I’ve been working on a rather complex and large Angular page. Unlike a typical AngularJs SPA style ‘application’ this particular page is just that: a single page with a large amount of data on it that has to be visible all at once.
The problem is that when this large page loads it flickers and displays template markup briefly before kicking into its actual content rendering. This is is what
the Angular ng-cloak is supposed to address, but in this case I had no luck getting it to work properly. This application is a shop floor app where workers need to see all related information in one big screen view, so some of
the benefits of Angular’s routing and view swapping features couldn’t be applied. Instead, we decided to have one very big view but lots of ng-controllers and directives to break out
the logic for code separation. For code separation this works great – there are a number of small controllers that deal with their own individual and isolated application concerns. For HTML separation we used partial ASP.NET MVC Razor Views which made breaking out
the HTML into manageable pieces super easy and made migration of this page from a previous server side Razor page much easier. We were also able to leverage most of our server side localization without a lot of changes as a bonus. But as a result of this choice
the initial HTML document that loads is rather large – even without any data loaded into it, resulting in a fairly large DOM tree that Angular must manage. Large Page and Angular Startup
The problem on this particular page is that there’s quite a bit of markup – 35k’s worth of markup without any data loaded, in fact. It’s a large HTML page with a complex DOM tree. There are quite a lot of Angular {{ }} markup expressions in
the document. Angular provides
the ng-cloak directive to try and hide
the element it cloaks so that you don’t see
the flash of these markup expressions when
the page initially loads before Angular has a chance to render
the data into
the markup expressions.<div id="mainContainer" class="mainContainer boxshadow"
ng-app="app" ng-cloak>
Note
the ng-cloak attribute on this element, which here is an outer wrapper element of
the most of this large page’s content. ng-cloak is supposed to prevent displaying
the content below it, until Angular has taken control and is ready to render
the data into
the templates.
Alas, with this large page
the end result unfortunately is a brief flicker of un-rendered markup which looks like this:
It’s brief, but plenty ugly – right? And depending on
the speed of
the machine this flash gets more noticeable with slow machines that take longer to process
the initial HTML DOM.
ng-cloak Styles
ng-cloak works by temporarily hiding
the marked up element and it does this by essentially applying a style that does this:[ng\:cloak], [ng-cloak], [data-ng-cloak], [x-ng-cloak], .ng-cloak, .x-ng-cloak {
display: none !important;
}
This style is inlined as part of AngularJs itself. If you looking at
the angular.js source file you’ll find this at
the very end of
the file:!angular.$$csp() && angular.element(document) .find('head') .prepend('<style type="text/css">@charset "UTF-8";[ng\\:cloak],[ng-cloak],' + '[data-ng-cloak],[x-ng-cloak],.ng-cloak,.x-ng-cloak,' + '.ng-hide{display:none !important;}ng\\:form{display:block;}' '.ng-animate-block-transitions{transition:0s all!important;-webkit-transition:0s all!important;}' + '</style>');
This is is meant to initially hide any elements that contain
the ng-cloak attribute or one of
the other Angular directive permutation markup. Unfortunately on this particular web page ng-cloak had no effect – I still see
the flicker.
Why doesn’t ng-cloak work?
The problem is of course – timing.
The problem is that Angular actually needs to get control of
the page before it ever starts doing anything like process even
the ng-cloak attribute (or style etc). Because this page is rather large (about 35k of non-data HTML) it takes a while for
the DOM to actually plow through
the HTML. With
the Angular <script> tag defined at
the bottom of
the page after
the HTML DOM content there’s a slight delay which causes
the flicker.
For smaller pages
the initial DOM load/parse cycle is so fast that
the markup never shows, but with larger content pages it may show and become an annoying problem.
Workarounds
There a number of simple ways around this issue and some of them are hinted on in
the Angular documentation.
Load Angular Sooner
One obvious thing that would help with this is to load Angular at
the top of
the page BEFORE
the DOM loads and that would give it much earlier control.
The old ng-cloak documentation actually recommended putting
the Angular.js script into
the header of
the page (apparently this was recently removed), but generally it’s not a good practice to load scripts in
the header for page load performance. This is especially true if you load other libraries like jQuery which should be loaded prior to loading Angular so it can use jQuery rather than its own jqLite subset. This is not something I normally would like to do and also something that I’d likely forget in
the future and end up right back here :-).
Use ng-include for Child Content
Angular supports nesting of child templates via
the ng-include directive which essentially delay loads HTML content. This helps by removing a lot of
the template content out of
the main page and so getting control to Angular a lot sooner in order to hide
the markup template content.
In
the application in question, I realize that in hindsight it might have been smarter to break this page out with client side ng-include directives instead of MVC Razor partial views we used to break up
the page sections. Razor partial views give that nice separation as well, but in
the end Razor puts humpty dumpty (ie.
the HTML) back together into a whole single and rather large HTML document. Razor provides
the logical separation, but still results in a large physical result document.
But Razor also ended up being helpful to have a few security related blocks handled via server side template logic that simply excludes certain parts of
the UI
the user is not allowed to see – something that you can’t really do with client side exclusion like ng-hide/ng-show – client side content is always there whereas on
the server side you can simply not send it to
the client.
Another reason I’m not a huge fan of ng-include is that it adds another HTTP hit to a request as templates are loaded from
the server dynamically as needed. Given that this page was already heavy with resources adding another 10 separate ng-include directives wouldn’t be beneficial :-)
ng-include is a valid option if you start from scratch and partition your logic. Of course if you don’t have complex pages, having completely separate views that are swapped in as they are accessed are even better, but we didn’t have this option due to
the information having to be on screen all at once.
Avoid using {{ }} Expressions
The biggest issue that ng-cloak attempts to address isn’t so much displaying
the original content – it’s displaying empty {{ }} markup expression tags that get embedded into content. It gives you
the dreaded “now you see it, now you don’t” effect where you sometimes see three separate rendering states: Markup junk, empty views, then views filled with data.
If we can remove {{ }} expressions from
the page you remove most of
the perceived double draw effect as you would effectively start with a blank form and go straight to a filled form. To do this you can forego {{ }} expressions and replace them with ng-bind directives on DOM elements.
For example you can turn:<div class="list-item-name listViewOrderNo">
<a href='#'>{{lineItem.MpsOrderNo}}</a>
</div>into:<div class="list-item-name listViewOrderNo">
<a href="#" ng-bind="lineItem.MpsOrderNo"></a>
</div>
to get identical results but because
the {{ }} expression has been removed there’s no double draw effect for this element.
Again, not a great solution.
The {{ }} syntax sure reads cleaner and is more fluent to type IMHO. In some cases you may also not have an outer element to attach ng-bind to which then requires you to artificially inject DOM elements into
the page. This is especially painful if you have several consecutive values like {{Firstname}} {{Lastname}} for example. It’s an option though especially if you think of this issue up front and you don’t have a ton of expressions to deal with.
Add
the ng-cloak Styles manually
You can also explicitly define
the .css styles that Angular injects via code manually in your application’s style sheet. By doing so
the styles become immediately available and so are applied right when
the page loads – no flicker.
I use
the minimal:[ng-cloak]
{
display: none !important;
}
which works for:<div id="mainContainer" class="mainContainer dialog boxshadow"
ng-app="app" ng-cloak>
If you use one of
the other combinations add
the other CSS selectors as well or use
the full style shown earlier. Angular will still load its version of
the ng-cloak styling but it overrides those settings later, but this will do
the trick of hiding
the content before that CSS is injected into
the page.
Adding
the CSS in your own style sheet works well, and is IMHO by far
the best option.
The nuclear option: Hiding
the Content manually
Using
the explicit CSS is
the best choice, so
the following shouldn’t ever be necessary. But I’ll mention it here as it gives some insight how you can hide/show content manually on load for other frameworks or in your own markup based templates.
Before I figured out that I could explicitly embed
the CSS style into
the page, I had tried to figure out why ng-cloak wasn’t doing its job. After wasting an hour getting nowhere I finally decided to just manually hide and show
the container.
The idea is simple – initially hide
the container, then show it once Angular has done its initial processing and removal of
the template markup from
the page.
You can manually hide
the content and make it visible after Angular has gotten control. To do this I used:<div id="mainContainer" class="mainContainer boxshadow"
ng-app="app" style="display:none">
Notice
the display: none style that explicitly hides
the element initially on
the page.
Then once Angular has run its initialization and effectively processed
the template markup on
the page you can show
the content. For Angular this ‘ready’ event is
the app.run() function:app.run( function ($rootScope, $location, cellService) {
$("#mainContainer").show(); …
});
This effectively removes
the display:none style and
the content displays. By
the time app.run() fires
the DOM is ready to displayed with filled data or at least empty data – Angular has gotten control.
Edge Case
Clearly this is an edge case. In general
the initial HTML pages tend to be reasonably sized and
the load time for
the HTML and Angular are fast enough that there’s no flicker between
the rendering times. This only becomes an issue as
the initial pages get rather large.
Regardless – if you have an Angular application it’s probably a good idea to add
the CSS style into your application’s CSS (or a common shared one) just to make sure that content is always hidden. You never know how slow of a browser somebody might be running and while your super fast dev
machine might not show any flicker, grandma’s old XP box very well might…© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2014Posted in Angular JavaScript CSS HTML
Tweet
!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");
(function() {
var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true;
po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js';
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);
})();
