Search Results

Search found 14152 results on 567 pages for 'private'.

Page 396/567 | < Previous Page | 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403  | Next Page >

• OneToMany association updates instead of insert

  - by Shvalb

  I have an entity with one-to-many association to child entity. The child entity has 2 columns as PK and one of the column is FK to the parent table. mapping looks like this: @OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.ALL}, fetch = FetchType.EAGER ) @JoinColumn(name="USER_RESULT_SEQUENCES.USER_RESULT_ID", referencedColumnName="USER_RESULT_ID", unique=true, insertable=true, updatable=false) private List<UserResultSequence> sequences; I create an instance of parent and add children instances to list and then try to save it to DB. If child table is empty it inserts all children and it works perfectly. if the child table is not empty it updates existing rows! I don't know why it updates instead of inserts, any ideas why this might happen?? Thank you!

  Read the article

• Best way of invoking getter by reflection

  - by Javi

  Hello, I need to get the value of a field with a specific annotation, So with reflection I am able to get this Field Object. The problem is that this field will be always private though I know in advance it will always have a getter method. I know that I can use setAccesible(true) and get its value (when there is no PermissionManager), though I prefer to invoke its getter method. I know that I could look for the method by looking for "get+fieldName" (though I know for example for boolean fields are sometimes named as "is+fieldName"). I wonder if there is a better way to invoke this getter (many frameworks use getters/setters to access the attributes so maybe they do in another way). Thanks

  Read the article

• Perform tasks with delay, without delaying web response (ASP.NET)

  - by Tomas Lycken

  I'm working on a feature that needs to send two text messages with a 30 second delay, and it is crucial that both text messages are sent. Currently, this feature is built with ajax requests, that are sent with a 30 second javascript delay, but since this requires the user to have his browser open and left on the same page for at least 30 seconds, it is not a method I like. Instead, I have tried to solve this with threading. This is what I've done: Public Shared Sub Larma() Dim thread As New System.Threading.Thread(AddressOf Larma_Thread) thread.Start() End Sub Private Shared Sub Larma_Thread() StartaLarm() Thread.Sleep(1000 * 30) StoppaLarm() End Sub A web handler calls Larma(), and StartaLarm() and StoppaLarm() are the methods that send the first and second text messages respectively. However, I only get the first text message delivered - the second is never sent. Am I doing something wrong here? I have no deep understanding of how threading works in ASP.NET, so please let me know how to accomplish this.

  Read the article

• C++ destructor issue with std::vector of class objects

  - by Nigel

  I am confused about how to use destructors when I have a std::vector of my class. So if I create a simple class as follows: class Test { private: int *big; public: Test () { big = new int[10000]; } ~Test () { delete [] big; } }; Then in my main function I do the following: Test tObj = Test(); vector<Test> tVec; tVec.push_back(tObj); I get a runtime crash in the destructor of Test when I go out of scope. Why is this and how can I safely free my memory?

  Read the article

• Switch Case on type of object (C#)

  - by Sem Dendoncker

  If you want to switch a type of object, what is the best way to do this? ex: private int GetNodeType(NodeDTO node) { switch (node.GetType()) { case typeof(CasusNodeDTO): return 1; case typeof(BucketNodeDTO): return 3; case typeof(BranchNodeDTO): return 0; case typeof(LeafNodeDTO): return 2; default: return -1; } } I know this doesn't work that way, but I was wondering how you could solve this. Is an if then else else else statement appropriate in this case? Or do you use this switch and add .ToString() to the types? Kind regards, Sem

  Read the article

• Use AJAX to check for a new message

  - by Luke

  Quite simply, I need to alert the end user when they have a new private message. From a combination of research and other opinion, I realise I need to use AJAX for this. The mysql query would be SELECT id FROM tbl_messages WHERE to_viewed = 1 So when someone sends a message, I want an alert to popup on the screen to inform the user without a page reload. I have absolutely no idea what I am doing, but know what I want. Really need help with this, AJAX is definitely something I want to improve as it opens up greater possibilities! Thanks

  Read the article

• Use this. to access internal class members?

  - by Sam

  On the internet I see a lot of code which uses this. to access local members of a class, like this: private String _whatever; public String Whatever { get { return this._whatever; } set { this._whatever = value; } } public void DoSomething() { String s = this.Whatever; this.DoSomething(); } (don't expect the code to do something sensible. I just wanted to show a few different uses for "this.") I wonder why to do this? To add more clarity to the source? Or is it just a waste of space?

  Read the article

• Modifying an inherited Rails association

  - by Chris Kilmer

  I have a Team class that inherits from a Group class. Both Team and Groups have memberships through the same association. However, I need to run a method after a Team memberships is added but not a Group. I currently have something like this: class Group < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :memberships, :class_name => 'Connection', :foreign_key => 'connectable_id', :as => :connectable, :dependent => :destroy end class Team < Group has_many :memberships, :class_name => 'Connection', :foreign_key => 'connectable_id', :as => :connectable, :dependent => :destroy, :after_add => :add_company_membership private def membership_check(membership) end end Is there some way to modify the inherited association in Team so that I don't have to redefine the entire thing but rather just add the :after_add hook it? Any help would be appreciated.

  Read the article

• Trying to use a list iterator to print out entire linked list in Java. Infinite loop for some reaso

  - by Matt

  I created my list: private static List list = new LinkedList(); and my iterator: ListIterator itr = list.listIterator(); and use this code to try to print out the list... Only problem is, it never comes out of the loop. When it reaches the tail, shouldn't it come out of the loop, because there is no next? Or is it going back to the head like a circular linked list? It is printing so quickly and my computer locks up shortly after, so I can't really tell what is going on. while (itr.hasNext()) System.out.println(itr.next());

  Read the article

• Exception for java Swing application?

  - by Rich Fluckiger

  For some reason this is locking up the java application. Did I handle the exception correctly? private void submitButtonActionPerformed(java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) { double amount, interest,rateCalc, a, b, c, payment; int years, months; while (true){ try{ amount = Double.valueOf(loanAmount.getText()); interest = Double.valueOf(interestRate.getText()); years = Integer.valueOf(loanYears.getText()); rateCalc = (interest/12); months = (years*12); a = Math.pow((1+rateCalc),months); b = (a*rateCalc); c = (a-1); payment = (amount *(b/c)); monthlyPayment.setText("Mortgage Payment $ = " + payment); } catch (NumberFormatException nfe){ javax.swing.JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null, "Please enter numbers and not letters"); return; } } } monthlyPayment returns to the java app.

  Read the article

• Java concurrency - Should block or yield?

  - by teto

  Hi, I have multiple threads each one with its own private concurrent queue and all they do is run an infinite loop retrieving messages from it. It could happen that one of the queues doesn't receive messages for a period of time (maybe a couple seconds), and also they could come in big bursts and fast processing is necessary. I would like to know what would be the most appropriate to do in the first case: use a blocking queue and block the thread until I have more input or do a Thread.yield()? I want to have as much CPU resources available as possible at a given time, as the number of concurrent threads may increase with time, but also I don't want the message processing to fall behind, as there is no guarantee of when the thread will be reescheduled for execution when doing a yield(). I know that hardware, operating system and other factors play an important role here, but setting that aside and looking at it from a Java (JVM?) point of view, what would be the most optimal?

  Read the article

• Form Closing help

  - by Michael Quiles

  How can I call the button1_Click event in the form closing event so I don't have to copy and paste the code from button1_Click? public void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { //Yes or no message box to exit the application DialogResult Response; Response = MessageBox.Show("Are you sure you want to Exit?", "Exit", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo, MessageBoxIcon.Question, MessageBoxDefaultButton.Button2); if (Response == DialogResult.Yes) // Exits the application Application.Exit(); } public void xGameThemeComboBox_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { string folder = Application.StartupPath; string theme = (string)xGameThemeComboBox.Items[xGameThemeComboBox.SelectedIndex]; string path = System.IO.Path.Combine(folder, theme + ".jpg"); Image newImage = new Bitmap(path); if (this.BackgroundImage != null) this.BackgroundImage.Dispose(); { this.BackgroundImage = newImage; } } private void xGameForm_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e) { // call button1_Click here }

  Read the article

• C# determining generic type

  - by Chris Klepeis

  I have several templated objects that all implement the same interface: I.E. MyObject<datatype1> obj1; MyObject<datatype2> obj2; MyObject<datatype3> obj3; I want to store these objects in a List... I think I would do that like this: private List<MyObject<object>> _myList; I then want to create a function that takes 1 parameter, being a datatype, to see if an object using that datatype exists in my list.... sorta clueless how to go about this. In Pseudo code it would be: public bool Exist(DataType T) { return (does _myList contain a MyObject<T>?); }

  Read the article

• doubt in - Function Objects - c++

  - by Eternal Learner

  I have a class class fobj{ public: fobj(int i):id(i) {} void operator()() { std::cout<<"Prints"<<std::endl; } private: int id; }; template<typename T> void func(T type) { type(); } My Doubt is if I invoke func like Method 1: func(fobj(1); the message I wanted to print is printed. I was always thinking I needed to do something like Method 2: fobj Iobj(1); // create an instance of the fobj class func(Iobj); //call func by passing Iobj(which is a function object) How does Method 1 work? I mean what exactly happens? and how is a call made to the operator() in class fobj ?

  Read the article

• Multiple inclusion of header file c++

  - by iSight

  Hi, I have a problem regarding multiple inclusion of header file in C++ code. say for example, i have three class X,Y,Z. X and Y are derived from Base class Z. And i want to create an instance of X in Y. The code will go like this. class Z{some code} class X:public Z{some code};//here #include header of class Z added class Y:public Z //here #include header of class Z added as well as of X class {private: X* mX;//instance of X some code}; So in this multiple definition of all methods of base class arises. how can i cope with this problem

  Read the article

• Serialize object from within

  - by Maximus

  I have the class testClass which has the method save. This method saves object to a database. But it needs to serialize object before saving. How can I serialize object from within the class to do that? class testClass { private $prop = 777; public function save() { $serializedObject = serialize(self); DB::insert('objects', array('id', 'object')) ->values(array(1, $serializedObject)) ->execute(); } } serialize(self) obviously doesn't work.

  Read the article

• C++ Static Array Initialization - Memory Issue

  - by donalmg

  Hi, I have a header file which contains a member variable declaration of a static char array: class ABC { public: static char newArray[4]; // other variables / functions private: void setArray(int i, char * ptr); } In the CPP file, I have the array initialized to NULL: char ABC::newArray[4] = {0}; In the ABC constructor, I need to overwrite this value with a value constructed at runtime, such as the encoding of an integer: ABC::ABC() { int i; //some int value defined at runtime memset(newArray, 0, 4); // not sure if this is necessary setArray(i,newArray); } ... void setArray(int i, char * value) { // encoding i to set value[0] ... value [3] } When I return from this function, and print the modified newArray value, it prints out many more characters than the 4 specified in the array declaration. Any ideas why this is the case. I just want to set the char array to 4 characters and nothing further. Thanks...

  Read the article

• Difference between :: and -> in PHP

  - by vrode

  I always see people in serious projects use :: everywhere, and - only occasionally in local environment. I only use - myself and never end up in situations when I need a static value outside of a class. Am I a bad person? As I understand, the only situation when -> won't work is when I try following: class StaticDemo { private static $static } $staticDemo = new StaticDemo( ); $staticDemo->static; // wrong $staticDemo::static; // right But am I missing out on some programming correctness when I don't call simple public methods by :: ? Or is it just so that I can call a method without creating an instance?

  Read the article

• Hiding What Site You're On (Branding Issues)

  - by John

  Here's the scenario: I have a private site that, once logged on, will display different information depending on the attributes of your account: the pages are branded differently based upon what company you are associated with. The problem is the companies linking to this site want everything to be displayed as their own brand, and do not want to see my brand anywhere, especially in the URL (i.e. from www.theirbrand.com they do not want to have links to www.mybrand.com). Is there an elegant solution to this? Is the best option to add a page on www.theirbrand.com that contains an iframe with a source of www.mybrand.com (I'm not sure if that would interfere with back/forward navigation, etc), or is there a better way?

  Read the article

• how i insert values from list of Data Grid View,current time ,EmployeeID using button click event (C

  - by Six fourty

  hi, it show me this error Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'Select' to make to clear Employee ID in this case is FK in the table (Attendance detail) and the other thing is i am using Data Grid View from another table(Employee information) to Show the list of the staff in my form. then i want to transfer each selected cell value from Data Grid View to attendance detail table. 10q private void time_in_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { employee_InformationDataGridView.SelectedCells[0].Style.ForeColor = Color.Green; time_in.Enabled = false; time_out.Enabled = true; con = new SqlConnection(GlobalClass.conn); con.Open(); SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("Insert into Attendancedetail Values(" + "Select from EmployeeInformation(EmployeeID)" + ",'" + employee_InformationDataGridView.SelectedCells[0] + "','" + DateTime.Now.ToLongDateString() + "','" + null + "','" + null + "','" + DateTime.Now.ToLongTimeString() + "'," + null + ")", con); int i = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); MessageBox.Show(i.ToString() + " record inserted"); }

  Read the article

• c++ manipulator question

  - by robert

  i have a class: template<class T> class matrix { private: int COLS,ROWS; public: inline matrix(int r,int c){ this->COLS=r; this->ROWS=c; } template<class T2> friend ostream& info(ostream& os); }; i tried in so many ways to implement the info class.but none is succeed. i want to use it in main function Matrix<int> M(10,20); cout<<info<<M; i want to out put the Matrix class's cols, and rows information. i have tried so many time in implementing the friend class info, but failed. any one can tell me how can do it?

  Read the article

• loading data into each textbox line by line

  - by Kyle

  private void sessionText() { try { System.IO.TextReader r = new System.IO.StreamReader("saved.txt"); this.textBox1.Text = r.ReadLine(); r.Close(); } catch (Exception x) { MessageBox.Show("Exception " +x); } } It reads the line into textBox1 but now I'm expanding my application. I added 5 more textBoxes and now I'm trying to load the data in each one saved line by line. How can I load each line into the next textbox? Line 0 -> textBox1 Line 1 -> textBox2 Line 2 -> textBox3

  Read the article

• Generic collection class?

  - by Mark

  Is there anyway I can do this? class TSOC<TCollection, TValue> : ICollection<TValue>, INotifyCollectionChanged where TCollection : ICollection { private TCollection<TValue> collection; } It doesn't like my definition of collection. I'd prefer the definition to look like TSOC<TCollection> where the user can pass in List<int> or something, but then I need to pull out the "int" to know what interface to implement.

  Read the article

• Two phase Construction in C++

  - by tommieb75

  I have as part of assignment to look into a development kit that uses the "two-phase" construction for C++ classes: // Include Header class someFubar{ public: someFubar(); bool Construction(void); ~someFubar(); private: fooObject _fooObj; } In the source // someFubar.cpp someFubar::someFubar : _fooObj(null){ } bool someFubar::Construction(void){ bool rv = false; this->_fooObj = new fooObject(); if (this->_fooObj != null) rv = true; return rv; } someFubar::~someFubar(){ if (this->_fooObj != null) delete this->_fooObj; } Why would this "two-phase" be used and what benefits are there? Why not just instantiate the object initialization within the actual constructor?

  Read the article

• class member access specifiers and binary code

  - by pdehaan

  I understand what the typical access specifiers are, and what they mean. 'public' members are accessible anywhere, 'private' members are accessible only by the same class and friends, etc. What I'm wondering is what, if anything, this equates to in lower-level terms. Are their any post-compilation functional differences between these beyond the high-level restrictions (what can access what) imposed by the language (c++ in this case) they're used in. Another way to put it - if this were a perfect world where programmers always made good choices (like not accessing members that may change later and using only well defined members that should stay the same between implementations), would their be any reason to use these things?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403  | Next Page >