Does clustered index on foreign key column increase join performance vs non-clustered ?

Posted by alpav on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by alpav
Published on 2010-03-11T22:02:16Z Indexed on 2010/03/12 6:27 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 246

Filed under:

sql

|

clustered-index

|

join

|

Performance

|

foreign-keys

In many places it's recommended that clustered indexes are better utilized when used to select range of rows using BETWEEN statement. When I select joining by foreign key field in such a way that this clustered index is used, I guess, that clusterization should help too because range of rows is being selected even though they all have same clustered key value and BETWEEN is not used.

Considering that I care only about that one select with join and nothing else, am I wrong with my guess ?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql

SQL SERVER – Concat Strings in SQL Server using T-SQL – SQL in Sixty Seconds #035 – Video

as seen on SQL Authority - Search for 'SQL Authority'
Concatenating string is one of the most common tasks in SQL Server and every developer has to come across it. We have to concat the string when we have to see the display full name of the person by first name and last name. In this video we will see various methods to concatenate the strings. SQL… >>> More
SQL SERVER – Concat Function in SQL Server – SQL Concatenation

as seen on SQL Authority - Search for 'SQL Authority'
Earlier this week, I was delivering Advanced BI training on the subject of “SQL Server 2008 R2″. I had great time delivering the session. During the session, we talked about SQL Server 2010 Denali. Suddenly one of the attendees suggested his displeasure for the product. He said, even though… >>> More
Error with SQL Server Setup 2012 on Windows 2012

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I am trying to install SQL Server on Windows 2012. I was able to finally get the wizard up and running after making some changes on the server, but now it fails no matter what I do with the following error: TITLE: SQL Server Setup failure. SQL Server Setup has encountered the following error: … >>> More
How can I detect which version of SQL (eg SQL 2008 or SQL Azure)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I need to detect which version of SQL I am dealing with to perorm various tasks, I need specifically detect if I am on SQL 2008 or SQL Azure. How can I do this with detection code written in SQL? >>> More
Nested SQL Select statement fails on SQL Server 2000, ok on SQL Server 2005

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Here is the query: INSERT INTO @TempTable SELECT UserID, Name, Address1 = (SELECT TOP 1 [Address] FROM (SELECT TOP 1 [Address] FROM [UserAddress] ua INNER JOIN UserAddressOrder uo ON ua.UserID = uo.UserID WHERE ua.UserID = u.UserID ORDER BY uo.AddressOrder ASC) q ORDER BY AddressOrder… >>> More

Related posts about clustered-index

Changing an MSSQL clustered index field from containing "random" GUIDs to sequential GUIDs - how wil

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
We have an MSSQL database in which all the primary keys are GUIDs (uniqueidentifiers). The GUIDs are produced on the client (in C#), and we are considering changing the client to generate sequential (comb) GUIDs instead of just using Guid.NewGuid(), to improve db performance. If we do this, how will… >>> More
SQL Server database with clustered GUID PKs - switch clustered index or switch to sequential (comb)

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We have a database in which all the PKs are GUIDs, and most of the PKs are also the clustered index for the table. We know that this is bad (due to the random nature of GUIDs). So, it seems there are basically two options here (short of throwing out GUIDs as PKs altogether, which we cannot do (at… >>> More
MS SQL Database with clustered GUID PKs - switch clustered index or switch to sequential (comb) GUID

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We have a database in which all the PKs are GUIDs, and most of the PKs are also the clustered index for the table. We know that this is bad (due to the random nature of GUIDs). So, it seems there are basically two options here (short of throwing out GUIDs as PKs altogether, which we cannot do (at… >>> More
SQL Server Clustered Index: (Physical) Data Page Order

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am struggling understanding what a clustered index in SQL Server 2005 is. I read the MSDN article Clustered Index Structures (among other things) but I am still unsure if I understand it correctly. The (main) question is: what happens if I insert a row (with a "low" key) into a table with a clustered… >>> More
Beware Sneaky Reads with Unique Indexes

as seen on SQL Blog - Search for 'SQL Blog'
A few days ago, Sandra Mueller (twitter | blog) asked a question using twitter’s #sqlhelp hash tag: “Might SQL Server retrieve (out-of-row) LOB data from a table, even if the column isn’t referenced in the query?” Leaving aside trivial cases (like selecting a computed column that does reference… >>> More