Search Results

Search found 18590 results on 744 pages for 'oracle community'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 425/744 | < Previous Page | 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432  | Next Page >

  • CVE-2011-3256 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in FreeType 2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-3256 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 4.3 FreeType 2 Library Solaris 11 Contact Support Solaris 10 SPARC: 119812-13 X86: 119813-15 Solaris 9 Contact Support Solaris 8 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service vulnerabilities in Quagga

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-3323 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 Quagga Solaris 10 SPARC: 126206-09 X86: 126207-09 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 4 CVE-2011-3324 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2011-3325 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2011-3326 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service vulnerabilities in Quagga

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2007-4826 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 3.5 Quagga Solaris 10 SPARC: 126206-09 X86: 126207-09 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 4 CVE-2009-1572 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2010-1674 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2010-1675 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2010-2948 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 6.5 CVE-2010-2949 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • OBI & P6 Analytics Demo @ MAOAUG

    - by mark.kromer
    Mark will be speaking in King of Prussia, outside of Philly, for the Mid-Atlantic Oracle Apps Users Group on Oracle BI w/P6 Analytics for IT projects this Friday: http://www.maoaug.org. Stop by and say HI if you are in the area!

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-4862 Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Telnet

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-4862 Buffer Overflow vulnerability 7.5 Telnet Solaris 10 SPARC: 148657-01 X86: 148658-01 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 04 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Wireshark

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-1593 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 3.3 Wireshark Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 8.5 CVE-2012-1594 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 3.3 CVE-2012-1595 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2012-1596 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Neue Zertifizierung von Pillar Axiom 600 Speichersystem

    - by swalker
    Sie haben nun die Möglichkeit, die Beta-Prüfung für Pillar Axiom 600 Storage System Essentials (1Z0-581) vorzunehmen. Wenn Sie die Prüfung bestehen, können Sie Implementierungsspezialist für Pillar Axiom 600 Speichersysteme werden! Für Oracle Partner sind kostenlose Gutscheine erhältlich. Wenn Sie einen kostenlosen Gutschein für die Beta-Prüfung erhalten möchten, senden Sie Ihre Anfrage an [email protected] und geben Sie bitte Ihren Namen, Ihre geschäftliche E-Mail-Adresse, Ihr Unternehmen und den Namen der Prüfung (Pillar Axiom 600 Storage System Essentials Beta) an.

    Read the article

  • Value Chain Execution E-Book

    - by John Murphy
    Taking a smart approach to logistics – from streamlining transport networks and global trade management, to optimizing everyday warehouse operations – can simultaneously reduce costs and maximize competitive advantage.Download your exclusive Oracle e-book, Oracle Value Chain Execution: Reinventing Logistics Excellence, to learn why our world-leading, unified solution is relied on by market-leading companies across the planet.Discover how it can help you: Drive business agility, scalability and innovation Reduce costs and increase efficiency Enhance visibility, productivity and inventory accuracy Simplify compliance and mitigate risk Measure and boost customer satisfaction See what reinventing logistics excellence could mean for your organization.

    Read the article

  • OPN Diamond Level Criteria Update

    - by Cinzia Mascanzoni
    On June 1, 2013, the criteria for Oracle PartnerNetwork members to attain the prestigious Diamond level will change and all members at the Diamond level at that point will be required to meet the new criteria. This change underscores the requirement for these elite partners to engage across Oracle’s broad product portfolio. Refer to the Diamond Level Requirements on the OPN Portal here for more detail.

    Read the article

  • Recording Available: March 2012 Quarterly Customer Update Webcast

    - by R.Hunter
    Missed the recent Quarterly Customer Update Webcast? We covered several topics including: * WebCenter 4 Pillars overview * Support Update * WebCenter Content 11gR1 Update * WebCenter Portal 11gR1 Update * Oracle Social Network Overview VIEW WEBCAST RECORDING: Access the March 2012 Webcast recording and presentation by going to: My Oracle Support Site Note: 568127.1 We'll announce the next Quarterly Customer Update Webcast here on the WebCenter Alerts blog.

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Network Time Protocol (NTP)

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2009-0021 Improper Authentication vulnerability 5.0 Firmware SPARC T3-4 SPARC: 147317-01 SPARC T3-2 SPARC: 147316-01 SPARC T3-1B SPARC: 147318-01 SPARC T3-1 SPARC: 147315-01 Netra SPARC T3-1B SPARC: 147320-01 Netra SPARC T3-1 SPARC: 147319-01 Netra SPARC T3-1BA SPARC: 144609-07 CVE-2009-0159 Buffer Overflow vulnerability 6.8 CVE-2009-3563 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 6.4 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • What are the types and inner workings of a query optimizer?

    - by Frank Developer
    As I understand it, most query optimizers are cost-based. Some can be influenced by hints like FIRST_ROWS(). Others are tailored for OLAP. Is it possible to know more detailed logic about how Informix IDS and SE's optimizers decide what's the best route for processing a query, other than SET EXPLAIN? Is there any documentation which illustrates the ranking of SELECT statements? I would imagine that "SELECT col FROM table WHERE ROWID = n" ranks 1st. What are the rest of them?.. If I'm not mistaking, Informix's ROWID is a SERIAL(INT) which allows for a max. of 2GB nrows, or maybe it uses INT9 for TB's nrows?.. However, I think Oracle uses HEX values for ROWID. Too bad ROWID can't be oftenly used, since a rows ROWID can change. So maybe ROWID is used by the optimizer as a counter? Perhaps, it could be used for implementing the query progress idea I mentioned in my "Begin viewing query results before query completes" question? For some reason, I feel it wouldn't be that difficult to report a query's progress while being processed, perhaps at the expense of some slight overhead, but it would be nice to know ahead of time: A "Google-like" estimate of how many rows meet a query's criteria, display it's progress every 100, 200, 500 or 1,000 rows, give users the ability to cancel it at anytime and start displaying the qualifying rows as they are being put into the current list, while it continues searching?.. This is just one example, perhaps we could think other neat/useful features, the ingridients are more or less there. Perhaps we could fine-tune each query with more granularity than currently available? OLTP queries tend to be mostly static and pre-defined. The "what-if's" are more OLAP, so let's try to add more control and intelligence to it? So, therefore, being able to more precisely control, not "hint-influence" a query is what's needed and therefore it would be necessary to know how the optimizers logic is programmed. We can then have Dynamic SELECT and other statements for specific situations! Maybe even tell IDS to read blocks of indexes nodes at-a-time instead of one-by-one, etc. etc.

    Read the article

  • Portraits of Excellence: Editors' Choice Awards 2009

    Each year the editors of Oracle Magazine recognize men and women who exemplify leadership, vision, and dedication in working with and managing Oracle technology. This year, we are pleased to present the winners of our eighth annual Editors' Choice Awards, and we are honored to feature them in our pages.

    Read the article

  • The Latest in Enterprise Continuous Controls Monitoring

    AMR identifies continuous controls monitoring as one of the top GRC software investments planned for 2010. Tune into this Appcast to hear why Gartner positions Oracle as a Leader in its Magic Quadrant for Continuous Controls Monitoring. Siddharth Sinha, Senior Director of GRC Product Strategy, unveils how Oracle GRC Controls monitors, enforces and optimizes critical processes within ERP applications, and reduce opportunities for fraud and error.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2008-3529 Buffer overflow vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2008-3529 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 10.0 libxml2 Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Exadata videó: az oszi érkezés Budapesten a Sysmanhoz

    - by Fekete Zoltán
    Tekintse meg a videót az elso Oracle Exadata Database Machine adatbázisgép megérkezésérol Magyarországra a Sysman Exadata Teszt és Demonstrációs Központba, ahol az extrém nagy adatbázis teljesítményt nyújtó megoldás tesztelheto és kipróbálható. A videót a Sysman készítette, megtekintheto itt: Oracle Exadata Database Machine - Hungary Amik eloször eszembe jutottak: felvillanyozó és hosies. :) Dinamikus a vágás és remek a zene választás. A másik videóról már korábban írtam blogbejegyzést, ami magáról az Exadata Teszt és Demonstrációs Központról szól: Videó a Sysman Exadata demó centrumáról

    Read the article

  • 6 Facts About GlassFish Announcement

    - by Bruno.Borges
    To help clarify the message about the recent roadmap for GlassFish, I decided to put together 6 facts about the announcement, future of GlassFish, and the Java EE platform as a whole:  "Since Oracle announced the end of commercial support for future Oracle GlassFish Server versions, the Java EE world has started wondering what will happen to GlassFish Server Open Source Edition. Unfortunately, there's a lot of misleading information going around. So let me clarify some things with facts, not FUD." Read full story here

    Read the article

  • Success with E-Business Suite Release 12 Implementations: Intelligroup, Inc.

    Want to learn more about implementing Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12? Listen to this Srinivas Krishna, Sr. Intelligroup is a global provider of outsourcing services including application management and support services, infrastructure management services, innovative consulting, technology, and implementation services. Learn more at: http://www.intelligroup.com/Direction – Oracle Practice, Intelligroup, Inc discuss customer experiences and benefits from Release 12 implementations.

    Read the article

  • Missed The Latest OPN Partnercast?

    - by Roxana Babiciu
    Don’t miss the replays. Patrick Ty, Director of Partner Enablement for CX discusses the advantages of Oracle’s Marketing Automation solutions. First, watch his interview with Neil Wilson, Vice President of Global Alliances & Channels, on Oracle Eloqua Marketing Automation. Then, see his conversation with David Lewis, the Founder and CEO of DemandGen International Inc., covering Marketing Automation best practices for partners.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-1937 Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Webmin

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-1937 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability 4.3 Webmin Solaris 10 SPARC: 145006-03 X86: 145007-03 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • A brief note for customers running SOA Suite on AIX platforms

    - by christian
    When running Oracle SOA Suite with IBM JVMs on the AIX platform, we have seen performance slowdowns and/or memory leaks. On occasion, we have even encountered some OutOfMemoryError conditions and the concomittant Java coredump. If you are experiencing this issue, the resolution may be to configure -Dsun.reflect.inflationThreshold=0 in your JVM startup parameters. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-nativememory-aix/ contains a detailed discussion of the IBM AIX JVM memory model, but I will summarize my interpretation and understanding of it in the context of SOA Suite, below. Java ClassLoaders on IBM JVMs are allocated a native memory area into which they are anticipated to map such things as jars loaded from the filesystem. This is an excellent memory optimization, as the file can be loaded into memory once and then shared amongst many JVMs on the same host, allowing for excellent horizontal scalability on AIX hosts. However, Java ClassLoaders are not used exclusively for loading files from disk. A performance optimization by the Oracle Java language developers enables reflectively accessed data to optimize from a JNI call into Java bytecodes which are then amenable to hotspot optimizations, amongst other things. This performance optimization is called inflation, and it is executed by generating a sun.reflect.DelegatingClassLoader instance dynamically to inject the Java bytecode into the virtual machine. It is generally considered an excellent optimization. However, it interacts very negatively with the native memory area allocated by the IBM JVM, effectively locking out memory that could otherwise be used by the Java process. SOA Suite and WebLogic are both very large users of reflection code. They reflectively use many code paths in their operation, generating lots of DelegatingClassLoaders in normal operation. The IBM JVM slowdown and subsequent OutOfMemoryError are as a direct result of the Java memory consumed by the DelegatingClassLoader instances generated by SOA Suite and WebLogic. Java garbage collection runs more frequently to try and keep memory available, until it can no longer do so and throws OutOfMemoryError. The setting sun.reflect.inflationThreshold=0 disables this optimization entirely, never allowing the JVM to generate the optimized reflection code. IBM JVMs are susceptible to this issue primarily because all Java ClassLoaders have this native memory allocation, which is shared with the regular Java heap. Oracle JVMs don't automatically give all ClassLoaders a native memory area, and my understanding is that jar files are never mapped completely from shared memory in the same way as IBM does it. This results in different behaviour characteristics on IBM vs Oracle JVMs.

    Read the article

  • Java EE 7 Roadmap

    - by Linda DeMichiel
    The Java EE 6 Platform, released in December 2009, has seen great uptake from the community with its POJO-based programming model, lightweight Web Profile, and extension points. There are now 13 Java EE 6 compliant appserver implementations today! When we announced the Java EE 7 JSR back in early 2011, our plans were that we would release it by Q4 2012. This target date was slightly over three years after the release of Java EE 6, but at the same time it meant that we had less than two years to complete a fairly comprehensive agenda — to continue to invest in significant enhancements in simplification, usability, and functionality in updated versions of the JSRs that are currently part of the platform; to introduce new JSRs that reflect emerging needs in the community; and to add support for use in cloud environments. We have since announced a minor adjustment in our dates (to the spring of 2013) in order to accommodate the inclusion of JSRs of importance to the community, such as Web Sockets and JSON-P. At this point, however, we have to make a choice. Despite our best intentions, our progress has been slow on the cloud side of our agenda. Partially this has been due to a lack of maturity in the space for provisioning, multi-tenancy, elasticity, and the deployment of applications in the cloud. And partially it is due to our conservative approach in trying to get things "right" in view of limited industry experience in the cloud area when we started this work. Because of this, we believe that providing solid support for standardized PaaS-based programming and multi-tenancy would delay the release of Java EE 7 until the spring of 2014 — that is, two years from now and over a year behind schedule. In our opinion, that is way too long. We have therefore proposed to the Java EE 7 Expert Group that we adjust our course of action — namely, stick to our current target release dates, and defer the remaining aspects of our agenda for PaaS enablement and multi-tenancy support to Java EE 8. Of course, we continue to believe that Java EE is well-suited for use in the cloud, although such use might not be quite ready for full standardization. Even today, without Java EE 7, Java EE vendors such as Oracle, Red Hat, IBM, and CloudBees have begun to offer the ability to run Java EE applications in the cloud. Deferring the remaining cloud-oriented aspects of our agenda has several important advantages: It allows Java EE Platform vendors to gain more experience with their implementations in this area and thus helps us avoid risks entailed by trying to standardize prematurely in an emerging area. It means that the community won't need to wait longer for those features that are ready at the cost of those features that need more time. Because we have already laid some of the infrastructure for cloud support in Java EE 7, including resource definition metadata, improved security configuration, JPA schema generation, etc., it will allow us to expedite a Java EE 8 release. We therefore plan to target the Java EE 8 Platform release for the spring of 2015. This shift in the scope of Java EE 7 allows us to better retain our focus on enhancements in simplification and usability and to deliver on schedule those features that have been most requested by developers. These include the support for HTML 5 in the form of Web Sockets and JSON-P; the simplified JMS 2.0 APIs; improved Managed Bean alignment, including transactional interceptors; the JAX-RS 2.0 client API; support for method-level validation; a much more comprehensive expression language; and more. We feel strongly that this is the right thing to do, and we hope that you will support us in this proposed direction.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432  | Next Page >