Search Results

Search found 40165 results on 1607 pages for 'function pointers'.

Page 367/1607 | < Previous Page | 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374  | Next Page >

  • Processing data from an AJAX request

    - by Josh K
    I have a PHP API I'm working with that outputs everything as JSON. I need to call one of the API methods and parse it out using an AJAX request. I am using jQuery (though it shouldn't matter). When I make the request it errors out with a "parsererror" as the textStatus and a "Syntax Error: invalid label" when I make the request. Simplified code: $.ajax ({ type: "POST", url: "http://mydomain.com/api/get/userlist/"+mid, dataType: "json", dataFilter: function(data, type) { /* Here we assume and pray */ users = eval(data); alert(users[1].id); }, success: function(data, textStatus, XMLHttpRequest) { alert(data.length); // Should be an array, yet is undefined. }, error: function(XMLHttpRequest, textStatus, errorThrown) { alert(textStatus); alert(errorThrown); }, complete: function(XMLHttpRequest, textStatus) { alert("Done"); } }); If I leave off the eval(data) then everything works fine. Well, except for data still being undefined in success. Note that I'm taking an array of objects in PHP and then passing them out through json_encode. Would that make any difference? There has been no progress made on this. I'm willing to throw more code up if someone believes they can help. Here is the PHP side of things private function _get_user_colors($id) { $u = new User(); $u->get_where(array('id' => $id)); $bar = array(); $bar['user'] = $u->stored; foreach($user->colors as $color) { $bar['colors'][] = $color; } echo(json_encode($bar)); } I have had zero issues using this with other PHP based scripts. I don't know why Javascript would take issue with it.

    Read the article

  • How would I use for_each to delete every value in an STL map?

    - by stusmith
    Suppose I have a STL map where the values are pointers, and I want to delete them all. How would I represent the following code, but making use of std::for_each? I'm happy for solutions to use Boost. for( stdext::hash_map<int, Foo *>::iterator ir = myMap.begin(); ir != myMap.end(); ++ir ) { delete ir->second; // delete all the (Foo *) values. } (I've found Boost's checked_delete, but I'm not sure how to apply that to the pair<int, Foo *> that the iterator represents). (Also, for the purposes of this question, ignore the fact that storing raw pointers that need deleting in an STL container isn't very sensible).

    Read the article

  • Why is `goog.Disposable.call(this);` necessary?

    - by David Faux
    In this snippet of Google Closure javascript code involving a constructor, why is goog.Disposable.call(this); necessary? Doesn't Foo already inherit from Disposable with goog.inherits(foo, goog.Disposable);? goog.provide('foo'); /** * @constructor */ foo = function(){ goog.Disposable.call(this); } goog.inherits(foo, goog.Disposable); foo.prototype.doSomething = function(){ ... } foo.prototype.disposeInternal = function(){ ... }

    Read the article

  • Eval string for wordpress "in_category" workaround outside the loop

    - by fimbim
    In Wordpress you can´t use "in_category" outside the loop, so I created a function that gives me all the categories my article is in and create a "is_category" if statement out of it. I put my function in my "functions.php": function inCatAlt($catID){ $allCats = get_categories('child_of='.$catID); $childCats = 'is_category('.$catID.') '; foreach($allCats as $childCat){ $childCats.= 'or is_category('.$childCat->cat_ID.') '; }; $allchildCats = trim(trim($childCats, 'or ')); return $allchildCats; } and call this in my sidebar, single and so on: echo inCatAlt(13); which gives me this as a string back: "is_category(13) or is_category(16) or is_category(15)" This is exactly what I needed, but now I want to evaluate the string to use it in a if function like this: if(eval(inCatAlt(13))){ do something } But it doesn´t work. Do I evaluate it wrong or what is the problem? If I copy paste the output into the if function it works fine… Thanks in advanced guys. Is my first time asking something here. I´m curious :)

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Prototype and Encapsulation

    - by Adam Davies
    Sorry I'm probably being a realy noob here...but: I have the following javascript object: jeeni.TextField = (function(){ var tagId; privateMethod = function(){ console.log("IN: privateMethod"); } publicMethod = function(){ console.log("IN: publicMethod: " + this.tagId); } jeeni.TextField = function(id){ console.log("Constructor"); this.tagId = id; } jeeni.TextField.prototype = { constructor: jeeni.TextField, foo: publicMethod }; return jeeni.TextField; }()); Now when I run the following code I get the corresponding result: var textField1 = new jeeni.TextField(21); // Outputs: Constructor textField1.foo(); // Outputs: IN: publicMethod: 21 console.log(textField1.tagId); // Outputs: 21 console.log(textField1.privateMethod); // Outputs: undefined So my question is why is privateMethod hidden and tagId is not. I want them both to be private scope. Please help a noob. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Zend and Jquery (Ajax Post)

    - by Zend_Newbie_Dev
    I'm using zend framework, i would like to get POST data using Jquery ajax post on a to save without refreshing the page. //submit.js $(function() { $('#buttonSaveDetails').click(function (){ var details = $('textarea#details').val(); var id = $('#task_id').val(); $.ajax({ type: 'POST', url: 'http://localhost/myproject/public/module/save', async: false, data: 'id=' + id + '&details=' + details, success: function(responseText) { //alert(responseText) console.log(responseText); } }); }); }); On my controller, I just don't know how to retrieve the POST data from ajax. public function saveAction() { $data = $this->_request->getPost(); echo $id = $data['id']; echo $details = $data['details']; //this wont work; } Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • ajax not working in codeigniter

    - by user1800797
    I'm trying to send a post request using the ajax jquery function and return some data into a window asynchronously. Here's what I have so far. It doesn't seem to be working. in the view: $.ajax({ url: '/dashboard/presskits/media/get_video_link/', type: 'POST', dataType: 'json', data: { encoded_link : encoded_link }, cache: false, success: function(output_string){ // $('#edit_video_info').append(output_string); alert(output_string.url_data); } // End of success function of ajax form }); // End of ajax call }); in the controller: public function get_video_link() { $temp_url = $this->input->post('encoded_link'); $output_string = json_encode(array('url_data' => $temp_url)); return $output_string; }

    Read the article

  • Game Objects Talking To Each Other

    - by PhilCK
    What is a good way of dealing with objects and having them talk to each other? Up until now all my games hobby/student have been small so this problem was generally solved in a rather ugly way, which lead to tight integration and circular dependencies. Which was fine for the size of projects I was doing. However my projects have been getting bigger in size and complexity and now I want to start re-using code, and making my head a simpler place. The main problem I have is generally along the lines of Player needs to know about the Map and so does the Enemy, this has usually descended into setting lots of pointers and having lots of dependencies, and this becomes a mess quickly. I have thought along the lines of a message style system. but I cant really see how this reduces the dependencies, as I would still be sending the pointers everywhere. Thanks. PS: I guess this has been discussed before, but I don't know what its called just the need I have.

    Read the article

  • Class Template Instantiation: any way round this circular reference?

    - by TimYorke34
    I have two classes that I'm using to represent some hardware: A Button and an InputPin class which represent a button that will change the value of an IC's input pin when it's pressed down. A simple example of them is: template <int pinNumber> class InputPin { static bool IsHigh() { return ( (*portAddress) & (1<<pinNumber) ); } }; template <typename InputPin> class Button { static bool IsPressed() { return !InputPin::IsHigh(); } }; This works beautifully and by using class templates, the condition below will compile as tightly as if I'd handwritten it in assembly (a single instruction). Button < InputPin<1> > powerButton; if (powerButton.IsPressed()) ........; However, I am extending it to deal with interrupts and have got a problem with circular references. Compared to the original InputPin, a new InputPinIRQ class has an extra static member function that will be called automatically by the hardware when the pin value changes. I'd like it to be able to notify the Button class of this, so that the Button class can then notify the main application that it has been pressed/released. I am currently doing this with function pointers to callbacks. In order for the callback code to be inlined by the compiler, I need to pass the function pointers as template parameters. So now, both of the new classes have an extra template parameter that is a pointer to a callback function. Unfortunately this gives me a circular reference because to instantiate a ButtonIRQ class I now have to do something like this: ButtonIRQ< InputPinIRQ< A1, ButtonIRQ<....>::OnPinChange, OnButtonChange > pB; where the <...... represents the circular reference. Does anyone know how I can avoid this circular reference? I am new to templates, so might be missing something really simple. It's important that the compiler knows exactly what code will be run when the interrupt occurs as it then does some very useful optimisation - it is able to inline the callback function and literally inserts the callback function's code at the exact address that is called on a h/w interrupt.

    Read the article

  • Python, lambda, find minimum

    - by qba
    I have foreach function which calls specified function on every element which it contains. I want to get minimum from thise elements but I have no idea how to write lambda or function or even a class that would manage that. Thanks for every help. I use my foreach function like this: o.foreach( lambda i: i.call() ) or o.foreach( I.call ) I don't like to make a lists or other objects. I want to iterate trough it and find min. I manage to write a class that do the think but there should be some better solution than that: class Min: def __init__(self,i): self.i = i def get_min(self): return self.i def set_val(self,o): if o.val < self.i: self.i = o.val m = Min( xmin ) self.foreach( m.set_val ) xmin = m.get_min() Ok, so I suppose that my .foreach method is non-python idea. I should do my Class iterable because all your solutions are based on lists and then everything will become easier. In C# there would be no problem with lambda function like that, so I though that python is also that powerful.

    Read the article

  • JQuery, Load() contents with plugins

    - by Galas
    I know this is not a completely new question, but none of the answers solved my problem... I have built a little menu that uses load() to load image galleries (as external html files) into a specified div ("content"). The said galleries make use of a JQuery plugin (SlideJS). Now I know that load() does not work for script tags and that I need to use $.getscript in the callback function in order to run the scripts, but it does not work. I have two .js files that need to be loaded: one is the plugin itself and another one is a smaller script with a preloader and the animations for the captions. I can't seem to merge them together; if I put them into the same document, the script won't run. So I tried just using $.getscript to load the two files. I tried using two callbacks as suggested in other answer (I know it's not ideal...): $("#proposal").click(function(){ $(this).addClass('selected'); $("a:not(:#proposal)").removeClass('selected'); $("#content").load("works/proposal/proposal.html", function(){ $.getScript("js/slide.js", function (){ $.getScript("js/slidepage.js"); }); }); }); and I tried a variable (read about it in some other faq, not sure if the syntax is correct) $("#proposal").click(function(){ $(this).addClass('selected'); $("a:not(:#proposal)").removeClass('selected'); $("#content").load("works/proposal/proposal.html", function(){ var scripts = ['js/slide.js','js/slidepage.js']; $.getScript(scripts); }); }); So none of these work. What am I doing wrong? I'm just starting on jquery and my js knowledge is very limited. Should I just merge the two .js files together using minify or something? One of them is already minified, but I've tried with a non-minified version and it does not work either. Can anyone suggest any other solution around this problem? I thought of just having the div embedded in the main document and just showing it on click, but I'll have at least 4 galleries with about 8 to 10 images each... its a lot of images to load in the main page, so I don't think its the best way. if you need me to post any more code, please ask! Thanks in advance for all your help!

    Read the article

  • Ajax Double Call

    - by Lordareon
    with this function <script type="text/javascript"> function ajaxcall(div, page) { if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest();} else { xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById(div).innerHTML=xmlhttp.responseText; } } xmlhttp.open("GET",page,true); xmlhttp.send(); } </script> i use my ajax. But in the page i call 2 times this function: <script type="text/javascript">ajaxcall("menu", "perfil.php");</script> <script type="text/javascript">ajaxcall('mapadiv', "map2.php");</script> But happens that only one of them works, if i remove one the other works. What im doing wrong? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • jquery loop hover button

    - by john morris
    ok i have 6 buttons, im trying to have a jquery listener for when you hover over one of the 6 buttons, it changes class. im using a for loop to do this, heres my code: $(document).ready(function() { for($i=1;$i<7;$i++) { $('#button'+i).hover(function() { $(this).addClass('hovering'); }, function() { $(this).removeClass('normal'); }); } }); each button has an id of "buttonx" ( the x being a number ) help?

    Read the article

  • Simple nested setTimeout() only runs once (JavaScript)

    - by danielfaraday
    For some reason my galleryScroll() function only runs once, even though the function calls itself using setTimeout(). I'm thinking the issue may be related to scope, but I'm not sure: http://jsfiddle.net/CYEBC/2/ $(document).ready(function() { var x = $('#box').offset().left; var y = $('#box').offset().top; galleryScroll(); function galleryScroll() { x = x + 1; y = y + 1; $('#box').offset({ left: x, top: y }); setTimeout('galleryScroll()', 100); } });? The HTML: <html> <head> </head> <body> <div id="box"> </div> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • How to add ease to this, with jQuery Easing plugin.

    - by user1691441
    I've asked this question previously before, and had a bit of help, but my lack of jQuery skills still didn't accomplish the job. I was wondering if anyone else could help me out with this. I've tried adding easing: "easeIn" right after the duration section, but still didn't work for me. if anyone could help me out that would be wonderful. I'm using the jquery easing plugin $(function() { function scroll(direction) { var scroll, i, positions = [], here = $(window).scrollTop(), collection = $('.part'); collection.each(function() { positions.push(parseInt($(this).offset()['top'],10)); }); for(i = 0; i < positions.length; i++) { if (direction == 'next' && positions[i] > here) { scroll = collection.get(i); break; } if (direction == 'prev' && i > 0 && positions[i] >= here) { scroll = collection.get(i-1); break; } } if (scroll) { $.scrollTo(scroll, { duration: 350 }); } return false; } $("#next,#prev").click(function() { return scroll($(this).attr('id')); }); $(".scrolltoanchor").click(function() { $.scrollTo($($(this).attr("href")), { duration: 350 }); return false; }); });

    Read the article

  • How do call this symbolic code transformation ?

    - by erric
    Hi, I often cross this kind of code transformation (or even mathematical transformation) (python example, but applies to any language) I've go a function def f(x): return x I use it into another one. def g(x): return f(x)*f(x) print g(2) leads to 4 But I want to remove the functional dependency, and I change the function g into def g(f): return f*f print g( f(2) ) leads to 4 too How do you call this kind of transformation, locally turning a function into a scalar ?

    Read the article

  • Replacing special characters by null

    - by madheena
    Hi, Is there any function to replace the special characters by null in informatica if we used replacestr function, i think we should specify all special characters as follows replacestr(input,'!','~','@','#','$','%','^','&','*',null) But we dont know what are teh special characters will be coming as input. can u please let me know that which function will be suitable.

    Read the article

  • lightbox dynamic image retrieval

    - by GSTAR
    I am constructing a lighbox gallery, currently experimenting with FancyBox (http://fancybox.net) and ColorBox (http://colorpowered.com/colorbox). By default you have to include a link to the large version of the image so that the Lightbox can display it. However, I am wanting to have the image link URLs pointing to a script rather than directly to the image file. So for example, instead of: <a href="mysite/images/myimage.jpg"> I want to do: <a href="mysite/photos/view/abc123"> The above URL points to a function: public function actionPhotos($view) { $photo=Photo::model()->find('name=:name', array(':name'=>$view)); if(!empty($photo)) { $user=$photo->user; $this->renderPartial('_photo', array('user'=>$user, 'photo'=>$photo, true)); } } At some point in the future the function will also update the view count of the image. Now this approach is working to an extent - most images load up but some do not load up (the lightbox gets displayed in a malformed state). I think the reason for this is because it is not processing the function quick enough. For example when I click the "next" button it needs to go to the URL, process the function and retreive/output the response. Does anybody know how I can get this working properly?

    Read the article

  • How do you make the script wait for the status of an Ajax get request before continuing?

    - by codeninja
    Basically what I'm doing is checking for the existence of an object, if it's not found, the script will try to load the source file using getScript. I only want to check this once though then return true or false to the function that calls fetch() fetch:function(obj){ ... isReady = false; $.getScript(obj.srcFile,function(){ isReady=true; warn("was able to load object "+key); }); return isReady; } but return kicks in before the script loads =/ later the script is loaded but the function returned false. This is the beauty of asynchronous I suppose... What's the best way to handle this... Maybe I could check again at some other point if the object exists? Or maybe there's a better way to do this where I dont have to potentially lock the browser?

    Read the article

  • Responsive: two different toggles on same element

    - by Mathijs Delva
    I'm having difficulties with the following problem. For a responsive website, i need to use the same toggle element for both a toggle system for one window width, and another toggle system for a second window width. I have the following snippets: 1.A simple hover for a language dropdown, which should be executed for resolutions greater than 980px. $('#clickme').hover(function() { $(this).parent().find("#select-language").show(); $(this).find("> a span").css({"opacity":"0.5"}); }, function() { $(this).parent().find("#select-language").hide(); $(this).find("> a span").css({"opacity":"1"}); }); 2.A simple click for the same language toggle, which should be executed for resolutions smaller than 980px. jQuery('#clickme').click(function() { jQuery("#select-language-mobile").slideToggle("fast"); }); I need to nest these two, so that when the user is viewing the website in one resolution, the click function with be fired, and in the other case the hover function. Can anybody help me with this? PS: I'm sorry, but the code blocks don't seem to work at the moment.

    Read the article

  • Is possible use 'div id' as name of array?

    - by rflfn
    Please view this jsfiddle jsfiddle.net/rflfn/uS4jd/ This is other try jsfiddle.net/rflfn/T3ZT6/ I'm using SMOF to developper Wordpress theme, I need make one function to change some values when link is clicked, but when I make array with name of div, the array returns null value... <a class="button" id="settext1">Some Link</a> <br /> <a class="button" id="settext2">Another Link</a> <br /> <a class="button" id="settext3">Link 3</a> <br /> JQ: $(document).ready(function(){ // var col_settext1 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked col_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; col_settext1['field_id2']='#00FFFF'; // var txt_settext1 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked txt_settext1['field_id3']='Some Text Here'; txt_settext1['field_id4']='Another Text Here'; // var txt_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked txt_settext2['field_id5']='Some Text Here'; // var col_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked col_settext2['field_id6']='Another Text Here'; // var chk_settext2 = new Array(); // <-- I need make this array with name of DIV cliked chk_settext2['field_id7']="checked"; }); $('.button').click(function(){ $myclass = this.id; $col = 'col_' + $myclass; $txt = 'txt_' + $myclass; $chk = 'chk_' + $myclass; // Based I clicked on the link 'settext1', Here I have this: // col_settext1 // txt_settext1 // chk_settext1 // THE PROBLEM ARE HERE! $col = new Array(); // <--- Here I use name of DIV as Array, but the value is lost... $txt = new Array(); $chk = new Array(); // Test... alert($col); // <--- Here no have any value :( alert($col[1]); // <--- Here no have any value :( for (id in $col) { // 'id' is value of array --> col_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... // just example: alert(id); } for (id in $txt) { // 'id' is value of array --> txt_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... } for (id in $chk) { // 'id' is value of array --> chk_settext1['field_id1']='#FF0000'; // do function based on array values... } }); Is possible use name of the div as array name? Any suggestion or any other method to solve this problem is welcome.

    Read the article

  • Add a + sign to a +ve number in PHP

    - by user318466
    I need to design a function to return -ve numbers unchanged but should add a + sign at the start of the number if its alreay no present. Example: Input Output ---------------- +1 +1 1 +1 -1 -1 It will get only numeric input. function formatNum($num) { # something here..perhaps a regex? } This function is going to be called several times in echo/print so the quicker the better.

    Read the article

  • How to convert a string to variable name

    - by p1xelarchitect
    I'm loading several external JSON files and want to check if they have been successfully cached before the the next screen is displayed. My strategy is to check the name of the array to see if it an object. My code works perfectly when I check only a single array and hard code the array name into my function. My question is: how can i make this dynamic? not dynamic: (this works) $("document").ready(){ checkJSON("nav_items"); } function checkJSON(){ if(typeof nav_items == "object"){ // success... } } dynamic: (this doesn't work) $("document").ready(){ checkJSON("nav_items"); checkJSON("foo_items"); checkJSON("bar_items"); } function checkJSON(item){ if(typeof item == "object"){ // success... } } here is the a larger context of my code: var loadAttempts = 0; var reloadTimer = false; $("document").ready(){ checkJSON("nav_items"); } function checkJSON(item){ loadAttempts++; //if nav_items exists if(typeof nav_items == "object"){ //if a timer is running, kill it if(reloadTimer != false){ clearInterval(reloadTimer); reloadTimer = false; } console.log("found!!"); console.log(nav_items[1]); loadAttempts = 0; //reset // load next screen.... } //if nav_items does not yet exist, try 5 times, then give up! else { //set a timer if(reloadTimer == false){ reloadTimer = setInterval(function(){checkJSON(nav_items)},300); console.log(item + " not found. Attempts: " + loadAttempts ); } else { if(loadAttempts <= 5){ console.log(item + " not found. Attempts: " + loadAttempts ); } else { clearInterval(reloadTimer); reloadTimer = false; console.log("Giving up on " + item + "!!"); } } } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374  | Next Page >