What's the lowest cost, legal, Microsoft server stack you can assemble?
- by McKAMEY
Assuming that you have an app infrastructure that generally only requires:
ASP.NET MVC / C# / .NET
Database or NoSQL data store (must be accessible from C#)
Here's the challenge to you server gods:
What is the least expensive configuration that will allow you to deploy to production in a way that doesn't break any licensing rules?
In what ways does this solution differ from the "standard" Microsoft deployment scenario?
Where does this solution's performance break down once the app begins to scale?
I'm not concerned about the hardware, only the server software itself. I would love to hear about any solutions you've personally put into production. Especially if they are unique alternatives.
For ideas, consider some of the possible variations, a) any Microsoft server solutions where they have lowered the barrier to entry to compete with OSS, or b) any OSS alternatives to Microsoft products which perform at a similar level.
An example of a): SQL Server 2008
Express Edition SP1 is a 100% free
version of SQL Server which will scale
to the needs of many smaller / early
stage applications.
An example of b): running the Mono
Framework on Linux.
An example of differing from the
"standard" stack: running Mono on
Linux will require a completely
different server OS familiarity. None
of the Windows-based knowledge really
transfers.
An example of breaking down under
scale: SQL Server Express will only
scale to 1GB of memory and 4GB of disk
storage. After that point, the
application will need to move to one
of the paid versions of SQL Server.
