Search Results

Search found 36254 results on 1451 pages for 'asp free'.

Page 434/1451 | < Previous Page | 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441  | Next Page >

  • Differences when Running with OutputCache managed module under ASP.NET IIS7.x with Cache-control header

    - by Shawn Cicoria
    This post is to report some differences when using MVC or IHttpHandlers if you’re attempting to set the Cache-control : max-age or s-maxage value under IIS7.x using the HttpResponse.Cache methods. [UPDATE]: 2011-3-14 – The missing piece was calling  Response.Cache.SetSlidingExpiration(true) as follows: context.Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.Public); context.Response.Cache.SetMaxAge(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5)); context.Response.ContentType = "image/jpeg"; context.Response.Cache.SetSlidingExpiration(true);   Under IIS7.x if you us one of the following 2 methods, you will only get a Cache-ability of “public”.  public ActionResult Image2() { MemoryStream oStream = new MemoryStream(); using (Bitmap obmp = ImageUtil.RenderImage("Respone.Cache.Setxx calls", 5, DateTime.Now)) { obmp.Save(oStream, ImageFormat.Jpeg); oStream.Position = 0; Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.Public); Response.Cache.SetMaxAge(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5)); return new FileStreamResult(oStream, "image/jpeg"); } } Method 2 – which is just a plain old HttpHandler and really isn’t MVC3, but under the same MVC ASP.NET application, same result. public class image : IHttpHandler { public void ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) { using (var image = ImageUtil.RenderImage("called from IHttpHandler direct", 5, DateTime.Now)) { context.Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.Public); context.Response.Cache.SetMaxAge(TimeSpan.FromMinutes(5)); context.Response.ContentType = "image/jpeg"; image.Save(context.Response.OutputStream, ImageFormat.Jpeg); } } } Using the following under MVC3 (I haven’t tried under earlier versions) will work by applying the OutputCacheAttribute to your Action: [OutputCache(Location = OutputCacheLocation.Any, Duration = 300)] public ActionResult Image1() { MemoryStream oStream = new MemoryStream(); using (Bitmap obmp = ImageUtil.RenderImage("called with OutputCacheAttribute", 5, DateTime.Now)) { obmp.Save(oStream, ImageFormat.Jpeg); oStream.Position = 0; return new FileStreamResult(oStream, "image/jpeg"); } } To remove the “OutputCache” module, you use the following in your web.config: <system.webServer> <validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false"/> <modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true"> <!--<remove name="OutputCache"/>--> </modules>

    Read the article

  • Use jQuery and ASP.NET to Build a News Ticker

    Many websites display a news ticker of one sort or another. A news ticker is a user interface element that displays a subset of a list of items, cycling through them one at a time after a set interval. For example, on Cisco's website there is a news ticker that shows the company's latest news items. Each news item is a one sentence link, such as "Desktop Virtualization Gathers Steam," or "Cisco Reports First Quarter Earnings." Clicking a headline whisks you to a page that shows the full story. Cisco's news ticker shows one headline at a time; every few seconds the currently displayed headline fades out and the next one appears. In total, Cisco has five different headlines - the ticker displays each of the five and then starts back from the beginning. This article is the first in a series that explores how to create your own news ticker widget using jQuery and ASP.NET. jQuery is a free, popular, open-source JavaScript library that simplifies many common client-side tasks, like event handling, DOM manipulation, and Ajax. This article kicks off the series and shows how to build a fairly simple news ticker whose contents can be specified statically in HTML markup or created dynamically from server-side code. Future installments will explore adding bells and whistles, such as: stopping the news ticker rotation when the mouse is hovered over it; adding controls to start, stop and pause the headlines; loading new headlines dynamically using Ajax; and packaging the JavaScript used by the ticker into a jQuery plugin. Read on to learn more! Read More >

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 3 (C#) Software Architecture

    - by ryanzec
    I am starting on a relatively large and ambitious ASP.NET MVC 3 project and just thinking about the best way to organize my code. The project is basically going to be a general management system that will be capable of supporting any type management system whether it be a blogging system, cms, reservation system, wikis, forums, project management system, etc…, each of them being just a separate 'module'. You can read more about it on my blog posted here : http://www.ryanzec.com/index.php/blog/details/8 (forgive me, the style of the site kinda sucks). For those who don't want to read the long blog post the basic idea is that the core system itself is nothing more than a users system with an admin interface to manage the users system. Then you just add on module as you need them and the module I will be creating is a simple blog post to test it out before I move on to the big module which is a project management system. Now I am just trying to think of the best way to structure this so that it is easy for users to add in there own modules but easy for me to update to core system without worrying about the user modifying the core code. I think the ideal way would be to have a number of core projects that user is specifically told not to modify otherwise the system may become unstable and future updates would not work. When the user wants to add in there own modules, they would just add in a new project (or multiple projects). The thing is I am not sure that it is even possible to use multiple projects all with their own controllers, razor view template, css, javascript, etc... in one web application. Ideally each module would have some of it own razor view templates, css, javascript, image files and also need access to some of the core razor view templates, css, javascript, image files which would is in a separate project. It is possible to have 1 web application run off of controllers, razor view templates, css, javascript, image files that are store in multiple projects? Is there a better was to structure this to allow the user to easily add in module with having to modify the core code?

    Read the article

  • Retrofit WebForms with ASP.NET MVC - NoVa Code Camp 2010.2 Demo

    - by Soe Tun
    Thank you to everyone who attended my Retrofit WebForms with ASP.NET MVC session at NoVa Code 2010.2. It was a fun event for me and I hope you had a great time and learned something from it. I wish I had more time to go over some more important topics in more detail. I *promise* I will be writing blog post series about it since I'll have some vacation time during the December holidays to cover some topics that I didn't get to cover in detail.   Please note that the ".bak" file included in the zip file is a SQL Server Database backup file. You have to restore it on your Database server to run it with the source code demo.   Please feel free to ask me about the demo project through Twitter or from this blog post. I'll be glad to help you out. If you want me to give this presentation at your .NET User Group, please let me know and I'll be honored to speak there also.   Again, thank you all and have a great holiday season. Here is the download link to my Demo project Zip file with the PowerPoint presentation in it. Please let me know if the link doesn't work.

    Read the article

  • If I use locks, can my algorithm still be lock-free?

    - by Joe Pension
    A common definition of lock-free is that at least one process makes progress. 1 If I have a simple data structure such as a queue, protected by a lock, then one process can always make progress, as one process can acquire the lock, do what it wants, and release it. So does it meet the definition of lock-free? 1 See eg M. Herlihy, V. Luchangco, and M. Moir. Obstruction-free synchronization: Double-ended queues as an example. In Distributed Computing, 2003. "It is lock-free if it ensures only that some thread always makes progress".

    Read the article

  • Service Pack 1 for Telerik Extensions for ASP.NET MVC just released

    We just released the first service pack for the Q1 2010 release of Telerik Extensions for ASP.NET MVC. As you may have guessed this is mostly a maintenance release addressing all reported bugfixes. It is important to note that the service pack will be available only to licensed users. We will update the open source version only for major releases. However if a critical bug has been found we will publish builds in the forum so no worries.   Whats new Everything is described in the release notes. There are a few breaking changes in the TreeView and Grid. Check here to see if you are affected: Grid changes and backwards compatibility TreeView changes and backwards compatibility We have also tested the extensions with Visual Studio 2010 to confirm we fully support it. The source and samples will continue to ship in Visual Studio 2008 projects though. Opening ...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 3 RC2 Razor- Syntax Intellisense in view.

    - by Jalpesh P. Vadgama
    Microsoft has recently launched Razor view engine with ASP.NET MVC RC2. It’s going to be promising one. There are lots of features bundled with this view engine. But in earlier version of ASP.NET 3 MVC. We were are not having Synatx intellisense provided for asp.net mvc views  in Visual Studio 2010. So either we have to depend third party tools like Resharper or we have to manage it without intellisesnse. But with ASP.NET MVC 3 RC2 Microsoft has moved one step forward and its providing syntax intellisense without installing any third party addons in Visual Studio. Here is example of it. Hope you liked it. Stay tuned for more.. Happy Programming..

    Read the article

  • Side effect of calling ValidatorEnable method: sets focus to control associated with validator

    - by Velika2
    When I called this function to enable a validator from client javascript: `ValidatorEnable(document.getElementById('<%=valPassportOtherText.ClientID%>'), true); //enable` validation control The side effect was that focus was shifted to the txtSpecifyOccupation textbox (the control associated with the Validation control) <asp:TextBox ID="txtSpecifyOccupation" runat="server" AutoCompleteType="Disabled" CssClass="DefaultTextBox DefaultWidth" MaxLength="24" Rows="2"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="valSpecifyOccupation" runat="server" ControlToValidate="txtSpecifyOccupation" ErrorMessage="1.14b Please specify your &lt;b&gt;Occupation&lt;/b&gt;" SetFocusOnError="True">&nbsp;Required</asp:RequiredFieldValidator> Perhaps there is a way to enable the (required) validator without having it simultaneously perform the validation (at least until the user has tabbed off of it?)

    Read the article

  • Setting a WebControls TabIndex based on the ControlId of another control

    - by Daniel Ballinger
    I have an ASP.NET Webforms site that is regularly having features added. The majority of time a new WebControl is added to the page and I need to increment the TabIndex to all subsequent controls on the page. I'd prefer a more robust solution than choosing an arbitrary gap between the initial assigned tab indexes. Setting the tab indexes using the designer tab order functionality is one option but I'd prefer to stay in the source view. Ideally, if I had three check boxes I'd like to be able to define the tabindex based off the previous controls tabindex. Then I'd only need to insert the new control and change one existing control. <asp:CheckBox ID="checkBoxA" runat="server" TabIndex="0"/> <asp:CheckBox ID="checkBoxB" runat="server" TabIndexAfterControlId="checkBoxA"/> <asp:CheckBox ID="checkBoxC" runat="server" TabIndexAfterControlId="checkBoxB"/> My first thought was to extend System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl with a new property, but extension properties aren't supported.

    Read the article

  • Binding a DropDownList in ListView InsertItemTemplate throwing an error

    - by Telos
    I've got a ListView which binds to a LinqDataSource and displays selected locations. The insert item Contains a dropdownlist that pulls from another LinqDataSource to give all the unselected locations. The problem is that I get the following error when loading the page: Databinding methods such as Eval(), XPath(), and Bind() can only be used in the context of a databound control. I'm doing a very similar setup in another page of the website, and it isn't giving us this error so I'm pretty confused. I know I can work around this by not binding, manually finding the control and getting the value, but this should work and I don't understand why it isn't. Any thoughts? The better part of the source code is below. <asp:LinqDataSource ID="ldsLocations" runat="server" ContextTypeName="ClearviewInterface.ESLinqDataContext" EnableDelete="true" EnableInsert="true" OnInserting="ldsLocations_Inserting" OnDeleting="ldsLocations_Deleting" TableName="crmLocations" OrderBy="addr1" OnSelecting="ldsLocations_Selecting" /> <asp:LinqDataSource ID="ldsFreeLocations" runat="server" ContextTypeName="ClearviewInterface.ESLinqDataContext" OrderBy="addr1" TableName="v_CVLocations" OnSelecting="ldsFreeLocations_Selecting" /> <asp:ListView ID="lvLocations" DataSourceID="ldsLocations" DataKeyNames="ID" InsertItemPosition="LastItem" runat="server" > <InsertItemTemplate> <tr> <td colspan="6"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <asp:DropDownList ID="ddlFreeLocations" DataSourceID="ldsFreeLocations" DataTextField="addr1" DataValueField="record" MarkFirstMatch="true" SelectedValue='<%# Bind("record") %>' runat="server" /> </td> <td><asp:ImageButton ID="btnAdd" CommandName="Insert" SkinID="Insert" runat="server" /></td> </tr> </InsertItemTemplate>

    Read the article

  • Silverlight/.Net RIA Services - Authorization Working Sample!??!

    - by Goober
    Hello! I have followed numerous tutorials and walkthroughs/blogs about the capabilities that Ria Services brings to the table when using Silverlight with ASP.Net. Essentially I am looking for a live working example of the authorization functionality that Ria Services can apparently take hold of from ASP.Net. (Even better if it works with ASP.NET MVC too) Example of failed to work Ria Services authorization implementation Navigate to the live demo link on this page....fails This one may work however I couldn't get it to work on my office computer(strange setup that seems to break code for no reason)

    Read the article

  • sample project of how to use Office.WebUI.Ribbon

    - by devn
    This is a trouble-some rather than an issue. I am searching for a free asp.net ribbon control and I have found this one: http://www.officewebui.com/ I can download the source code of the control. However, there is no sample asp.net project using that Ribbon control. I wonder if there is a sample project to show how to use that control in asp.net. That would be great if you share it. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Nested DataPagers problem

    - by diamandiev
    Sample code <asp:Repeater> <ItemTemplate> <asp:ListView DataSource=<%# Container.DataItem.Items %> ... /> <asp:DataPager .... /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:Repeater> This does not work. The repeater data source is not a datasource control It is set like so repeater.DataSource = datasource repeater.DataBind()

    Read the article

  • Gridview sorting: SortDirection always Ascending

    - by Julien N
    Hi ! I have a gridview and I need to sort its elements when the user clicks on the header. Its datasource is a List object. The aspx is defined this way : <asp:GridView ID="grdHeader" AllowSorting="true" AllowPaging="false" AutoGenerateColumns="false" Width="780" runat="server" OnSorting="grdHeader_OnSorting" EnableViewState="true"> <Columns> <asp:BoundField DataField="Entitycode" HeaderText="Entity" SortExpression="Entitycode" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Statusname" HeaderText="Status" SortExpression="Statusname" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="Username" HeaderText="User" SortExpression="Username" /> </Columns> </asp:GridView> The code behind is defined this way : First load : protected void btnSearch_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { List<V_ReportPeriodStatusEntity> items = GetPeriodStatusesForScreenSelection(); this.grdHeader.DataSource = items; this.grdHeader.DataBind(); } when the user clicks on headers : protected void grdHeader_OnSorting(object sender, GridViewSortEventArgs e) { List<V_ReportPeriodStatusEntity> items = GetPeriodStatusesForScreenSelection(); items.Sort(new Helpers.GenericComparer<V_ReportPeriodStatusEntity>(e.SortExpression, e.SortDirection)); grdHeader.DataSource = items; grdHeader.DataBind(); } My problem is that e.SortDirection is always set to Ascending. I have webpage with a similar code and it works well, e.SortDirection alternates between Ascending and Descending. What did I do wrong ?

    Read the article

  • UpdatePanel, Repeater, DataBinding Problem

    - by Gordon Carpenter-Thompson
    In a user control, I've got a Repeater inside of an UpdatePanel (which id displayed inside of a ModalPopupExtender. The Repeater is databound using an array list of MyDTO objects. There are two buttons for each Item in the list. Upon binding the ImageURL and CommandArgument are set. This code works fine the first time around but the CommandArgument is wrong thereafter. It seems like the display is updated correctly but the DTO isn't and the CommandArgument sent is the one that has just been removed. Can anybody spot any problems with the code? ASCX <asp:UpdatePanel ID="ViewDataDetail" runat="server" ChildrenAsTriggers="true"> <Triggers> <asp:PostBackTrigger ControlID="ViewDataCloseButton" /> <asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="DataRepeater" /> </Triggers> <ContentTemplate> <table width="100%" id="DataResults"> <asp:Repeater ID="DataRepeater" runat="server" OnItemCommand="DataRepeater_ItemCommand" OnItemDataBound="DataRepeater_ItemDataBound"> <HeaderTemplate> <tr> <th><b>Name</b></th> <th><b>&nbsp;</b></th> </tr> </HeaderTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <tr> <td> <b><%#((MyDTO)Container.DataItem).Name%></b> </td> <td> <asp:ImageButton CausesValidation="false" ID="DeleteData" CommandName="Delete" runat="server" /> <asp:ImageButton CausesValidation="false" ID="RunData" CommandName="Run" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <table> <tr> <td>Description : </td> <td><%#((MyDTO)Container.DataItem).Description%></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Search Text : </td> <td><%#((MyDTO)Container.DataItem).Text%></td> </tr> </table> </td> </tr> </ItemTemplate> </asp:Repeater> </table> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel> Code-Behind public DeleteData DeleteDataDelegate; public RetrieveData PopulateDataDelegate; public delegate ArrayList RetrieveData(); public delegate void DeleteData(String sData); protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { //load the initial data.. if (!Page.IsPostBack) { if (PopulateDataDelegate != null) { this.DataRepeater.DataSource = this.PopulateDataDelegate(); this.DataRepeater.DataBind(); } } } protected void DataRepeater_ItemCommand(object source, RepeaterCommandEventArgs e) { if (e.CommandName == "Delete") { if (DeleteDataDelegate != null) { DeleteDataDelegate((String)e.CommandArgument); BindDataToRepeater(); } } else if (e.CommandName == "Run") { String sRunning = (String)e.CommandArgument; this.ViewDataModalPopupExtender.Hide(); } } protected void DataRepeater_ItemDataBound(object source, RepeaterItemEventArgs e) { RepeaterItem item = e.Item; if (item != null && item.DataItem != null) { MyDTO oQuery = (MyDTO)item.DataItem; ImageButton oDeleteControl = (ImageButton) item.FindControl("DeleteData"); ImageButton oRunControl = (ImageButton)item.FindControl("RunData"); if (oDeleteControl != null && oRunControl !=null) { oRunControl.ImageUrl = "button_expand.gif"; oRunControl.CommandArgument = "MyID"; oDeleteControl.ImageUrl = "btn_remove.gif"; oDeleteControl.CommandArgument = "MyID"; } } } public void BindDataToRepeater() { this.DataRepeater.DataSource = this.PopulateDataDelegate(); this.DataRepeater.DataBind(); } public void ShowModal(object sender, EventArgs e) { BindDataToRepeater(); this.ViewDataModalPopupExtender.Show(); }

    Read the article

  • jQueryUI Ajax.NET Postback Bug

    - by nigative
    Hi, I have this ASP.NET page with ASP.NET UpdatePanel and jQueryUI droppable and sortable components. The page works fine in all browsers, but doesn't in Internet Explorer (IE8 tested). After I try to call ASP.NET AJAX event (by pressing my asp.net button inside the UpdatePanel) my sortable list stops working properly inside IE browser and the browser throws the following error: Message: Unspecified error. Line: 145 Char: 186 Code: 0 URI: http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.4.2.min.js I found out that the problem is caused by the code on line 66: $("#droppable").droppable(); If I comment it out, the sortable list works fine after ajax postbacks. But it doesn't make sense. Does anyone know what could be wrong? Thanks. P.S. I am using jQueryUI 1.8.1 and jQuery 1.4.2

    Read the article

  • Visual studio 2003 web projects.

    - by swapna
    Hi, I have a requirement to work on a VS2003 web project. I have VS2008,vs2010,vs2003 installed in my system Other System details are Windows Xp professional version 2 service pack 3. IIS 5.1 When i am trying to create a VS 2003 web project giving the localhost as path i am getting the following error. "visual studio noted that specified web server is not running under asp .net 1.1 version.You will be unable to run asp .net web applications or services". I have used aspnet_regiis commands as well as a tool(ASPNETVersionSwitcher.exe ) to swith versions and in iis also default web site asp.net version chosen as asp .net 1.14322. Still i am getting the error. same error i get ,if i point a virtual directory in the existing 1.1 .net web application and trying to open it. Please advise since i have to work on this project as soon as possible. Thanks SNA

    Read the article

  • Error with masterpage

    - by Raphyboy
    Hi, i'm creating a brand new masterpage with VS2010 Beta 2 and I get this warning (that causes me errors in the content pages): Validation (XHTML 1.0 Transitional): Content is not supported outside 'script' or 'asp:content' regions. The masterpage's code : <%@ Master Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="Bob.master.cs" Inherits="TShirtFactory.Web.All.Core.lib.masterpage.Bob" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title></title> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="head" runat="server"> </asp:ContentPlaceHolder> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div> <asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="ContentPlaceHolder1" runat="server"> </asp:ContentPlaceHolder> </div> </form> </body> </html> As you can see, it's the default masterpage generated code. I get the warning when I hover the tag at top. Does anybody have an idea of what's going on ? Thank you

    Read the article

  • How to Pass parameter to SQlDataSource from gridview?

    - by user144842
    Gridview has many columns and a Delete button as well. Delete button is a control as TemplateField <asp:TemplateField> <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="btnDelete" CommandName="Delete" Text='<%# Eval("disabled").ToString()=="False" ? "Disabled" : "Enabled" %>' OnClientClick="return confirm('Are you sure you want to take this action?');" runat="server"></asp:LinkButton> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> Now associated SQLDataSource's Delete command's stored procedure is expecting two parameters. One is going from DataKeyNames (RowID), other one i wanna pass is the Text of btnDelete (True or False). How can i achieve it?

    Read the article

  • Calling server side method as filling value inside a textbox from calendar extender

    - by Dharmendra Singh
    I have a text box which i m filling of date from the calendar extender and the code is as below:- <label for="input-one" class="float"><strong>Date</strong></label><br /> <asp:TextBox ID="txtDate" runat="server" CssClass="inp-text" Enabled="false" AutoPostBack="true" Width="300px" ontextchanged="txtDate_TextChanged"></asp:TextBox> <asp:ImageButton ID="btnDate2" runat="server" AlternateText="cal2" ImageUrl="~/App_Themes/Images/icon_calendar.jpg" style="margin-top:auto;" CausesValidation="false" onclick="btnDate2_Click" /> <ajaxToolkit:CalendarExtender ID="calExtender2" runat="server" Format="dddd, MMMM dd, yyyy" OnClientDateSelectionChanged="CheckDateEalier" PopupButtonID="btnDate2" TargetControlID="txtDate" /> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator7" runat="server" ControlToValidate="txtDate" ErrorMessage="Select a Date" Font-Bold="True" Font-Size="X-Small" ForeColor="Red"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> Javascript code is :- function CheckDateEalier(sender, args) { sender._textbox.set_Value(sender._selectedDate.format(sender._format)) } My requirement is that as the date is entered in to the textbox, I want to call this method: public void TimeSpentDisplay() { string date = txtDate.Text.ToString(); DateTime dateparsed = DateTime.ParseExact(date, "dddd, MMMM dd, yyyy", null); DateTime currentDate = System.DateTime.Now; if (dateparsed.Date > currentDate.Date) { divtimeSpent.Visible = true; } if (dateparsed.Date < currentDate.Date) { divtimeSpent.Visible = true; } if (dateparsed.Date == currentDate.Date) { divtimeSpent.Visible = false; } } Please help me that how i achieve this as i m calling this method inside txtDate_TextChanged method but the event is not firing as the text is changed inside the textbox. Please suggest how I can achieve this or give me an alternate idea to fulfill my requirement.

    Read the article

  • Databinding int32 to MaskedEditExtender enabled TextBox

    - by Zach Skinner
    I have a master/detail scheme for editing an asp:GridView using an asp:DetailsView. One of my fields is for a phone number of type int64 (always 10 digits). I would like this field to always be displayed as (###)###-####. My issue is the first digit in the phone number is always truncated for my edit item field which I used a MaskedEditExtender to achieve the formatting. Here is my EditItemTemplate for the details view: <cc1:MaskedEditExtender TargetControlID="edtPROJ_Leader_Phone" Mask="(999)999-9999" runat="server" ClearMaskOnLostFocus="false" ClipboardEnabled="true" MaskType="Number" /> <asp:TextBox ID="edtPROJ_Leader_Phone" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("PROJ_Leader_Phone") %>' ></asp:TextBox> When my details view is displayed for editing, the text box displays(_23)456-7890 for the integer 1234567890. Also worth noting that if the property MaskType="Number" is removed, the textbox shows: (234)567-890_. I would of course have the textbox show (123)-546-67890 after binding.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441  | Next Page >