropdown for example and when I post the form, the ones that are greyed out are not passed back on the form. How can I correct this?

    Read the article

  • Hot to implement grails server-side-triggered dialog, or how to break out of update region after AJA

    - by werner5471
    In grails, I use the mechanism below in order to implement what I'd call a conditional server-side-triggered dialog: When a form is submitted, data must first be processed by a controller. Based on the outcome, there must either be a) a modal Yes/No confirmation in front of the "old" screen or b) a redirect to a new controller/view replacing the "old" screen (no confirmation required). So here's my current approach: In the originating view, I have a <g:formRemote name="requestForm" url="[controller:'test', action:'testRequest']", update:"dummyRegion"> and a <span id="dummyRegion"> which is hidden by CSS When submitting the form, the test controller checks if a confirmation is necessary and if so, renders a template with a yui-based dialog including Yes No buttons in front of the old screen (which works fine because the dialog "comes from" the dummyRegion, not overwriting the page). When Yes is pressed, the right other controller & action is called and the old screen is replaced, if No is pressed, the dialog is cancelled and the "old" screen is shown again without the dialog. Works well until here. When submitting the form and test controller sees that NO confirmation is necessary, I would usually directly redirect to the right other controller & action. But the problem is that the corresponding view of that controller does not appear because it is rendered in the invisble dummyRegion as well. So I currently use a GSP template including a javascript redirect which I render instead. However a javascript redirect is often not allowed by the browser and I think it's not a clean solution. So (finally ;-) my question is: How do I get a controller redirect to cause the corresponding view to "break out" of my AJAX dummyRegion, replacing the whole screen again? Or: Do you have a better approach for what I have in mind? But please note that I cannot check on the client side whether the confirmation is necessary, there needs to be a server call! Also I'd like to avoid that the whole page has to be refreshed just for the confirmation dialog to pop up (which would also be possible without AJAX). Thanks for any hints!

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET 2.0 control is not shown up un VS 2010 toolbox

    - by user353653
    Hi, I have developed some ASP.NET controls in .NET 2.0 with VS 2008. Now, I upgraded my project to VS 2010 but did not change the target framework to .NET 4.0 yet. But, surprisingly, I found that, the toolbox is not showing the bitmaps for the control added to the toolbox in VS 2010. Moreover, when I dragged and dropped a control (.NET 2.0) from the toolbox to my Web Form, I see some junk xml code added to my web form. I dont know if I need to recompile the .NET 2.0 controls with VS 2010 ? or what should I do in order to make the controls compatible for both in VS 2008 and VS 2010 ? I found that, there is no problem with Windows Forms control, rather it is just with ASP.NET Controls.

    Read the article

  • <button type="submit"> compatibility?

    - by Mark
    I'd like to have a submit button that submits a different value than is displayed on the button. With <input type="submit"> you can't seem to do this. With <button type="submit"> however, these can be two different values. The question is, will it work in all browsers? Trying this test code here: <form method="get" action=""> <input type="text" name="txt"/> <button type="submit" name="btn" value="val">text</button> </form> In FF 3.6 it updates my address bar with both values appropriately (and responds to me pressing enter in the text box). In IE 8, it also accepts pressing enter, displays the text value in the address bar, but it show the button's value as a GET param at all... does that mean it's not submitting it?

    Read the article

  • How do I do Textbox Submit

    - by Newb
    Hello everyone, I have a search box and a buttion. currently a user enter some text and press the search button. But I want to add another feature that instead of clicking the search button people can hit enter to search. How can I do that? Here is my code sample: <form method="post" action=""> <input id="search" name="search" type="text" /> <input id="search_btn" name="search_btn" type="submit" /> </form> Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC - Typesafe Html.TextBoxFor with different outputmodel

    - by BjartN
    My view uses ModelX to render my HTML form and my controller action takes ModelY as input when saving the form. It seems the typesafe textbox API assumes I am using the same model in both places. Is it possible to use different models and beeing type safe without creating my own helpers ? <% = Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Text) %> I would like something like this. Does it exist ? <% = Html.TextBoxFor<InputModel,OutputModel>(input=>input.Text, output=>output.SomeOtherText)

    Read the article

  • I am trying to make a simple toggle button in javascript.

    - by CDeanMartin
    I am trying to make a simple toggle button in javascript. However, the button will only turn "OFF" and will not turn back "ON" <html><head></head> <script type="text/javascript"> function toggle(button) { if(document.getElementById("1").value=="OFF"){ document.getElementById("1").value="ON";} if(document.getElementById("1").value=="ON"){ document.getElementById("1").value="OFF";} } </script> <body> <form action=""> <input type="button" id="1" value="ON" style="color:blue" onclick="toggle(this);"> </form></body></html> I am running:HP Netbook : Ubuntu Linux 10.04 : Firefox for Ubuntu 1.0.

    Read the article

  • On saving a new record an associated id changes to 9 figure number

    - by Dave
    Hi, I have a table of venues, with each venue belonging to an area and a type. I recently dropped the table and added to it some addressline fields. I have re-migrated it but now the area_id field saves as a random? 9 figure number. Both the area_id and venuetype_id integers are created in the same way from the create new form and the venuetype_id saves as normal but not the area_id. Can anyone offer any help? whats shown in the console => [#<Venue id: 4, name: "sdf", addressline1: "", addressline2: "", addressline3 : "", addressline4: "", icontoppx: 234, iconleftpx: 234, area_id: 946717224, ven uetype_id: 8, created_at: "2011-03-17", updated_at: "2011-03-17 23:33:53">] irb(main):030:0> the area_id should be 8 in the above example. The area and venuetype id's are slected from dropdown boxes on the new venue form. new form <%= form_for @venue do |f| %> <p>name: <br> <%= f.text_field :name %></p> <p>top: <br> <%= f.text_field :icontoppx %></p> <p>left: <br> <%= f.text_field :iconleftpx %></p> <p>addressline1: <br> <%= f.text_field :addressline1 %></p> <p>addressline2: <br> <%= f.text_field :addressline2 %></p> <p>addressline3: <br> <%= f.text_field :addressline3 %></p> <p>addressline4: <br> <%= f.text_field :addressline4 %></p> <p>area: <br> <%= f.collection_select(:area_id, Area.all, :id, :name) %></p> <p>venuetype: <br> <%= f.collection_select(:venuetype_id, Venuetype.all, :id, :name) %></p> <br><br> <div class="button"><%= submit_tag %></div> <% end %> Areas table class CreateAreas < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :areas do |t| t.string :name t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :areas end end Thanks very much for any help!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373  | Next Page >