Search Results

Search found 14152 results on 567 pages for 'private'.

Page 394/567 | < Previous Page | 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401  | Next Page >

  • Qt request never trigger the finished() signal

    - by user63898
    i have something realy strange i have this code : m_url.setUrl("www.cnn.com"); QNetworkRequest request; request.setRawHeader("User-Agent", USER_AGENT.toUtf8()); request.setRawHeader("Accept-Charset", "ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7"); request.setRawHeader("Accept", "text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8"); request.setRawHeader("Accept-Language", "en-us,en;q=0.5"); request.setRawHeader("Connection", "Keep-Alive"); request.setUrl(m_url); reply = qnam.get(request); //QNetworkAccessManager qnam member of the class; connect(reply, SIGNAL(finished()), this, SLOT(httpFinished())); the httpFinished() function that is under private slots: never triggered , why ?

    Read the article

  • sqlite COUNT in flex returning [object Object]

    - by Adam
    I'm sure this is an easy questions and I'm just doing something stupid but I'm really new to all this code. I'm trying to run a sqlite query in flex to count the total number of records I believe its working fine but I just can't figure out how to display the results - all I get back is [object Object]. private function overviewOne():void{ var stmt:SQLStatement = new SQLStatement(); stmt.sqlConnection = sqlConn; stmt.text = "SELECT COUNT(user_id) FROM tbl_user WHERE status_status ='Away'"; stmt.execute(); var result:SQLResult = stmt.getResult(); acoverviewOne = new Array(result.data); trace (result.data[0]); }

    Read the article

  • How to inherit methods from a parent class in C++

    - by Pat
    When inheriting classes in C++ I understand members are inherited. But how does one inherit the methods as well? For example, in the below code, I'd like the method "getValues" to be accessible not through just CPoly, but also by any class that inherits it. So one can call "getValues" on CRect directly. class CPoly { private: int width, height; public: void getValues (int* a, int* b) { *a=width; *b=height;} }; class CRect: public CPoly { public: int area () { return (width * height); } }; In other words, is there any way to inherit methods for simple generic methods like getters and setters?

    Read the article

  • Component not listening to MainApp's state change

    - by tag
    I don't know if this is too difficult or too easy. My custom component is trying to listen to the main application's state changes using StateChangeEvent.CURRENT_STATE_CHANGE private function init(){ addEventListener(StateChangeEvent.CURRENT_STATE_CHANGE, function():void{ Alert.show("parent state changed"); }); } but as expected, it's reporting its own state changes not the main application's. I have 2 options: figure a way to tell it that I really mean the main application's state change not its own or configure the main application to dispatch a specific custom event that the component would listen for Any idea how I could do the first? or do I need the second option in this case?

    Read the article

  • KeyDown event is not Working for Arrow keys ,Home , End ,Pageup,Pagedown and other similar keys in s

    - by Subhen
    Hi , I want to over ride the selection behaviour of listbox Items. We can traverse through listbox items using Up and Down arrows where as I wan to traverse the list using Left and Right arrow keys. While I am trying to add the key down event for Listbox, It shows almost all key presses except for Arrow Keys, Home, End and Similar keys. I have the following Code: private void listArtist_KeyDown(object sender, System.Windows.Input.KeyEventArgs e) { if (e.Key.ToString() == "Enter") { //Go to Some Page } else { MessageBox.Show(e.Key.ToString()); } } I am clue less about it. Please help. Thanks, Subhen

    Read the article

  • Do fields need to be explicitly final to have a "proper" immutable object?

    - by Yishai
    You often read about immutable objects requiring final fields to be immutable in Java. Is this in fact the case, or is it simply enough to have no public mutability and not actually mutate the state? For example, if you have an immutable object built by the builder pattern, you could do it by having the builder assign the individual fields as it builds, or having the builder hold the fields itself and ultimately return the immutable object by passing the values to its (private) constructor. Having the fields final has the obvious advantage of preventing implementation errors (such as allowing code to retain a reference to the builder and "building" the object multiple times while in fact mutating an existing object), but having the Builder store its data inside the object as it is built would seem to be DRYer. So the question is: Assuming the Builder does not leak the Object early and stops itself from modifying the object once built (say by setting its reference to the object as null) is there actually anything gained (such as improved thread safety) in the "immutability" of the object if the object's fields were made final instead?

    Read the article

  • Is there a way in C# 4.0 to have a method take a delegate with the parameters baked in?

    - by Rob Packwood
    I have this code for reporting on a simple demo app I am writing: private static void ReportOnTimedProcess(Action process) { var stopwatch = new Stopwatch(); stopwatch.Start(); process(); stopwatch.Stop(); Console.WriteLine("Process took {0} seconds", stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds*1000); } I basically want to track the time of any process. I am trying to have this method take a delegate as a parameter that can have any number of varying parameters. Is there some way an Expression can do this?

    Read the article

  • Need to ignore property in XmlSerialization because of circular reference

    - by NestorArturo
    Have an object with a property I don't need to serialize. The type of this property generates a circular reference which I expected, so I decorated this property with everything comes to my mind: private clsDeclaracion _Declaracion; [DesignerSerializationVisibility(DesignerSerializationVisibility.Hidden)] [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlIgnore] public clsDeclaracion Declaracion { get { return _Declaracion; } set { _Declaracion = value; } } However, the circular reference keeps firing. Tried using a public field with no luck. This is my serialization code: System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer Serializador = new System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer(objeto.GetType()); using (StreamWriter SW = System.IO.File.CreateText(ArchivoTemp)) { Serializador.Serialize(SW, objeto); }

    Read the article

  • Why doesn't the C++ default destructor destroy my objects?

    - by Oszkar
    The C++ specification says the default destructor deletes all non-static members. Nevertheless, I can't manage to achieve that. I have this: class N { public: ~N() { std::cout << "Destroying object of type N"; } }; class M { public: M() { n = new N; } // ~M() { //this should happen by default // delete n; // } private: N* n; }; Then this should print the given message, but it doesn't: M* m = new M(); delete m; //this should invoke the default destructor

    Read the article

  • Parsing an WebService URL in Flex

    - by theband
    [Bindable]public var xmlData:Object = new Object(); [Bindable]public var headingData:Object = new Object(); private function getHeadings(evt:ResultEvent):void{ //xmlData = ObjectUtil.toString(evt.result); //ObjectUtil.toString(evt.result) xmlData = evt.result; headingData = xmlData.root.survey; } <mx:WebService id="srv" wsdl="http://domainame/Service.asmx?WSDL"> <mx:operation name="GetClientDetails_ParameterDetails" resultFormat="object" result="getHeadings(event);" /> </mx:WebService> I am able to parse an simple XML and create the components, but i am not able to do when i call an webService. The Method name which fetches the XML is the same. Am i doing something wrong in receiving the XML in Flex.

    Read the article

  • Flex: Problem with CollectionEvent on ArrayCollection

    - by dasnervtdoch
    Hi there, got a reference to an arrayCollection and add event listener like this: collection.addEventListener(CollectionEvent.COLLECTION_CHANGE, onCollectionChange); that´s fine. Now some other component does have the same reference and is adding items to and removing items from that collection. Each time the handler is called: private function onProjectPersonsChange(event:Event):void { if (event.kind == CollectionEventKind.ADD) { //do something } else if (event.kind == CollectionEventKind.REMOVE) { //do something //here is the problem: event.items.length = 0 } else { trace('CollectionEvent: kind not handled!'); } } Does somebody know why the removed item is not in 'items'? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Wait for inline thread to complete before moving to next method...

    - by Tyler
    Hello, I have an android app where I am doing the following: private void onCreate() { final ProgressDialog dialog = ProgressDialog.show(this, "Please wait..", "Doing stuff..", true); new Thread() { public void run() { //do some serious stuff... dialog.dismiss(); } }.start(); stepTwo(); } And I would like to ensure that my thread is complete before stepTwo(); is called. How can I do this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C#: Select row from DataGridView

    - by Bi
    Hi I have a form with a DataGridView (of 3 columns) and a Button. Every time the user clicks on a button, I want the get the values stored in the 1st column of that row. Here is the code I have: private void myButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { foreach (DataGridViewRow row in ProductsGrid.Rows) { if (this.ProductsGrid.SelectedRows.Count == 1) { // get information of 1st column from the row string value = this.ProductsGrid.SelectedRows[0].Cells[0].ToString(); } } } However when I click on myButton, the this.ProductsGrid.SelectedRows.Count is 0. Also, how do I ensure that the user selects only one row and not multiple rows? Does this code look right?

    Read the article

  • Dictionary as parameter, where the Value-Type is irrelevant

    - by aaginor
    Hi folks, I have a function, that returns the next higher value of a Dictionary-Keys-List compared to a given value. If we have a Key-List of {1, 4, 10, 24} and a given value of 8, the function would return 10. Obviously the type of the Value-Part of the Dictionary doesn't matter for the function, the function-code for a Dictionary<int, int> and Dictionary<int, myClass> would be the same. How has the method-head have to look like, when I want to call the function with any Dictionary, that has int as key-Type and the value-Type is irrelevant? I tried: private int GetClosedKey(Dictionary<int, object> list, int theValue); but it says that there are illegal arguments, when I call it with a Dictionary. I don't want to copy'n'paste the function for each different value-type that my function may be called. Any idea, how to accomplish that? Thanks in advance, Frank

    Read the article

  • How to raise an event when another event is raised?

    - by WulfgarPro
    Hi, I have an application that handles the OnQuit event of another running application. I would like to raise an additional (custom) event when the OnQuit event is handled. How could I implement such an event? My OnQuit handler is like so: private void StkQuit() { _stkApplicationUi.OnQuit -= StkQuit; Marshal.FinalReleaseComObject(_stkApplicationUi); Application.Exit(); } The reason I require the additional event is so that I can tell my View layer that the application has exited. If this is not the correct way, what would be better? WulfgarPro

    Read the article

  • Cannot find the certificate

    - by user409756
    We get a T-SQL (SQL Server 2008 R2) error on BACKUP CERTIFICATE: ERROR_NUMBER 15151, SEVERITY 16, STATE 1, PROCEDURE -, LINE 8, MESSAGE: Cannot find the certificate 'certificate1', because it does not exist or you do not have permission. We can see the certificate in master.sys.certificates. Our pseudo-code: copy an unattached template_db to db1 attach db1 create certificate1 (in stored procedure in master db) generate @password CREATE DATABASE ENCRYPTION KEY … ENCRYPTION BY SERVER CERTIFICATE '+@certificate_name +… (in stored procedure in db1) turn on Transparent Database Encryption for db1 using certificate1. (N'ALTER DATABASE '+@db_name+N' SET ENCRYPTION ON') N’BACKUP CERTIFICATE '+@certificate_name+N' TO FILE = '''+@certificate_file_path+N''' WITH PRIVATE KEY ( FILE = '''+@private_key_file_path+N''', ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = '''+@password+N'''' To try to work-around the error, we tested three ways with the BACKUP CERTIFICATE code in a different databases each time, including db1 and master. All get the same error. Any ideas? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to use .DefaultListCellRenderer

    - by loddn
    First, i'm new at Java-programming and my native lang is not english, but still i hope to get some help from you all. What I try to do is a simple java-interface with a jComboBox and a jList. I want to poplate to jComboBox with Object-names and when the user select one of the names get the object-id which i will use to populate the jList. It's probably simple but i have bin stuck with this problem all day. private void loadComboBox() { biz.Object object = new biz.Object(); try { ArrayList<biz.Object> arrayOfObjects= object.getAllObjects();// ArrayList of objects for (biz.Object o:arrayOfObjects) { if (o != null) cbm.addElement(o); //`toString-method } cb.setModel(cbm); //JComboBox

    Read the article

  • before_save not working with Rails 3

    - by Mich Dart
    I have this Project model: class Project < ActiveRecord::Base validates :status, :inclusion => { :in => ['active', 'closed'] } validates :title, :presence => true, :length => { :in => 4..30 } before_save :set_default_status_if_not_specified private def set_default_status_if_not_specified self.status = 'active' if self.status.blank? end end If I create a new object like this: Project.create!(:title => 'Test 2', :pm_id => 1) I get these errors: Validation failed: Status is not included in the list But status field should get filled in before save.

    Read the article

  • does overload operator-> a compile time action?

    - by Brent
    when I tried to compile the code: struct S { void func2() {} }; class O { public: inline S* operator->() const; private: S* ses; }; inline S* O::operator->() const { return ses; } int main() { O object; object->func(); return 0; } there is a compile error reported: D:\code>g++ operatorp.cpp -S -o operatorp.exe operatorp.cpp: In function `int main()': operatorp.cpp:27: error: 'struct S' has no member named 'func' it seems that invoke the overloaded function of "operator-" is done during compile time? I'd add "-S" option for compile only.

    Read the article

  • C++ Vector of vectors

    - by xbonez
    I have a class header file called Grid.h that contains the following 2 private data object: vector<int> column; vector<vector<int>> row; And a public method whose prototype in Grid.h is such: int getElement (unsigned int& col, unsigned int& row); The definition of above mentioned function is defined as such in Grid.cpp: int getElement (unsigned int& col, unsigned int& row) { return row[row][col] ; } When I run the program, I get this error: error C2109: subscript requires array or pointer type Whats going wrong?

    Read the article

  • Infinite loop when Selecting a panel?

    - by serhio
    I have a winform in witch I have a custom LongPanel with textboxes. In order to validate an eventually edited textbox when the user click somewhere out of textBoxY I use the following code: Private Sub LongPanel_MouseClick(ByVal sender As Object, _ ByVal e As MouseEventArgs) _ Handles MyBase.MouseClick _AttachedPanel.Select() End Sub In runtime application freezes at the "Select" line... I receive infinite panel Leave events(sender is a panel)... any idea why? EDIT: precision on panels parents: Form => SplitPanel => _AttachedPanel | _LongPanel (_LongPanel contains a reference to _AttachedPanel)

    Read the article

  • problem with animating resizing agdatagridcolumn !!

    - by mahdokht
    i want resize width of agdatagridcolumn in a agdatagrid with animation code : (CreateStb(agdatagrid)).Begin();//Exceptin: Cannot resolve TargetProperty Width on specified object. . . Private StoaryBoard CreateStb(UIElement element) { Storyboard stb = new Storyboard(); DoubleAnimation dbAnmtin = new DoubleAnimation(); Storyboard.SetTarget(dbAnmtin, (AgDataGridColumn)((AgDataGrid)element).Columns[0]); Storyboard.SetTargetProperty(dbAnmtin, new PropertyPath("Width")); dbAnmtin1.To=//custom value dbAnmtin1.Duration=//custom value stb.Children.Add(dbAnmtin); Return stb; } I think defining TargetProperty has a problem but I don’t know how to solve it . plz help me

    Read the article

  • Storing information in the DOM?

    - by John
    Im making a small private message application in the form of a phone. Ten messages are shown at the time. And the list of messages are scrolled up/down by hiding them. Just how bad is it to use the DOM to store information in this way. My main goal for doing this is to reduce calls to the database. And instead of making a new call all the time, it only checks if any new messages has arrived and ads the new message(s). Whats the alternative, cookies anyone? Thank you for the time

    Read the article

  • When debugging in VS 2008 why does the debugger land on a second return statement?

    - by Hellfire
    When debugging the following console program: class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine(DoIt(false)); Console.WriteLine(DoIt(true)); } private static Boolean DoIt(Boolean abort) { try { throw new InvalidOperationException(); } catch(Exception ex) { if (abort) { return true; } Console.WriteLine("Got here"); return false; } } } Why does the IDE land on the second return statement during the second call to DoIt()? The results of the execution is correct but the debugging experience is misleading. Is this a known issue? Is the behavior in VS 2010 the same?

    Read the article

  • Set a session hash outside of RoR program?

    - by Sindri Guðmundsson
    Hi, I have had my new rails program up for a few days now. I'm running it on Ubuntu 10.4 with apache2 in another location than the website it's made for (it's a standalone database application for physiotherapists). The people I made it for now want me to deploy it to the public part of their website, only with one change. Those who open it via the link in the public-part should not be able to click one button! I was thinking of doing something like this in my view: <% if session[:inside]%> <%=button_to 'Sækja mælitæki', @link_to_mt%> <%end%> How could I set session[:inside] only to true if the program was started from within the private part of the webpage? I thought of creating two new actions, the other would set session[:inside] to true and the other to false, but that seems to me like a security risk, is it not? BR, Sindri

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401  | Next Page >