Search Results

Search found 1292 results on 52 pages for 'readonly'.

Page 27/52 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

• Visual studio does not gray out properties with a ReadOnlyAttribute(true)

  - by Fire-Dragon-DoL

  I know it's stupid but visual studio (2010) doesn't gray out my properties tagged with ReadOnlyAttribute, I can't edit their values (if I try to do it, simply return to the previous value), but they aren't grayed out, I think it's really boring this when using the editor Is there an option or an attribute that I'm forgetting? Thanks for any help Example 1: /// <summary> /// Inform if the LcdDisplay has been already initiated /// </summary> [Description("Inform if the LcdDisplay has been already initiated")] [DefaultValue(false)] [ReadOnly(true)] public bool Initialized { get; private set; } Initialized is not grayed out

  Read the article

• Create UserControl DependencyProperty of which value can be chosen in dropdown list (as combo box)

  - by Viet

  Hello everybody, I'm a starter at WPF, now i would like to make a WPF userControl library which include a Rating bar userControl. All the steps of creating the rating Bar has been done, however i would like to add a property RatingValue: public static readonly DependencyProperty RatingValueProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("RatingValue", typeof(int), typeof(RatingControl), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(0, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault, new PropertyChangedCallback(RatingValueChanged))); public int RatingValue { get { return (int)GetValue(RatingValueProperty); } set { SetValue(RatingValueProperty, value); } } private static void RatingValueChanged(DependencyObject sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e) { //... change the rating value } that the user of my UserControl can modify by a value from 0 to 5 that are shown in a dropdown list (combo box) in the Properties windows (as some exist properties of Usercontrols like Visibility, windows style, background ...) How can i do? Thank you very much in advance, Viet

  Read the article

• wpf DependencyProperty Not accepting default value for short

  - by biju

  Hi, I was trying to use tis depencency property in my code but it gives me error says that Default value type does not match type of property 'MyProperty'.But short should accept 0 as default value.Ans also if i try to give null as default value it works..even if its a non nullabel type.How come this happens.. public short MyProperty { get { return (short)GetValue(MyPropertyProperty); } set { SetValue(MyPropertyProperty, value); } } // Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for MyProperty. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc... public static readonly DependencyProperty MyPropertyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("MyProperty", typeof(short), typeof(Window2), new UIPropertyMetadata(0));

  Read the article

• How to modify style for an asp:textbox in codebehind ?

  - by Fahad

  Hi all, I am trying to set the style of an asp:TextBox in codebehind, the textbox is style is set initially to style="display:none" when I set the dispaly to block in codebehind the textbox appears for a moment and then it's gone. I don't know what this problem is, when it's done in javascript it works fine Here is the code: asp.net code: <asp:TextBox ID="txtError" style="display:none" runat="server" ReadOnly="True" Width="95%"></asp:TextBox> codebehind: txtError.Style["display"] = "block"; Am I doing anything wrong? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• django 1.1 beta issue

  - by ha22109

  Hello all, I m using django 1.1 beta.I m facing porblem in case of list_editable.First it was throughing exception saying need ordering in case of list_editable" then i added ordering in model but know it is giving me error.The code is working fine with django1.1 final. here is my code model.py class User(models.Model): advertiser = models.ForeignKey(WapUser,primary_key=True) status = models.CharField(max_length=20,choices=ADVERTISER_INVITE_STATUS,default='invited') tos_version = models.CharField(max_length=5) contact_email = models.EmailField(max_length=80) contact_phone = models.CharField(max_length=15) contact_mobile = models.CharField(max_length=15) contact_person = models.CharField(max_length=80) feedback=models.BooleanField(choices=boolean_choices,default=0) def __unicode__(self): return self.user.login class Meta: db_table = u'roi_advertiser_info' managed=False ordering=['feedback',] admin.py class UserAdmin(ReadOnlyAdminFields, admin.ModelAdmin): list_per_page = 15 fields = ['advertiser','contact_email','contact_phone','contact_mobile','contact_person'] list_display = ['advertiser','contact_email','contact_phone','contact_mobile','contact_person','status','feedback'] list_editable=['feedback'] readonly = ('advertiser',) search_fields = ['advertiser__login_id'] radio_fields={'approve_auto': admin.HORIZONTAL} list_filter=['status','feedback'] admin.site.register(User,UserADmin)

  Read the article

• Approaches to use Repositories (w/ StructureMap) with AutoMapper?

  - by jacko

  Any idea how I can tell AutoMapper to resolve a TypeConverter constructor argument using StructureMap? ie. We have this: private class GuidToContentProviderConverter : TypeConverter<Guid, ContentProvider> { private readonly IContentProviderRepository _repository; public GuidToContentProviderConverter(IContentProviderRepository repository) { _repository = repository; } protected override ContentProvider ConvertCore(Guid contentProviderId) { return _repository.Get(contentProviderId); } } And in the AutoMap registration: Mapper.CreateMap<Guid, ContentProvider>().ConstructUsing<GuidToContentProviderConverter>(); However, this generates a compile-time error about ctor args. Any ideas? Or ideas to other approaches for using Automapper to hydrate domain objects from viewmodel ID's using a repository?

  Read the article

• Panel visible=true has no effect

  - by tsilb

  I have a Panel that I'm setting visible=true explicitly. The debugger passes over that line and visible still evaluates to False on the next line. Obviously as a result, the Panel is not shown. How is this possible? pnlValidate.Visible = true; if (IsPostBack) return; <asp:Panel ID="pnlValidate" runat="server"> <asp:Button cssclass="submit2" ID="btnValidate" runat="server" Visible="false" text="Validate" OnClick="btnValidate_Click" /> <br /> <asp:TextBox ID="txt6sql" runat="server" Visible="false" TextMode="multiLine" Width="500" Height="200" ReadOnly="true" ToolTip="Report SQL Statement" /> </asp:Panel> ASP.NET 2.0, no other threads or wonky erratta that "should" be messing with my members.

  Read the article

• Editable QTreeView with expandable cells

  - by serge

  Hi everyone, I tried to write an editable table based on QTreeView with wordwraped content in cells which in turn should expand in height (that whole text was visible) like usual cells in tables like in MSWord, but have met insuperable obstacles: first - i can't set fixed cell size. second - i can't make text display in cells wordwraped. For this i used void QTreeWidget::setItemWidget ( QTreeWidgetItem * item, int column, QWidget * widget ), but it works only for readonly solutions. And i haven't come up with any other idea. Can such behavior of QTreeView be realized? And how to solve those problems of mine? Thanks in advance Serge

  Read the article

• Suggestion for chkstk.asm stackoverflow exception in C++ with Visual Studio 2010

  - by Gulshan

  I am working with an implementation of merge sort. I am doing C++ Visual Studio 2010. But when I took a array of 300000 integers for timing, it is showing an unhandled stackoverflow exception and taking me to a readonly file named "chkstk.asm". I reduced the size to 200000 and it worked. Again the same code worked with C-free 4 editor (mingw 2.95) without any problem while the size was 400000. Do you have any suggestion to get the code working in Visual Studio? May be the recursion in the mergesort is causing the problem.

  Read the article

• Is it safe to lock a static variable in a non-static class?

  - by Dario Solera

  I've got a class that manages a shared resource. Now, since access to the resource depends on many parameters, this class is instantiated and disposed several times during the normal execution of the program. The shared resource does not support concurrency, so some kind of locking is needed. The first thing that came into my mind is having a static instance in the class, and acquire locks on it, like this: // This thing is static! static readonly object MyLock = new object(); // This thing is NOT static! MyResource _resource = ...; public DoSomeWork() { lock(MyLock) { _resource.Access(); } } Does that make sense, or would you use another approach?

  Read the article

• compiling cocos3d 0.7.2 with Xcode5 error

  - by jimmy

  I tried to compile my cocos3d 0.7.2 project with xcode5. I am already stuck at the first error I get with the line “super.parent = aNode;” in CC3ParametricMeshNodes.m. this line is in the setParent function: -(void) setParent: (CC3Node*) aNode { super.parent = aNode; [self deriveNameFrom: aNode]; if ( !mesh ) self.box = self.parentBoundingBox; } and the error I get is: CC3ParametricMeshNodes.m:246:15: Assignment to readonly property I am sure that there will be other errors after this one is fixed. Is there any topic on common errors that occur while compiling cocos3d 0.7.2 with Xcode5? Thanks

  Read the article

• WPF, getting two way binding to work on custom control

  - by e28Makaveli

  Two way binding does not work on my custom control with the following internals: public partial class ColorInputControl { public ColorInputControl() { InitializeComponent(); colorPicker.AddHandler(ColorPicker.SelectedColorChangedEvent, new RoutedPropertyChangedEventHandler( SelectedColorChanged));; colorPicker.AddHandler(ColorPicker.CancelEvent, new RoutedPropertyChangedEventHandler(OnCancel)); } public static readonly DependencyProperty SelectedColorProperty = DependencyProperty.Register ("SelectedColor", typeof(Color), typeof(ColorInputControl), new PropertyMetadata(Colors.Transparent, null)); public Color SelectedColor { get { return (Color)GetValue(SelectedColorProperty); //return colorPicker.SelectedColor; } set { SetValue(SelectedColorProperty, value); colorPicker.SelectedColor = value; } } private void SelectedColorChanged(object sender, RoutedPropertyChangedEventArgs<Color> e) { SetValue(SelectedColorProperty, colorPicker.SelectedColor); } } SelectedColor is being bound to a property that fires INotifyPropertyChanged event control when it changes. However, I cannot get two way binding to work. Changes from the UI are pesisted to the data source. However, changes originating from the data source are not reflected on the UI. What did I miss? TIA.

  Read the article

• Recursion in Unity and Dispose pattern implementation

  - by Budda

  My class is inherited from UnityContainer (from Unity 2.0), here is source code: public class UnityManager : UnityContainer { private UnityManager() { _context = new MyDataClassesDataContext(); // ... } protected override void Dispose(bool disposing) { if ( disposing ) { _context.Dispose(); } base.Dispose(disposing); } private readonly CMCoreDataClassesDataContext _context; } When Dispose method is called for the instance of UnityManager class it drop into recursion... Why? As far as I know base.Dispose should call the Dispose method of base class only... isn't it? Who call back the Dispose(bool) of UnityManager? How to prevent that? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Singleton class design in C#, are these two classes equivalent?

  - by Oskar

  I was reading up on singleton class design in C# on this great resource and decided to go with alternative 4: public sealed class Singleton1 { static readonly Singleton1 _instance = new Singleton1(); static Singleton1() { } Singleton1() { } public static Singleton1 Instance { get { return _instance; } } } Now I wonder if this can be rewritten using auto properties like this? public sealed class Singleton2 { static Singleton2() { Instance = new Singleton2(); } Singleton2() { } public static Singleton2 Instance { get; private set; } } If its only a matter of readability I definitely prefer the second version, but I want to get it right.

  Read the article

• Implicit and Explicit implementation of interface.

  - by Amby

  While working on a upgrade i happened to come across a code like this. interface ICustomization { IMMColumnsDefinition GetColumnsDefinition(); } class Customization : ICustomization { private readonly ColumnDefinition _columnDefinition; //More code here. public ColumnsDefinition GetColumnsDefinition() { return _columnDefinition; } ColumnsDefinition ICustomization.GetColumnsDefinition() //redundant { return GetColumnsDefinition(); } } My question is: Is there any need/use of 'explicit' implementation of interface in this piece of code? Will it create any problem if i remove the method (explicit implementation of interface) that i have marked "redundant" above? PS: I understand that explicit implementation of interface is very important, and it can be used when we need to give access to a method at interface level only, and to use two interface with same signature of method.

  Read the article

• Monitor what users are doing in an .net Application and trigger application functionality changes.

  - by Jamie Clayton

  I need some suggestions for how to implement a very basic mechanism that logs what multiple users are doing in an application. When another feature is running I then need to change the application, to restrict functionality. Use Case Example User can normaly edit unpaid records. If the application then runs a Payrun process (Long), I need to then change parts of the application to restrict functionality for a short period of time (eg. Make existing unpaid records readonly). Any suggestions on how I can do this in a .net application?

  Read the article

• How to show that the double-checked-lock pattern with Dictionary's TryGetValue is not threadsafe in

  - by Amir

  Recently I've seen some C# projects that use a double-checked-lock pattern on a Dictionary. Something like this: private static readonly object _lock = new object(); private static volatile IDictionary<string, object> _cache = new Dictionary<string, object>(); public static object Create(string key) { object val; if (!_cache.TryGetValue(key, out val)) { lock (_lock) { if (!_cache.TryGetValue(key, out val)) { val = new object(); // factory construction based on key here. _cache.Add(key, val); } } } return val; } This code is incorrect, since the Dictionary can be "growing" the collection in _cache.Add() while _cache.TryGetValue (outside the lock) is iterating over the collection. It might be extremely unlikely in many situations, but is still wrong. Is there a simple program to demonstrate that this code fails? Does it make sense to incorporate this into a unit test? And if so, how?

  Read the article

• Is this a correct way to host a WCF service?

  - by mafutrct

  For some testing code, I'd like to be able to host a WCF service in only a few lines. I figured I'd write a simple hosting class: public class WcfHost : IDisposable where Implementation : class where Contract : class { public readonly string Address = "net.tcp://localhost:8000/"; private ServiceHost _Host; public WcfHost () { _Host = new ServiceHost (typeof (Implementation)); var binding = new NetTcpBinding (); var address = new Uri (Address); _Host.AddServiceEndpoint ( typeof (Contract), binding, address); _Host.Open (); } public void Dispose () { ((IDisposable) _Host).Dispose (); } } That can be used like this: using (var host = new WcfHost<ImplementationClass, ContractClass> ()) { Is there anything wrong with this approach? Is there a flaw in the code (esp. about the disposing)?

  Read the article

• Setting a "dependency property" in code

  - by Matt B

  I'm on a roll today... I have the following code delaring a dependency property inside a class called ActionScreen: #region Dependency Properties & Methods public string DescriptionHeader { get { return (string)GetValue(DescriptionHeaderProperty); } set { SetValue(DescriptionHeaderProperty, value); } } // Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for DescriptionHeader. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc... public static readonly DependencyProperty DescriptionHeaderProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("DescriptionHeader", typeof(string), typeof(ActionScreen), new UIPropertyMetadata("xxx")); #endregion I bind to this property in my Xaml as so: <GridViewColumn DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Description}" Header="{Binding DescriptionHeader}" Width="350" /> Now I want to be able to set the parameter from my code behind when I recieve an event - but it's not working: public string DescColText { set { this.Dispatcher.Invoke(DispatcherPriority.Normal, new Action(delegate() { DescriptionHeader = value; })); } }

  Read the article

• list editabale error

  - by ha22109

  Hello all, I m using django 1.1 beta.I m facing porblem in case of list_editable.First it was throughing exception saying need ordering in case of list_editable" then i added ordering in model but know it is giving me error.The code is working fine with django1.1 final. here is my code model.py class User(models.Model): advertiser = models.ForeignKey(WapUser,primary_key=True) status = models.CharField(max_length=20,choices=ADVERTISER_INVITE_STATUS,default='invited') tos_version = models.CharField(max_length=5) contact_email = models.EmailField(max_length=80) contact_phone = models.CharField(max_length=15) contact_mobile = models.CharField(max_length=15) contact_person = models.CharField(max_length=80) feedback=models.BooleanField(choices=boolean_choices,default=0) def __unicode__(self): return self.user.login class Meta: db_table = u'roi_advertiser_info' managed=False ordering=['feedback',] admin.py class UserAdmin(ReadOnlyAdminFields, admin.ModelAdmin): list_per_page = 15 fields = ['advertiser','contact_email','contact_phone','contact_mobile','contact_person'] list_display = ['advertiser','contact_email','contact_phone','contact_mobile','contact_person','status','feedback'] list_editable=['feedback'] readonly = ('advertiser',) search_fields = ['advertiser__login_id'] radio_fields={'approve_auto': admin.HORIZONTAL} list_filter=['status','feedback'] admin.site.register(User,UserADmin)

  Read the article

• Adding pdb files to VSS

  - by George

  Every time I try to compile my web app, I am prompted if i want to add pdb extensioned files to VSS. I thought pdb files do not belong in VSS see a previous post. Is there any way to prevent them from being added. I cannot even logically delete them from VSS because a previous version has been logically deleted and if I were to delete the current version, the previous version would have to be purged, for which I need vss admin rights that I do not have. I just can't get a handle on how to avoid getting a million files added to VSS that prevent otehr develoeprs from compiling their solutions because they have unchecked out read only copies. Is the only solution to check them in but flip the readonly flag off locally? This is not a good option in my mind.

  Read the article

• Why does TabStop stop working??

  - by Jerry

  I have a project that uses a series of auto-generated user control instances. The user-control itself exists, but I populate a panel with a series of these user controls, one for each item in my collection. Each user control displays a ton of information, but only ONE text field is editable. All of the other fields have TabStop set to false, and are marked as ReadOnly. The tab order of each user control is set at the time it is created so that the tab-key goes from one field to the next (or ... it's supposed to). When I have TWO fields on my user control whose TabStop is set to true, everything works great. But if I only have ONE field whose TabStop is true, the tab key stops working, and I have to physically CLICK on the next user control for it to gain focus. What's up? Has anyone else seen this behavior? Am I doing something stupid as usual?

  Read the article

• Which connection string for MySql ODBC connector 5.2.6?

  - by stighy

  it seems i can't make work a connection to MySql using ODBC connector 5.2.6. In a 64 bit environment, in a VBA excel application, i use this string, but it not work: "Driver={MySQL ODBC 5.2 Driver}; Server=myserver;Database=mydb;User=readonly;Password=mypass;Option=3" I have also used Driver={MySQL ODBC 5.2w Driver} and Driver={MySQL ODBC 5.2a Driver} But the error is: ODBC driver unknow. Can someone help me ? Ps: it works with a DSN setted, but i would like to use a connection string so i don't go to each user computer and set a DSN. Thanks

  Read the article

• Performance of delegate and method group

  - by BlueFox

  Hi I was investigating the performance hit of creating Cachedependency objects, so I wrote a very simple test program as follows: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Diagnostics; using System.Web.Caching; namespace Test { internal class Program { private static readonly string[] keys = new[] {"Abc"}; private static readonly int MaxIteration = 10000000; private static void Main(string[] args) { Debug.Print("first set"); test7(); test6(); test5(); test4(); test3(); test2(); Debug.Print("second set"); test2(); test3(); test4(); test5(); test6(); test7(); } private static void test2() { DateTime start = DateTime.Now; var list = new List<CacheDependency>(); for (int i = 0; i < MaxIteration; i++) { list.Add(new CacheDependency(null, keys)); } Debug.Print("test2 Time: " + (DateTime.Now - start)); } private static void test3() { DateTime start = DateTime.Now; var list = new List<Func<CacheDependency>>(); for (int i = 0; i < MaxIteration; i++) { list.Add(() => new CacheDependency(null, keys)); } Debug.Print("test3 Time: " + (DateTime.Now - start)); } private static void test4() { var p = new Program(); DateTime start = DateTime.Now; var list = new List<Func<CacheDependency>>(); for (int i = 0; i < MaxIteration; i++) { list.Add(p.GetDep); } Debug.Print("test4 Time: " + (DateTime.Now - start)); } private static void test5() { var p = new Program(); DateTime start = DateTime.Now; var list = new List<Func<CacheDependency>>(); for (int i = 0; i < MaxIteration; i++) { list.Add(() => { return p.GetDep(); }); } Debug.Print("test5 Time: " + (DateTime.Now - start)); } private static void test6() { DateTime start = DateTime.Now; var list = new List<Func<CacheDependency>>(); for (int i = 0; i < MaxIteration; i++) { list.Add(GetDepSatic); } Debug.Print("test6 Time: " + (DateTime.Now - start)); } private static void test7() { DateTime start = DateTime.Now; var list = new List<Func<CacheDependency>>(); for (int i = 0; i < MaxIteration; i++) { list.Add(() => { return GetDepSatic(); }); } Debug.Print("test7 Time: " + (DateTime.Now - start)); } private CacheDependency GetDep() { return new CacheDependency(null, keys); } private static CacheDependency GetDepSatic() { return new CacheDependency(null, keys); } } } But I can't understand why these result looks like this: first set test7 Time: 00:00:00.4840277 test6 Time: 00:00:02.2041261 test5 Time: 00:00:00.1910109 test4 Time: 00:00:03.1401796 test3 Time: 00:00:00.1820105 test2 Time: 00:00:08.5394884 second set test2 Time: 00:00:07.7324423 test3 Time: 00:00:00.1830105 test4 Time: 00:00:02.3561347 test5 Time: 00:00:00.1750100 test6 Time: 00:00:03.2941884 test7 Time: 00:00:00.1850106 In particular: 1. Why is test4 and test6 much slower than their delegate version? I also noticed that Resharper specifically has a comment on the delegate version suggesting change test5 and test7 to "Covert to method group". Which is the same as test4 and test6 but they're actually slower? 2. I don't seem a consistent performance difference when calling test4 and test6, shouldn't static calls to be always faster?

  Read the article

• Change write-host output color based on foreach if elseif outcome in Powershell

  - by Emo

  I'm trying to change the color of write-host output based on the lastrunoutcome property of SQL Server jobs in Powershell....as in...if a job was successfull, the output of lastrunoutcome is "Success" in green....if failed, then "Failed" in red. I have the script working to get the desired job status...I just don't know how to change the colors. Here's what I have so far: # Check for failed SQL jobs on multiple servers [reflection.assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo") | out-null foreach ($svr in get-content "C:\serverlist2.txt") { $a = get-date $BegDate = (Get-Date $a.AddDays(-1) -f d) + " 12:00:00 AM" $BegDateTrans = [system.datetime]$BegDate write-host $svr $srv=New-Object "Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.Server" "$svr" $srv.jobserver.jobs | where-object {$_.lastrundate -ge $BegDateTrans -and $_.Name -notlike "????????-????-????-????-????????????"} | format-table name,lastrunoutcome,lastrundate -autosize foreach ($_.lastrunoutcome in $srv.jobserver.jobs) { if ($_.lastrunoutcome = 0) { -forgroundcolor red } else {} } } This seems to be the closest I've gotten...but it's giving me an error of ""LastRunOutcome" is a ReadOnly property." Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Emo

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >