Search Results

Search found 52899 results on 2116 pages for 'ado net'.

Page 1313/2116 | < Previous Page | 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320  | Next Page >

  • MVC3 application I want javascript methods to fire on passed in route values

    - by DavieDave
    I have an MVC3 application in Visual Studio 2010. I have a view with several dropdowns that do javascript calls to populate dropdowns based on the selected value, some of which are disabled initially. That all works great with the initial state of nothing. If I however pass routevalues to the dropdowns from a redirect to this action, I do get the value set correctly but it's not enabled like it should be on the dropdown for example and when I post the form, the ones that are greyed out are not passed back on the form. How can I correct this?

    Read the article

  • avoid caching of page in browser

    - by Shan
    I am using an iframe to show the child pages.In that one one particular page contains hidden div and i am showing it as a pop-up like thing with javascript by changing the visibility of the hidden div. Problem is before showing the hidden div , some manipulations are done at server level and I am calling the div from C# code after the manipulations like Page.ClientScript.RegisterStartupScript(GetType(), "MyKey", "javascript:OpenModelPopup('cb','cs');", true); so the page is getting posted back and the div is shown. after this, after going to next page if i click browser back it shows that page with that hidden div and on next click of browser back gives the page without hidden div. but I want to show only the initial stage of the page ie. without showing the hidden div that stage with hidden div should not be cached or it should not be shown on click of browser back.

    Read the article

  • When using out parameters in a function, is it good practice to initialize them in the function?

    - by adambox
    I have a function that uses out parameters to return multiple values to the caller. I would like to initialize them in the function, but I wasn't sure if that's a bad idea since you don't know when you call the function that it's going to change the values right away. The caller might assume that after the function returns, if whatever it was doing didn't work, the values would be whatever they were initialized to in the caller. Is it ok / good for me to initialize in the function? Example: public static void SomeFunction(int ixID, out string sSomething) { sSomething = ""; sSomething = something(ixID); if (sSomething = "") { somethingelse(); sSomething = "bar" } }

    Read the article

  • How to plot the graph(line) from a file in java?

    - by kiran
    I have a directory containing list of files. Those files have some list of values as x and y ordered as line by line. And my question is just I would like to read those files one by one and to plot line graphs based on those values. Could you please help me for that?

    Read the article

  • Add text into a desktop application

    - by John
    Hello, I would like to come up with a simple application that would add a specific phrase into a specific location on a desktop application. I assume this isn't very hard, but I'm kind of new. Any help?? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Redirect after refreshing update panel

    - by teebot.be
    Hello, Do you think it's possible to refresh an update panel and immediately after redirecting the response (for instance a download) ? I tried this: an invisible button - as an asyncpostbacktrigger a download button - when it is clicked the onclientclick clicks the invisible button the click event on the invisible button refreshes the update panel then the download button click event launches the download (normal postback which launches the download) However for some reason when the invisible button is clicked by the download button client script, it doesn't refresh the update panel.. Do you have an idea why it doesn't work? Or do you have other and cleaner techniques? Here's how the elements are declared: <asp:Button runat="server" ID="ButtonInvisible" Text="" Click="RefreshDisplay" /> <asp:Button runat="server" ID="ButtonDownload" Text="Download" OnClientClick="clickInvisible(this.id)" Click="Download" /><Triggers> <asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="ButtonInvisible" /></Triggers> //the javascript <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> function clickInvisible(idButton) { document.getElementById('ButtonInvisible').click(); }</script> ' //the methods Download(object source, EventArgs e){Response.Redirect("test.txt")} RefreshDisplay(object source, EventArgs e){ ButtonCancel.Enabled = false;}

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use AutoMapper to map methods?

    - by Woj
    I have two classes: public class TestClass1 { public int TestInt { get; set; } public void TestMethod() { // Do something } } public class TestClass2 { public int TestInt { get; set; } public void TestMethod() { // Do something } } I want to create interface that I can use for both classes. The easiest solution is to implement the interface on TestClass1 and TestClass2 but I don;t have access to the implementation of these classes (external dll). I was wondering if I can create new interface and use AutoMapper to map TestClass1 and TestClass2 to ITestInterface: public interface ITestInterface { int TestInt { get; set; } void TestMethod(); }

    Read the article

  • When using Sessions is bad thing, and whats wrong with it?

    - by Amr ElGarhy
    I know that in community server which means that you can't use Sessions, and few years ago i remember i was working on a website where we were not allowed to use sessions. In my point of view sessions are a very helpful tool if we managed how to use the right way, but is using session variable in a website is something bad, when its bad and when its not?

    Read the article

  • Best way to reverse a string in C# 2.0

    - by Guy
    I've just had to write a string reverse function in C# 2.0 (i.e. LINQ not available) and came up with this: public string Reverse(string text) { char[] cArray = text.ToCharArray(); string reverse = String.Empty; for (int i = cArray.Length - 1; i > -1; i--) { reverse += cArray[i]; } return reverse; } Personally I'm not crazy about the function and am convinced that there's a better way to do it. Is there?

    Read the article

  • add .js file as source in html file from server

    - by zeeshan
    I have an HTML file on my server, and a Javascript file on the same server. I want it so that when I load the HTML file, it will the reference of .js file placed on the server. I tried this way: <html> <head> <script type="text/javascript src="...server side path...."></script> </head> </html> but it is not working. Can any one tell me how I can do this?

    Read the article

  • How do I stop and empty tag in XML serializer?

    - by John
    I have an object like this, public class UserObj { public string First {get; set;} public string Last {get; set;} public addr Address {get; set;} } public class addr { public street {get; set;} public town {get; set;} } Now when I use XmlSerializer on it and street and town are empty I get this in the XML output, <Address /> Is there a way not to output this empty tag? Thanks

    Read the article

  • I need to add ranges and if a range is missed while adding i should display a message

    - by sabita
    EXAMPLE :if i add a range {1,10} and another range{15,20} i should get a message saying the ranges from 11 to 14 are missing. for (int i = 0; i < weightdata.Count; i++) { if ((i == 0 && i<weightdata.Count-1) && ((MaximumValue < weightdata[i].MinRange && BaseAmount < weightdata[i].BaseAmount)|| (MaximumValue>weightdata[i].MinRange && MaximumValue<weightdata[i+1].MinRange && BaseAmount>weightdata[i].BaseAmount &&BaseAmount>weightdata[i].BaseAmount))) { hdnflag.Value = ""; flag = false; if (weightdata[i].MinRange - MaximumValue > 1) { AlertMsg = string.Format(MinSpeedReqMsg.ErrorMessage, MaximumValue,weightdata[i].MinRange); flag = true; } break; } else if ((i == weightdata.Count - 1 && weightdata[i].MaxRange != null) && ((MinimumValue > weightdata[i].MaxRange && BaseAmount > weightdata[i].BaseAmount))) { hdnflag.Value = ""; flag = false; if (MinimumValue - weightdata[i].MaxRange > 1) { AlertMsg = string.Format(MinSpeedReqMsg.ErrorMessage, MaximumValue, weightdata[i].MinRange); flag = true; } break; } else if ((i > 0 && i < weightdata.Count - 1) && (MinimumValue > weightdata[i].MaxRange && MaximumValue < weightdata[i + 1].MinRange && MaximumValue > weightdata[i].MaxRange && BaseAmount > weightdata[i].BaseAmount && BaseAmount < weightdata[i + 1].BaseAmount)) { hdnflag.Value = ""; flag = false; if (MinimumValue - weightdata[i].MaxRange > 1) { AlertMsg =string.Format(MinSpeedReqMsg.ErrorMessage ,weightdata[i].MaxRange, MinimumValue); flag = true; } break; }

    Read the article

  • Why the only hidden field that is being filled from GET action is not being passed in model?

    - by user1807954
    Sorry for the long title, I didn't know how to make it any shorter. My code: My model: public class CarFilter { public String carMake { get; set; } public String carModel { get; set; } public String carEdition { get; set; } . . . public String SortBy { get; set; } } public class CarSearch : CarFilter { public List<Car> Car { get; set; } } My controller: public ActionResult SearchResult(CarSearch search) { var cars = from d in db.Cars select d; if (Request.HttpMethod == "POST") { search.SortBy = "Price"; } search.Car = new List<Car>(); search.Car.AddRange(cars); var temp = new List<CarSearch>(); temp.Add(search); return View(temp); } My Index view (where user filters results): @model IEnumerable<Cars.Models.CarSearch> @using (Html.BeginForm("SearchResult", "Home", FormMethod.Post)){..forms and other stuff..} My SearchResult view (where user sees the results of filtration): @model IEnumerable<Cars.Models.CarSearch> @using (Html.BeginForm("SearchResult", "Home", FormMethod.Get)) { @Html.Hidden("carMake") @Html.Hidden("carModel") @Html.Hidden("carEdition") . . . @Html.Hidden("SortBy", temp.SortBy) <input name="SortBy" class="buttons" type="submit" value="Make"/> My goal What I'm trying to do is when user clicked on sort by Make it will have to GET back all the variables in hidden field back to the SearchResult action in order to sort the result (same filtered results). Result Is: <input id="SortBy" name="SortBy" type="hidden" value=""/>. The value is null and it's not being passed but all the other hidden fields such as carMake and etc have value. But when I use foreach it works perfect. Question Why is this like this? the SortBy is in the same model class as other fields in the view. The only difference is that SortBy is not being filled in the Index view with other fields, instead it's being filled in controller action. What is the explanation for this? Am I missing any C# definition or something such as dynamic objects or something?

    Read the article

  • [Raise|Trigger|Fire|...] an event?!?

    - by winSharp93
    Hello, in a German programming forum we currently have a discussion about events and what you (grammatically) do with them. The MSDN talks about "Event Raising" and "to raise an event". Thus, this seems to be one possibility. Are there any other synonyms? What about "to trigger an event" and "to fire an event"? A Google search will bring results for all of the three possibilities. This, however, does not mean that they are correct, too, of course. Are they? Are there any (stylistic, ...) differences or are they used in different contexts? Many thanks in advance for ending a heated debate :-)

    Read the article

  • Imbedded wpf textbox does not accept input

    - by pro3carp3
    I put a wpf textbox inside a combobox to allow the user to enter a custom setting. I can read the keypress in the keydown event, but the text in the textbox does not change. What am I missing? <ComboBoxItem Name="GridSizeCustom"> <StackPanel Height="30" Orientation="Horizontal"> <TextBlock Text="Grid Size (8 - 200)" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Top" Margin="0" /> <TextBox Name="GridSizeBox" KeyDown="test" Width="50" /> </StackPanel> </ComboBoxItem> I step through this event handler when I press a key, but no change to the textbox text: public void test(Object sender, KeyboardEventArgs e) { int x = 0; } Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • autofac's Func<T> to resolve named service

    - by ppiotrowicz
    Given registered services: builder.RegisterType<Foo1>().Named<IFoo>("one").As<IFoo>(); builder.RegisterType<Foo2>().Named<IFoo>("two").As<IFoo>(); builder.RegisterType<Foo3>().Named<IFoo>("three").As<IFoo>(); Can I retrieve named implementations of IFoo interface by injecting something like Func<string, IFoo ? public class SomeClass(Func<string, IFoo> foo) { var f = foo("one"); Debug.Assert(f is Foo1); var g = foo("two"); Debug.Assert(g is Foo2); var h = foo("three"); Debug.Assert(h is Foo3); } I know I can do it with Meta<, but I don't want to use it.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320  | Next Page >