Search Results

Search found 38562 results on 1543 pages for 'library project'.

Page 378/1543 | < Previous Page | 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385  | Next Page >

  • Django's local web server works, but not apaches

    - by tipu
    I've made no changes to the django project after running django-admin.py startproject Twingle When I run the local web server using python manage.py runserver, I can view the splash page telling me everything is working fine. But when I try to visit that project through apache, it fails. You can see the error at http://djaffry.selfip.com:8080/ The exception: Exception Value: No module named Twingle.urls (the project is Twingle)

    Read the article

  • Ways to make (relatively) safe assumptions about the type of concrete subclasses?

    - by Kylotan
    I have an interface (defined as a abstract base class) that looks like this: class AbstractInterface { public: bool IsRelatedTo(const AbstractInterface& other) const = 0; } And I have an implementation of this (constructors etc omitted): class ConcreteThing { public: bool IsRelatedTo(const AbstractInterface& other) const { return m_ImplObject.has_relationship_to(other.m_ImplObject); } private: ImplementationObject m_ImplObject; } The AbstractInterface forms an interface in Project A, and the ConcreteThing lives in Project B as an implementation of that interface. This is so that code in Project A can access data from Project B without having a direct dependency on it - Project B just has to implement the correct interface. Obviously the line in the body of the IsRelatedTo function cannot compile - that instance of ConcreteThing has an m_ImplObject member, but it can't assume that all AbstractInterfaces do, including the other argument. In my system, I can actually assume that all implementations of AbstractInterface are instances of ConcreteThing (or subclasses thereof), but I'd prefer not to be casting the object to the concrete type in order to get at the private member, or encoding that assumption in a way that will crash without a diagnostic later if this assumption ceases to hold true. I cannot modify ImplementationObject, but I can modify AbstractInterface and ConcreteThing. I also cannot use the standard RTTI mechanism for checking a type prior to casting, or use dynamic_cast for a similar purpose. I have a feeling that I might be able to overload IsRelatedTo with a ConcreteThing argument, but I'm not sure how to call it via the base IsRelatedTo(AbstractInterface) method. It wouldn't get called automatically as it's not a strict reimplementation of that method. Is there a pattern for doing what I want here, allowing me to implement the IsRelatedTo function via ImplementationObject::has_relationship_to(ImplementationObject), without risky casts? (Also, I couldn't think of a good question title - please change it if you have a better one.)

    Read the article

  • Makefile automatic link dependency ?

    - by Kuang Chen
    It's easy to let program figure out the dependency at compile time, (with gcc -MM). Nevertheless, link dependency (deciding which libraries should be linked to) seems to be difficult to figure out. This issue become emergent when multiple targets with individual libraries to link to are needed. For instance, three dynamic library targets t1.so, t2.so and t3.so needs to be built. t1.so needs math library (-lm), while t2 and t3 don't. It would be tedious to write separate rules. A single rule requiring the three targets linked with math library saves the trouble. However, it causes inflation of target size since math library is unused for t2.so and t3.so. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Symfony 1.3: the .css and images are not loaded in production.

    - by user248959
    Hi, I have deployed my symfony app into a shared server. The problem: for example, the images and the .css of the default page that says ok Symfony Project Created Congratulations! You have successfully created your symfony project. Project setup successful ... are not loaded. I read this but it's not enough for me.. What should I do? Regards Javi

    Read the article

  • How to remove .zip file in c on windows? (error: Directory not empty)

    - by ExtremeBlue
    include include include include "win32-dirent.h" include include include define MAXFILEPATH 1024 bool IsDirectory(char* path) { WIN32_FIND_DATA w32fd; HANDLE hFindFile; hFindFile = FindFirstFile((PTCHAR)path, &w32fd); if(hFindFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) { return false; } return w32fd.dwFileAttributes & (FILE_ATTRIBUTE_DIRECTORY); } int RD(const char* folderName) { DIR *dir; struct dirent *ent; dir = opendir(folderName); if(dir != NULL) { while((ent = readdir(dir)) != NULL) { if(strcmp(ent->d_name , ".") == 0 || strcmp(ent->d_name, "..") == 0) { continue; } char fileName[MAXFILEPATH]; sprintf(fileName,"%s%c%s", folderName, '\\', ent->d_name); if(IsDirectory(fileName)) { RD(fileName); } else { unlink(fileName); } } closedir(dir); //chmod(folderName, S_IWRITE | S_IREAD); if(_rmdir(folderName) != 0)perror(folderName); } else { printf("%s <%s>\n","Could Not Open Directory.", folderName); return -1; } return 0; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { if(argc < 2) { printf("usage: ./a.out \n"); return 1; } //RD(argv[1]); //_mkdir("12"); //_mkdir("12\\34"); //_rmdir("12\\34"); //_rmdir("12"); char buf[0xff]; sprintf(buf, "unzip -x -q -d 1234 1234.zip"); system(buf); RD("1234"); //unlink("D:\\dev\\c\\project\\removeFolder\\Debug\\1234\\56\\5.txt"); //unlink("D:\\dev\\c\\project\\removeFolder\\Debug\\1234\\56\\6.txt"); //unlink("D:\\dev\\c\\project\\removeFolder\\Debug\\1234\\1_23.zip"); //unlink("D:\\dev\\c\\project\\removeFolder\\Debug\\1234\\4.txt"); //_rmdir("D:\\dev\\c\\project\\removeFolder\\Debug\\1234\\56"); //_rmdir("D:\\dev\\c\\project\\removeFolder\\Debug\\1234"); return 0; } Archive: 1234.zip inflating: 1234/4.txt inflating: 1234/56/5.txt inflating: 1234/56/6.txt inflating: 1234/1_23.zip

    Read the article

  • Maven + Java package declaration

    - by Vasan
    We have a Maven project (packaged as JAR) with Java files. A new Java source file was recently added to this project. The path in which the Java file was added, does not match its package declaration. As expected, Eclipse shows an error in the class for the mismatch. However, Maven builds the project just fine. In the generated JAR file, the .class file is present in the path indicated by the package declaration. We tried moving the Java source file to other incorrect folders (i.e. different from the package declaration), but every time Maven builds the project fine. So, does Maven ignore the actual directory in which the .java file is present? Does it only consider package declaration?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385  | Next Page >