Search Results

Search found 45289 results on 1812 pages for 'buddy class'.

Page 553/1812 | < Previous Page | 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560  | Next Page >

• Count Records in Listing View

  - by 47

  I have these two models: class CommonVehicle(models.Model): year = models.ForeignKey(Year) series = models.ForeignKey(Series) engine = models.ForeignKey(Engine) body_style = models.ForeignKey(BodyStyle) ... class Vehicle(models.Model): objects = VehicleManager() stock_number = models.CharField(max_length=6, blank=False) vin = models.CharField(max_length=17, blank=False) common_vehicle = models.ForeignKey(CommonVehicle) .... What I want to do is to have a count of how many times a given CommonVehicle object is used in the Vehicle class. So far my attempts are giving me one number, which is a total of all the records. How can I have the count being the total appearances for each CommonVehicle

  Read the article

• How do I create a dynamic method in PHP?

  - by sandelius

  I'm trying to extend my ActiveRecord class with some dynamic methods. I would like to be able to run this from my controller $user = User::find_by_username(param); $user = User::find_by_email(param); I've read a little about overloading and think that's the key. I'v got a static $_attributes in my AR class and I get the table name by pluralizing my model (User = users) in this case. How do I do this? All models extends the ActiveRecord class.

  Read the article

• Good Design for Initialization of Static Array

  - by jplot

  I have a question regarding good design in C++. I have a class A, and all objects of this class use an integer array of constant values (they should share the same array, as their values are constant). The array needs to be computed (just once) before any object A. I thought about having another class B which contains the integer array as a static member, an init() method which would fill this array according to some formula and a static boolean flag initialized (if this variable if true then the init() method would do nothing), but I'm not sure this is the best way to solve my design issue. So my question is, what would be a good design/way to accomplish this ? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• ActiveRecord find all parents that have associated children

  - by brad

  I don't know why I can't figure this out, I think it should be fairly simple. I have two models (see below). I'm trying to come up with a named scope for SupplierCategory that would find all SupplierCategory(s) (including :suppliers) who's associated Supplier(s) are not empty. I tried a straight up join, named_scope :with_suppliers, :joins => :suppliers which gives me only categories with suppliers, but it gives me each category listed separately, so if a category has 2 suppliers, i get the category twice in the returned array: Currently I'm using: named_scope :with_suppliers, :include => :suppliers and then in my view I'm using: <%= render :partial => 'category', :collection => @categories.find_all{|c| !c.suppliers.empty? } %> Not exactly eloquent but illustrates what I'm trying to achieve. Class Definitions class SupplierCategory < AR has_many :suppliers, :order => "name" end class Supplier < AR belongs_to :supplier end

  Read the article

• Visual C++ CreateThread Parameter Problem

  - by Vanwaril

  I have a class that contains a function that calls create thread, and needs to pass itself (this) as a parameter: DWORD threadId; HANDLE h = CreateThread( NULL, 0, runThread, this, 0, &threadId); My runThread definition is as follows: DWORD WINAPI runThread(LPVOID args) { Obj *t = (Obj*)args; t->funct(); return 0; } Unfortunately, the object t that I get in runThread() gets garbage. My Obj class has a function pointer attribute. Could that be the problem? class Obj{ void(*funct)(); and in the constructor: Obj(void(*f)()) { funct = f; } where is my mistake? The function pointer, the createThread itself, or type-casting? I tried whatever I could think of.

  Read the article

• rails active record - Advanced find

  - by par

  I have the following model setup - a User is interested in projects in many project Categories. Each Project has many categories. Like so: class User has_many :projects has_and_belongs_to_many :project_categories class Project belongs_to :user has_and_belongs_to_many :project_categories class ProjectCategory has_and_belongs_to_many :projects has_and_belongs_to_many :users Now, I'd like to do a find for projects with any of the catogories that a certain user are interested in, i.e. if a user is interested in project categories A,B,C then I'd like to find projects which are part of one or more of those project categories. Anyone?

  Read the article

• Destructors for C++ Interface-like classes

  - by sdg

  Starting to use PC-Lint on an existing code base (fear and trepidation). One thing that it complains about is the following: class IBatch { public: virtual void StartBatch() =0; virtual int CommitBatch() =0; }; Which when another class derives from this to use it like an interface base class 'IBatch' has no destructor So, the question: when you create Interface classes like the above, do you always include a virtual destructor? Why? (is it a style or a coding error?)

  Read the article

• Force to call virtual base function instead of the overriden one.

  - by Roberto Sebestyen

  In the following example "Test that v1 function was called" fails. Is there a way to force call the base implementation of "RunFunction" through an instance of "class V2" ?? class V1 { public virtual string RunFunction() { return "V1"; } } class V2 : V1 { public override string RunFunction() { return "V2"; } } [Test] public void TestCall() { var v1 = (V1)new V2(); var v2 = new V2(); Assert.IsTrue(v1.RunFunction() == "V1", "Test that v1 function was called"); Assert.IsTrue(v2.RunFunction() == "V2", "Test that v2 function was called"); }

  Read the article

• nested has_many

  - by Nick Vanderbilt

  I am using Rails 2.3.5. Class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :phones end class Phone < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :frequency_bands end I want to get all the frequency_bands for a user. I know I can write a method def freq_bands for User but I would like to know if it is possible to have has_many freq_bands for a User. In this way I can chain the call. What I would like to have is class User < ActiveRecor::Base has_many :frequence_bands, :through => phones end I think it is possible to have nested has_many using this plugin http://github.com/ianwhite/nested_has_many_through However if possible I would like to avoid using another plugin and rely solely on rails.

  Read the article

• Declaring two classes that contain instance variables of each others' types.

  - by Benji XVI

  Let’s say you wish to have two classes like so, each declaring an instance variable that is of the other’s class. @interface A : NSObject { B *something; } @end @interface B : NSObject { A *something; } @end It seems to be impossible to declare these classes with these instance variables. In order for A to include an IV of class B, B must already be compiled, and so its @interface must come before A’s. But A’s must be put before B’s for the same reason. Putting the two class declarations in separate files, and #import-ing each other’s .h doesn’t work either, for obvious reasons. So, what is the solution? Or is this either (1) impossible or (2) indicative of a bad design anyway?

  Read the article

• Getting the last member of a group on an intermediary M2M

  - by rh0dium

  If we look at the existing docs, what is the best way to get the last member added? This is similar to this but what I want to do is to be able to do this. group = Group.objects.get(id=1) group.get_last_member_added() #This is by ('-date_added') <Person: FOO> I think the best way is through a manager but how do you do this on an intermediary model? class Person(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=128) def __unicode__(self): return self.name class Group(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=128) members = models.ManyToManyField(Person, through='Membership') def __unicode__(self): return self.name class Membership(models.Model): person = models.ForeignKey(Person) group = models.ForeignKey(Group) date_joined = models.DateField() invite_reason = models.CharField(max_length=64)

  Read the article

• Problem building relationships between models

  - by Brian Roisentul

  Until now, I've been using acts_as_taggable_on plugin for tagging announcements. That plugin creates the following tables: taggings: relates tags and announcements table(for the tagged item, it has a field called taggable_id, which I rename to "announcement_id" for what I'll explain below). tags: has the tag ids and names. The other day, I discovered that I had no way of getting the announcements tagged with a certain tag, but doing Announcement.tagged_with(tag_name), and I don't want to search by name, but for id. So, as I'm using almost nothing of the functionality in that plugin, I decided to create the models for taggings and tags tables, to accomplish this: Announcement.tags. The models' relationships look as following: class Tagging < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :announcement belongs_to :tag end class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :announcements, :through => :taggings end class Announcement < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :tags, :through => :taggings Why can't I execute the command Announcement.tags? Because when I try, I get undefined method `tags'

  Read the article

• php help hiding navigation with cookie

  - by user342391

  I have these tabs on my navigation: <li<?php if ($thisPage=="Customers") echo " class=\"current\""; ?>><a href="/customers/">Customers</a></li> <li<?php if ($thisPage=="Trunks") echo " class=\"current\""; ?>><a href="/trunks/">Trunks</a></li> <li<?php if ($thisPage=="Settings") echo " class=\"current\""; ?>><a href="/settings/">Settings</a></li> and I only want to show them when admin is logged in: if ($_COOKIE['custid'] == "admin") { echo "Customers"; echo "Trunks"; echo "Settings"; } How can I combine the two of these scripts???

  Read the article

• Rails Scope for association of 0 size.

  - by MissingHandle

  I'm having trouble figuring out the scope method for all the Foos that have no Bars. That is: class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base has_may :bars end class Bar < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :foo end I'd like to write a scope method that returns me all the foos that have no bars. Something like: class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base has_may :bars scope :has_no_bars, includes(:bars).where("COUNT(foo.bars) = 0") end But I don't understand the appropriate syntax. Any help? Happy to use a MetaWhere solution if easier.

  Read the article

• Hibernate and mssql inner join rowcount

  - by ez2sarang

  I am struggling with Hibernate Criteria. My aim is to create the following request using Hibernate Criteria : select count(*) as y0_ from PInterface this_ inner join Product product2_ on this_.product_id=product2_.id where this_.product_interface_type_id=? Here is my code: @Entity @Table(name = "PInterface") public class PInterface { @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name = "id", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false) private int id; @Column(name = "product_id") private int productId; @Column(name = "product_interface_type_id") private int type; @ManyToOne(optional=false) @JoinColumn(name = "product_id", referencedColumnName = "id", insertable=false, updatable=false) private Product product; } @Entity @Table(name = "Product") public class Product { @Id @GeneratedValue @Column(name = "id", nullable = false, insertable = false, updatable = false) private int id; private String name; } //Criteria is : Object criteria = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession() .createCriteria(PInterface.class) .add(Restrictions.eq("type", 1)) .setProjection(Projections.rowCount()) .uniqueResult() ; However, the results ... select count(*) as y0_ from PInterface this_ where this_.product_interface_type_id=? Where Inner join? Thank you for help!

  Read the article

• Upcasting in C#: Making a Fruit a Pear

  - by Adam Kane

  Why can't I upcast (?) a Fruit to a Pear? public static class PearGenerator { public static Pear CreatePear () { // Make a new generic fruit. Fruit genericFruit = new Fruit(); // Upcast it to a pear. (Throws exception: Can't cast a Fruit to a Pear.) Pear pear = (Pear)genericFruit; // Return freshly grown pear. return ( pear ); } } public class Fruit { // some code } public class Pear : Fruit { public void PutInPie () { // some code } } Thanks!

  Read the article

• Rails 3 many-to-many query on includes or joins

  - by Myat

  I have three models User, Activity and ActivityRecord. class User < ActiveRecord::Base # Include default devise modules. Others available are: # :token_authenticatable, :confirmable, # :lockable, :timeoutable and :omniauthable devise :database_authenticatable, :registerable, :recoverable, :rememberable, :trackable, :validatable # Setup accessible (or protected) attributes for your model attr_accessible :first_name, :last_name, :email, :gender, :password, :password_confirmation, :remember_me # attr_accessible :title, :body has_many :activities has_many :activity_records , :through=> :activities end class Activity < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :point, :title belongs_to :user has_many :activity_records end class ActivityRecord < ActiveRecord::Base attr_accessible :activity_id belongs_to :activity scope :today, lambda { where("DATE(#{'activity_records'}.created_at) = '#{Date.today.to_s(:db)}'")} end I would like to query all activities for a user together with the count for their respective activity records for today. For example, after querying and converting to json format, I would like to have something like below [ { id: 23 title: "jogging", point: "5", today_activity_records_count: 1, }, { id: 12 title: "diet dinner", point: "2", today_activity_records_count: 0, }, ] Please kindly guide me how I can achieve that. Thanks

  Read the article

• Running a loop (such as one for a mock webserver) within a thread

  - by bob c

  I'm trying to run a mock webserver within a thread within a class. I've tried passing the class' @server property to the thread block but as soon as I try to do server.accept the thread stops. Is there some way to make this work? I want to basically be able to run a webserver off of this script while still taking user input via stdin.gets. Is this possible? class Server def initialize() @server = TCPServer.new(8080) end def run() @thread = Thread.new(@server) { |server| while true newsock = server.accept puts "some stuff after accept!" next if !newsock # some other stuff end } end end def processCommand() # some user commands here end test = Server.new while true do processCommand(STDIN.gets) end In the above sample, the thread dies on server.accept

  Read the article

• jQuery ajax get

  - by Happy

  There are many class="item" blocks on the page. For each one there is different var item_link and ajax request. Ajax searches for src attribute of .message img and throws it to var src. $(".item").each(function(){ var item_link = "http://..."; $(this).prepend('<div class="src"></div>'); $.get(item_link, function(data) { var src = $('.message img', data).attr('src'); }); }); How to print var src to <div class="src"></div>? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Rails valiation among a three model relationship

  - by Andrew

  I'm working on a three model relationship with one aspect that I'm not sure how to approach. Here's the basic relationship: class Taxonomy has_many :terms # attribute: `inclusive`, default => false end class Term belongs_to :taxonomy has_and_belongs_to_many :photos end class Photo has_and_belongs_to_many :terms end This is pretty straightforward stuff except for one thing: A Taxonomy can be either 'Inclusive' or 'Exclusive'. Exclusive means the terms are mutually exclusive, Inclusive means they're not. So, if a Taxonomy is exclusive ie. taxonomy.inclusive = false, then there can only be one term from that taxonomy attached to a given photo. Now, I can handle this on the client-side without a problem, but I am not quite sure how to set up a validation on Photos (or somewhere else) that says basically: "validate that no more than one term from an exclusive taxonomy is associated with this record." Any ideas on how to do that?

  Read the article

• C++ template restrictions

  - by pingvinus

  I wondering is there any way to set restrictions on template class? Specify that every type substituted in template must have specific ancestor (realize some interface). template < class B > //and every B must be a child of abstract C class A { public: B * obj; int f() { return B::x + this->obj->f(); } }; Like = in haskell func :: (Ord a, Show b) => a -> b -> c

  Read the article

• Localized database strings

  - by Steve

  I have a small Grails application that has the following domain: class Meal { String name String description String allergyNote } For localization purposes the three strings should now be available in multiple languages. For example, while an English user would see name="Steak", a Spanish user should see name="Filete" in the output. I was thinking of doing the following: class Language { String isoCode String languageName } class TranslatedString { Language language String translation } but I am not sure how to link the Meals with the TranslatedStrings as it is used for three members, also I would like to use it for other classes (not just Meal) as well (or do I need to have separated tables, i.e. a MealNameTranslated, MealDescriptionTranslated, etc tables?). I know this is probably a stupid question, but I am a beginner and have not been able to figure this out :-(

  Read the article

• Confusing calling method in Java

  - by vBx

  class Parent { private void method1() { System.out.println("Parent's method1()"); } public void method2() { System.out.println("Parent's method2()"); method1(); } } class Child extends Parent { public void method1() { System.out.println("Child's method1()"); } } class test { public static void main(String args[]) { Parent p = new Child(); p.method2(); } } I'm confuse why does in Parent::method2() when invoking method1() it will cal Parents method1() and not Childs method1 ? I see that this happens only when method1() is private? Can someone explain me why ? Thanks you.

  Read the article

• Search a List inside another with IQueryable

  - by ovini poornima

  public static IQueryable<Institution> WithFunds(this IQueryable<Institution> query, IEnumerable<Fund> allowedFunds) { return query. } I want to get the query to return all Institutions having any of the Fund given in 'allowedFunds' list in Institution.Funds. Please help. My class hierarchy goes like this. public partial class Institution { public int Id { get; set; } public virtual ICollection<Fund> Funds { get; set; } } public partial class Fund { public int Id { get; set; } public virtual Institution Institution { get; set; } }

  Read the article

• Array Flatten does not work (Instance variable nil)

  - by Nick

  I was trying to write a simple array flatten method, but it does not work using instance variable. It works only using class variables. Can anyone tell me why? and how to make it work using instance variables. class Array @y = [] def flatten_array self.each do |x| if x.class.to_s != 'Array' @y << x else x.flatten_array end end return @y end end a = [1,2,3,4,5] b = [6,7,8] c = [9,10] a1 = [12,13,a,b,c] puts a1.inspect b1 = a1.flatten_array puts b1.inspect

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560  | Next Page >