Search Results

Search found 18761 results on 751 pages for 'lot'.

Page 90/751 | < Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >

  • Get More Traffic by Integrating SEO Techniques

    Many SEO techniques can generate good site traffic. Some webmasters however choose to apply these methods separately. This is perhaps because of the belief that some options are better than others. In a lot of cases though, a fully integrated campaign makes better sense.

    Read the article

  • How to Choose the Best Affordable SEO Firm

    One of the most complex parts in having a website is choosing the best affordable SEO firm that offers services in bringing traffic to your website. You need to be very careful in your choice because a mistake could cost you a lot.

    Read the article

  • Setting Up a Backlink Campaign

    When you're setting about a backlink campaign, you have to make sure that you have some sort of plan implemented. Some types of backlinks have a lot more power than normal backlinks.

    Read the article

  • Making Your First Website

    Making your own website is not as hard as you might think. I know it can be very intimidating at first, but for beginners and newcomers to the internet it may seem like a lot to learn (can be very intimidating at first). I know it was for me.

    Read the article

  • Invest on a Dynamic Website

    Nowadays, the challenge for good programmers to create a highly dynamic website is really high. A lot of people have learned the value of owning a website especially for online business owners.

    Read the article

  • Local SEO Today

    There are so many Local SEO companies who are willing to help you on your website problems such as search engine rankings and gaining more clicks and visitors for your website. A lot of search engine optimization companies do offer their services to small business companies in order to lend them a helping hand in increasing their search engine rankings in Google and other search engine websites.

    Read the article

  • 'Linux is Not User Friendly' - No Way!

    <b>Tech Drive-In:</b> "In our previous post, we discussed how mainstream media is adopting linux('Stop using Windows, Use Ubuntu instead'). And a lot of people started complaining how not-user-friendly Linux really is."

    Read the article

  • This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your

    - by WebDude
    I am having a highly annoying problem on Windows 7 with Microsoft Outlook 2007. Whenever I click on any hyperlinks I am present with the message This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator and let's not forget the most ear-piecing "DING" to accompany this wonderful informative message. Now I have searched the web high and low for a solution here and most sources suggest the same solution of resetting your IE as your default browser. Tried .. failed A lot of sources suggest this has something to do with installing and uninstalling chrome. I have never installed Chrome but am actually consdering this to see if it by some chance fixes my computer. A lot of sources also point to a microsoft kb article 325478 which is focused around Windows XP and totally unrelated to my problem. I see there are some other queries on SuperUser with no resolution. Please can someone help solve this highly annoying issue. I am running Window 7 professional x64 Microsoft Office 2007 Microsoft Security Essentials Running in a windows work group with default policy settings HELP!

    Read the article

  • SQL Server: How to shrink FileStream files?

    - by J4N
    For a project, I'm using a SQL Server 2008 R2. One table has a filestream column. I've made some load tests, and now the database has ~20GB used. I've empty tables, except several(configuration tables). But my database was still using a lot of space. So I used the Task -> Shrink -> Database / Files But my database is still using something like 16GB. I found that it's the filestream file is still using a lot of space. The problem is that I need to backup this database to export it on the final production server, and event if I indicate to compress the backup I got a file more than 3.5Go. Not convenient to store and upload. And I'm planning much bigger test, so I want to know how to shrink that empty space. When I'm trying: I get this exception: The properties SIZE, MAXSIZE, or FILEGROWTH cannot be specified for the FILESTREAM data file 'FileStreamFile'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 5509) So what should I do? I found several topics with this error but they was about removing the filestream column.

    Read the article

  • PDF Converter wanted: Convert 8.5*11 PDF images into 600*800px PDF images for the Nook

    - by Astro
    I have PDF files that are maritime charts, For example this one from the Delaware Bay http://ocsdata.ncd.noaa.gov/BookletChart/12304_BookletChart_HomeEd.pdf There is a lot of detailed information in the image. When I show them on a monitor the details are shown. When I put them on the Nook they are sized to fit the Nook screen (about 3*5) and all the details are lost. Since the Nook pdf reader does not have a zoom feature, the charts are unreadable. I'd like to convert them to fit on the Nook screen(600*800px). This means the images would need to be sliced into multiple images. (ie a single image (page) would get split into 5 rows and 4 columns) In a perfect world they would get converted with a slight overlap, left to right, top to bottom. I could then page through the smaller slices to find the section I need. I had used PaperCrop in the past to convert two col PDF's (highly recommended) but it can't do anything with the images. ImageMagick does a lot with combining images, but I didn't see any split options to split the image into tiles. Windows program preferred. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Problem with apache + ssl: length mismatch error and ocasional bad request

    - by Ruben Garat
    we migrated a server from slicehost to linode recently, we copied the config from one server to the other. Everything works perfectly except that we get: Occasional errors with "Bad Request", this error is not common, you can use it all day and not see it, and the next day it will happen a lot. apart from that, a lot of the time, event though the request works fine we get some errors. using ssldump we get: New TCP connection #1: myip(39831) <-> develserk(443) 1 1 0.2316 (0.2316) C>S SSLv2 compatible client hello Version 3.1 cipher suites Unknown value 0x39 Unknown value 0x38 Unknown value 0x35 TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA SSL2_CK_3DES Unknown value 0x33 Unknown value 0x32 Unknown value 0x2f SSL2_CK_RC2 TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 SSL2_CK_RC4 TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA SSL2_CK_DES TLS_DHE_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_DES40_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5 SSL2_CK_RC2_EXPORT40 TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 SSL2_CK_RC4_EXPORT40 1 2 0.2429 (0.0112) S>C Handshake ServerHello Version 3.1 session_id[32]= 9a 1e ae c4 5f df 99 47 97 40 42 71 97 eb b9 14 96 2d 11 ac c0 00 15 67 4e f3 7d 65 4e c4 30 e9 cipherSuite Unknown value 0x39 compressionMethod NULL 1 3 0.2429 (0.0000) S>C Handshake Certificate 1 4 0.2429 (0.0000) S>C Handshake ServerKeyExchange 1 5 0.2429 (0.0000) S>C Handshake ServerHelloDone 1 6 0.4965 (0.2536) C>S Handshake ClientKeyExchange 1 7 0.4965 (0.0000) C>S ChangeCipherSpec 1 8 0.4965 (0.0000) C>S Handshake 1 9 0.5040 (0.0075) S>C ChangeCipherSpec 1 10 0.5040 (0.0000) S>C Handshake ERROR: Length mismatch from the apache error.log [Fri Aug 27 14:50:05 2010] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1892): OpenSSL: I/O error, 5 bytes expected to read on BIO#b80c1e70 [mem: b8100918] the server is ubuntu 10.04.1 the apache version is 2.2.14-5ubuntu8 the openssl version is 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8

    Read the article

  • Alternative to robocopy /MIR

    - by Robin Day
    We run a number of web apps that store a lot of local data in small xml files. One part of our backup / recovery strategy is to produce a local mirror of the file system via a VPN to the hosting centre. The VPN connection is only via a 12Mbps ADSL and whilst there are a lot of files and directories, the actual number of files that changes is quite small. Although the bandwidth is probably an issue, I'm seeing results such as the output below. The robocopy /MIR took 5 hours to run yet only 30 mins to actually perform the copy. Does anyone have any suggestions as to ways to improve this. The 5 hours is now bordering on too slow and if we can't find a way to speed this up then we're going to have to come up with a completely different solution. Total Copied Skipped Mismatch FAILED Extras Dirs : 17625 6618 11007 0 0 0 Files : 1112430 1223 1111207 0 0 0 Bytes : 57.451 g 192.25 m 57.263 g 0 0 0 Times : 5:01:23 0:35:55 0:00:00 4:25:27 Speed : 93509 Bytes/sec. Speed : 5.350 MegaBytes/min. Ended : Fri Apr 16 05:54:23 2010

    Read the article

  • Stange stream of HTTP GET requests in apache logs, from amazon ec2 instances

    - by Alexandre Boeglin
    I just had a look at my apache logs, and I see a lot of very similar requests: GET / HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: curl/7.24.0 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) libcurl/7.24.0 \ NSS/3.13.5.0 zlib/1.2.5 libidn/1.18 libssh2/1.2.2 Host: [my_domain].org Accept: */* there's a steady stream of those, about 2 or 3 per minute; they all request the same domain and resource (there are slight variations in user agent version numbers); they come form a lot of different IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, in blocs that belong to amazon ec2 (in Singapore, Japan, Ireland and the USA). I tried to look for an explanation online, or even just similar stories, but couldn't find any. Has anyone got a clue as to what this is? It doesn't look malicious per say, but it's just annoying me, and I couldn't find any more information about it. I first suspected it could be a bot checking if my server is still up, but: I don't remember subscribing to such a service; why would it need to check my site twice every minute; why doesn't it use a clearly identifying fqdn. Or, should I send this question to amazon, via their abuse contact? Thanks!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >