Search Results

Search found 3325 results on 133 pages for 'route'.

Page 77/133 | < Previous Page | 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84  | Next Page >

• Is there such a thing as an IP femtocell, and what does it do?

  - by The Journeyman geek

  My dad mentioned a co-worker suggested using a device, that might use CDMA to route calls through IP to save costs on a certain overseas project we're on- since our home base is quite far from there. I've never heard of such a device, so if it does exist, I'm wondering, if it's specific to particular ISPs, or if you can just pick one off the shelf, plug it into an arbitrary Internet connection, and make calls using it and a cellphone of some sort? As you can tell, details are sketchy, so... if such a device doesn't exist, saying so might be a right answer ;)

  Read the article

• Disable "Send as XPS Attachment" Word 2007

  - by Tim Alexander

  Is there a way to disable this option either via Group Policy or via some form of registry hack? Normally I would go down the route of telling users not to send as XPS and send as something else but with our recent upgrade to 2007 lots of users are banding these files around. Unfortunately our version of Citrix does not play nicely with XPS documents and we end up having to log them out. Am told the fix for Citrix is not forthcoming so wondered if I could bury my head in the sand and disable the option all together. Regards Tim

  Read the article

• Approach for monitoring internet backbone traffic volume

  - by Greg Harman

  I'm interested in getting a picture of relative volume across different internet backbones. In particular, I'd like to see how traffic volume over a given route differs over the course of a day or from one day to the next. InternetTrafficReport.com is the closest approximation to this that I've found online, and their approach is to test ping times to a number of key routers from several geographically-dispersed servers. This sounds like one straightforward way to measure, but I don't have several geographically-dispersed servers. Is there a different approach for sampling this type of information from a single server?

  Read the article

• ldirectord ipvsadm not show reals ip and not work wtih pacemaker and corosync

  - by miguer27

  first thanks for your time. I'm having a problem with ldirectord that I can not solve, I comment my situation: I have two nodes with pace maker and corosync and configure somes resources: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# crm status Last updated: Tue Jun 3 12:58:30 2014 Last change: Tue Jun 3 12:23:47 2014 via cibadmin on ldap1 Stack: openais Current DC: ldap2 - partition with quorum Version: 1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes 7 Resources configured. Online: [ ldap1 ldap2 ] Resource Group: IPV_LVS IPV_4 (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started ldap1 IPV_6 (ocf::heartbeat:IPv6addr): Started ldap1 lvs (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord): Started ldap1 Clone Set: clon_IPV_lo [IPV_lo] Started: [ ldap2 ] Stopped: [ IPV_lo:1 ] root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# crm configure show node ldap2 \ attributes standby="off" node ldap1 \ attributes standby="off" primitive IPV-lo_4 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr \ params ip="192.168.1.10" cidr_netmask="32" nic="lo" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV-lo_6 ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addrLO \ params ipv6addr="[fc00:1::3]" cidr_netmask="64" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV_4 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \ params ip="192.168.1.10" nic="eth0" cidr_netmask="25" lvs_support="true" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV_6 ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addr \ params ipv6addr="[fc00:1::3]" nic="eth0" cidr_netmask="64" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive lvs ocf:heartbeat:ldirectord \ params configfile="/etc/ldirectord.cf" \ op monitor interval="20" timeout="10" \ meta target-role="Started" group IPV_LVS IPV_4 IPV_6 lvs group IPV_lo IPV-lo_6 IPV-lo_4 clone clon_IPV_lo IPV_lo \ meta interleave="true" target-role="Started" location cli-prefer-IPV_LVS IPV_LVS \ rule $id="cli-prefer-rule-IPV_LVS" inf: #uname eq ldap1 colocation LVS_no_IPV_lo -inf: clon_IPV_lo IPV_LVS property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff" \ cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ expected-quorum-votes="2" \ no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ stonith-enabled="false" \ last-lrm-refresh="1401264327" rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \ resource-stickiness="1000" The problem is in the ipvsadm only show a one real IP, when i configured two now, show the ldirector.cf: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# ipvsadm IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP ldap-maqueta.cica.es:ldap wrr - ldap2.cica.es:ldap Route 4 0 0 TCP [[fc00:1::3]]:ldap wrr - [[fc00:1::2]]:ldap Route 4 0 0 root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# cat /etc/ldirectord.cf checktimeout=10 checkinterval=2 autoreload=yes logfile="/var/log/ldirectord.log" quiescent=yes #ipv4 virtual=192.168.1.10:389 real=192.168.1.11:389 gate 4 real=192.168.1.12:389 gate 4 scheduler=wrr protocol=tcp checktype=on #ipv6 virtual6=[[fc00:1::3]]:389 real6=[[fc00:1::1]]:389 gate 4 real6=[[fc00:1::2]]:389 gate 4 scheduler=wrr protocol=tcp checkport=389 checktype=on and in the logs I see nothing clear: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# ldirectord -d /etc/ldirectord.cf start DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.11:389 -g -w 0) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.11:389 -g -w 0) DEBUG2: Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) DEBUG2: Disabled real server=on:tcp:192.168.1.11:389:::4:gate:\/: (virtual=tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 0) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 0) DEBUG2: Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) DEBUG2: Disabled real server=on:tcp:192.168.1.12:389:::4:gate:\/: (virtual=tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Checking on: Real servers are added without any checks DEBUG2: Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) Destination already exists root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# cat /var/log/ldirectord.log [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) failed: [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Added real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.11:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Restored real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: [[fc00:1::2]]:389 (tcp:[[fc00:1::3]]:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t [[fc00:1::3]]:389 -r [[fc00:1::2]]:389 -g -w 4) failed: [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Added real server: [[fc00:1::2]]:389 ([[fc00:1::3]]:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: [[fc00:1::1]]:389 (tcp:[[fc00:1::3]]:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Restored real server: [[fc00:1::1]]:389 ([[fc00:1::3]]:389) (Weight set to 4) do not know if this is a bug or a configuration error, can anyone help? Regards.

  Read the article

• Turn my machine in a hotspot/proxy

  - by Leonardo

  My workplace does not provide a wifi... only wired connection... but my machine has a working wifi card... is there a way to "bridge" my wired connection, making my iphone connect to it and use it as if the own machine is being used? (the idea is to make my machine provide a wifi-connection and route it through my wired connection) Details: My machine OS is win 2012 server I have full admin rights to my machine There is a corporate-proxy PS: If more details needed pls ask!

  Read the article

• Postfix configuration: different outgoing hosts based on sender

  - by Joe

  I've seen a few answers to this on the web, but nothing definitive nor any good examples. I relay all my mail out through Postfix, currently everything sent to my ISP's mail server. However, there are a few users with gmail accounts or gmail-hosted accounts; I'd like to route their outgoing mail through Google's servers (since it will then appear in their Gmail sent folder). All email NOT from one of these senders should go out through the default relayhost. I believe I need to use the "sender_dependent_default_transport_maps" configuration within Postfix, but can't find a good example on what this setup looks like. Can anyone point me at a specific setup?

  Read the article

• vsFTPd and iptables - how to configure them in CentOS 5.5?

  - by Vincenzo

  I've installed vsFTPd in CentOS 5.5, on TWO servers, and added this rule to their iptable-s: -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 21 -j ACCEPT Looks like this is not enough, since when I'm trying to upload a file from one server to another, I'm getting this result (IP address is masked): # ftp 99.99.99.99 Connected to …com (99.99.99.99). 220 (vsFTPd 2.0.5) Name (99.99.99.99:root): vinny 331 Please specify the password. Password: 230 Login successful. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> ls 227 Entering Passive Mode (99,99,99,99,107,74) ftp: connect: No route to host I've found a few articles in the net about the second rule I have to add to iptables, but I didn't find the right syntax for it. Could you please help?

  Read the article

• Fortigate VPN Routing issue

  - by user1571299

  I have 200B Fortigate unit with 2 internet WAN connections. I also have a remote site which I'm connected to via IPSEC VPN through WAN1. This site has only one GW IP address. I'd also like to setup a VPN ontop of WAN2 with that specific site as it's destination. The default route for my end is WAN1. My problem is I cant figure out how to have both tunnels up at the same time. What's the best practice for achieving this? Thanks

  Read the article

• Nginx server_name is set to mydomain.com, so why is www.mydomain.com getting served too?

  - by Lorenz Forvang

  I have my Nginx conf set up as follows: server { listen 443 ssl; server_name mydomain.com; ... } When I load https://mydomain.com, the site loads fine. But when I load https://www.mydomain.com, the site loads as well. Why is this happening? I set up the DNS records using Amazon Route 53 as: A mydomain.com xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (IP) CNAME www.mydomain.com mydomain.com So is a request to www.mydomain.com arriving at Nginx as a request to mydomain.com? If so, how do I differentiate requests to www.mydomain.com and mydomain.com at my server?

  Read the article

• Cname to multi-level heroku subdomain

  - by user123424234

  I'm trying to create a cname that points from my custom domain (s.mydomain.com) to a multilevel subdomain hosted on heroku (me.myapp.herokuapp.com). I've created the Cname s.mydomain.com with the value me.myapp.herokuapp.com. When I go to s.mydomain.com it does not route to me.myapp.herokuapp.com, instead I get: method=GET path=/ host=s.mydomain.com dyno=web.1 queue=0 wait=0ms connect=4ms service=18ms status=404 It's possible I'm not fully understanding how this Cname should be setup. My desired outcome is for s.mydomain.com to act as if it were at me.myapp.herokuapp.com.

  Read the article

• Routing Traffic on Ubuntu to give Raspberry PI Internet Access

  - by Scruffers

  I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction for setting up my Linux (Ubuntu 12.04) box to route traffic from eth0 to wlan0. I'll try and explain the problem I am trying to solve: I currently have two separate networks: [RaspberryPi/eth0] 192.168.2.2 / 255.255.255.0 ^ | v [Ubuntu/eth0] 192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0 And: [Ubuntu/wlan0] 192.168.1.100 / 255.255.255.0 ^ | v [ADSL router] 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0 So currently if I want to access the RaspberryPI I can SSH from the Ubuntu box to the PI. And if I want to use the Internet, I have full access from the Ubuntu box, but nothing from the RaspberryPI - the two networks are partitioned. What I would like to do is configure things so that the RaspberryPI has Internet access via the Ubuntu box and out to the Internet. I tried to create a bridge, but got the message "wlan0: operation not supported" (wireless chipset is Ralink RT3062). I'm sure giving the Raspberry PI Internet access should be easy to do in this configuration, but I am a bit lost - can someone point me in the right direction please?

  Read the article

• ip routing policy in linux

  - by Dragos

  I have a linux system with two network interfaces (eth0 in x.x.x.0 and eth1 in x.x.y.0). Is there any posibility to add some route policy to send all the traffic to network x.x.y.0. I would like even the traffic from eth0 to be send to eth1's network. I cannot delete the direct connected networks from the routing table so all the traffic from x.x.x.0 network is send to eth0. I would like to send all traffic to eth1.

  Read the article

• HP DL370 G6 expansion

  - by user72185

  Hi, we are running a HP DL370 server with 6 x 300 gb disks on RAID 5. Due to a Windows update causing our server to fail recently, we couldn't access the data. I now want to separate the data from the OS (Windows server 2008 r2) so that if anything like that happens again, we can route everyone through a separate server. I have seen these HP storageworks enclosures (msa70) and have a couple of questions: Can I just take out our 2.5 inch 10k SAS drives, install them in the new Storageworks NAS and hey presto we would be up and running? If I wanted to then add another drive (I think there are 25 bays), can I just insert a blank but identical drive and the RAID 5 would dynamically expand to incorporate the new drive. Many thanks Adrian

  Read the article

• Access points fighting for dominance?

  - by Phillip Oldham

  We have a small office with a large number of wireless devices (a mixture of desktop machines, laptops, and wifi-enabled phones) all working from a single Apple Airport Extreme which extends our wired network. I've added another Airport Extreme for resiliency, since we've been seeing a decrease in performance and (as far as I understand) access points can only handle a small number of clients. I set the new AP to extend the current network so that the clients weren't constantly switching between different wireless networks, however as soon as this AP was configured all the wireless devices started seeing network trouble, flicking on and off. I'm assuming that this is because both APs are reasonably strong, and the client can't decide which to use. What is the best route to follow to resolve this? What I'm aiming for is wireless resiliency; preferably having two APs share the network load, or if this isn't an option then having a primary AP with a "fail-over", should the primary go down for any reason.

  Read the article

• Multicasting Windows 7 Image

  - by LawnChairSkank

  I am trying to deploy some new machines with windows 7 for the first time in our computer labs. We used to use third party imaging software and then run sysprep after the image was copied(XP), but it seems you can't go that route with windows 7. We set up a new imaging server with the windows system image manager, but when we try to multicast the image it pretty much takes down our whole staff and faculty network. I heard you can turn on a multicast feature on our cisco switches to help with the issue, but that it also slows the switches to a crawl. Another idea we have tried was pulling the the computer lab switch off the main network and plugging the imaging server directly into the computer lab switch so the multicast doesn't take down our network, but it doesn't seem to work without being able to hit a domain controller. Is there a way to multicast without taking out the network? I feel like I am missing something... Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• Can qmail-ldap replace the validrcptto file?

  - by T. Fabre

  We are using qmail to route incoming mail to our Domino server. However, that requires us to maintain the validrcptto with the list of all allowed email addresses. Since Domino provides an LDAP directory, does qmail-ldap provide functionnality to lookup valid rcpt to addresses in the Domino directory instead of the validrcptto file, so that we wouldn't have to maintain that extra list ? We have about 150~200 users, so is setting up qmail-ldap worth the extra mile if it can verify addresses in the LDAP directory ? If anyone has experience with qmail-ldap and its setup, I'd be glad to hear from you.

  Read the article

• ip routes to specific interface

  - by user65053

  I am trying to figure out how to get all traffic to 10.8.78.* to connect using interface ppp0 when available how would I properly handle this (centos) and can I fall back on eth0 when pp0 is not up? /sbin/route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 69.19.219.69 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.0.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

  Read the article

• SFTP through proxy

  - by aerodynamic_props

  I have a large amount of data on scratch space at computer b that I want to get. In my network I cannot directly connect to computer b (ssh exits with "No route to host"); I must first connect to computer a, and then connect to computer b. I cannot move the data from the scratch space on computer b to computer a because of a disk quota that is imposed on me at computer a. How can I move the data from computer b to my computer in this situation?

  Read the article

• How do I make a privileged port non-privileged in Redhat 5?

  - by Jason Thompson

  So I have a RedHat 5 box that I'm wanting to run an application that I wrote that implements SLP. SLP uses port 427 for answering service queries. My understanding is that ports below 1024 are "privileged" and thus cannot be bound to by anyone that's not root. I cannot run this application as root as it is launched via tomcat. One creative solution I really like was simply writing an iptables rule to route the privileged port to a non-privileged. In my proof of concept tests, this works wonderfully. Unfortunately, it would be greatly (and understandably) desired by the powers if my application did not require screwing around with iptables upon installation. So I heard a rumor and cannot find anything to verify this that there was some sort of command or parameter that could be set to make any port I want be non-privileged. Is this true? If so, how is this done? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Access to self created torrent on public tracker

  - by Nick

  Not sure if this is the right site to ask this, but here it goes: Let's say I'd like to share a couple of private files with a few friends. The size of these are quite large, so I've figured the best route to distribute these is via torrent. So, on my home PC I create a torrent and start seeding and announce to a public tracker like openbittorrent and publicbt. Now, both of those are public trackers, but they don't seem to have anyway of searching through what is actually being tracked. If I'm only passing around the torrent file to a few friends, whats the chances that someone else will 'randomly' come across the torrent via the public tracker and start leeching?

  Read the article

• Serving static web files off a non-standard port

  - by Nimmy Lebby

  I'm close to deploying a Django project to production. I'm looking over some infrastructure decisions. Something that came up was serving static files with a different server such as lighttpd. However, we're starting off with a single dedicated server so our only option would be to use a non-standard port for the static file webserver. Is there precedence for this? I.e. Does anyone "big" do this? Any particular port I should use or shy away from using? Can anyone thing of some downsides of going this route?

  Read the article

• How does a winkydink Teradici offer high res, full FPS, 3D rendering on ESXi 5 VDIs for AutoCAD/SolidWorks/1080p YouTube applications?

  - by BlueToast

  How does such a small Teradici card ![enter image description here][1] offer high resolution, full FPS 3D graphics (1:38) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXA4QMmfY5Y&feature=player_detailpage#t=97s for ESXi 5.0/5.1 VDI environments? We're shooting for an AutoCAD/SolidWorks/YouTube 1080p capable environment. I can't see how such a small and low profile card could possibly have the horsepower to handle such GPU computations for a big environment like that. We're going to have up to 64 VDIs per server, and are a 500-1000 employee count sized company. Someone enlighten me please! Determining which route to go (between RemoteFX and VMware View/PCoIP) and the hardware (NVIDIA 4GB non-Quadro/Tesla GPUs vs Teradici card). Servers have three 4x, three 8x, and one 16x PCI-E lane. Two of the 8x lanes will be occupied by SAS RAID cards.

  Read the article

• Network Role based routing

  - by Steve Butler

  Apologies my networking skills are a tad rusty. I'm looking for a way to setup a system that gives me the ability to setup Role-based access to specific network resources. For example, i have three private subnets for specific groups, users will need access to one one or more subnets. I'd like to have all client machines on the same subnet/vlan, and then use 802.1x to authorize into a router(NAC device/whatever), the router would then see what user had authenticated(huge plus if it could determine AD group), and then allow routing to one or more of the three private subnets based upon their group membership. I've looked at packetFence, and it appears to work by assigning a client to a VLAN, but i'd still need a way to route some users into different back-end networks.

  Read the article

• pptp VPN, routing

  - by Adrian

  Details: eth0 = current internet port pptp1 = VPN connection, if I connect to my provider, he give me an IP address, which is accessible from the internet. This is what I need. I want to connect through this IP back to my PC. I want to keep my primary internet connection (eth0) on my PC for all traffic, but route traffic to VPN for specified application/or port, to access application/port from the IP, which I given from the pptp provider. Huhh? Difficult but, it is possible? If yes, how? Incoming port will be always: 33340 Outgoing port can be change, but usually it is 33330

  Read the article

• vmware workstation - virtual network adapters missing from ipconfig, still show in networking (XP host)

  - by Adam

  Hi Folks - here's a new one for me, and my first time posting here: I installed VMWare workstation 7.1 on a new PC. VMWare properly installs the virtual network adapters under the Network Connections control panel, however for some reason they do not show up under ipconfig, which is very weird. They also don't appear anywhere in "route print". I don't have network connectivity to the VM. My guesses are perhaps some conflict with Symantec AntiVirus or Symantec Client Firewall. Tried the following things: enabling TCP/IP in the virtual network adapters (they often get installed with it disabled for some reason) Restoring defualts in the VMnetcfg gui tool (this causes an uninstall and reinstall of the virtual network adapters on the host) Re-installing vmware workstation Uninstalling checkpoint secureremote and then reinstalling vmware Just to be clear, this problem is totally on the host. In my searching for stuff about (non-vmware) adapters missing from ipconfig, I see some posts about resetting the TCP/IP stack using netsh. Looking into that next... Thanks!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84  | Next Page >