Search Results

Search found 511 results on 21 pages for 'operational'.

Page 9/21 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • PeopleSoft Mobile Expenses and Mobile Approvals now available in FSCM 9.1

    - by Howard Shaw
    Oracle is pleased to announce the release of two new applications, PeopleSoft Mobile Expenses and PeopleSoft Mobile Approvals, which are now generally available in PeopleSoft FSCM 9.1. These are the first two of many upcoming applications designed and built to cater directly to the mobile workforce by providing user-friendly access to key business functions on a smartphone or tablet. Enter and Submit Expenses Anytime, Anywhere PeopleSoft Mobile Expenses provides the ability to enter employee expense reports quickly and easily, for busy travelers on the go. The contemporary, streamlined user interface is optimized for mobile devices (that support HTML 5), such as tablets or smartphones, and provides a simple-to-use tool for capturing expenses as they are being incurred, submitting expense reports while waiting at the airport, approving your employees’ expense reports, and more. And since it is part of the PeopleSoft Mobile Applications suite, you don’t have to wait until you return home or to the office, which can lead to improved efficiencies. The user interface and gesture actions (for example, swipe, touch, and so on) will be immediately familiar to mobile device users, and is specifically targeted to keep the experience as streamlined as possible for just the tasks you need to get to while on the go. In addition, PeopleSoft Mobile Expenses leverages all of the powerful expense policy compliance tools delivered by PeopleSoft Expenses, contributing to reduced spend and increased efficiency throughout your organization. PeopleSoft Mobile Expenses is integrated directly with PeopleSoft Mobile Approvals, so managers can quickly approve submitted expense reports in addition to entering or reviewing their own expenses. Manage Approvals Anytime, Anywhere PeopleSoft Mobile Approvals improves productivity and keeps business moving forward when your users are on the go without comprising business imperatives and operational policies. This innovative solution is delivered using the latest HTML 5 technology to allow customers to manage their critical tasks anytime through any device. PeopleSoft Approvals enables your users to approve transactions through the desktop, smart phones or tablet devices. This will speed up the approval process thus avoiding potential late payment penalties and supports early payment discounts for invoices. For more information, please watch the Video Feature Overviews (VFO) available on YouTube (links below) or contact your application sales representative. PeopleSoft Mobile ExpensesPeopleSoft Mobile Approvals The PeopleSoft Mobile Applications 9.1 documentation update for Bundle 23 is available under MOS Document ID 1495035.1.

    Read the article

  • Bandwidth sizing for simultaneous RDP sessions

    - by Gareth Marlow
    We're doing some DR scenario planning which will require up to 150 users to RDP into their desktop machines (mainly running Windows XP) over our VPN. We have a 2mbit uncontended internet connection at the moment but there's scope to upgrade this and also to use a secondary SDSL line to give us more bandwidth. Typical bandwidth figures I've seen suggest to plan for 64kbps per session, which works out to 9.6mbps in total. I'd like to know: Does anyone have any real-world data which would support these estimates? Are there any operational 'gotcha's that we need to be aware of? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Can't mount time capsule via wi-fi.

    - by Grnmntn
    I have an Apple time capsule, and have been able to back up to it without a problem for the past few months. However, today I found I cannot connect to the time capsule from Finder, though it appears there, when I click "connect as...", it takes a few seconds and then reports connect failed, "the server may not exist or it is not operational at this time. Check the server name or IP address and your network connection and try again". When I check Time Machine, it says the last backup failed because "the backup volume could not be mounted". The strange part is, the time capsule is also my router, and I am able to use the time capsule as a wireless access point without a problem. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Designing a Content-Based ETL Process with .NET and SFDC

    - by Patrick
    As my firm makes the transition to using SFDC as our main operational system, we've spun together a couple of SFDC portals where we can post customer-specific documents to be viewed at will. As such, we've had the need for pseudo-ETL applications to be implemented that are able to extract metadata from the documents our analysts generate internally (most are industry-standard PDFs, XML, or MS Office formats) and place in networked "queue" folders. From there, our applications scoop of the queued documents and upload them to the appropriate SFDC CRM Content Library along with some select pieces of metadata. I've mostly used DbAmp to broker communication with SFDC (DbAmp is a Linked Server provider that allows you to use SQL conventions to interact with your SFDC Org data). I've been able to create [console] applications in C# that work pretty well, and they're usually structured something like this: static void Main() { // Load parameters from app.config. // Get documents from queue. var files = someInterface.GetFiles(someFilterOrRegexPattern); foreach (var file in files) { // Extract metadata from the file. // Validate some attributes of the file; add any validation errors to an in-memory // structure (e.g. List<ValidationErrors>). if (isValid) { var fileData = File.ReadAllBytes(file); // Upload using some wrapper for an ORM or DAL someInterface.Upload(fileData, meta.Param1, meta.Param2, ...); } else { // Bounce the file } } // Report any validation errors (via message bus or SMTP or some such). } And that's pretty much it. Most of the time I wrap all these operations in a "Worker" class that takes the needed interfaces as constructor parameters. This approach has worked reasonably well, but I just get this feeling in my gut that there's something awful about it and would love some feedback. Is writing an ETL process as a C# Console app a bad idea? I'm also wondering if there are some design patterns that would be useful in this scenario that I'm clearly overlooking. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • See Oracle GoldenGate 11g R2 Unveiled at Oracle OpenWorld

    - by Oracle OpenWorld Blog Team
    Oracle OpenWorld 2012 promises to be bigger than ever when it comes to Data Integration. The Data Integration track is full of product release updates, deep dives into key features, and customer presentations. Oracle GoldenGate 11g ’s latest release features will be presented in multiple sessions. In addition, customers, such as Raymond James, Comcast, Paychex, Ticketmaster, Bank of America, St. Jude Medical, Turk Telekom, Ross, and Aderas will present their projects with data integration products. Last but not least, hands-on-labs will cover deep dives into Oracle GoldenGate and introductions to key products such as Oracle Data Integrator and Oracle Enterprise Data Quality.Catch these must-see Data Integration sessions taking place at Moscone West 3005:·    Future Strategy, Direction, and Roadmap of Oracle’s Data Integration Platform: Monday, October 1 at 10:45 a.m.·    Real-Time Data Integration with Oracle Data Integrator at Raymond James: Monday, October 1 at 4:45 p.m.·    Real-World Operational Reporting with Oracle GoldenGate - Customer Panel: Tuesday, October 2 at 11:45 a.m.To stay in touch about the details and announcements for Oracle Data Integration, check out the Data Integration blog.

    Read the article

  • Should we be able to deploy a single package to the SSIS Catalog?

    - by jamiet
    My buddy Sutha Thiru sent me an email recently asking about my opinion on a particular nuance of the project deployment model in SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) 2012 and I’d like to share my response as I think it warrants a wider discussion. Sutha asked: Jamie What is your take on this? http://www.mattmasson.com/index.php/2012/07/can-i-deploy-a-single-ssis-package-from-my-project-to-the-ssis-catalog/ Overnight I was talking to Matt who confirmed that they got no plans to change the deployment model. For example if we have following scenrio how do we do deploy? Sprint 1 Pkg1, 2 & 3 has been developed and deployed to UAT. Once signed off its been deployed to Live. Sprint 2 Pkg 4 & 5 been developed. During this time users raised a bug on Pkg2. We want to make the change to Pkg2 and deploy that to UAT and eventually to LIVE without releasing Pkg 4 &5. How do we do it? Matt pointed me to his blog entry which I have seen before . http://www.mattmasson.com/index.php/2012/02/thoughts-on-branching-strategies-for-ssis-projects/ Thanks Sutha My response: Personally, even though I've experienced the exact problem you just outlined, I agree with the current approach. I steadfastly believe that there should not be a way for an unscrupulous developer to slide in a new version of a package under the covers. Deploying .ispac files brings a degree of rigour to your operational processes. Yes, that means that we as SSIS developers are going to have to get better at using source control and branching properly but that is no bad thing in my opinion. Claiming to be proper "developers" is a bit of a cheap claim if we don't even do the fundamentals correctly. I would be interested in the thoughts of others who have used the project deployment model. Do you agree with my point of view? @Jamiet

    Read the article

  • EPPM Webcast Series Part II: Build – Consistently delivering successful projects to ensure financial success

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
    Oracle Primavera invites you to the second in a series of three webcasts linking Enterprise Project Portfolio Management with enhanced operational performance and better financial results. Join us for the next installment of our 'Plan, Build, Operate' webcast series, as we look to address the challenges organizations face during the execution phase of their projects. Webcast II: Build – Consistently delivering successful projects to ensure financial success. This webcast will look at Three key questions: How do you maintain consistency in delivery whilst maintaining visibility and control? How do you deal with project risk and mitigation strategies? How do you ensure accurate reporting? Hear from Geoff Roberts, Industry Strategist from Oracle Primavera. Geoff will look at how solutions can help to address the challenges around: Visibility and governance Communication and complex coordination Collecting and reporting progress Measuring and reporting It is imperative that organizations understand the impact projects can have on their business. Attend this webcast and understand how consistently delivering successful projects is vital to the financial success of an asset intensive organisation. Register today! Please forward this invite to your colleagues who you think may benefit from attending.

    Read the article

  • MySQL Workbench sends computer name with login not IP

    - by Android Addict
    I am attempting to connect MySQLWorkbench to a remote MySQL Server. The server has granted access to user@IPAddress However, when I try to connect MySQLWorkbench, it sends user@computername instead. How do I configure the connection to use the IP address instead in MySQLWorkbench? Reference: The remote server is on the local network, so I need to use the local IP address assigned to my client. EDIT What I have tried so far: from the server: mysql -u user@IPAddress -p --host=(ServerIPAddress) Returns: mysql> So that tells me the user account is operational. Furthermore, I confirmed it exists using: select user from mysql.user; returning a table of all users, of which the user I am using is present. I have also opened the port 3306: sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -s clientIPAddress -p tcp --destination-port3306 -j ACCEPT Still I encounter Access Denied

    Read the article

  • Let's introduce the Oracle Enterprise Data Quality family!

    - by Sarah Zanchetti
    The Oracle Enterprise Data Quality family of products helps you to achieve maximum value from their business applications by delivering fit-­for-­purpose data. OEDQ is a state-of-the-art collaborative data quality profiling, analysis, parsing, standardization, matching and merging product, designed to help you understand, improve, protect and govern the quality of the information your business uses, all from a single integrated environment. Oracle Enterprise Data Quality products are: Oracle Enterprise Data Quality Profile and Audit Oracle Enterprise Data Quality Parsing and Standardization Oracle Enterprise Data Quality Match and Merge Oracle Enterprise Data Quality Address Verification Server Oracle Enterprise Data Quality Product Data Parsing and Standardization Oracle Enterprise Data Quality Product Data Match and Merge Also, the following are some of the key features of OEDQ: Integrated data profiling, auditing, cleansing and matching Browser-based client access Ability to handle all types of data – for example customer, product, asset, financial, operational Connection to any JDBC-compliant data sources and targets Multi-user project support (role-based access, issue tracking, process annotation, and version control) Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) - support for designing processes that may be exposed to external applications as a service Designed to process large data volumes A single repository to hold data along with gathered statistics and project tracking information, with shared access Intuitive graphical user interface designed to help you solve real-world information quality issues quickly Easy, data-led creation and extension of validation and transformation rules Fully extensible architecture allowing the insertion of any required custom processing  If you need to learn more about EDQ, or get assistance for any kind of issue, the Oracle Technology Network offers a huge range of resources on Oracle software. Discuss technical problems and solutions on the Discussion Forums. Get hands-on step-by-step tutorials with Oracle By Example. Download Sample Code. Get the latest news and information on any Oracle product. You can also get further help and information with Oracle software from: My Oracle Support Oracle Support Services An Information Center is available, where you can find technical information and fast solutions to the most common already solved issues: Information Center: Oracle Enterprise Data Quality [ID 1555073.2]

    Read the article

  • How to calculate turn heading to a missile?

    - by Tony
    I have a missile that is shot from a ship at an angle, the missile then turns towards the target in an arc with a given turn radius. How do I determine the point on the arc when I need to start turning so the missile is heading straight for the target? EDIT What I need to do before I launch the missiles is calculate and draw the flight paths. So in the attached example the launch vehicle has a heading of 90 deg and the targets are behind it. Both missiles are launched at a relative heading of -45deg or + 45 deg to the launch vehicle's heading. The missiles initially turn towards the target with a known turn radius. I have to calculate the point at which the turn takes the missile to heading at which it will turn to directly attack the target. Obviously if the target is at or near 45 degrees then there is no initial turn the missile just goes straight for the target. After the missile is launched the map will also show the missile tracking on this line as indication of its flight path. What I am doing is working on a simulator which mimics operational software. So I need to draw the calculated flight path before I allow the missile to be launched. In this example the targets are behind the launch vehicle but the precalculated paths are drawn.

    Read the article

  • ArchBeat Link-o-Rama for 11/18/2011

    - by Bob Rhubart
    IT executives taking lead role with both private and public cloud projects: survey | Joe McKendrick "The survey, conducted among members of the Independent Oracle Users Group, found that both private and public cloud adoption are up—30% of respondents report having limited-to-large-scale private clouds, up from 24% only a year ago. Another 25% are either piloting or considering private cloud projects. Public cloud services are also being adopted for their enterprises by more than one out of five respondents." - Joe McKendrick SOA all the Time; Architects in AZ; Clearing Info Integration Hurdles This week on the Architect Home Page on OTN. OIM 11g OID (LDAP) Groups Request-Based Provisioning with custom approval – Part I | Alex Lopez Iin part one of a two-part blog post, Alex Lopez illustrates "an implementation of a Custom Approval process and a Custom UI based on ADF to request entitlements for users which in turn will be converted to Group memberships in OID." ArchBeat Podcast Information Integration - Part 3/3 "Oracle Information Integration, Migration, and Consolidation" author Jason Williamson, co-author Tom Laszeski, and book contributor Marc Hebert talk about upcoming projects and about what they've learned in writing their book. InfoQ: Enterprise Shared Services and the Cloud | Ganesh Prasad As an industry, we have converged onto a standard three-layered service model (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) to describe cloud computing, with each layer defined in terms of the operational control capabilities it offers. This is unlike enterprise shared services, which have unique characteristics around ownership, funding and operations, and they span SaaS and PaaS layers. Ganesh Prasad explores the differences. Stress Testing Oracle ADF BC Applications - Do Connection Pooling and TXN Disconnect Level Oracle ACE Director Andrejus Baranovskis describes "how jbo.doconnectionpooling = true and jbo.txn.disconnect_level = 1 properties affect ADF application performance." Exploring TCP throughput with DTrace | Alan Maguire "According to the theory," says Maguire, "when the number of unacknowledged bytes for the connection is less than the receive window of the peer, the path bandwidth is the limiting factor for throughput."

    Read the article

  • ArchBeat Link-o-Rama for 2012-03-29

    - by Bob Rhubart
    A surefire recipe for cloud failure | @DavidLinthicum www.infoworld.com "Foundational planning for the use of cloud computing is an architectural problem," says David Linthicum. "You need to consider the enterprise holistically, starting with the applications, data, services, and storage. Understand where it is and what it does." Validating an Oracle IDM Environment (including a Fusion Apps build out) | Brian Eidelman fusionsecurity.blogspot.com Brian Eidelman shows how to "validate an Oracle Identity Management build out containing OID, OVD, OIM, and OAM." Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center 12c Launch - Interactive Webcast and Live Chat www.oracle.com Thursday, April 12, 2012. 9 a.m. PT / 12 p.m. ET / 4 p.m. GMT. Learn how your enterprise cloud can achieve 10x improved performance and 12x operational agility. Includes demo session. Speakers: Steve Wilson (VP Systems Management, Oracle) John Fowler (Exec VP Systems, Oracle) Brad Cameron (VP Development, Oracle Fusion Middleware) Bill Nesheim (VP Oracle Solaris) Dennis Reno (VP Customer Portal Experience, Oracle) Mike Wookey (Chief Architect, Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center) Prasad Pai (Sr Director, Oracle Enterprise Manager Ops Center) 2012 Real World Performance Tour Dates |Performance Tuning | Performance Engineering www.ioug.org Coming to your town: a full day of real world database performance with Tom Kyte, Andrew Holdsworth, and Graham Wood. Rochester, NY - March 8 Los Angeles, CA - April 30 Orange County, CA - May 1 Redwood Shores, CA - May 3 Thought for the Day "At first sight, the idea of any rules or principles being superimposed on the creative mind seems more likely to hinder than to help, but this is quite untrue in practice. Disciplined thinking focuses inspiration rather than blinkers it." — G. L. Glegg

    Read the article

  • Oracle Brings Analytics to Project Management

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
    Excerpt from PROFIT - ORACLE - by Alison Weiss  Nonprofit and for-profit organizations have many differences, but there is one way they are alike—managers struggle with huge amounts of data generated every day. Project data by itself has limited use—but any organization that can gain insight to make accurate predictions or to use resources more effectively can gain an operational advantage. Oracle’s Primavera P6 Analytics 2.0 business intelligence solution enables organizations using Oracle’s Primavera P6 Professional Project Management to do just that: identify critical issues and uncover trends in stores of project data. Primavera P6 Analytics provides management with the ability to look at not only how a single effort is progressing, but also how the entire organization is doing from a project perspective. The latest release includes new features that make it even easier to gather and analyze critical information. For example, the addition of geocoding gives Primavera P6 Analytics users the ability to track resources geographically on longitude and latitude and use a map to get an overall view of how projects, programs, and activities are deployed. “A nonprofit with relief projects in Vietnam, for example, can drill down to the project and get a world view and a regional view,” says Yasser Mahmud, vice president of product strategy and industry marketing in Oracle’s Primavera Global Business Unit. “Then they can drill down further to show statistics; key performance indicators; and how that program, portfolio, or project work is actually getting done.” The addition of new mobile capabilities to Primavera P6 Analytics puts deep-dive analysis into project managers’ hands with compatibility with major tablet operating systems. Now, nonprofits or for-profits working in remote locations can provide real-time visibility into projects to alert management if issues are occurring that need to be addressed immediately. “Primavera P6 Analytics generates information that can help organizations improve their utilization and trim down overall operating costs,” says Mahmud. “But more importantly, it gives organizations improved visibility.”

    Read the article

  • Hill International Wins Oracle Eco-Enterprise Innovation Award

    - by Evelyn Neumayr
    In my last blog entry, I discussed Oracle’s Eco-Enterprise Innovation Award, part of the Oracle Excellence awards. Nominations for this year’s awards are due July 17. These awards are presented to organizations that use Oracle products to reduce their environmental footprint while improving their operational efficiency. One of last year’s winners was Hill International. Engineering News-Record magazine recently ranked Hill as the eighth-largest construction management firm in the United States. Hill International was able to streamline its forecasting and improve its visibility into its construction projects’ productivity and profitability using Oracle Primavera. They also implemented Oracle Hyperion Financial Management to standardize its financial reporting and forecasting processes and support its decision-making. With Oracle, Hill gained visibility into the true productivity of each project and cut its financial reporting cycle time from two weeks to one. The company also used the data generated to support new construction project proposals and determine the profitability of potential projects. Hill International realized significant cost savings and reduced its environmental impact on its US$400 million Comcast Center construction project in Philadelphia by centralizing its data storage, reducing paper usage, and maximizing project efficiency. It also leveraged the increased visibility offered by the Oracle solutions to make more environmentally-sound business decisions regarding on-site demolition, re-use of previous structures, green design of new facilities, procurement, and materials usage. See more about Hill International and the other Eco-Enterprise Innovation award winners here.  

    Read the article

  • Spotlight: How Scandinavia's Largest Nuclear Power Plant Increased Productivity and Reduced Costs wi

    - by [email protected]
    Ringhals nuclear power plant, which is part of the Vattenfall Group, is located about 60 km south-west of the beautiful coastal city of Gothenburg in Sweden. A deep concern to reduce environmental impact coupled with an effort to increase plant safety and operational efficiency have led to a recent surge in investments and initiatives around plant modification and plant optimization at Ringhals. A multitude of challenges were faced by the users in various groups that were involved in these projects. First, it was very difficult for users to easily access complex and layered asset and engineering information, which was critical to increased productivity and completing projects on time. Moreover, the 20 or so different solutions that were being used to view various document formats, not only resulted in collaboration complexity but also escalated IT administration costs and woes. Finally, there was a considerable non-engineering community comprising non-CAD specialists that needed easy access to plant data in an effort to minimize engineering disruption. Oracle's AutoVue significantly simplified the ability to efficiently view and use digital asset information by providing a standardized visualization solution for the enterprise. The key benefits achieved by Ringhals include: Increased productivity of plant optimization and plant modification by 3% Saved around $ 500 K annually Cut IT maintenance costs by 50% by using a single solution Reduced engineering disruption by allowing non-CAD users easy access to digital plant data The complete case-study can be found here

    Read the article

  • Dealing with the customer / developer culture mismatch on an agile project

    - by Eric Smith
    One of the tenets of agile is ... Customer collaboration over contract negotiation ... another one is ... Individuals and interactions over processes and tools But the way I see it, at least when it comes to interaction with the customer, there is a fundamental problem: How the customer thinks is fundamentally different to how a software engineer thinks That may be a bit of a generalisation, yes. Arguably, there are business domains where this is not necessarily true---these are few and far between though. In many domains though, the typical customer is: Interested in daily operational concerns--short-range tactics ... not strategy; Only concerned with the immediate solution; Generally one-dimensional, non-abstract thinkers; Primarily interested in "getting the job done" as opposed to coming up with a lasting, quality solution. On the other hand, software engineers who practice agile are: Professionals who value quality; Individuals who understand the notion of "more haste less speed" i.e., spending a little more time to do things properly will save lots of time down the road; Generally, very experienced analytical thinkers. So very clearly, there is a natural culture discrepancy that tends to inhibit "customer collaboration". What's the best way to address this?

    Read the article

  • Webcast Tomorrow: Securing the Cloud for Public Sector

    - by Darin Pendergraft
    Securing the Cloud for Public Sector Click here, to register for the live webcast. Cloud computing offers government organizations tremendous potential to enhance public value by helping organizations increase operational efficiency and improve service delivery. However, as organizations pursue cloud adoption to achieve the anticipated benefits a common set of questions have surfaced. “Is the cloud secure? Are all clouds equal with respect to security and compliance? Is our data safe in the cloud?” Join us December 12th for a webcast as part of the “Secure Government Training Series” to get answers to your pressing cloud security questions and learn how to best secure your cloud environments. You will learn about a comprehensive set of security tools designed to protect every layer of an organization’s cloud architecture, from application to disk, while ensuring high levels of compliance, risk avoidance, and lower costs. Discover how to control and monitor access, secure sensitive data, and address regulatory compliance across cloud environments by: providing strong authentication, data encryption, and (privileged) user access control to ensure that information is only accessible to those who need it mitigating threats across your databases and applications protecting applications and information – no matter where it is – at rest, in use and in transit For more information, access the Secure Government Resource Center or to speak with an Oracle representative, please call1.800.ORACLE1. LIVE Webcast Securing the Cloud for Public Sector Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 Time: 2:00 p.m. ET Visit the Secure Government Resource CenterClick here for information on enterprise security solutions that help government safeguard information, resources and networks. ACCESS NOW Copyright © 2012, Oracle. All rights reserved. Contact Us | Legal Notices | Privacy Statement

    Read the article

  • Drive project success & financial performance with business critical Enterprise Project Portfolio Management

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
    Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} Oracle Primavera invites you to the first in a series of three webcasts linking Enterprise Project Portfolio Management with enhanced operational performance and better financial results. Few organizations fully understand the impact projects have on their business. Consistently delivering successful projects is vital to the financial success of an asset intensive organization. Enterprise Project Portfolio Management (EPPM) is not a new concept yet for many organizations it is not considered "business critical". Webcast 1: Plan – Aligning project selection and prioritization with corporate objectives This webcast will look at 2 key questions: Are you aligning portfolio decisions with strategic objectives? How do you effectively measure the success of your portfolio decisions? Hear from Accenture who'll present a compelling case for why asset intensive organizations should consider EPPM as business critical. They'll explore: How technology is being used to enhance project delivery How collaboration enhances delivery performance The major challenges associated with the planning phase of a project Next hear from Geoff Roberts, Industry Strategist from Oracle Primavera. With over 30 years experience in project management/project controls in the construction, utilities and oil & gas sectors, Geoff will investigate how EPPM is a best practice and can support an organization through project selection and prioritization ensuring that decisions are aligned with corporate objectives. Don’t miss out, register today!

    Read the article

  • Oracle nomeada pela Forrester Leader em Enterprise Business Intelligence Platforms

    - by Paulo Folgado
    According to an October 2010 report from independent analyst firm Forrester Research, Inc., Oracle is a leader in enterprise business intelligence (BI) platforms. Forrester Research defines BI as a set of methodologies, processes, architectures, and technologies that transform raw data into meaningful and useful information, which can then be used to enable more effective strategic, tactical, and operational insights and decision-making. Written by Forrester vice president and principal analyst Boris Evelson, The Forrester Wave: Enterprise Business Intelligence Platforms, Q4 2010 states that "Oracle has built new metadata-level [Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 11g] integration with Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle Fusion Applications and continues to differentiate with its versatile ROLAP engine." The report goes on, "And in addition to closing some gaps it had in 10.x versions such as lack of RIA functionality, [the Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 11g] actually leapfrogs the competition with the Common Enterprise Information Model (CEIM)--including the ability to define actions and execute processes right from BI metadata across BI and ERP applications." "We're pleased that the Forrester Wave recognizes Oracle Business Intelligence as a leading enterprise BI platform," said Paul Rodwick, vice president of product management, Oracle Business Intelligence. Key Innovations in Oracle Business Intelligence 11g Released in August 2010, Oracle Business Intelligence 11g represents the industry's most complete, integrated, and scalable suite of BI products. Encompassing thousands of new features and enhancements, the latest release offers three key areas of innovations. * A unified environment. The industry's first unified environment for accessing and analyzing data across relational, OLAP, and XML data sources. * Enhanced usability. A new, integrated scorecard application, plus innovations in reporting, visualization, search, and collaboration. * Enhanced performance, scalability, and security. Deeper integration with Oracle Enterprise Manager 11g and other components of Oracle Fusion Middleware provide lower management costs and increased performance, scalability, and security. Read the entire Forrester Wave Report.

    Read the article

  • Out-of-the-Box Integration Links Primavera Solutions with PeopleSoft Projects Applications

    - by Sylvie MacKenzie, PMP
    In a move that brings best-in-class enterprise project portfolio management to Oracle’s PeopleSoft enterprise resource planning customers, Oracle announced the integration of Oracle’s PeopleSoft projects applications and Oracle’s Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management. The combination of PeopleSoft financial controls and Primavera portfolio management capabilities brings greater oversight of end-to-end processes to help organizations improve the planning and execution efforts needed to deliver projects on time and within budget. “As an organization with many high-value, project-driven initiatives, we are very pleased to see Oracle’s investment in this important integration,” says Janardhanan Sankar, senior vice president for technology and quality at ITC Infotech India Ltd. Oracle’s PeopleSoft projects applications enable project-centric organizations and departments to establish core operational processes for full project lifecycle management across operations and finance. The integration with Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management means organizations can eliminate costly and difficult-to-maintain proprietary integrations. Organizations can also standardize on the Oracle technologies to Align back-office budgets and costs with project operations to help ensure accurate forecasting of costs, resources, and schedules Provide an accurate single source of truth to financial managers and analysts using Oracle’s PeopleSoft projects applications, and to project managers using Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management  Enhance project collaboration and execution by having all users utilizing common solutions to communicate, plan, and deliver projects “By bringing together Oracle’s PeopleSoft projects applications and Oracle’s Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management, we are able to provide customers with the infrastructure they need to achieve a single source of truth on the projects they are managing,” says Paco Aubrejuan, Oracle’s group vice president and general manager, PeopleSoft. “This real-time visibility drives profitability, increases productivity, and improves operations.” For more information, view the on-demand Webcast, “Bridging Business Processes for Optimal Portfolio Performance,” or read about the new integration.

    Read the article

  • Windows XP waits for usb drive on almost every operation.

    - by Tomasz Kowalczyk
    Hello everyone, I have a problem with my Windows XP operating system, particularly with the USB device that is plugged in - 1TB WD My Book external drive. I haven't found any information about such behaviour when searching in Internet, so I have to ask You. The problem is: when I am using computer, especially during work (programming), when I try to access any information on a hard disk ("internal" one), Windows seems to "consult" it with the external drive. For example, when I open file selection dialog window, if I try to change directory, system activates external drive, reads something (I hear the disk's operational noise) and after some seconds of such pause it makes the operations I requested. There are many situations in which I can reproduce this behavior - opening My Computer, shutting down system, opening partition folder from My Computer - every operation involves the usage of external drive. Please understand me properly - this is not something that happens EVERY time, but at least "many" times a day. What causes such behavior and how can I "turn off" external drive when it's not needed? Thanks in advance for your answers.

    Read the article

  • How To: Modernize IBM AIX/Power To Oracle Solaris/SPARC

    - by Cinzia Mascanzoni
    Learn how to leverage the Modernizing IBM AIX/Power to Oracle Solaris/SPARC Program, to assist you in migrating IBM AIX/Power customers to the Oracle Solaris/SPARC platform.  Customers will find Oracle Solaris/SPARC solutions an ideal long-term platform, providing greatly significantly reduced capital and operational cost savings and greatly improved performance and productivity. Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

    Read the article

  • Podcast Show Notes: By Any Other Name: Governance and Architecture

    - by Bob Rhubart
    The OTN ArchBeat Podcast returns from a brief summer hiatus with a three-part conversation about IT architecture and governance. My guests for this conversation are Eric Stephens , an Oracle Enterprise architect and a frequent guest on this program. Joining Eric on the panel is Tim Hall , Senior Director of product management for the Oracle Enterprise Repository, Oracle Service Registry, and Oracle Application Integration Architecture. Tim made his first appearance on ArchBeat as panelist on the recent program featuring Thomas Erl. The Conversation Listen to Part 1:Why it's important to revive the dormant conversation about IT governance. Listen to Part 2 (Sept 19): Balancing functional, technical, operational requirements to meet the challenge of defining appropriate governance "guardrails." Listen to Part 3 (Sept 26): Bringing IT architecture out of the ivory tower to make governance a less intimidating, more collaborative process. Additional Resources Leveraging Governance to Sustain Enterprise Architecture Efforts, an Oracle white paper by Eric Stephens. SOA, Cloud, and Service Technologies, a transcript of an ArchBeat interview with Thomas Erl, Tim Hall, and Demed L'Her, in which Tim says the following about governance: "For a long time people have argued that SOA governance is sort of an awkward name, no one wanted to be audited. There's 50% of the world that think, yes, we're going to have to tops down initiative to address this and there's 50% of the world that says that it feels like a heavy weight process that I want no part of. So what I think we should do is change the name…"

    Read the article

  • RHEL Cluster FAIL after changing time on system

    - by Eugene S
    I've encountered a strange issue. I had to change the time on my Linux RHEL cluster system. I've done it using the following command from the root user: date +%T -s "10:13:13" After doing this, some message appeared relating to <emerg> #1: Quorum Dissolved however I didn't capture it completely. In order to investigate the issue I looked at /var/log/messages and I've discovered the following: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering GATHER state from 0. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Creating commit token because I am the rep. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Storing new sequence id for ring 354 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering COMMIT state. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering RECOVERY state. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] position [0] member 192.168.1.49: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] previous ring seq 848 rep 192.168.1.49 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] aru 61 high delivered 61 received flag 1 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Did not need to originate any messages in recovery. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Sending initial ORF token Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] CLM CONFIGURATION CHANGE Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] New Configuration: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.49) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Left: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.51) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Joined: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CMAN ] quorum lost, blocking activity Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] CLM CONFIGURATION CHANGE Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] New Configuration: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.49) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Left: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Joined: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [SYNC ] This node is within the primary component and will provide service. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering OPERATIONAL state. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a kernel: dlm: closing connection to node 2 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] got nodejoin message 192.168.1.49 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a clurgmgrd[25809]: <emerg> #1: Quorum Dissolved Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CPG ] got joinlist message from node 1 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Cluster is not quorate. Refusing connection. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Error while processing connect: Connection refused Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Invalid descriptor specified (-21). Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Someone may be attempting something evil. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Error while processing disconnect: Invalid request descriptor Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering GATHER state from 9. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Creating commit token because I am the rep. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Storing new sequence id for ring 358 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering COMMIT state. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering RECOVERY state. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] position [0] member 192.168.1.49: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] previous ring seq 852 rep 192.168.1.49 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] aru f high delivered f received flag 1 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] position [1] member 192.168.1.51: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] previous ring seq 852 rep 192.168.1.51 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] aru f high delivered f received flag 1 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Did not need to originate any messages in recovery. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] Sending initial ORF token Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] CLM CONFIGURATION CHANGE Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] New Configuration: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.49) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Left: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Joined: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] CLM CONFIGURATION CHANGE Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] New Configuration: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.49) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.51) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Left: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] Members Joined: Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] #011r(0) ip(192.168.1.51) Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [SYNC ] This node is within the primary component and will provide service. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [TOTEM] entering OPERATIONAL state. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [MAIN ] Node chb_sfe2a not joined to cman because it has existing state Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] got nodejoin message 192.168.1.49 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CLM ] got nodejoin message 192.168.1.51 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CPG ] got joinlist message from node 1 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a openais[25715]: [CPG ] got joinlist message from node 2 Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Cluster is not quorate. Refusing connection. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Error while processing connect: Connection refused Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Invalid descriptor specified (-111). Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Someone may be attempting something evil. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Error while processing get: Invalid request descriptor Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Invalid descriptor specified (-21). Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Someone may be attempting something evil. Mar 22 16:40:42 hsmsc50sfe1a ccsd[25705]: Error while processing disconnect: Invalid request descriptor How could this be related to the time change procedure I performed?

    Read the article

  • OpenWorld Session: BPM Analytics - Process Dashboards, BAM and Intelligent Optimization

    - by Ajay Khanna
    Blog Contributed by Payal Srivastava, Oracle Product Mamagement   Margin of error for the business is shrinking dramatically. Business needs to accomplish more with less i.e. minimal investment with quick ROI. Learn how you can leverage Oracle BPM suite and complementary technologies to create a robust analytics capability to provide visibility into operations to  C-level executives and Operational managers. We will talk about BPM analytics options available today that will not only enhance the visibility but allow you to intelligently optimize the business process at design time as well as run time.  The session will share some exciting this on our roadmap.  Come meet with the Oracle team members  from Product Development (Avinash Dabholkar , Eric Hsiao) and Product Management (Payal Srivastava) at the session. We would like to hear  your questions/comments about  our offering and roadmap. BPM Analytics: Process Dashboards, BAM and Intelligent Optimization, Moscone South 308, 10/3/12 @11:45am – CON 8598

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >