Search Results

Search found 1848 results on 74 pages for 'printf'.

Page 56/74 | < Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >

  • MPFR Rounding 0.9999 to 1?

    - by Silmaersti
    I'm attempting to store the value 0.9999 into an mpfr_t variable But 0.9999 is rounded to 1 (or some other value != 0.9999) during storage, no matter the round value (GMP_RNDD, GMP_RNDU, GMP_RNDN, GMP_RNDZ) So what's the best method to store 0.9999 in an mpfr_t variable? Is it possible? Here is my test program, it prints "buffer is: 1", instead of the wanted "buffer is: 0.9999": int main() { size_t precision = 4; mpfr_t mpfrValue; mpfr_init2(mpfrValue, precision); mpfr_set_str(mpfrValue, "0.9999", 10, GMP_RNDN); char *buffer = (char*)malloc((sizeof(char) * precision) + 3); mp_exp_t exponent; mpfr_get_str(buffer, &exponent, 10, precision, mpfrValue, GMP_RNDN); printf("buffer is: %s\n", buffer); free(buffer); mpfr_clear(mpfrValue); return 0; } Thanks for any help !

    Read the article

  • Avoid incompatible pointer warning when dealing with double-indirection

    - by fnawothnig
    Assuming this program: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> static void ring_pool_alloc(void **p, size_t n) { static unsigned char pool[256], i = 0; *p = &pool[i]; i += n; } int main(void) { char *str; ring_pool_alloc(&str, 7); strcpy(str, "foobar"); printf("%s\n", str); return 0; } ... is it possible to somehow avoid the GCC warning test.c:12: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘ring_pool_alloc’ from incompatible pointer type test.c:4: note: expected ‘void **’ but argument is of type ‘char **’ ... without casting to (void**) (or simply disabling the compatibility checks)? Because I would very much like to keep compatibility warnings regarding indirection-level...

    Read the article

  • storing an integer constant other than zero in a pointer variable

    - by benjamin button
    int main() { int *d=0; printf("%d\n",*d); return 0; } this works fine. >cc legal.c > ./a.out 0 if i change the statement int *d=0; to int *d=1; i see the error. cc: "legal.c", line 6: error 1522: Cannot initialize a pointer with an integer constant other than zero. so its obvious that it will allow only zero.i want to know what happens inside the memory when we do this int *d=0 which is making it valid syntax. I am just asking this out of curiosity!

    Read the article

  • Elegant way for a recursive C++ template to do something different with the leaf class?

    - by Costas
    I have a C++ class template that makes an Array of pointers. This also gets typedefed to make Arrays of Arrays and so on: typedef Array<Elem> ElemArray; typedef Array<ElemArray> ElemArrayArray; typedef Array<ElemArrayArray> ElemArrayArrayArray; I would like to be able to set one leaf node from another by copying the pointer so they both refer to the same Elem. But I also want to be able to set one Array (or Array of Arrays etc) from another. In this case I don't want to copy the pointers, I want to keep the arrays seperate and descend into each one until I get to the leaf node, at where I finally copy the pointers. I have code that does this (below). When you set something in an Array it calls a CopyIn method to do the copying. But because this is templated it also has to call the CopyIn method on the leaf class, which means I have to add a dummy method to every leaf class that just returns false. I have also tried adding a flag to the template to tell it whether it contains Arrays or not, and so whether to call the CopyIn method. This works fine - the CopyIn method of the leaf nodes never gets called, but it still has to be there for the compile to work! Is there a better way to do this? #include <stdio.h> class Elem { public: Elem(int v) : mI(v) {} void Print() { printf("%d\n",mI); } bool CopyIn(Elem *v) { return false; } int mI; }; template < typename T > class Array { public: Array(int size) : mB(0), mN(size) { mB = new T* [size]; for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) mB[i] = new T(mN); } ~Array() { for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) delete mB[i]; delete [] mB; } T* Get(int i) { return mB[i]; } void Set(int i, T* v) { if (! mB[i]->CopyIn(v) ) { // its not an array, so copy the pointer mB[i] = v; } } bool CopyIn(Array<T>* v) { for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) { if (v && i < v->mN ) { if ( ! mB[i]->CopyIn( v->mB[i] )) { // its not an array, so copy the pointer mB[i] = v->mB[i]; } } else { mB[i] = 0; } } return true; // we did the copy, no need to copy pointer } void Print() { for (int i=0; i<mN; i++) { printf("[%d] ",i); mB[i]->Print(); } } private: T **mB; int mN; }; typedef Array<Elem> ElemArray; typedef Array<ElemArray> ElemArrayArray; typedef Array<ElemArrayArray> ElemArrayArrayArray; int main () { ElemArrayArrayArray* a = new ElemArrayArrayArray(2); ElemArrayArrayArray* b = new ElemArrayArrayArray(3); // In this case I need to copy the pointer to the Elem into the ElemArrayArray a->Get(0)->Get(0)->Set(0, b->Get(0)->Get(0)->Get(0)); // in this case I need go down through a and b until I get the to Elems // so I can copy the pointers a->Set(1,b->Get(2)); b->Get(0)->Get(0)->Get(0)->mI = 42; // this will also set a[0,0,0] b->Get(2)->Get(1)->Get(1)->mI = 96; // this will also set a[1,1,1] // should be 42,2, 2,2, 3,3, 3,96 a->Print(); }

    Read the article

  • Can this example be done with pointers instead of global variable?

    - by Louise
    This is a simplified example of the problem I have: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> void f2(int** a) { printf("a: %i\n", **a); } void f1(int* a) { f2(&a); } int main() { int a = 3; f1(&a); // prints "a: 3" f2(???); return 0; } The problem is that I would like to be able to use f2() both in main() and in f1(). Can that be done without using global variables?

    Read the article

  • how to parse from command line arguements in yacc ?

    - by user205688
    how to parse from command line arguements in yacc ? of course i undefined input in both lex & yacc and then wrote int input(void) { printf("in input\n:"); char c; if(target > limit) return 0; if((c = target[0][offset++]) != '\0') return (c); target++; offset =0; return (' '); } where target contains the command line arguements. But only the standard input is getting excueted how to make dis input function get executed.

    Read the article

  • CryptGenRandom to generate asp.net session id

    - by DoDo
    Hi! does anyone have working example of CryptGenrRandom class to generate session id (need to use in my iis module). HCRYPTPROV hCryptProv; BYTE pbData[16]; if(CryptAcquireContext( &hCryptProv, NULL, NULL, PROV_RSA_FULL, CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT)) { if(CryptGenRandom(hCryptProv, 8, pbData)) { std::string s(( const char *) pbData); printf(s.c_str()); } else { MyHandleError("Error during CryptGenRandom."); } } else { MyHandleError("Error during CryptAcquireContext!\n"); } i tried this code but, its not working quite well (i get it from msdn) and this example don't work for me ( http://www.codeproject.com/KB/security/plaintextsessionkey.aspx ) so if anyone know how to generate sessionid using this class plz let me know tnx anyway!

    Read the article

  • Copy a function in memory and execute it

    - by Elinghton
    Hi everybody, I would like to know how in C in can copy the content of a function into memroy and the execute it? I'm trying to do something like this: typedef void(*FUN)(int *); char * myNewFunc; char *allocExecutablePages (int pages) { template = (char *) valloc (getpagesize () * pages); if (mprotect (template, getpagesize (), PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC|PROT_WRITE) == -1) { perror ("mprotect"); } } void f1 (int *v) { *v = 10; } // allocate enough spcae but how much ?? myNewFunc = allocExecutablePages(...) /* Copy f1 somewere else * (how? assume that i know the size of f1 having done a (nm -S foo.o)) */ ((FUN)template)(&val); printf("%i",val); Thanks for your answers

    Read the article

  • Why would I get a bus error or segmentation fault when calling free() normally?

    - by chucknelson
    I have a very simple test program, running on Solaris 5.8: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main(void) { char *paths; paths = getenv("PATH"); printf("Paths: %s\n", paths); free(paths); // this causes a bus error return 0; } If I don't call free() at the end, it displays the message fine and exits. If I include the free() call, it crashes with a bus error. I've had other calls to free(), in other programs, cause segmentation faults as well. Even if I allocate the memory for *paths myself, free() will cause a bus error. Is there some reason trying to free up the memory is causing a crash?

    Read the article

  • why does the array doesn't get initialized by global variable , even though it should not?

    - by ashish yadav
    why does the array a does not get initialized by global variable 'size'. include int size=5; int main() { int a[size]={1,2,3,4,5}; printf("%d",a[0]); return 0; } the compilation error is shown as "variable-sized object may not be initialized". according to me the array should get initialized by 'size'. i apologize if i am not clear but i feel i have expressed myself well enough. thank you!!!!!!!!!!!

    Read the article

  • Ajax / GroovyGrails Post data coming over with unexpected leading character. Who is encoding/decod

    - by ?????
    I'm having an encoding issue, and I'm not sure where to look for the problem. I have this Ajax.Request function (prototype library) sending data to a Groovy/Grails encoder var myAjax = new Ajax.Request(url, {method:'post', encoding:'UTF-8', contentType:'application/x-www-form-urlencoded', parameters:{'content':new_content}, onSuccess:success, onFailure:failure}); The data is coming in with an unexpected %A0 at the beginning: I have this simple controller that just echos the content back: def titlechange = { def content = URLDecoder.decode(params['content']) printf("Content: %s; DecodedContent = %s\n", params['content'], content) response.characterEncoding='UTF-8' render content } the debug print statement shows: Content: %A0Hello%2C%20world%21; DecodedContent = †Hello, world! Where is that %A0 coming from? My grails configuration has this: // The default codec used to encode data with ${} grails.views.default.codec="none" // none, html, base64 grails.views.gsp.encoding="UTF-8" grails.converters.encoding="UTF-8 Is the issue on the grails side or on the JavaScript side?

    Read the article

  • How to buffer stdout in memory and write it from a dedicated thread

    - by NickB
    I have a C application with many worker threads. It is essential that these do not block so where the worker threads need to write to a file on disk, I have them write to a circular buffer in memory, and then have a dedicated thread for writing that buffer to disk. The worker threads do not block any more. The dedicated thread can safely block while writing to disk without affecting the worker threads (it does not hold a lock while writing to disk). My memory buffer is tuned to be sufficiently large that the writer thread can keep up. This all works great. My question is, how do I implement something similar for stdout? I could macro printf() to write into a memory buffer, but I don't have control over all the code that might write to stdout (some of it is in third-party libraries). Thoughts? NickB

    Read the article

  • Why this C program outputs a negative number?

    - by JMSA
    I have assigned the complement value in an unsigned variable. Then why this C program outputs a negative number? #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> int main() { unsigned int Value = 4; /* 4 = 0000 0000 0000 0100 */ unsigned int result = 0; result = ~ Value; /* -5 = 1111 1111 1111 1011 */ printf("result = %d", result); /* -5 */ getch(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Why the output for "a" is -80?

    - by Abhi
    #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> #define ABC 20 #define XYZ 10 #define XXX ABC - XYZ void main() { int a; a = XXX * 10; printf("\n %d \n", a); getch(); } I thought the output should be 100 but when i saw the result i found o/p as -80. when i put bracket as #define XXX (ABC-XYZ) then i get output as 100 but without bracket i get o/p as -80.

    Read the article

  • Fibonacci Numbers in Haskell

    - by boraer
    Hi everbody I need to change my F# code to Haskell code but I am so new in Haskell and I can not this My code simply read data from keyboard if data not an integer return an error message then calculate the n fibonacci number then writes to a list after that writes the list into a txt file Here is my code open System let rec fib n = match n with |0->0 |1->1 |2->1 |n->fib(n-1)+fib(n-2);; let printFibonacci list = for i=0 to (List.length list)-1 do printf "%d " (list.Item(i));; let writeToFile list = let file = System.IO.File.Create("C:\out2.txt") let mutable s ="" let writer = new System.IO.StreamWriter(file) try for i=0 to (List.length list)-1 do s <- list.Item(i).ToString() writer.Write(s+" ") finally writer.Close() file.Dispose() printfn "Writed To File" let mutable control = true let mutable num = 0 while control do try printfn "Enter a Number:" num <- Convert.ToInt32(stdin.ReadLine()) let listFibonacci = [for i in 0 .. num-1->fib(i)] printFibonacci(listFibonacci) printfn "\n%A"(listFibonacci) writeToFile(listFibonacci) control<-false with | :? System.FormatException->printfn "Number Format Exception"; Console.ReadKey true|>ignore

    Read the article

  • Why am I getting a segmentation fault with this code?

    - by gooswa
    Trying to make a simple rectangle/bin packer in C. Takes a given area and finds placement for any given size rectangle. About after 4 recursions is when I get the segmentation fault. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> typedef struct node_type PackNode; struct node_type { int x , y; int width , height; int used; struct node_type *left; struct node_type *right; }; typedef struct point_type PackPoint; struct point_type { int x,y; }; PackNode _clone(PackNode *node) { PackNode clone; clone.used = 0; clone.x = node->x; clone.y = node->y; clone.width = node->width; clone.height= node->height; clone.left = NULL; clone.right= NULL; return clone; } PackNode root; int rcount; PackPoint* recursiveFind(PackNode *node, int w, int h) { PackPoint rp; PackPoint *p = NULL; rcount++; printf ("rcount = %u\n", rcount); //left is not null go to left, if left didn't work try right. if (node->left!=NULL) { //move down to left branch p = recursiveFind(node->left, w, h); if (p!=NULL) { return p; } else { p = recursiveFind(node->right, w, h); return p; } } else { //If used just return null and possible go to the right branch; if (node->used==1 || w > node->width || h > node->height) { return p; } //if current node is exact size and hasn't been used it return the x,y of the mid-point of the rectangle if (w==node->width && h == node->height) { node->used=1; rp.x = node->x+(w/2); rp.y = node->y+(h/2); p = &rp; return p; } //If rectangle wasn't exact fit, create branches from cloning it's parent. PackNode l_clone = _clone(node); PackNode r_clone = _clone(node); node->left = &l_clone; node->right = &r_clone; //adjust branches accordingly, split up the current unused areas if ( (node->width - w) > (node->height - h) ) { node->left->width = w; node->right->x = node->x + w; node->right->width = node->width - w; } else { node->left->height = h; node->right->y = node->y + h; node->right->height = node->height - h; } p = recursiveFind(node->left, w, h); return p; } return p; } int main(void) { root = malloc( root.x=0; root.y=0; root.used=0; root.width=1000; root.height=1000; root.left=NULL; root.right=NULL; int i; PackPoint *pnt; int rw; int rh; for (i=0;i<10;i++) { rw = random()%20+1; rh = random()%20+1; pnt = recursiveFind(&root, rw, rh); printf("pnt.x,y: %d,%d\n",pnt->x,pnt->y); } return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Returning pointer to a certain value in a macro?

    - by Andrei Ciobanu
    Is it possible to write a macro that has a type and a value as its input parameters (MACRO(type,value)), and returns a valid pointer to a location that holds the submitted value. This macro should perform like the following function, but in a more generic manner: int *val_to_ptr(int val){ int *r = NULL; r = nm_malloc(sizeof(*r)); *r = val; return r; } Where nm_malloc() is a failsafe malloc. The Macro usage should be compatible with this usage: printf("%d",*MACRO(int,5)); Is it possible to achieve that ?

    Read the article

  • Function declaration in C and C++

    - by Happy Mittal
    I have two C++ files, say file1.cpp and file2.cpp as //file1.cpp #include<cstdio> void fun(int i) { printf("%d\n",i); } //file2.cpp void fun(double); int main() { fun(5); } When I compile them and link them as c++ files, I get an error "undefined reference to fun(double)". But when I do this as C files, I don't get error and 0 is printed instead of 5. Please explain the reason. Moreover I want to ask whether we need to declare a function before defining it because I haven't declared it in file1.cpp but no error comes in compilation.

    Read the article

  • how to compile youtube-api appliation

    - by Gpathy
    Hi, i am developing a custom Youtube video player. But i am not able to compile the program. I am missing something in Makefile. My program looks like main.c #include<gdata/services/youtube/gdata-youtube-service.h> int main(int argc, char **argv[]) { printf("Youtube Application\n"); return 0; } makefile gcc `pkg-config --cflags --libs libgdata-google-1.2`  -lgdata-google-1.2 main.c -o youtube When i compile, it is giving error like error: gdata/services/youtube/gdata-youtube-service.h: No such file or directory Do i got to install some other packages ? Or, i need to include something in my Makefile ? Thanks...

    Read the article

  • Can we have an anonymous struct as template argument?

    - by nonoitall
    The title is pretty self-explanatory, but here's a simplified example: #include <cstdio> template <typename T> struct MyTemplate { T member; void printMemberSize() { printf("%i\n", sizeof(T)); } }; int main() { MyTemplate<struct { int a; int b; }> t; // <-- compiler doesn't like this t.printMemberSize(); return 0; } The compiler complains when I try to use an anonymous struct as a template argument. What's the best way to achieve something like this without having to have a separate, named struct definition?

    Read the article

  • template static classes across dynamic linked libraries

    - by user322274
    Hello, I have a templated class with a static value, like this: template <class TYPE> class A{ static TYPE value; }; in the code of a dll I assign the static value: code of DLL_1 A<float>::value = 2.0; I wish the value to be shared by all the dlls I'm using, i.e. I want that: code of DLL_2 printf("value on DLL_2 %f",A<float>::value); print out "2.0" any clues? thx

    Read the article

  • GCC fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory

    - by user2615799
    I'm trying to compile a program in C on OS X 10.9 with GCC 4.9 (experimental). For some reason, I'm getting the following error at compile time: gcc: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory I then tried a simple Hello World program: #include <stdio.h> int main(int *argc, const char *argv[]) { printf("Hello, world!"); return 0; } Again, upon running gcc -o ~/hello ~/hello.c, I got the same error. I'm using an experimental version of gcc, but it seems implausible that there would be a release which generated errors upon importing stdio. What could be causing this issue, and how can it be fixed?

    Read the article

  • C : Memory layout of C program execution

    - by pavun_cool
    Hi All , I wanted know how the kernel is providing memory for simple C program . For example : #include<stdio.h> #include<malloc.h> int my_global = 10 ; main() { char *str ; static int val ; str = ( char *) malloc ( 100 ) ; scanf ( "%s" , str ) ; printf( " val:%s\n",str ) ; } See, In this program I have used static , global and malloc for allocating dynamic memory So , how the memory lay out will be ... ? Any one give me url , which will have have details information about this process..

    Read the article

  • The unary increment operator in pointer arithmetic

    - by RhymesWithDuck
    Hello, this is my first post. I have this function for reversing a string in C that I found. void reverse(char* c) { if (*c != 0) { reverse(c + 1); } printf("%c",*c); } It works fine but if I replace: reverse(c + 1); with: reverse(++c); the first character of the original string is truncated. My question is why would are the statements not equivalent in this instance? Thanks

    Read the article

  • __FILE__ In .h what does it resolve to

    - by Pablitorun
    Is there a specification on how the FILE macro will be expanded if it is in a .h? So if I #define MYFILE __FILE__ in foo.h and foo.c #includes "foo.h" void main(){ printf("%s",MYFILE); .... does this output foo.h or foo.c? (Yes I realize this is a stupid example) Sorry for what should be a simple question. The documentation on the web seems conflicting. For what it is worth VS2008 comes back as foo.c which is what I would expect....I think. I am just trying to confirm if this is defined behavior.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63  | Next Page >