Search Results

Search found 30268 results on 1211 pages for 'sql 2011'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 389/1211 | < Previous Page | 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396  | Next Page >

  • question about adding another column to a sql statement

    - by every_answer_gets_a_point
    i am starting with this table: SELECT [Lab Occurrence Form].[Practice Code], [Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)], Count([Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)]) AS [CountOf1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)] FROM [Lab Occurrence Form] WHERE ((([Lab Occurrence Form].[Occurrence Date]) Between [Forms]![By Number]![Text4] And [Forms]![By Number]![Text2])) GROUP BY [Lab Occurrence Form].[Practice Code], [Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)] HAVING ((([Lab Occurrence Form].[Practice Code])<>"") AND ((Count([Lab Occurrence Form].[1 0 Preanalytical (Before Testing)]))<>0)); it selects 3 columns but i need to aggregate the comments and put it in the fourth column where the first two values are the same

    Read the article

  • I need to programmatically remove a batch of unique constraints that I don't know the names of.

    - by Bill
    I maintain a product that is installed at multiple locations which as been haphazardly upgraded. Unique constraints were added to a number of tables, but I have no idea what the names are at any particular instance. What I do know is the table/columnname pair that has the unique constraints and I would like to write a script to delete any unique constraint on these column/table combinations. This is MSSQL 2000 and later. Something that works on 2000/2005/2008 would be best!

    Read the article

  • SQL Server > Query > Column Names

    - by pojomx
    Hi, I'm here again- I have something like this Select A.a, A.b, A.a+A.b as c, (A.a+A.b*2)+A.d as d from Table But i want to know, if it is possible, to make it work with something like this: Select A.a,A.b,A.a+A.b as c, (c*2)+A.d as d from Table Thank you

    Read the article

  • How to find missing alpha values in sets of data within same table in SQL

    - by Jeff
    I have a table of many values where one column has the WO Number, and another column has the Resource ID. I need to be able to find all the WO numbers that do not have a resource value of "RW". Here is an example of the typical information. I need to be able to know that work order 5678 does not have an "RW" Resource ID. WO Number - Resource ID 1234 - IN 1234 - WE 1234 - AS 1234 - RW 5678 - PR 5678 - WE 5678 - IN 5678 - AS

    Read the article

  • saving an image object in sql server database from action method

    - by user3532152
    [HttpPost] public void Test(HttpPostedFileBase file) { UsersContext db = new UsersContext(); byte[] image = new byte[file.ContentLength]; file.InputStream.Read(image, 0, image.Length); CrimeReport i = new CrimeReport { ImageId=1, ImageName="Anjli",ImageContent = image, Active=true }; db.CrimeReports.Add(i); db.SaveChanges(); } I am getting an exception on db.CrimeReports.Add(i);

    Read the article

  • SQL more elegant combination of boolean checks possible?

    - by Matze
    Call me pedantic but is there a more elegant way to combine all those checks? SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '10.48.20.10' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '0.%' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE '127.%' ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC; To something like this: SELECT * FROM [TABLE1] WHERE [path] = 'RECEIVE' AND [src_ip] NOT LIKE IN ('10.48.20.10','0.%','127.%', .... ) ORDER BY [date],[time] DESC;

    Read the article

  • SQL 2000 xp_sendmail

    - by Steven
    Hi Guys, I have a trigger that sends an email once a value has been changed. It works when i make any amendments but when the users make the changes it fails. I have figured out the users havnt got permission to send mails in master.dbo.xp_sendmail The way the DB was originally setup wis shocking!! (each user has a network login rather than being part of a network group) Is there anyway i can allow a role in customerDb to access the xp_sendmail proc in the mater db? Thanks Sp

    Read the article

  • sql exception handling

    - by christine33990
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE p_createLocaltable IS table_already_exist EXCEPTION; PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT (table_already_exist, -00955); BEGIN create table local_table as select * from supplied_table where rownum < 1; EXCEPTION when table_already_exist then DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line('Table already exists , does not need to recreate it'); END; can anyone see any problem of the above code?

    Read the article

  • Combining IN and NOT IN in SQL as single result

    - by UltraVi01
    I apologize for the vague title. I am attempting to write a query that returns an alias column with matching values (resulting from an IN) as well as an alias column with values that do not match (using NOT IN). I want the result set to have: userId | matches | nonmatches. I currently have the following query which returns the matches as expected. I am having trouble getting the nonmatches in the result set -- that is, from a NOT IN statement SET @userId = 9; SELECT ug.user_id, COUNT(DISTINCT goal_id) as matches FROM user_goal ug WHERE ug.user_id!=@userId AND goal_id IN (SELECT iug.goal_id FROM user_goal iug WHERE user_id=@userId) GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY matches DESC LIMIT 4 So, the NOT IN would look something like this: goal_id NOT IN(SELECT uggg.goal_id FROM user_goal uggg WHERE user_id=@userId) AS nonmatches I am just not sure how to incorporate the NOT IN statement in my query so I get all the results

    Read the article

  • SQL Server 2005 Transactions

    - by mcallec
    I have a long running stored proc (approx 30 mins) which is currently running within a transaction (isolation level snapshot). I've set the transaction to snapshot to avoid locking records preventing other processes from accessing the data. What I'm trying to do is write to and read from a status table, but although we're in a transaction I'd like to write to and read from the status table as if I'm not in a transaction. I need this so that other processes can read any updates to this table by my stored proc, and this stored proc can also read any inserts made by other processes. I realise that having my entire stored proc running within a transaction isn't recommended, but this has been done for other reasons and we need to stick with that approach. So my question is within a transaction, is it possible to execute a query or call a stored proc which effectively isn't enlisted in the transaction?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396  | Next Page >