Hi,
I'm making tests with ASP.NET HttpHandler for download a file writting directly on the response stream, and I'm not pretty sure about the way I'm doing it. This is a example method, in the future the file could be stored in a BLOB in the database:
public void GetFile(HttpResponse response)
{
String fileName = "example.iso";
response.ClearHeaders();
response.ClearContent();
response.ContentType = "application/octet-stream";
response.AppendHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename=" + fileName);
using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(Path.Combine(HttpContext.Current.Server.MapPath("~/App_Data"), fileName), FileMode.Open))
{
Byte[] buffer = new Byte[4096];
Int32 readed = 0;
while ((readed = fs.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
{
response.OutputStream.Write(buffer, 0, readed);
response.Flush();
}
}
}
But, I'm not sure if this is correct or there is a better way to do it.
My questions are:
When I open the url with the browser, appears the "Save File" dialog... but it seems like the server has started already to push data into the stream before I click "Save", is that normal?
If I remove the line"response.Flush()", when I open the url with the browser, ... I see how the web server is pushing data but the "Save File" dialog doesn't come up, (or at least not in a reasonable time fashion) why?
When I open the url with a WebRequest object, I see that the HttpResponse.ContentLength is "-1", although I can read the stream and get the file. What is the meaning of -1? When is HttpResponse.ContentLength going to show the length of the response? For example, I have a method that retrieves a big xml compresed with deflate as a binary stream, but in that case... when I access it with a WebRequest, in the HttpResponse I can actually see the ContentLength with the length of the stream, why?
What is the optimal length for the Byte[] array that I use as buffer for optimal performance in a web server? I've read that is between 4K and 8K... but which factors should I consider to make the correct decision.
Does this method bloat the IIS or client memory usage? or is it actually buffering the transference correctly?
Sorry for so many questions, I'm pretty new in web development :P
Cheers.
