Search Results

Search found 51747 results on 2070 pages for 'oracle database in memory'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 845/2070 | < Previous Page | 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852  | Next Page >

  • Multiple Denial of Service vulnerabilities in Quagga

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-3323 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 Quagga Solaris 10 SPARC: 126206-09 X86: 126207-09 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 4 CVE-2011-3324 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2011-3325 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2011-3326 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service vulnerabilities in Quagga

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2007-4826 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 3.5 Quagga Solaris 10 SPARC: 126206-09 X86: 126207-09 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 4 CVE-2009-1572 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2010-1674 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2010-1675 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2010-2948 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 6.5 CVE-2010-2949 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-4862 Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Telnet

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-4862 Buffer Overflow vulnerability 7.5 Telnet Solaris 10 SPARC: 148657-01 X86: 148658-01 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 04 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • OBI & P6 Analytics Demo @ MAOAUG

    - by mark.kromer
    Mark will be speaking in King of Prussia, outside of Philly, for the Mid-Atlantic Oracle Apps Users Group on Oracle BI w/P6 Analytics for IT projects this Friday: http://www.maoaug.org. Stop by and say HI if you are in the area!

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Wireshark

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-1593 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 3.3 Wireshark Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 8.5 CVE-2012-1594 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 3.3 CVE-2012-1595 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2012-1596 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • 2 min video about the SQL_Compare

    - by CatherineRussell
    It is nice to start blogging again! I am working on new project in a small company now. We do not have a full time database admin. I have to cover multiple roles: getting requirements, writing docs and creating diagrams, designing app, writing code, testing and DBA role. I am not a DBA. But, I have to do day to day database changes: adding new new columns and tables. Check out 2 min video about the SQL_Compare. This tool saves time by automatically comparing and synchronizing database schemas; eliminate mistakes migrating database changes from dev, to test, to production; speed up the deployment of new database schema updates; generate T-SQL scripts to update one database to match the schema of another; find and fix errors caused by differences between databases;  keeps an accurate history of all previous database records.  http://www.red-gate.com/products/SQL_Compare/index.htm

    Read the article

  • Disaster Recovery Discovery

    - by Rodney Landrum
    Last weekend I joined several of my IT staff on a mission to perform a DR test in our remote CoLo center in a large South East city of the US. Can I be more obtuse? The goal was simple for me as the sole DBA in a throng of Windows, Storage, Network and SAN admins – restore the databases and make them work. There were 4 applications that back ended to 7 SQL Server databases on 4 different SQL Server instances. We would maintain the original server names, but beyond that it was fair game. We had time to prepare so I was able to script out or otherwise automate the recovery process. I used sp_help_revlogin for three of the servers, a bit of a cheat actually because restoring the Master database on the target DR servers was the specified course of action according to the DR procedures ( the caveat “IF REQUIRED” left it open to interpretation. I really wanted to avoid the step of restoring Master for a number of reasons but mainly because I did not want to deal with issues starting SQL Services afterward. Having to account for the location of TempDB and the version conflicts of the resource DBs were just two of the battles I chose not to fight. Not to mention other system database location problems that might arise and prevent SQL from starting.  I was going to have to restore all of the user databases anyway, so I would not really gain any benefit, outside of logins, for taking the time to restore the source Master database over the newly installed one on the fresh server. What I wanted was the ability to restore the Master database as a user database, call it Master_Mine, from a backup on the source system and then use that restored database to script the SQL Logins and passwords on the DR systems. While I did not attempt this on the trip, the thought stuck in my mind and this past week I succeeded at scripting user accounts and passwords using only a restored copy of the Master database. Granted there were several challenges to overcome.  Also, as is usual for any work like this the usual disclaimers apply:  This is not something that I would imagine Microsoft would condone or support and this was really only an experiment for me to learn if it was even possible. While I have tested the process with success, I do not know that I would use this technique in a documented procedure because future updates for SQL Server will render this technique non-functional. I thought at first, incorrectly of course, that I could use sp_help_revlogin on a restored copy of the master database I named Master_Mine.   Since sp_help_revlogin uses system schema objects, sys.syslogins and sys.server_principals, this was not going to work because all results would come from the main Master database. To test this I added a SQL login via SSMS, backed up Master, restored  it as Master_Mine, and then deleted the login.  Even though the test account I created should presumably still be in the Master_Mine database, I should be able to get to it and script out its creation with its password hash so that I would not need to know the password, but any applications that stored that password would not have to be altered in the DR scenario. They would just work as expected. Once I realized that would not work I began looking deeper.  Knowing that sys.syslogins and sys.server_principals are system views, their underlying code should be available with sp_helptext, right? They were. And this led me to discover the two tables sys.sysxlgns and sys.sysprivs, where the data I needed was stored. These tables existed in both the real Master and the restored copy, Master_Mine.  I used this information to tweak the sp_help_revlogin stored procedure to use these tables instead to create the logins cursor used in sp_help_revlogin. For the password hash,  sp_help_revlogin uses the function LoginProperty() which takes a user name and option ‘passwordhash’ to return the hash for the user. Unfortunately, it requires the login to exist in the Master database. This would not work. So another slight modification I had to make was to pull the password hash itself (pwdhash from sys.sysxlgns) into the logins cursor and comment out the section of sp_help_revlogin that uses LoginProperty. Instead, I pass the pwdhash value as the variable @PWD_varbinary to the sp_hexadecimal stored procedure which is also created by and used within the code provided by Microsoft in the link above for sp_help_revlogin. The final challenge: sys.sysxlgns and sys.server_principals are visible only within a Dedicated Administrator Connection (DAC) query window in SSMS or within SQLCDMD.  To open a DAC connection you have to be logged in on the SQL Server itself, via RDP in my case,  and you preface the server name in the query connection with ADMIN:, so that the server connection looks like ADMIN:ServerName. From there you can create the modified stored procedure in the restored copy of a Master database from a source system as whatever name you like, and then run the modified stored procedure. I named my new stored procedure usp_help_revlogin_MyMaster. Upon execution I was happy to see the logins and password hashes that I needed to apply from the source Master database without having to restore over the new Master system database and without the need to access the original server (assuming it was down due to whatever disaster put it in that state). You will note that I am not providing full code samples here of the modifications. I will say that it was a slight bit of work and anyone who needed to do this for whatever reason, could fairly easily roll their own solution with the information provided herein.  My goal, as I said was to prove that this could be done and provide another option if required to ease the burden of getting SQL Servers up and available in an emergency situation where alternatives may be more challenging or otherwise unavailable.  

    Read the article

  • Neue Zertifizierung von Pillar Axiom 600 Speichersystem

    - by swalker
    Sie haben nun die Möglichkeit, die Beta-Prüfung für Pillar Axiom 600 Storage System Essentials (1Z0-581) vorzunehmen. Wenn Sie die Prüfung bestehen, können Sie Implementierungsspezialist für Pillar Axiom 600 Speichersysteme werden! Für Oracle Partner sind kostenlose Gutscheine erhältlich. Wenn Sie einen kostenlosen Gutschein für die Beta-Prüfung erhalten möchten, senden Sie Ihre Anfrage an [email protected] und geben Sie bitte Ihren Namen, Ihre geschäftliche E-Mail-Adresse, Ihr Unternehmen und den Namen der Prüfung (Pillar Axiom 600 Storage System Essentials Beta) an.

    Read the article

  • How to make Unit Tests to make sure stored procedure is deleting row from the database?

    - by aspdotnetuser
    I'm new to unit testing and I need some help with the following. I have created a small project to help me learn how to make Unit Tests. The functionality for one of the forms in my application deletes a user from the User table (and other rows in mapping tables). Currently, the unit test I have created to test this sets up the required objects and then calls the business rules method (passing in the user id) which calls the data access method to execute the stored procedure that deletes the rows in the tables. Is this the correct method to test whether something is being deleted successfully? Should the unit test / setup method first insert some test data which the unit test then deletes?

    Read the article

  • Value Chain Execution E-Book

    - by John Murphy
    Taking a smart approach to logistics – from streamlining transport networks and global trade management, to optimizing everyday warehouse operations – can simultaneously reduce costs and maximize competitive advantage.Download your exclusive Oracle e-book, Oracle Value Chain Execution: Reinventing Logistics Excellence, to learn why our world-leading, unified solution is relied on by market-leading companies across the planet.Discover how it can help you: Drive business agility, scalability and innovation Reduce costs and increase efficiency Enhance visibility, productivity and inventory accuracy Simplify compliance and mitigate risk Measure and boost customer satisfaction See what reinventing logistics excellence could mean for your organization.

    Read the article

  • Recording Available: March 2012 Quarterly Customer Update Webcast

    - by R.Hunter
    Missed the recent Quarterly Customer Update Webcast? We covered several topics including: * WebCenter 4 Pillars overview * Support Update * WebCenter Content 11gR1 Update * WebCenter Portal 11gR1 Update * Oracle Social Network Overview VIEW WEBCAST RECORDING: Access the March 2012 Webcast recording and presentation by going to: My Oracle Support Site Note: 568127.1 We'll announce the next Quarterly Customer Update Webcast here on the WebCenter Alerts blog.

    Read the article

  • OPN Diamond Level Criteria Update

    - by Cinzia Mascanzoni
    On June 1, 2013, the criteria for Oracle PartnerNetwork members to attain the prestigious Diamond level will change and all members at the Diamond level at that point will be required to meet the new criteria. This change underscores the requirement for these elite partners to engage across Oracle’s broad product portfolio. Refer to the Diamond Level Requirements on the OPN Portal here for more detail.

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Network Time Protocol (NTP)

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2009-0021 Improper Authentication vulnerability 5.0 Firmware SPARC T3-4 SPARC: 147317-01 SPARC T3-2 SPARC: 147316-01 SPARC T3-1B SPARC: 147318-01 SPARC T3-1 SPARC: 147315-01 Netra SPARC T3-1B SPARC: 147320-01 Netra SPARC T3-1 SPARC: 147319-01 Netra SPARC T3-1BA SPARC: 144609-07 CVE-2009-0159 Buffer Overflow vulnerability 6.8 CVE-2009-3563 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 6.4 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • How can I solve out of memory exception in generic list generic ?

    - by Phsika
    How can i solve out of memory exception in list generic if adding new value foreach(DataColumn dc in dTable.Columns) foreach (DataRow dr in dTable.Rows) myScriptCellsCount.MyCellsCharactersCount.Add(dr[dc].ToString().Length); MyBase Class: public class MyExcelSheetsCells { public List<int> MyCellsCharactersCount { get; set; } public MyExcelSheetsCells() { MyCellsCharactersCount = new List<int>(); } }

    Read the article

  • Live Virtual Class for Partners: Application Management

    - by Patrick Rood
    v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} November 11-12th Manageability Partner Community Application Management Suite Live Virtual Training This training will be offered to Oracle Partners over a live webcast during business hours. Each day will consist of approximately 2-3 hours of lecture/demos. It will be recorded and available for playback. Purpose: This virtual course is a comprehensive program of training sessions, prepared and presented by Product Managers. This ensures you have all the information you need to position and sell Oracle Application Management Suites. The sessions will be lecture based with demonstrations to complement. These sessions are interactive and everyone will be required to participate. Customer case studies will be used as appropriate and there will be plenty of opportunity for in-depth discussion. Please bring to the training an understanding of what Enterprise Manager 12c does for our customers, along with your own experiences to date. Logistics: Topic: Oracle Application Management Suite Training (2 Days - approx 2-3 Hour per Day) WebEx session details to be provided upon registration. Monday 11th November | 14:00PM GMT | 18:00PM Gulf (GMT+4) Tuesday 12th November | 14:00PM GMT | 18:00PM Gulf (GMT+4) (Back to the top) Copyright © 2012, Oracle. All rights reserved. Contact Us | Legal Notices and Terms of Use | Privacy Statement Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}

    Read the article

  • What are the types and inner workings of a query optimizer?

    - by Frank Developer
    As I understand it, most query optimizers are cost-based. Some can be influenced by hints like FIRST_ROWS(). Others are tailored for OLAP. Is it possible to know more detailed logic about how Informix IDS and SE's optimizers decide what's the best route for processing a query, other than SET EXPLAIN? Is there any documentation which illustrates the ranking of SELECT statements? I would imagine that "SELECT col FROM table WHERE ROWID = n" ranks 1st. What are the rest of them?.. If I'm not mistaking, Informix's ROWID is a SERIAL(INT) which allows for a max. of 2GB nrows, or maybe it uses INT9 for TB's nrows?.. However, I think Oracle uses HEX values for ROWID. Too bad ROWID can't be oftenly used, since a rows ROWID can change. So maybe ROWID is used by the optimizer as a counter? Perhaps, it could be used for implementing the query progress idea I mentioned in my "Begin viewing query results before query completes" question? For some reason, I feel it wouldn't be that difficult to report a query's progress while being processed, perhaps at the expense of some slight overhead, but it would be nice to know ahead of time: A "Google-like" estimate of how many rows meet a query's criteria, display it's progress every 100, 200, 500 or 1,000 rows, give users the ability to cancel it at anytime and start displaying the qualifying rows as they are being put into the current list, while it continues searching?.. This is just one example, perhaps we could think other neat/useful features, the ingridients are more or less there. Perhaps we could fine-tune each query with more granularity than currently available? OLTP queries tend to be mostly static and pre-defined. The "what-if's" are more OLAP, so let's try to add more control and intelligence to it? So, therefore, being able to more precisely control, not "hint-influence" a query is what's needed and therefore it would be necessary to know how the optimizers logic is programmed. We can then have Dynamic SELECT and other statements for specific situations! Maybe even tell IDS to read blocks of indexes nodes at-a-time instead of one-by-one, etc. etc.

    Read the article

  • Portraits of Excellence: Editors' Choice Awards 2009

    Each year the editors of Oracle Magazine recognize men and women who exemplify leadership, vision, and dedication in working with and managing Oracle technology. This year, we are pleased to present the winners of our eighth annual Editors' Choice Awards, and we are honored to feature them in our pages.

    Read the article

  • 6 Facts About GlassFish Announcement

    - by Bruno.Borges
    To help clarify the message about the recent roadmap for GlassFish, I decided to put together 6 facts about the announcement, future of GlassFish, and the Java EE platform as a whole:  "Since Oracle announced the end of commercial support for future Oracle GlassFish Server versions, the Java EE world has started wondering what will happen to GlassFish Server Open Source Edition. Unfortunately, there's a lot of misleading information going around. So let me clarify some things with facts, not FUD." Read full story here

    Read the article

  • How to share memory buffer across sessions in Django?

    - by afriza
    I want to have one party (or more) sends a stream of data via HTTP request(s). Other parties will be able to receive the same stream of data in almost real-time. The data stream should be accessible across sessions (according to access control list). How can I do this in Django? If possible I would like to avoid database access and use in memory buffer (along with some synchronization mechanism)

    Read the article

  • CVE-2008-3529 Buffer overflow vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2008-3529 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 10.0 libxml2 Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • SQL installation scripts for WebCenter Content 11g

    - by KJH
    As part of the installation of WebCenter Content 11g (UCM or URM), one of the main functions is to run the Repository Creation Utility (RCU) to establish the database schema and tables.   This is pretty helpful because it runs all the scripts you need to have without having to manually set anything up in the database.   In UCM 10g and earlier, the installation  itself would establish the database tables if you wanted it to.  Otherwise, the SQL scripts were available to be run independently ahead of time.  For DBAs who wanted to understand what was being done to the database for the application, this was helpful for them.  But in 11g, that is all masked now in RCU.  You don't get to see the scripts at all as part of it's establishing the tables.  But if you comb through the directories for RCU, you can track them down.  They are in the  /rcuHome/rcu/integration/contentserver11/sql/ directories.  And to understand the order in which they are run, you can open up the /rcuHome/rcu/integration/contentserver11/contentserver11.xml file and see how they are run there.  The order in which they are run are: contentserverrole.sql contentserveruser.sql intradoc.sql workflow.sql formats.sql users.sql default.sql contentprocedures.sql  If you are installing WebCenter Records (URM), it will run some additional scripts between the formats.sql and users.sql : MetadataSet.sql UIEnhancements.sql RecordsManagement.sql RecordsManagement_default.sql ClassifiedEnhancements.sql ClassifiedEnhancements_default.sql In addition to the scripts being available within the RCU install directories, they are also available from within the Content Server UI.  If you go to Administration -> DataStoreDesign SQL Generation, this page can allow you to download these various SQL scripts.    From here, you can select your particular database type and which components to include.  Several components make changes dynamically to the database when they are enabled, so these scripts give you a way to inspect what is being run during that startup time.  Once selected, click Generate and you now can either view or download the scripts from the Actions menu. DISCLAIMER:  Installations are ONLY supported when done with the Repository Creation Utility.  These scripts are for reference only and not supported to be run manually.

    Read the article

  • The Latest in Enterprise Continuous Controls Monitoring

    AMR identifies continuous controls monitoring as one of the top GRC software investments planned for 2010. Tune into this Appcast to hear why Gartner positions Oracle as a Leader in its Magic Quadrant for Continuous Controls Monitoring. Siddharth Sinha, Senior Director of GRC Product Strategy, unveils how Oracle GRC Controls monitors, enforces and optimizes critical processes within ERP applications, and reduce opportunities for fraud and error.

    Read the article

  • links for 2010-06-07

    - by Bob Rhubart
    Dynamic Data Lookup in a Business Process In the latest installment of the SOA Suite Essentials for WLI Users article series, Simone Geib shows how dynamic data can be retrieved at run-time in a business process through Domain Value Maps in SOA Suite and the similarities to an XML MetaData Cache control in Oracle WebLogic Integration. (tags: oracle soa weblogic)

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852  | Next Page >