Search Results

Search found 13560 results on 543 pages for 'free lancer'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 76/543 | < Previous Page | 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83  | Next Page >

  • Are there any FREE Xaml Diff/Merge tools available?

    - by Ahikam
    I am searching a free diff tool with support of native syntax and markup for XAML, but failed to find one. I like Altova's DiffDog but it's paid. CodeCompare is an useful tool. It has some worth with its integration into VisualStudio and usage of native editors. It's a perfect solution for XML! However, it does not support XAML editors. Who can recommend a diff tool for XAML?

    Read the article

  • QR code - where can I find (free) code to embed my own generator on a web page?

    - by Robbert Huisman
    Hi, couldn't find it exactly from earlier questions, but I am probably repeating an earlier question, so apologies upfront ;-) I am looking for a simple code to embed a QR 2D code generator on a website I am building. I assume their should be some free open source code for that but I could only find paid software. Can anyone point me in the right direction? would be mostly appreciated! best regards, Robbert

    Read the article

  • (Free) Text editor on Windows with a folder view?

    - by Horace Ho
    I have to stay away from my MacBook and will use Windows for a while. I missed Textmate's folder view when editing my rails projects. Is there an editor on Windows with the folder view? I know there is the E text editor. But I'll save a few bucks if there is a free (cheaper) alternative, as I won't stay in Windows for long ...

    Read the article

  • Debian keyring error: "No keyring installed"

    - by donatello
    I have a Debian Squeeze EC2 AMI. On booting up an instance with it and trying to install packages with apt-get I get errors saying there is no keyring installed. Here is the error with apt-get update: root@ip:~# apt-get update Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg [1672 B] Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/contrib Translation-en Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/non-free Translation-en Get:2 http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release.gpg [836 B] Ign http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/contrib Translation-en Ign http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main Translation-en Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze Release Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze Release Ign http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/non-free Translation-en Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/main Sources/DiffIndex Get:3 http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release [86.9 kB] Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/non-free Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/non-free amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/main Sources/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/main Sources Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib Sources Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/non-free Sources Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/contrib amd64 Packages Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/contrib Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/non-free Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/contrib amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/non-free amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze/non-free amd64 Packages Get:4 http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports Release.gpg [836 B] Ign http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ squeeze-backports/main Translation-en Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/main Sources Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/contrib Sources Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/non-free Sources Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/main amd64 Packages Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/contrib amd64 Packages Hit http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates/non-free amd64 Packages Get:5 http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports Release [77.6 kB] Ign http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports Release Hit http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports/main amd64 Packages Fetched 3346 B in 0s (5298 B/s) Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze Release: No keyring installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/. W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org squeeze/updates Release: No keyring installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/. W: GPG error: http://backports.debian.org squeeze-backports Release: No keyring installed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/. Googling around didn't really help me fix this problem. I tried installing the packages "debian-keyring" and "debian-archive-keyring" but the error does not go away. I'd like to avoid installing unstrusted packages. Any help is appreciated! Why does this error happen and where can I learn more?

    Read the article

  • GPL vs plugin interfaces not designed with a specific application in mind

    - by Kristóf Marussy
    I am not seeking or in need of legal advice, but an interesting though experiment came to my mind. Imagine the following situtation (I cannot really think about a concrete example and I am unsure if a real manifestation even exists): there is a free (libre) api A licensed under some permissive license or even LGPL. Non-free application B implements this api in order host plugins, but there are other free software doing the same thing. Moreover, there is plugin C acting as a plugin under api A. It links to library D, that is under GPL, so C is also under GPL. Plugins using A are loaded into hosts via a dlopen-like mechanism and use complex data structure for host-plugin communication. Neither B nor C distribute any files that may be required for A to function properly (like headers containing the structure definitions of A or dynamic libraries containing helper functions for A written by the authors of A), but such things may exist. Now some user installs application B and plugin C on his machine, along with anything that may be required for api A to function properly. Then he proceeds and loads C into B and creates some intellectual property with B which is not a piece of software. Did a GPL violation happend at some point, and if so, who violated GPL and why? The authors of C violate D's license by making C possible to be used in non-free host B? This is a possibility because they can't give and exception of GPL (like one described in http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLPluginsInNF or http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingOverControlledInterface) due to D's license terms. The authors of B violate C's and D's license by making C possible to be loaded in B? This is a possibility because http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NFUseGPLPlugins disallows the mechanisms A uses for communitation between the free and non-free modules. The authors of A, because the api may be used (and in this case, was used) for communication between GPL'd and non-free software. This would be extremely absurd. The user, because at the moment of loading B into C, he made a derived work of C. I think this is impossible, because he does not distribute it. But would the situation change is he decided to release a configuration file of B which makes B load C as a plugin? Nobody, because A counts as a 'system library', and both B and C directly interact only with A, not eachother. In a sane world, this would happen... A concrete example of A could be some kind of audio (think LADSPA) or image processing api. However, I could find no such interface (that is free software, generic and is also implemented by commercial tools). A real-world example could also be quite enlightening.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83  | Next Page >