I am trying to use Boost::Fusion (Boost v1.42.0) in a personal project. I get an interesting error with this code:
#include "boost/fusion/include/sequence.hpp"
#include "boost/fusion/include/make_vector.hpp"
#include "boost/fusion/include/insert.hpp"
#include "boost/fusion/include/invoke_procedure.hpp"
#include "boost/fusion/include/make_vector.hpp"
#include <iostream>
class Class1
{
public:
typedef boost::fusion::vector<int,float,float,char,int,int> SequenceType;
SequenceType s;
Class1(SequenceType v):s(v){}
};
class Class2
{
public:
Class2(){}
void met(int a,float b ,float c ,char d ,int e,int f)
{
std::cout << a << " " << b << " " << c << " " << d << " " << e << std::endl;
}
};
int main(int argn, char**)
{
Class2 p;
Class1 t(boost::fusion::make_vector(9,7.66f,8.99f,'s',7,6));
boost::fusion::begin(t.s); //OK
boost::fusion::insert(t.s, boost::fusion::begin(t.s), &p); //OK
boost::fusion::invoke_procedure(&Class2::met,boost::fusion::insert(t.s, boost::fusion::begin(t.s), &p)); //FAILS
}
It fails to compile (gcc 4.4.1):
In file included from /home/thechaos/Escriptori/of_preRelease_v0061_linux_FAT/addons/ofxTableGestures/ext/boost/fusion/include/invoke_procedur
e.hpp:10,
from problema concepte.cpp:11:
/home/thechaos/Escriptori/of_preRelease_v0061_linux_FAT/addons/ofxTableGestures/ext/boost/fusion/functional/invocation/invoke_procedure.hpp: I
n function ‘void boost::fusion::invoke_procedure(Function, const Sequence&) [with Function = void (Class2::*)(int, float, float, char, int, in
t), Sequence = boost::fusion::joint_view<boost::fusion::joint_view<boost::fusion::iterator_range<boost::fusion::vector_iterator<const boost::f
usion::vector<int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_>, 0>,
boost::fusion::vector_iterator<boost::fusion::vector<int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fus
ion::void_, boost::fusion::void_>, 0> >, const boost::fusion::single_view<Class2*> >, boost::fusion::iterator_range<boost::fusion::vector_iter
ator<boost::fusion::vector<int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion:
:void_>, 0>, boost::fusion::vector_iterator<const boost::fusion::vector<int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion
::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_>, 6> > >]’:
problema concepte.cpp:39: instantiated from here
/home/thechaos/Escriptori/of_preRelease_v0061_linux_FAT/addons/ofxTableGestures/ext/boost/fusion/functional/invocation/invoke_procedure.hpp:88
: error: incomplete type ‘boost::fusion::detail::invoke_procedure_impl<void (Class2::*)(int, float, float, char, int, int), const boost::fusio
n::joint_view<boost::fusion::joint_view<boost::fusion::iterator_range<boost::fusion::vector_iterator<const boost::fusion::vector<int, float, f
loat, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_>, 0>, boost::fusion::vector_itera
tor<boost::fusion::vector<int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::
void_>, 0> >, const boost::fusion::single_view<Class2*> >, boost::fusion::iterator_range<boost::fusion::vector_iterator<boost::fusion::vector<
int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_>, 0>, boost::fusion:
:vector_iterator<const boost::fusion::vector<int, float, float, char, int, int, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::void_, boost::fusion::voi
d_, boost::fusion::void_>, 6> > >, 7, true, false>’ used in nested name specifier
However, if I change the number of arguments in the vectors and the method from 6 to 5 from int,float,float,char,int,int to int,float,float,char,int,I can compile it without problems.
I suspected about the maximum number of arguments being a limitation, but I tried to change it through defining FUSION_MAX_VECTOR_SIZE without success.
I am unable to see what am I doing wrong. Can you reproduce this? Can it be a boost bug (i doubt it but is not impossible)?
