Search Results

Search found 17762 results on 711 pages for 'sr query'.

Page 453/711 | < Previous Page | 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460  | Next Page >

  • MySQL column not found

    - by vian
    The SQL query without where statement runs great and outputs good results, but when I include WHERE condition it shows Unknown column 'date1' in 'where clause'. What's the problem? SELECT IF(e.weekly, DATE_ADD(DATE(e.time), INTERVAL CEIL(DATEDIFF('2010-04-08', e.time)/7) WEEK), DATE(e.time)) AS `e.date1`, `v`.`lat`, `v`.`lng` FROM `events` AS `e` INNER JOIN `venues` AS `v` ON e.venue_id = v.id WHERE e.date1 > '2010-09-01'

    Read the article

  • PHP & MySQL Pagination

    - by Francesc
    Hi. I have a MySQL query SELECT * FROM 'redirect' WHERE 'user_id'= \''.$_SESSION['user_id'].' \' ORDER BY 'timestamp'` I want to paginate 10 results per page. How Can I do it?

    Read the article

  • Oracle "Partition By" Keyword

    - by Nalandial
    Can someone please explain what the "partition by" keyword does and give a simple example of it in action, as well as why one would want to use it? I have a SQL query written by someone else and I'm trying to figure out what it does. An example of partition by: SELECT empno, deptno, COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY deptno) DEPT_COUNT FROM emp The examples I've seen online seem a bit too in-depth. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • MVC model flow?

    - by fuzzygoat
    I am setting up an application using the MVC model and I have a query regrading the flow of information from the UI to the data model. What I need to do is place data from the UI in the model, what I have done is write a method in the view which collects the required data in an object and then passes it to the model. The model then takes ownership of the data so that the view can release its ownership. Does this sound sensible?

    Read the article

  • How long can a URL be?

    - by Spines
    How long can a URL be? I want to pass a lot of data through the query string. I think I remember that it depends on what different routers it passes through, but how long can the URL be and definitely not get truncated?

    Read the article

  • Programicaly measure size and way-order of L1 and L2 caches

    - by osgx
    Hello How can I measure programicaly (not query the OS, but measure) the size and order of associativity of L1 and L2 caches (data caches)? Assumtions about system: It has L1 and L2 cache (may be L3 too, may be cache sharing), It may have a hardware prefetch unit (just like P4+), it has a stable clocksource (tickcounter or good HPET for gettimeofday). There are no assumtions about OS (it can be Linux, Windows, smth non-standart), and we can't use posix queries. Language is C. And Compiler optimizations may be disabled.

    Read the article

  • Rails Joins and include columns from joins table

    - by seth.vargo
    I don't understand how to get the columns I want from rails. I have two models - A User and a Profile. A User :has_many Profile (because users can revert back to an earlier version of their profile): > DESCRIBE users; +----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | username | varchar(255) | NO | UNI | NULL | | | password | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | | | last_login | datetime | YES | | NULL | | +----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+   > DESCRIBE profiles; +----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ | id | int(11) | NO | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | | user_id | int(11) | NO | MUL | NULL | | | first_name | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | | | last_name | varchar(255) | NO | | NULL | | | . . . . . . | | . . . . . . | | . . . . . . | +----------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ In SQL, I can run the query: > SELECT * FROM profiles JOIN users ON profiles.user_id = users.id LIMIT 1; +----+-----------+----------+---------------------+---------+---------------+-----+ | id | username | password | last_login | user_id | first_name | ... | +----+-----------+----------+---------------------+---------+---------------+-----+ | 1 | john | ****** | 2010-12-30 18:04:28 | 1 | John | ... | +----+-----------+----------+---------------------+---------+---------------+-----+ See how I get all the columns for BOTH tables JOINED together? However, when I run this same query in Rails, I don't get all the columns I want - I only get those from Profile: # in rails console >> p = Profile.joins(:user).limit(1) >> [#<Profile ...>] >> p.first_name >> NoMethodError: undefined method `first_name' for #<ActiveRecord::Relation:0x102b521d0> from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-3.0.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:373:in `method_missing' from (irb):8 # I do NOT want to do this (AKA I do NOT want to use "includes") >> p.user >> NoMethodError: undefined method `user' for #<ActiveRecord::Relation:0x102b521d0> from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-3.0.1/lib/active_record/relation.rb:373:in method_missing' from (irb):9 I want to (efficiently) return an object that has all the properties of Profile and User together. I don't want to :include the user because it doesn't make sense. The user should always be part of the most recent profile as if they were fields within the Profile model. How do I accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • What is the best scala-like persistence framework available right now?

    - by egervari
    What is the best scala-like persistence framework available right now? Hibernate works, but it's not very scala-like. It insists on using annotations, no-arg constructors, doesn't work with anonymous class instances, doesn't work with scala collections, has an outdated string-based query model, etc. I'm looking for something that really fits Scala. Does it exist? Or do I have to make it?

    Read the article

  • Cakephp Insert Ignore Feature?

    - by SeanDowney
    Is there a way to do an "insert ignore" in cake without using a model-query function? $this->Model->save(array( 'id' => NULL, 'guid' => $guid, 'name' => $name, )); Generates error: Warning (512): SQL Error: 1062: Duplicate entry 'GUID.....' for key 'unique_guid' [CORE/cake/libs/model/datasources/dbo_source.php, line 524] It would be great to be able to set some flag or option that says "don't care"

    Read the article

  • SQL Server DB metadata

    - by Lijo
    Hi Team, I am using SQL Server 2005. I have a requirement to list out all the tables (and the column) whcih has the value 'xyzeee'. Is there a query to achieve this? Thanks Lijo

    Read the article

  • using the starUml, the align problem

    - by hguser
    I am using the StarUml to draw some component dialog,however I found that it is to difficult to make a straight line straight enough. As shown in this image: the example image,see the interface "query" In visio, when I want to draw a Horizontal straight line,I can use the "Shift" key in my keybordl,how to do it in StarUml?

    Read the article

  • Databases Views with Parameters

    - by asrijaal
    Hi there, I know that is it possible to create a View with Parameters at MSSQL, does anyone knows if I can achieve something similar with a DB2 database? I have a more complicated query which includes a user number which I want to pass as param to the view.

    Read the article

  • rails named_scope ignores eager loading

    - by Craig
    Two models (Rails 2.3.8): User; username & disabled properties; User has_one :profile Profile; full_name & hidden properties I am trying to create a named_scope that eliminate the disabled=1 and hidden=1 User-Profiles. The User model is usually used in conjunction with the Profile model, so I attempt to eager-load the Profile model (:include = :profile). I created a named_scope on the User model called 'visible': named_scope :visible, { :joins => "INNER JOIN profiles ON users.id=profiles.user_id", :conditions => ["users.disabled = ? AND profiles.hidden = ?", false, false] } I've noticed that when I use the named_scope in a query, the eager-loading instruction is ignored. Variation 1 - User model only: # UserController @users = User.find(:all) # User's Index view <% for user in @users %> <p><%= user.username %></p> <% end %> # generates a single query: SELECT * FROM `users` Variation 2 - use Profile model in view; lazy load Profile model # UserController @users = User.find(:all) # User's Index view <% for user in @users %> <p><%= user.username %></p> <p><%= user.profile.full_name %></p> <% end %> # generates multiple queries: SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 1) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SHOW FIELDS FROM `profiles` SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 2) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 3) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 4) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 5) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 6) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 Variation 3 - eager load Profile model # UserController @users = User.find(:all, :include => :profile) #view; no changes # two queries SELECT * FROM `users` SELECT `profiles`.* FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id IN (1,2,3,4,5,6)) Variation 4 - use name_scope, including eager-loading instruction #UserConroller @users = User.visible(:include => :profile) #view; no changes # generates multiple queries SELECT `users`.* FROM `users` INNER JOIN profiles ON users.id=profiles.user_id WHERE (users.disabled = 0 AND profiles.hidden = 0) SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 1) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 2) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 3) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 SELECT * FROM `profiles` WHERE (`profiles`.user_id = 4) ORDER BY full_name ASC LIMIT 1 Variation 4 does return the correct number of records, but also appears to be ignoring the eager-loading instruction. Is this an issue with cross-model named scopes? Perhaps I'm not using it correctly. Is this sort of situation handled better by Rails 3?

    Read the article

  • full text search on multiple fields in diferrent tables

    - by crisgomez
    Hi, I want to create a a full text search usng ms sql 2005. here is the structure of my table User-contains fields of Id, fname,lname,email,alternativeemail Attachment-contains fields of id, name,category,filenameorurl Certification-contains of fileds of id, title,school,sdate,edate EducationalBackground-contain of fields of, id,qualification,sdate,edate,school,fieldofstudy EmploymentDetails-contain of fields position, positionlevelid,specializationid,description now the relationship of user to the other table is one to many relationship. now how can I create an effective query to have quick full text search and return the values of the different tables?any help please

    Read the article

  • How to use Contains() in my join

    - by jrep...
    I am trying to get my linq query to replicate my t-sql but I am lost. SELECT * FROM BaiDetail INNER JOIN BaiDetailMap ON BaiDetail.DetailText LIKE '%' + BaiDetailMap.BaiDetailMapSearchText +'%' This is what I have so far... but no go from det in Source from map in Map where det.DetailText.Contains(map.SearchText) select new {det, map} Error Message: Only arguments that can be evaluated on the client are supported for the String.Contains method.

    Read the article

  • using SET datatype in mysql

    - by Dan Snyder
    Is it possible to set a varaible to a query result such as: DECLARE result INT; SET result = (SELECT index FROM table WHERE data = 'xxxx' LIMIT 1); Assuming of course you know that there will only be one result set

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460  | Next Page >