Search Results

Search found 46260 results on 1851 pages for 'google custom search'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 509/1851 | < Previous Page | 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516  | Next Page >

  • Projet Tango : après les smartphones capables de capturer des images en 3D, Google plancherait cette fois-ci sur les tablettes

    Projet Tango : après les smartphones capables de capturer des images en 3D, Google plancherait cette fois-ci sur les tablettes Après avoir dévoilé son projet Tango, qui prévoit des smartphones disposant de capteurs 3D capables de récréer l'environnement dans lequel l'utilisateur se trouve en 3D sur l'écran, Google devrait produire un nombre restreint de tablettes dotées d'un écran de 7 pouces elles aussi capables de capturer des images en 3D. Les tablettes seraient équipées de deux caméras orientées...

    Read the article

  • Les outils de développement Google Chrome s'enrichissent d'un émulateur des terminaux mobiles et de plusieurs autres fonctions

    Les outils de développement Google Chrome s'enrichissent d'un émulateur des terminaux mobiles et de plusieurs autres fonctions expérimentales Google a procédé à une mise à jour des outils de développement de son navigateur Chrome. La fonction vedette de cette nouvelle version est l'intégration d'un émulateur, qui permettra aux développeurs de tester des applications Web sur différents navigateurs mobiles à travers une multitude de dispositifs. Grâce à cette fonctionnalité, les développeurs pourront tester leur application et déboguer celle-ci dans un environnement virtuel, proche de celui des différents terminaux ciblés, à l'instar de la Galaxy Nexus ou encore l'iPhone.

    Read the article

  • Go : nouvelle version pour le langage de Google avec un meilleur support sous Windows et des modifications significatives de la syntaxe

    Go : une nouvelle version du langage de Google améliore le support sous Windows Et introduit des modifications significatives de sa syntaxe Mise à jour du 03/02/2011 par Idelways Une nouvelle version de Go, le langage de programmation open-source de Google, vient de voir le jour. Estampillée « release.2011-02-01 » par l'équipe du développement du langage, cette version introduit des changements significatifs à la syntaxe des opérations sur les canaux et introduit de nouvelles améliorations au support dans les environnements Windows. Les opérations non bloquantes sur les canaux ont été supprimées. ...

    Read the article

  • Google Chrome sur le point d'intégrer le framework WebRTC soutenu par la fondation Mozilla, une sérieuse menace pour Microsoft Skype ?

    Google Chrome sur le point d'intégrer le framework WebRTC Soutenu par la fondation Mozilla, une sérieuse menace pour Microsoft Skype ? Mise à jour du 23/06/2011 Google Chrome est sur le point d'avoir des capacités de communication audio et vidéo en natif qui pourraient permettre à n'importe quelle application Web de rivaliser avec Skype, le célèbre logiciel de VoIP, propriété de Microsoft désormais. Ces nouvelles fonctionnalités seront fondées sur le framework Web...

    Read the article

  • Optimising For Google and Bing - How Distinct Are They?

    With Bing and Yahoo set to combine soon enough, the Bing search engine will probably count for near to 30% of the search engine business, this means it could be somewhat beneficial to optimise for both Bing and Google in the not too remote future. Now that does not really entail that you ought to implement tremendous modifications to the optimisation approaches you presently use, as an evaluation by SEOmoz reveals that the two engines appear to be growing to be increasingly more similar.

    Read the article

  • Firefox OS une alternative au contrôle de Google sur Android ? Mozilla voit son OS comme la solution qui réduira la dépendance des constructeurs

    Firefox OS une alternative au contrôle de Google sur Android ? Mozilla voit son OS comme la solution qui réduira la dépendance des constructeurs de Google Le lancement officiel de Firefox OS est prévu pour ce mois dans plusieurs pays, notamment le Brésil, le Mexique, la Pologne ou encore l'Espagne (lire le dossier de la rédaction sur l'OS).Développé depuis pratiquement deux ans par la fondation Mozilla, Firefox OS repose sur les technologies du Web, et est présenté comme un système d'exploitation pour le « Web ouvert », qui ouvrira le plein potentiel des terminaux mobiles aux développeurs d'applications Web.L'OS est la réponse d...

    Read the article

  • Des smartphones sous Android... mais avec Bing, Motorola proposera l'OS de Google en Chine avec le m

    Mise à jour du 11/03/10 [NB : Les commentaires sur cette mise à jour commencent ici dans le topic] Chine vs Google : des smartphones sous Android, mais avec Bing L'OS de Google sera proposé avec le moteur de recherche de Microsoft sur les modèles de Motorola Motorola vient de signer un accord pour le moins curieux avec Microsoft. Sur le marché Chinois, le constructeur proposera Bing, le moteur de recherche de Redmond, sur ses smartphones sous Android. Ironique quand on sait...

    Read the article

  • How Does a Landing Page Affect Search Engine Optimization?

    Search engine optimization or SEO for short is one of the many those new to online commercial have to deal with when setting up their web presence. One SEO related question that seems to come up frequently is "How does a landing page affect search engine optimization, and if so to what degree"? The short answer is, yes it does.

    Read the article

  • Droit à l'oubli : 12 000 requêtes reçues par Google en une journée, après le lancement de son formulaire

    Droit à l'oubli : 12 000 requêtes reçues par Google en une journée après le lancement du formulaire de demande de suppression des données sensiblesEn fin de semaine dernière, Google lançait un formulaire en ligne pour permettre aux internautes européens de signaler en quelques clics qu'ils ne souhaitaient plus voir des liens vers des informations sensibles les concernant affichés dans les résultats du moteur de recherche.En seulement une journée après l'ouverture des soumissions, le géant de la...

    Read the article

  • Natural Search Engine Optimization - Don't "Game the System" Or You Will Get Banned!

    When focusing on natural search engine optimization, it is important that you keep the process "white hat." You see, when it comes to SEO, there are basically three schools of thought: White hat, Gray hat, and Black hat. As you can probably infer, white hat is following the rules, gray hat is a little in between, and black hat is going against parameters that Google and other major search engines have set for ethical SEO practices.

    Read the article

  • Google : vers plus de reconnaissance faciale et de réalité augmentée, Motorola vient de racheter la société spécialisée Viewdle

    Google va ajouter plus de reconnaissance faciale et de réalité augmentée à ses produits Motorola rachète la société spécialisée Viewdle Google, via sa filiale Motorola, vient de racheter une société d'origine Ukrainienne baptisée Viewdle. Basé aujourd'hui en Californie, Viewdle est spécialisée « dans la réalité augmentée et la reconnaissance faciale ». [IMG]http://ftp-developpez.com/gordon-fowler/Viewdle%20Google%20Motorola/Viewdle%20Google%20Motorola%201.jpg[/IMG] Sur le même modèle que Face.com acquis par Facebook, son produit phare reconnait et tague automatiquement les visages sur les photos avant de les uploader sur Facebook.

    Read the article

  • Android AlertDialog with rounded corners: rectangle seen below corners

    - by user1455909
    I want a Dialog with rounded corners, but when the Dialog is seen there's a rectangle below it that's seen below the corners, like this: I build the dialog using a custom DialogFragment: public class MyDialogFragment extends DialogFragment{ @Override public Dialog onCreateDialog(Bundle savedInstanceState) { AlertDialog.Builder builder = new AlertDialog.Builder(getActivity()); LayoutInflater inflater = getActivity().getLayoutInflater(); builder.setView(inflater.inflate(R.layout.playdialog, null)); return builder.create(); } } The dialog layout (playdialog) has the following drawable as background: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <shape xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" android:shape="rectangle" > <solid android:color="#AAAAAAAA" /> <stroke android:width="2dp" android:color="#FF000000" /> <corners android:radius="20dp" /> </shape> As I said, I set this drawable as background: android:background="@drawable/dialog_background" I don't want that rectangle to be seen. How can I do it?? In this post the user had the same problem. I tried to use the solution that worked for him but it didn't work for me. I modified my DialogFragment like this: public Dialog onCreateDialog(Bundle savedInstanceState) { AlertDialog.Builder builder = new AlertDialog.Builder(getActivity()); LayoutInflater inflater = getActivity().getLayoutInflater(); builder.setView(inflater.inflate(R.layout.playdialog, null)); Dialog d = builder.create(); d.getWindow().setBackgroundDrawable(new ColorDrawable(android.graphics.Color.TRANSPARENT)); return d; } The result is exactly the same. How can I remove that rectangle? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Asp.net MVC Route class that supports catch-all parameter anywhere in the URL

    - by Robert Koritnik
    the more I think about it the more I believe it's possible to write a custom route that would consume these URL definitions: {var1}/{var2}/{var3} Const/{var1}/{var2} Const1/{var1}/Const2/{var2} {var1}/{var2}/Const as well as having at most one greedy parameter on any position within any of the upper URLs like {*var1}/{var2}/{var3} {var1}/{*var2}/{var3} {var1}/{var2}/{*var3} There is one important constraint. Routes with greedy segment can't have any optional parts. All of them are mandatory. Example This is an exemplary request http://localhost/Show/Topic/SubTopic/SubSubTopic/123/This-is-an-example This is URL route definition {action}/{*topicTree}/{id}/{title} Algorithm Parsing request route inside GetRouteData() should work like this: Split request into segments: Show Topic SubTopic SubSubTopic 123 This-is-an-example Process route URL definition starting from the left and assigning single segment values to parameters (or matching request segment values to static route constant segments). When route segment is defined as greedy, reverse parsing and go to the last segment. Parse route segments one by one backwards (assigning them request values) until you get to the greedy catch-all one again. When you reach the greedy one again, join all remaining request segments (in original order) and assign them to the greedy catch-all route parameter. Questions As far as I can think of this, it could work. But I would like to know: Has anyone already written this so I don't have to (because there are other aspects to parsing as well that I didn't mention (constraints, defaults etc.) Do you see any flaws in this algorithm, because I'm going to have to write it myself if noone has done it so far. I haven't thought about GetVirtuaPath() method at all.

    Read the article

  • Wix - How do I specify a directory to run a batch file in?

    - by Mike Pateras
    I want to run a batch file, which I do via the following: <CustomAction Id='InstallFilter' FileKey='install' ExeCommand='' Execute='deferred' /> <InstallExecuteSequence> <Custom Action='InstallFilter' Before='InstallFinalize' /> </InstallExecuteSequence> This will execute the batch file, but it runs in C:\Windows\System32 (or something like that). I want it to run in the directory that the file is found in. It won'et let me specify a Directory attribute with a FileKey attribute. How can I tell the installer to run out of a specific directory, preferably by the directory ID. Also, when I try to uninstall my app with script, I get an error message saying "There is a problem with the Windows Installer package. A program required for the install to complete could not be run." This makes sense, as by the time the script gets run, the files have been removed. The question is: How do I specify that my action should only be run on install, not uninstall? How do I uninstall this current copy?

    Read the article

  • GDI RoundRect on Compact Framework: make rounded rectangle's outside transparent.

    - by VansFannel
    Hello! I'm using the RoundRect GDI function to draw a rounded rectangle following this example: .NET CF Custom Control: RoundedGroupBox Because all controls are square, it also draw the corners outside of the rounded rectangle. How can I make this space left outside the rectangle transparent? The OnPaint method is: protected override void OnPaint(PaintEventArgs e) { int outerBrushColor = HelperMethods.ColorToWin32(m_outerColor); int innerBrushColor = HelperMethods.ColorToWin32(this.BackColor); IntPtr hdc = e.Graphics.GetHdc(); try { IntPtr hbrOuter = NativeMethods.CreateSolidBrush(outerBrushColor); IntPtr hOldBrush = NativeMethods.SelectObject(hdc, hbrOuter); NativeMethods.RoundRect(hdc, 0, 0, this.Width, this.Height, m_diametro, m_diametro); IntPtr hbrInner = NativeMethods.CreateSolidBrush(innerBrushColor); NativeMethods.SelectObject(hdc, hbrInner); NativeMethods.RoundRect(hdc, 0, 18, this.Width, this.Height, m_diametro, m_diametro); NativeMethods.SelectObject(hdc, hOldBrush); NativeMethods.DeleteObject(hbrOuter); NativeMethods.DeleteObject(hbrInner); } finally { e.Graphics.ReleaseHdc(hdc); } if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(m_roundedGroupBoxText)) { Font titleFont = new Font("Tahoma", 9.0F, FontStyle.Bold); Brush titleBrush = new SolidBrush(this.BackColor); try { e.Graphics.DrawString(m_roundedGroupBoxText, titleFont, titleBrush, 14.0F, 2.0F); } finally { titleFont.Dispose(); titleBrush.Dispose(); } } base.OnPaint(e); } An the OnPaintBackground is: protected override void OnPaintBackground(PaintEventArgs e) { if (this.Parent != null) { SolidBrush backBrush = new SolidBrush(this.Parent.BackColor); try { e.Graphics.FillRectangle(backBrush, 0, 0, this.Width, this.Height); } finally { backBrush.Dispose(); } } } Thank you!

    Read the article

  • Model Binding, a simple, simple question

    - by Paul Hatcherian
    I have a struct which works much like the System.Nullable type: public struct SpecialProperty<T> { public static implicit operator T(SpecialProperty<T> value) { return value.Value; } public static implicit operator SpecialProperty<T>(T value) { return new TrackChanges<T> { Value = value }; } T internalValue; public T Value { get { return internalValue; } set { internalValue = value; } } public override bool Equals(object other) { return Value.Equals(other); } public override int GetHashCode() { return Value.GetHashCode(); } public override string ToString() { return Value.ToString(); } } I'm trying to use it with ASP.NET MVC binding. Using the default customer model binder the property will always yield null. I can fix this by adding ".Value" to the end of every form input name, but I just want it to bind to the new type directly using some sort of custom model binder, but all the solutions I've tried seemed needlessly complex. I feel like I should be able to extend the default binder and with a few lines of code redirect the property binding to the entire model using implicit conversion. I don't quite get the binding paradigm of the default binder, but it seems really stuck on this distinction between the model and model properties. What is the simplest method to do this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • User Control SiteMap Provider Rendering Error

    - by Serexx
    I have created a Custom Server Control that renders the SiteMap as a pure UL for CSS styling. At run-time it renders properly but in VS2008 Design View VS shows this error: Error Rendering Control - menuMainAn unhandled exception has occurred. The provider 'AspNetXmlSiteMapProvider' specified for the defaultProvider does not exist in the providers collection. I have 'AspNetXmlSiteMapProvider' specified in web.config as per here : link text While I am happy that the code runs properly, the Designer error is bothersome if the underlying issue might cause the code to break in some circumstances so I need to understand what is going on... The code explicitly references the sitemap in the Render Method with : int level = 1; string ul = string.Format("<div class='{0}' id='{1}'>{2}</div>", CssClassName, this.ID.ToString(), EnumerateNodesRecursive(SiteMap.RootNode, level)); output.Write(ul); and the recursive method called referrences SiteMap.CurrentNode. Otherwise there are no explicit sitemap references in the code. Does anyone have any ideas why Deisgner is complaining?

    Read the article

  • Getting Custom NSCell with NSButtonCell instance to handle mouse click/mouse events

    - by sidha
    OK I'm really stumped on this one. I want to make a checkbox with a NSTextFieldCell combined together. It's important that the checkbox goes ON if the mouse hits the box, NOT the text. I've accomplished this, more or less, but the issue is receiving the mouse event because I click one checkbox in a row, but ALL of them turn to NSOnState. I will show what I've done and my various failed attempts in order to get this to work. So this is how I've done it so far: header: @interface MyCheckboxCellToo : NSTextFieldCell { NSButtonCell *_checkboxCell; } implementation: - (NSUInteger)hitTestForEvent:(NSEvent *)event inRect:(NSRect)cellFrame ofView:(NSView *)controlView { NSPoint point = [controlView convertPoint:[event locationInWindow] fromView:nil]; NSLog(@"%@", NSStringFromPoint(point)); NSRect checkFrame; NSDivideRect(cellFrame, &checkFrame, &cellFrame, cellFrame.size.height/*3 + [[_checkboxCell image] size].width*/, NSMinXEdge); if (NSMouseInRect(point, checkFrame, [controlView isFlipped])) { // the checkbox, or the small region around it, was hit. so let's flip the state NSCellStateValue checkState = ([_checkboxCell state] == NSOnState) ? NSOffState:NSOnState; [self setState:checkState]; [_checkboxCell setState:checkState]; [controlView setNeedsDisplay:YES]; return NSCellHitTrackableArea; } return [super hitTestForEvent:event inRect:cellFrame ofView:controlView]; } I know I probably shouldn't be doing: [self setState:checkState]; [_checkboxCell setState:checkState]; [controlView setNeedsDisplay:YES]; in there... because the result is that EVERY checkbox in every goes to NSOnState. Is this because cells are re-used? How come the ImageAndTextCell can have different images in the same tableview? How do I handle the mouse event? I have tried: - (BOOL)trackMouse:(NSEvent *)theEvent inRect:(NSRect)cellFrame ofView:(NSView *)controlView untilMouseUp:(BOOL)untilMouseUp { NSLog(@"%s %@", _cmd, theEvent); return [_checkboxCell trackMouse:theEvent inRect:cellFrame ofView:controlView untilMouseUp:untilMouseUp]; // return YES; // return [super trackMouse:theEvent inRect:cellFrame ofView:controlView untilMouseUp:untilMouseUp]; } - (BOOL)startTrackingAt:(NSPoint)startPoint inView:(NSView *)controlView { NSLog(@"%s %@", _cmd, NSStringFromPoint(startPoint)); return [super startTrackingAt:startPoint inView:controlView]; } - (BOOL)continueTracking:(NSPoint)lastPoint at:(NSPoint)currentPoint inView:(NSView *)controlView { NSLog(@"%s %@", _cmd, NSStringFromPoint(currentPoint)); return [super continueTracking:lastPoint at:currentPoint inView:controlView]; } - (void)stopTracking:(NSPoint)lastPoint at:(NSPoint)stopPoint inView:(NSView *)controlView mouseIsUp:(BOOL)flag { NSLog(@"%s %d %@", _cmd, flag, NSStringFromPoint(stopPoint)); } trackMouse: ... DOES gets called but startTrackingAt:..., continueTracking:..., and stopTracking:.... DO NOT get called when I click on the checkbox "hit area" in trackMouse:... I have tried return [_checkboxCell trackMouse:theEvent inRect:cellFrame ofView:controlView untilMouseUp:untilMouseUp]; and return [super trackMouse:theEvent inRect:cellFrame ofView:controlView untilMouseUp:untilMouseUp]; and neither seems to result in the mouse event being handled by the checkbox. How do I get that single checkbox to go NSOnState? I know I'm pretty close but after a lot of doc reading and google searching I haven't been successful at solving this. suggestions and comments welcome.. OK here is a bit more to show creation and destruction of the object.. - (id)init { if ((self = [super init])) { _checkboxCell = [[NSButtonCell alloc] init]; [_checkboxCell setButtonType:NSSwitchButton]; [_checkboxCell setTitle:@""]; [_checkboxCell setTarget:self]; [_checkboxCell setImagePosition:NSImageLeft]; [_checkboxCell setControlSize:NSRegularControlSize]; } return self; } - copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone { MyCheckboxCellToo *cell = (MyCheckboxCellToo *)[super copyWithZone:zone]; cell->_checkboxCell = [_checkboxCell copyWithZone:zone]; return cell; } - (void)dealloc { [_checkboxCell release]; [super dealloc]; }

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516  | Next Page >