Search Results

Search found 99443 results on 3978 pages for 'build server'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 375/3978 | < Previous Page | 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382  | Next Page >

  • Distinct with Count and SQl Server

    - by chopps
    Hey everyone, Trying to work on a query that will return the top 3 selling products with the three having a distinct artist. Im getting stuck on getting the unique artist. Simplified Table schema Product ProductID Product Name Artist Name OrderItem ProductID Qty So results would look like this... PID artist qty 34432, 'Jimi Hendrix', 6543 54833, 'stevie ray vaughan' 2344 12344, 'carrie underwood', 1

    Read the article

  • Why better isolation level means better performance in MS SQL Server

    - by Oleg Zhylin
    When measuring performance on my query I came up with a dependency between isolation level and elapsed time that was surprising to me READUNCOMMITTED - 409024 READCOMMITTED - 368021 REPEATABLEREAD - 358019 SERIALIZABLE - 348019 Left column is table hint, and the right column is elapsed time in microseconds (sys.dm_exec_query_stats.total_elapsed_time). Why better isolation level gives better performance? This is a development machine and no concurrency whatsoever happens. I would expect READUNCOMMITTED to be the fasted due to less locking overhead.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Process Queue Race Condition

    - by William Edmondson
    I have an order queue that is accessed by multiple order processors through a stored procedure. Each processor passes in a unique ID which is used to lock the next 20 orders for its own use. The stored procedure then returns these records to the order processor to be acted upon. There are cases where multiple processors are able to retrieve the same 'OrderTable' record at which point they try to simultaneously operate on it. This ultimately results in errors being thrown later in the process. My next course of action is to allow each processor grab all available orders and just round robin the processors but I was hoping to simply make this section of code thread safe and allow the processors to grab records whenever they like. So Explicitly - Any idea why I am experiencing this race condition and how I can solve the problem. BEGIN TRAN UPDATE OrderTable WITH ( ROWLOCK ) SET ProcessorID = @PROCID WHERE OrderID IN ( SELECT TOP ( 20 ) OrderID FROM OrderTable WITH ( ROWLOCK ) WHERE ProcessorID = 0) COMMIT TRAN SELECT OrderID, ProcessorID, etc... FROM OrderTable WHERE ProcessorID = @PROCID

    Read the article

  • Set of Tools to optimize the performance in general of SQL Server

    - by Dave
    Hi, I know there are things out there to help to optimize queries, ect... but is there anything else, something like a full package that can scan your database and highlight all the performance issues, naming conventions, tables not properly normalized, etc? I know this is the job of a DBA and if the DBA is good, he shouldn't need a tool like that, but sometimes you start a new job, you get in charge of an existing database and the DB is a mess, so you don't know where to start... Thanks to everyone Dave

    Read the article

  • Sql Server - INSERT INTO SELECT to avoid duplicates

    - by Ashish Gupta
    I have following two tables:- Table1 ------------- ID Name 1 A 2 B 3 C Table2 -------- ID Name 1 Z I need to insert data from Table1 to Table2 and I can use following sytax for the same:- INSERT INTO Table2(Id, Name) SELECT Id, Name FROM Table1 However, In my case duplicate Ids might exist in Table2 (In my case Its Just "1") and I dont want to copy that again as that would throw an error. I can write something like this:- IF NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM Table2 WHERE Id=1) INSERT INTO Table2 (Id, name) SELECT Id, name FROM Table1 ELSE INSERT INTO Table2 (Id, name) SELECT Id, name FROM Table1 WHERE Table1.Id<>1 Is there a better way to do this without using IF - ELSE? I want to avoid two INSERT INTO-SELECT statements based on some condition. Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • delete all but minimal values, based on two columns in SQL Server table

    - by sqlill
    how to write a statement to accomplish the folowing? lets say a table has 2 columns (both are nvarchar) with the following data col1 10000_10000_10001_10002_10002_10002 col2 10____20____10____30____40_____50 I'd like to keep only the following data: col1 10000_10001_10002 col2 10____10____30 thus removing the duplicates based on the second column values (neither of the columns are primary keys), keeping only those records with the minimal value in the second column. how to accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Distinct Question

    - by RPS
    I need to be able to select only the first row for each name that has the greatest value. I have a table with the following: id name value 0 JOHN 123 1 STEVE 125 2 JOHN 127 3 JOHN 126 So I am looking to return: id name value 1 STEVE 125 2 JOHN 127 Any idea on the MSSQL Syntax on how to perform this operation?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008 - A clever way to fill a column with rising integers

    - by cc0
    This is a really silly question probably, I'm working on a database and what I want to do is create a table with an ID (auto increment) and another column: "Number" (I realize it sounds useless but bare with me here please), and I need to fill this "Number" column with values from 1 to 180, each time adding 1 to the previous. What would be a clever "automatic" way of doing that?

    Read the article

  • Comma Seperated Values Insertion In SQL server 2005

    - by Asim Sajjad
    How can I insert Values from the comma separated input paramater to the Store prodcedure ? Example is exec StopreProcedure Name 17,'127,204,110,198',7,'162,170,163,170' you can see that I have two Comma Separated Values in the parameter list , both will have same number of values if first have 5 comma seperated value then second one also has 5 comma separated values you can says 127 and 162 are related 204 and 170 are related and same for other how can I insert these two values in ? One comma Sepated value is inserted but how to insert two ?

    Read the article

  • Problem with Date Query - sql server 2008

    - by Gold
    hi i have this date's & Time's: date1: 10/04/2010 - Time: 08:09 date2: 11/04/2010 - Time: 08:14 i need to show all the date's between 10/04/2010 time 06:00 and 11/04/2010 time 6:00 i write this: select * from MyTbl where ((Tdate BETWEEN '20100410' AND '20100411') and (Ttime BETWEEN '06:00' and '06:00')) but i get empty table thank's in advance

    Read the article

  • sp_OACreate error on SQL Server 2005

    - by Johnny Lamho
    hi there, I have a stored procedure and trying to run "sp_OACreate" but fall over with the following message: Msg 50000, Level 16, State 1, Procedure HTTP_REQUEST, Line 26 sp_OACreate on MSXML2.XMLHttp.4.0 failed That occurs because I am setting a variable to get the return value of sp_OACreate and raise the above error if the return value is not 0. Now, the return value I get is "-6" but i don't know why it is happening? Any help on this would be good to help make this work.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2008: CASE vs IF-ELSE-IF vs GOTO

    - by Saharsh Shah
    I have some rules in my application and I have written the business logic of that rules in my procedure. At the time of creation of procedure I came to know that CASE statement won't work in my scenario. So I have tried two ways to perform same operations (using IF-ELSE-IF or GOTO) shown as below. Method 1 Using IF-ELSE-IF conditions: DECLARE @V_RuleId SMALLINT; IF (@V_RuleId = 1) BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END ELSE IF (@V_RuleId = 2) BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END ELSE IF (@V_RuleId = 3) BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END /* ... ... ... ...*/ ELSE IF (@V_RuleId = 19) BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END ELSE IF (@V_RuleId = 20) BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END Method 2 Using GOTO statement: DECLARE @V_RuleId SMALLINT, @V_Temp VARCHAR(100); SET @V_Temp = 'GOTO RULE' + CONVERT(VARCHAR, @V_RuleId); EXECUTE sp_executesql @V_Temp; RULE1: BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END RULE2: BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END RULE3: BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END /* ... ... ... ...*/ RULE19: BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END RULE20: BEGIN /*My business logic*/ END Today I have 20 rules. It can be increase to any number in future. If I can able to use CASE statement then I have not any problem with performance, but I can't do that so I am worried about the performance of my procedure. Also one thing to be noticed that this procedure will execute very frequently by application. My questions are: Is there any way to use CASE statement in my procedure? If not, which method is best to use in my procedure to improve the performance of my code? Thanks in advance...

    Read the article

  • Trying to verify understanding of foreign keys SQL Server

    - by msarchet
    So I'm working on just a learning project to expose myself to doing some things I do not get to do at work. I'm just making a simple bug and case tracking app (I know there are a million this is just to work with some tools I don't get to). So I was designing my database and realized I've never actually used Foreign Keys before in any of my projects, I've used them before but never actually setting up a column as a FK. So I've designed my database as follows, which I think is close to correct (at least for the initial layout). However When I try to add the FK's to the linking Tables I get an error saying, "The tables present in the relationship must have the same number of columns". I'm doing this by in SQLSMS by going to the Keys 'folder' and adding a FK. Is there something that I am doing wrong here, I don't understand why the tables would have to have the same number of columns for me to add a FK relationship between the tables?

    Read the article

  • sql server optional parameters: syntax for between clause

    - by Aseem Gautam
    @FromDate datetime = null @ToDate datetime = null SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE .... AND [PI].Date BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate When any date is null, the records are not displayed. What is the correct syntax so that I can get all records if any of the dates are null. I have thought of this: @FromDate datetime = '01/01/1901', @ToDate datetime = '12/31/9999' Thanks.

    Read the article

  • INNER JOIN vs LEFT JOIN performance in SQL Server

    - by Ekkapop
    I've created SQL command that use INNER JOIN for 9 tables, anyway this command take a very long time (more than five minutes). So my folk suggest me to change INNER JOIN to LEFT JOIN because the performance of LEFT JOIN is better, at first time its despite what I know. After I changed, the speed of query is significantly improve. I want to know why LEFT JOIN is faster than INNER JOIN? My SQL command look like below: SELECT * FROM A INNER JOIN B ON ... INNER JOIN C ON ... INNER JOIN D and so no

    Read the article

  • sql-server: how to insert to temporary table?

    - by RedsDevils
    I have one Temporary Table CREATE TABLE #TEMP (TEMP_ID INT IDENTITY(1,1)) And I would like to insert records to that table, How can I?I do as follow: INSERT INTO #TEMP DEFAULT VALUES But sometimes it doesn't work. What it might be?And I would like to know lifetime of temptable in MSSQL. Please Help me! Thanks all!

    Read the article

  • varchar comparison in SQL Server

    - by Ram
    I am looking for some SQL varchar comparison function like C# string.compare (we can ignore case for now, should return zero when the character expression are same and a non zero expression when they are different) Basically I have some alphanumeric column in one table which needs to be verified in another table. I cannot do select A.col1 - B.col1 from (query) as "-" operator cannot be applied on character expressions I cannot cast my expression as int (and then do a difference/subtraction) as it fails select cast ('ASXT000R' as int) Conversion failed when converting varchar 'ASXT000R' to int Soundex would not do it as soundex is same for 2 similar strings Difference would not do it as select difference('abc','ABC') = 4 (as per msdn, difference is the difference in the soundex of 2 character expressions and difference =4 implies least different) Is there any other way of doing it ?

    Read the article

  • .NET and Closing SQL Server connections

    - by user307076
    I am having a hard time figuring out why the following constructor will not close connnections. When I view the active connections. Here is the code that I have. Public Sub New(ByVal UserID As Integer) Dim oConn As New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("connStr").ToString()) Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("stored proc", oConn) Dim sdr As SqlDataReader cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@userID", UserID) oConn.Open() sdr = cmd.ExecuteReader() Try If Not sdr.HasRows Then sdr.Close() If Not oConn Is Nothing Then If oConn.State <> ConnectionState.Closed Then oConn.Close() End If End If cmd.Dispose() Exit Sub End If 'User has account in WATS, proceed to load account information While sdr.Read _firstname = Convert.ToString(sdr("First Name")) _lastname = Convert.ToString(sdr("Last Name")) End While Catch ex As Exception 'Throw New Exception("User Error: " + ex.Message) Finally sdr.Close() If Not oConn Is Nothing Then If oConn.State <> ConnectionState.Closed Then oConn.Close() End If End If cmd.Dispose() End Try End Sub

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382  | Next Page >